2000年以来国内外城乡记忆研究的比较与启示
Comparison of urban and rural memory research in China and internationally since 2000 and implications
收稿日期: 2023-04-12 修回日期: 2023-08-9
基金资助: |
|
Received: 2023-04-12 Revised: 2023-08-9
Fund supported: |
|
作者简介 About authors
王立(1984— ),男,山西长治人,博士,副教授,硕导,研究方向为城市与区域规划。E-mail:
城乡记忆记录并演绎了社会形态与文化结构的变迁,可以透视人地关系、地方文化精神和城乡景观变迁,是人们生活在“理想家园”中不可或缺的组成部分。论文运用CiteSpace和VOSviewer可视化图谱软件,结合国内外城乡记忆研究的比较,探讨其重要研究进展并反思现代社会的发展。研究发现:① 该领域可细分为纪念性记忆、日常性记忆和媒介性记忆。② 城乡记忆为多学科交融的研究领域,国内以建筑、规划、旅游管理等学科为主,具有明显的应用指向;而国外则是综合的人文社会科学研究。③ 国内外研究思想理论一致,将记忆视为社会遗产,国外主要沿着“文化转向产生的集体记忆—官方叙事下的纪念性记忆—地方与习俗下的日常性记忆”脉络演进,集中于地方和景观分析,重视空间感知;而国内演进脉络为“档案建设与记忆—城市历史文脉保护与记忆—乡村振兴战略下的旅游与记忆”,倾向于以人的乡愁情感为切入点。未来,应界定城乡记忆与文化遗产的内涵与区别,关注少数群体的记忆话语权,立足本土文化发展的实际,更全面地建构地理学视角下的城乡记忆空间范式。
关键词:
Urban and rural memories record and interpret the changes in social forms and cultural structures. They provide insights into human-environment relationships, local cultural spirit, and urban-rural landscape changes, and are an indispensable part of people's lives in their "ideal home". This study used the CiteSpace and VOSviewer visualization software, combined with comparative studies of urban and rural memory research in China and internationally, to explore important research progress and reflect on the development of modern society. The study found that: 1) Urban and rural memory can be divided into commemorative memory, daily memory, and media memory. 2) Urban and rural memory is a multidisciplinary research field. In China, it is mainly focused on disciplines such as architecture, planning, and tourism management, with a clear application direction; while in other countries, it is a comprehensive research field in humanities and social sciences. 3) The ideas and theories of Chinese and international research are consistent, viewing memory as a social heritage. The evolution of international research followed the route of collective memory produced by cultural turn, commemorative memory under official narratives, and daily memory under local customs, with a focus on localities and landscape analysis, emphasizing spatial perception. In contrast, the evolution of Chinese research followed archive construction and memory-urban historical context protection and memory-tourism and memory under the rural revitalization strategy, focusing on people's nostalgia as the entry point. In the future, it is necessary to define the connotations of and differences between urban and rural memory and cultural heritage, pay attention to the memory discourse rights of minority groups, and construct a more comprehensive urban and rural memory space paradigm based on the development of local culture.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
王立, 龚世明.
WANG Li, GONG Shiming.
工业化、城镇化和全球化的历史进程导致城乡记忆在大规模建设和社会转型中断裂。城乡空间所依附的物质载体被快速更新,日常生活景观不断“去地方化”,原真性文化和地方文化基因在不同程度上被遗忘,蕴含历史文化的空间记忆受到了重大冲击[1]。将城市作为增长机器的观念带来了千城一面的失根城市;将乡村视为资源腹地的行动割断了原乡的山水脉络,城市和乡村被相似的模型不停复制,丢失了地方环境和人文情怀。因此,如何保护和传承城市和乡村的特色与记忆成为学界普遍关注的议题[2]。2023年6月文化传承发展座谈会上,习近平总书记对中华文化传承发展的一系列重大理论和现实问题作了系统阐述,强调“文化关乎国本、国运”。城乡记忆的承续是文化传承的重要组成部分。与此同时,中国国家档案局发起的城乡记忆工程推动了城乡记忆的保护工作。城乡记忆真实完整地展示并演绎了社会形态与文化结构的变迁,同时城乡记忆也是地域文化和地方精神的集中体现,是人们生活在“诗意画境”中的物质载体和情感寄托[3]。城乡记忆不仅隐喻了社会群体对曾经生活过的地方的记忆与怀念,更表达着中华优秀传统文化的根脉与灵魂[4]。关照城乡记忆,就是关照全球化背景下的地方,就是对新型城镇化道路、新的城乡关系和新的现代化模式的审视和再出发。
自哈布瓦赫(Maurice Halbwachs)[5]提出集体记忆的概念以来,西方社会科学与人文学科研究出现了“记忆转向”,将记忆与景观、地方、日常生活关联起来,通过反映、构建、关联一系列物质实体空间展开城乡记忆研究。国内地理、规划、建筑、旅游、文物保护等领域就城乡记忆的演变机制展开了思想争鸣与学术对话[6],在记忆地理[7-8]、文化记忆[9]、集体记忆[10]方面已有评述,引入了国外“记忆”研究的社会学理论,为本文提供了记忆研究的理论基础。然而,目前尚缺乏基于传承中华优秀传统文化使命的城乡记忆评述,没有通过中外比较的视野揭示城乡记忆的地域特质,并昭示未来研究的方向。而这正是反思现代社会发展的重要途径之一,因为城乡记忆与社会发展、国家制度、地方历史紧密联系在一起。为此,本文利用文献计量法,对国内外城乡记忆的研究文献进行归纳整理,重点构建科学知识图谱,并比较和分析其研究前沿方向。旨在响应传承中国特色城乡记忆,推动传统文化保护,为相关的理论和实证研究提供学科史的参照,为城市文化空间乃至城乡关怀和人文发展提供科学依据和启示。
1 理论化记忆研究的分化与衍生
1.1 记忆研究四重奏
在记忆理论中,可以区分出个体记忆和集体记忆,法国哲学家利科(Paul Ricoeur)称之为“内关的传统(the tradition of inwardness)”和“外观(the external gaze)”[11]。内关的传统认为:个体记忆是一个人独有的记忆体验,是构建个人身份和与他人交流的基础,但大部分记忆处于沉睡状态,需要通过后来的重叙和社交互动来获得连贯性和固定化。因此,个体记忆不是自足的,而是受到社会环境的支持和发展。巴特利特(F. C. Bartlett)通常被视为是首位关注记忆社会维度的现代心理学家,他强调了群体动态对个体记忆的决定性影响[12]。柏格森(Henri Bergson)[13]和涂尔干(Émile Durkheim)[14]分别为哈布瓦赫的理论奠定了记忆的时空性和社会性基础。哈布瓦赫[15]推动了记忆研究从心理学范式向社会学范式的转变,使得记忆研究得以从个体到社会的全面发展。同时,哈布瓦赫[5]的开创性著作《记忆的社会框架》确立了外观的传统。与个体记忆不同,集体记忆是一个社会建构的概念,其传承需要依赖于社会交往和群体意识,以维持记忆的延续性。因此,集体记忆在本质上是立足于现在而面对过去的一种重构。康纳顿(Paul Connerton)[16]在其著作《社会如何记忆》中引入了社会记忆的概念,并主张纪念仪式是一种保持和传递社会记忆的手段,通过周期性重复特定的仪式来加强和传递特定的象征性内容,从而使其成为社会记忆的一部分。然而,康纳顿的研究多限于政治性事件的分析。阿斯曼(Jan Assmann)[17]强调文化记忆与符号媒介之间的密切联系,并将集体记忆提升到文化层面,强调记忆的持久性和稳定性。文化记忆作为一个独特的实体,包含了集体和个人的记忆以及物质符号,具有无限延续和代际传递的特点(图1)。按照阿斯曼的理解,文化记忆是一种集体形式的记忆,它超越了个人经验,被归入文化系统。文化记忆的载体被诺拉(Pierre Nora)[18]形象地称为“记忆之场(sites of memory)”。诺拉[19]认为现代社会的加速和多样化,以及传统意义上的“共同体”消失,使得人们难以从整体上理解和掌握历史。因此,人们开始回到具体的、可感知的场所和物品中,通过它们来建立集体记忆。这些“记忆之场”可以是任何事物,例如公共纪念碑、博物馆、故居、宗教场所、战争遗址、文学作品等。阿斯曼和诺拉的理论都突出了文化载体在集体记忆中的重要性,通过符号和载体,文化记忆可以被无限传递和延续,成为一个超越个体的集体记忆体系。而记忆之场则提供了一个具体的场所和物品,通过这些场所和物品,人们可以在社会和历史的连续性中建立共同的记忆,从而促进文化和社会的稳定和发展。
图1
1.2 记忆研究的时空关联机制
在空间和时间上的具体性是集体记忆的关键特征之一。集体记忆需要通过特定的空间和时间来物质化和现时化,这种联系往往与具体的地理和历史背景相关。然而,集体记忆并不一定局限于特定的地理和历史背景,它们与特定的时空形成结晶点[20]。在时间维度上,记忆通常以原始或重大事件为中心,具有循环节奏。随着时间的推移,事件的记忆会发生变化,每次回忆都是对上一次事件被记忆的回忆,而非直接关联所涉及事件。在空间维度上,记忆与其所唤起的空间相互联系。例如,房屋之于家庭就像村落山谷之于那里的农民、城市之于居民一样,它们是记忆的空间框架,尤其当它们不在场时,便会被当作“故乡”在回忆里扎根。但是当人们在不同地区和国家之间移动时,形成和评估记忆的方式也会发生变化。此外,物理空间和社会环境的变化也会影响记忆的结构和内容。因此,记忆的时空关联机制是一个复杂而多层次的过程[21]。当记忆被呈现在景观中时,其时间顺序需要被重新配置到一组同步的空间特征上,产生空间叙事。因此,时间要素通常是通过物理环境、建筑和景观来表达的[22]。历史叙述的一维时间序列相当于“悬挂”在实际历史场所的空间维度之上。时空关联的重要性表现在增强我们对地方的想象力,并强化了我们与环境的链接[23]。
1.3 记忆研究的场所观
诺拉[19]指出,现代的生活方式与我们祖先的生活方式截然不同,这使我们与我们的过去断裂,没有真正的记忆环境。因此要有意识地培养记忆之场。正如Huyssen[24]所提到的,我们正在寻找和建立记忆的场所,以便在一个充斥着最新媒体和“信息过载”的世界中提供一种“时间锚定”的感觉。因此,城乡空间不仅仅是一个静态的物理实体,还是一个动态的、不断发展的文化景观,不断被其居民的集体记忆和想象力所塑造和重塑。记忆场所就像是一部被不断重写的书(palimpsest),记录着一个城市记忆的形态和内容。一个城市被不同的历史时期和文化印记分层,每一层都被下一层部分地抹去和覆盖。城市重写本被Huyssen解释为“相信文学的历史性、互文性、建构性和解构性的阅读技巧可以交织在我们对城市空间的理解中,作为塑造我们集体想象力的生活空间”。这一观点在城市环境的建筑表现形式中得到了进一步的验证[25],并且更具体地与城市主义或城市设计的感知层面,以及我们对地方、建筑与城市的物质和非物质存在的认知产生联系[26]。
2 现代化浪潮中的城乡巨变与城乡记忆
2.1 宏大叙事下的日常生活记忆
现代化的宏大叙事造就了巨变中的城乡差异和记忆断裂,忽略了人们的日常生活和微观体验,导致居民在城乡变迁中失去了他们的记忆和历史,被视为被动的观察者而非积极的参与者。日常生活可以揭示城乡变迁的多样性和不确定性。Till[27]以美国、德国和西班牙等国家的城市为例,提出了地方关怀的伦理框架,强调了集体记忆可以作为治愈和重建创伤城市(wounded cities)的一种方式,在情感和心理上对创伤城市的修复和重建意义重大。然而,不可否认,日常生活常常充斥着商品化,意味着将记忆转化为一种商品,以牟取经济利益。在这种情况下,历史和记忆被视为一种市场上的商品,其价值取决于它们在市场上的受欢迎程度。这可能导致主导的叙述占据话语权,忽略了那些不符合主流价值观的声音和故事。因此,记忆的商品化可能会产生负面的后果,使主导的叙述永久化,沉默边缘声音。城乡居民的生活方式和文化传统有助于创造一种过去和现在之间的连续性和联系感,并有助于理解正在发生变化的日常生活[28]。展开城乡记忆的微观研究对完善城乡变迁的宏大叙事至关重要,需要关注个体的故事和细节。
2.2 城乡记忆研究的框架
城乡记忆具有选择性,那些能强化环境意义、完整性、认同感、归属感的线索是城乡记忆的主体。城乡记忆的选择性早在环境意义产生时就开始了,通过过滤器,环境的意义会发生变化,因此产生了不同的城乡记忆。西方近今研究关注城乡记忆作为社会遗产的重要性以及城乡记忆对城乡演变和现代化模式的影响。城乡记忆作为人们在城乡生活中产生的与生产、生活、文化等方面有关的集体和个人记忆,以物质和非物质的形式保存、传承,并不断演化发展。城乡记忆是地区文化的重要组成部分,也是社会资本的重要来源,需要制定相应的政策和规划,积极保护、传承和发展。城乡记忆的构成要素为时间[个人(生活阶段)和历史(城市的过去)]、空间(城市、社区、地区或特定场所),以及群体(家庭、社区、教育与工作)[29]。无论是城乡二元的差异视角,还是城乡一体的整合视角,城乡记忆的理论指向皆为揭示在流动与扎根之间不断摇摆的群体社会生活史和家园演化史,其理想诉求便是留住城市的记忆,寻找家园的乡愁(图2)。
图2
3 城乡记忆研究的进展与前沿
3.1 数据与方法
本文数据来源于Web of Science (WoS)和中国知网(CNKI)。英文文献数据以WoS核心合集为数据源,检索式为((TS=(collective memory or social memory or cultural memory)) AND (TS=(urban or city or rural or village or country)) OR (TS=(urban memory or rural memory))),时间跨度为2000—2022年,共得到8570篇文献。中文文献数据以CNKI为数据源,检索方式为以“城市”并含“记忆”或“乡村”并含“记忆”为主题,选择核心期刊、CSSCI和CSCD数据库进行检索,时间跨度同上,共获取1506篇文献。为避免动态网络分析信息可视化技术工具的片面性,本文采用科学知识图谱的分析结果作为研究热点领域的重要参考依据,同时对相关文献及高被引专著进行重点剖析,目的在于更全面、系统地揭示城乡记忆研究的脉络与发展前沿。
3.2 研究方向及研究主题
通过对搜集到的8570篇英文文献进行分类,可以分为三部分:① 与计算机领域相关的记忆研究;② 医学和心理学领域中的生理性记忆研究;③ 人文社科领域的集体记忆研究。英文文献针对人文社科领域的集体记忆研究展开分析,其中,载文量最高的方向为历史学,共计894篇。历史学、人文学科、地理学等是国外城乡记忆研究的主体学科(图3)。在1506篇中文文献中,载文量最高的是图书情报档案学(308篇)。此外,城乡规划与市政(197篇)、城市经济(187篇)、文学(141篇)、文化学(116篇)、社会学(115篇)等方向也有较高的载文量(图3),表明国内研究具有明显的管理学和工学导向,而国外侧重社会科学和人文学科研究。
图3
图3
2000—2022年国内外城乡记忆研究前10领域对比
Fig.3
Comparison of the top 10 Chinese and international urban and rural memory research fields during 2000-2022
3.3 国外关键词共现分析
根据算法限定关键词共现频次≥20的输出结果(图4),可见,集体记忆(collective memory)具有最高的共现频次(932次),其次是认同(identity)和政治(poltics)。
图4
图4
2000—2022年国外城乡记忆关键词共现图
注:节点和关键词字号大小代表了共现频次,关键词节点之间的距离反映了关系的强弱,且节点之间的线条代表共现频率,线条越粗,共现频率越高;节点的颜色表示与该节点有关的每年平均文献数量;蓝紫色节点对应研究初期经常使用的关键词,红色节点则是对应最近出现的关键词,绿色节点代表在分析周期中反复出现的关键词。
Fig.4
Co-occurrence mapping of keywords in international rural and urban memory research during 2000-2022
从关键词共现来看,城乡记忆涵盖了人类经验和文化认同的各种要素。研究早期热点领域着重探讨城乡记忆、认同和物质文化景观的联系,特别关注民族记忆相关的景观,如纪念碑、纪念馆、博物馆等[30⇓-32]。记忆表现在物质文化景观领域[21],主要通过视觉和仪式被唤起,如纪念活动(commemoration)、表演(performance)、叙述(narrative)、纪念碑(monument)和景观(landscape)。因此,与地方和空间联系在一起的景观,既包含了客观的物质形式,也锚定了主观的经验、想象和记忆。此外,对暴力(violence)、冲突(conflict)和战争(war)引起的创伤记忆(trauma)也是国外关注的焦点问题。文化遗产(cultural heritage)是近年来国外城乡记忆的热点。研究的地区主要集中在文化底蕴深厚且历史演变过程中发生过较大变革的国家或地区,如德国柏林[33]、西班牙瓦伦西亚[34]、土耳其凡城[35]、英国伯明翰与考文垂[28]等。绅士化、城市更新、历史文化遗产作为城市发展的重要途径和载体,包含众多记忆要素,具有改变城市发展模式、提升城市形象、实现城市可持续发展的潜力。保护历史文化遗产不但延续了城乡记忆,同时还是维持城乡记忆可持续发展的重要战略。
3.4 国内关键词共现分析
根据算法限定关键词共现频次≥8的输出结果,显示了70个关键词。乡村振兴是近年来共现频次最高的关键词,是城乡记忆研究的热点,与之相关的有传统村落、乡村旅游、文化空间、空间生产等。从关键词的共现图谱可以看出,城市记忆的关注度极高,其次是城市记忆工程、乡村记忆、文化记忆、乡村振兴等。研究内容涵盖记忆工程、城市记忆的构成要素、城市记忆演变的影响因素及在城市更新过程中城市记忆所发挥的作用(图5)。早期以档案资源整理为主,后逐渐与文化景观、空间生产、乡村振兴和数字人文等理论与实践联系在一起,学科交叉融合的趋势明显,研究的视角进一步拓展,大数据技术支持下的跨学科研究日益增多。城乡记忆研究的重点从历史时期的记忆保存和再现转向对当代社会发展现实问题的关注。其中,有关媒介记忆研究聚焦于新媒体和数字技术对记忆的影响与传播;有关全球化和社会变迁背景下的记忆流动与重塑成为新的话语体系。理论研究与服务于城乡发展的现实需求共同推动着城乡记忆研究向更深层次发展。
图5
图5
2000—2022年国内城乡记忆研究关键词共现图谱
Fig.5
Co-occurrence mapping of keywords in Chinese urban and rural memory research during 2000-2022
3.5 主题词演化路径
国外城乡记忆研究主题词呈现多样性变化特征,关键词共现时间线图谱中前10位聚类分别为地方依恋(place attachment)、暴力(violence)、建成环境(built environment)、历史记忆(historical memory)、日常景观(everyday landscape)、认知地图(cognitive maps)、口述史(oral history)、文化遗产(cultural heritage)、城市地名学(urban toponymy)与生活经验(lived experience)等(图6a)。记忆(memory)是最早出现的关键词,政治(politics)、认同(identity)、权力(power)、集体记忆(collective memory)、历史(history)、城市(city)等高频关键词具有较高的连接度和中心性,在整个研究中居于重要地位。地理学是2008年最大的节点[36],空间(space)是当年第二大的节点,表明地理学者从空间观念出发,试图阐明城乡记忆是如何通过物质的和象征性的记忆空间或记忆景观而被空间化的。2009年出现了许多新的关键词,包括地方(place)、城市空间(urban space)、地方依恋(place attachment)、社区(community)、旅游(tourism)等,地理学者极大地推动了这一研究领域的发展。在后续的研究中日益关注旅游(tourism)、日常景观(everyday landscape)、移民(immigration)、公共艺术(public art)、空间正义(space justice)、城市想象(urban imagination)、建筑(architecture)等。国家历史和日常生活场景在人们的记忆中以独特的方式呈现,社会发展的脉络和核心事件留下了深刻的烙印。值得一提的是,乡村社会的演变和进步日益受到全球环境的影响。乡村特定空间范围内的历史事件可能会受到来自远方的时空因素的影响。全球性的社会活动逐渐映射在乡村地区的社会实践、文化积累和情感体验中[37]。2010—2017年,聚类一中对城市记忆空间特征研究有复原力(resilience)、管理(management)、流动性(mobility)、多元性(diversity)等。聚类二则是关注社会运动、暴力事件和战争造成的创伤,如人权(human right)、内战(civil war)、安全(security)、黑色旅游(dark tourism)。聚类三中主要涉及对空间的感知分析(spatial analysis)和历史保护(historical preservation)。这3个聚类作为城乡记忆“空间转向”的重要基底,奠定了城乡记忆内涵形成的基础。此外,公共空间和文化遗产是这段时间内最大的两个节点。Hoelscher等[21]指出记忆和地方之间的构成关系在物质文化(景观)领域最为明显,记忆研究除了关注物理环境层面,还应关注生活体验和主观价值。2018—2022年,研究后期出现小而多的节点,研究的主题变得越来越细化和专业化。文化遗产领域分出城市遗产(urban heritage)、工业遗产(industrial heritage)、历史城镇景观(historical urban landscape)。聚类六、七分别为认知地图和口述史,表明城乡记忆研究的方法主要是定性的,重点是心理学、历史学和社会学的问卷设计、口述历史和田野调查等。
图6
图6
2000—2022年国内外城乡记忆研究路径演化时间线
Fig.6
Path evolution timeline of Chinese and international urban and rural memory research during 2000-2022
国内城乡记忆研究的关键词共现时间线图谱中前10位聚类分别为城市记忆、乡村记忆、文化记忆、历史记忆、身份认同、个人记忆、空间记忆、公共空间、短视频、社会记忆(图6b)。中国城乡记忆研究范式受到哈布瓦赫集体记忆、康纳顿社会记忆及阿斯曼文化记忆理论的影响。城市记忆和社会记忆出现于2000年,乡村记忆和文化记忆出现于2005年。诗歌[38]、小说[39]、民间传说[40]等文学作品是早期城乡理论构建的重要载体。城市记忆将单一的物理空间转变为具有社会精神内涵的场所,将时间、空间与人的认知进行结合,传达外在表现形式中所蕴含的内在价值[41]。城市记忆的研究最早开始于城市档案、图书管理及情报搜集机构,在青岛、武汉、上海、广州等城市相继出现的“城市记忆工程”推动了城乡记忆理论内涵的形成[42]。城乡记忆工程得到各级政府对城乡记忆保护工作的支持和大力推进。在2003—2013年间,研究文献也多与档案建设相关,包括对文化遗产的保护和修复等[43]。与此同时,如何运用城乡记忆进行城乡规划、景观设计和社区营造也成为学者关注的热点问题。文化景观已不再被简单视作静止的遗产或文化他者的呈现,其象征性意义被认为是在复杂的关系中博弈发展的产物,地方认同是影响记忆的重要因素之一。2015年出现较多新的关键词,文化是关键词的核心,如乡村文化、民俗文化、传统村落和乡愁。2017年乡村振兴的提出促进了城乡记忆文化属性的探索,空间生产、文旅融合、短视频、数字人文等新关键词随之产生。
4 研究脉络与前沿分析
4.1 空间感知的国外脉络:集体记忆→纪念性记忆→日常性记忆
国外城乡记忆研究沿着空间感知的脉络演进,经历了早期经典理论探索的集体记忆研究,后转向对城乡记忆的物质载体的纪念性记忆研究,具体的物质载体要素如纪念碑[44]、纪念馆[45]、博物馆[46]、雕塑[47]、树木[48]、街道[49]、遗址[50]、广场[51]、公园[52]、花园[53]、废墟[54-55]等人与自然环境共同构成的景观。这些景观提供了获得过去经验的稳定性,空间作为过去的稳定“容器”,为身份的固定提供了支持。以人为主体的城乡变迁和发展过程,动态、持续地重构了城乡历史及现在的认知与记忆,反映了城乡主体和客体随时间变化的互动过程。Crinson[56]批评了现代主义建筑将记忆从城乡景观中抹去的趋势,并谴责将记忆作为审美和日常生活的商品化工具。Ringas等[57]提出了日常生活中城市记忆的3个构成要素——地点、社区和基础设施,并开展了一项旨在捕捉、保存和利用城市记忆的应用调查。之后,日常生活的景观和场所受到西方学者的重视,空间感知的脉络渐渐转向对人的微观日常生活世界的关注。
4.2 乡愁永续的国内脉络:档案建设→城市文脉保护→乡村振兴
国内城乡记忆研究在城市化快速发展和社会转型的背景下展开。“让城市留住记忆”的城市文化遗产研究和“让家园留住乡愁”的乡村振兴研究共同推动了城乡记忆的理论研究和社会实践。其中,国家档案部门开展的记忆工程实践,以多种媒介载体记录城乡发展和历史,以历史档案形式收集和保存反映城市原始风貌的系统性工程产生重大影响[58]。家园景观基因研究围绕着“把根留住”的精神需求[59],对如何维系乡愁记忆进行了一系列针对乡村地域景观修复与文脉传承的研究[60-61]。历史文化街区[62-63]、工业遗产[64-65]的适应性再利用在城市更新中起到了引领的作用。城乡记忆的研究重点也转向了城市文脉的承续与美丽乡村的建设。因此,相较国外而言,乡愁永续成为城乡记忆研究的重要演进脉络,这与中国快速的城镇化和城乡空间巨变紧密相联。
4.3 国内外研究前沿对比
哈布瓦赫[15]提出的记忆的社会框架和诺拉[19]提出的民族—国家框架,共同奠定了早期城乡记忆的理论基石。但目前国外也有学者反对其民族主义方法论,认为记忆超越了这种狭隘的界限,因此必须从跨国、跨文化或全球的角度来研究[66-67]。国外研究中,景观具有最长的突现时间,意味着景观是城乡记忆研究中的核心部分。景观在记忆地理学中以隐喻的方式被应用,成为符号文本、文化舞台和纪念性表演的构成要素。此外,景观作为一个重要的空间载体,记录了社会群体的日常生活行为,具有独特的空间意义。它在塑造城乡记忆解释的内涵和机制方面发挥着核心作用,可以将遗产、身份和权力在城乡记忆空间中的多重互动联系起来。“气候变化”和“社会生态记忆”成为近期的关键词,代表着国外记忆研究出现了“生态思考”(表1)。景观、记忆和地方认同之间有着不可分割的联系。国外对记忆场所的研究不再局限于纪念性景观,而是更多关注日常空间和自然环境,特别是与冲突、战争和历史的创伤有关的问题。
表1 国外城乡记忆研究突现强度前20关键词
Tab.1
关键词 | 突现强度 | 开始年 | 结束年 | 突现图谱(2000—2021年) |
---|---|---|---|---|
景观 | 2.34 | 2001 | 2015 | ▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
纪念碑 | 4.20 | 2003 | 2008 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
地方认同 | 2.80 | 2003 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
空间 | 2.23 | 2003 | 2009 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
创伤记忆 | 2.11 | 2010 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
地理 | 2.75 | 2011 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
建筑 | 3.83 | 2013 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
权利 | 1.83 | 2013 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
气候变化 | 2.77 | 2016 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
公共记忆 | 3.28 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
文化遗产 | 2.94 | 2017 | 2020 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂ |
文化景观 | 2.66 | 2017 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
工业遗产 | 2.62 | 2017 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
公共空间 | 2.23 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
政治记忆 | 2.10 | 2017 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
历史城镇景观 | 2.64 | 2019 | 2020 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂ |
旅游 | 1.82 | 2019 | 2021 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃ |
地方依恋 | 1.75 | 2019 | 2020 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂ |
口述史 | 2.31 | 2020 | 2021 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
生态社会记忆 | 2.19 | 2020 | 2021 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
表2 国内城乡记忆研究突现强度前20关键词
Tab.2
关键词 | 突现强度 | 开始年 | 结束年 | 突现图谱(2000—2022年) |
---|---|---|---|---|
城市文化 | 2.57 | 2006 | 2013 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
城市记忆 | 10.23 | 2008 | 2012 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
档案馆 | 5.33 | 2008 | 2013 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
档案局 | 6.30 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
档案部门 | 6.06 | 2011 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
示范基地 | 4.03 | 2013 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
集体记忆 | 6.67 | 2015 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃ |
工业遗产 | 3.27 | 2015 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
档案记忆 | 4.06 | 2016 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
城市空间 | 2.67 | 2016 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
传统村落 | 4.61 | 2017 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃ |
乡村振兴 | 15.04 | 2018 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃ |
乡村文化 | 3.96 | 2018 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃ |
档案资源 | 2.58 | 2018 | 2020 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂ |
空间记忆 | 3.66 | 2019 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃ |
城市更新 | 3.10 | 2019 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃ |
短视频 | 5.07 | 2020 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
文化记忆 | 5.00 | 2020 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
文旅融合 | 4.85 | 2020 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
口述史 | 3.68 | 2020 | 2022 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
城乡记忆的研究涉及对记忆的代际传递以及现代发展和全球化对城乡记忆重塑的影响。国外城乡记忆的研究重点不仅仅是对自然和人文要素的历史回忆,还强调了特定社会背景对这些记忆对象的空间映射。国内记忆研究面临的是快速发展过程中“难以忆”的问题,国外更多讨论民族冲突和国家主义下有关“为何忆”的问题。国内外城乡记忆研究在关注的维度和重点上存在差异。国外研究借鉴了多学科的理论框架,擅长使用口述史和批判分析的研究方法,国内研究突出了档案资源整理引领和国家发展战略支持的实践驱动,二者存在较大的差异。前者遵循了个体化知识生产的模式,后者多以国家政策的集体行动为主。尽管如此,国内外城乡记忆研究仍然存在对话的空间,因为导致差异的因素更多是社会发展阶段和发展情境的不同,而不是学科问题的认知差异。
5 结论与启示
城市和乡村是承载人类文明的空间实体。在人类社会发展的长河中,不同的发展阶段都留下了昭示人类情感寄托的集体记忆。从城乡记忆研究的发展脉络来看,通过国内外的比较分析,得出以下结论:
(1) 国内外城乡记忆研究都经历了从集体记忆向文化记忆的过渡,而城乡记忆则是文化记忆的延展。本质上,城乡记忆是一种社会遗产,城市里程碑事件、重要历史人物、古建筑、历史街区等物质与非物质、空间与非空间的历史客体是其重要的承载形式。
(2) 城乡记忆研究为跨学科领域,历史学、人文学科、地理学、图书情报档案学、城乡规划学等是其重要的学科群体,涉及探讨人—人、人—地、人—物关系的根本逻辑,民众的日常生活史和流动的城乡文化共同塑造了不同地域的情感归属、身份认同,在社会文化空间的转型中扮演着重要角色。
(3) 国内外城乡记忆研究具有诸多不同之处,国外记忆研究与西方宗教世界观相关,并侧重关注战争或民主运动引起的创伤记忆和身份认同,而国内起源于城镇变迁导致的乡愁记忆,侧重于对历史文脉的留存;国外城乡记忆研究集中于地方和景观的分析,重视空间感知,而国内城乡记忆研究以人的乡愁情感为切入点,重视地方价值。
(4) 城乡记忆研究具有强烈的地方烙印和地域特质,开展城乡记忆演变与传承机制的研究有助于承续中华优秀传统文化,反思现代社会发展。城乡记忆本身也受到社会发展、国家制度和地方历史的影响,特别是中国城乡记忆研究具有明显的实践驱动特征。由国家档案局发起的城市记忆工程应当超越档案资源整理本身,结合使用大数据和VR、AR等数字技术,在历史文化遗产保护、文化旅游产业开发、乡村口述史收集、记忆的媒介化传播等方面开展跨学科的研究,拓宽城乡记忆研究的视野。
可预见的是,记忆的媒介化是大势所趋。媒体、旅游和娱乐行业将会有强烈的动机去搜寻过去的记忆,将其转化为全球熟悉的符号,利用商业和技术手段向观众展示。因此,要警惕记忆扩散的资本化和记忆传播的商品化。站在传承文化、延续多元化城乡特质的认知观上,开展城乡记忆的实证研究和理论建构,将城乡的自然、时间的累积和人类的创造综合集成,改变工业化社会以来城乡发展及城乡景观的趋同化现象,为人类理想的家园和诗意的栖居注入更多的人文智慧。
未来,城乡记忆研究既要在“软”科学的跨学科综合上构建理论[70],也要在“硬”科学的范式传承和要素体系上付诸实践[71],并推广到国家乃至全人类的尺度[72]。城乡记忆研究并不是要恢复曾经的景观与文化,而是要传承文化的根基和人类的文明。从哈布瓦赫记忆的社会建构[15]到康纳顿的记忆传递[16],再到记忆的代际差异和文脉承续[20],城乡记忆研究已经远远超越了“记忆”本身,而是深入到“文化”和“文明”的范畴。遗产化[73-74]、旅游化[75⇓-77]在一定程度上促进了国内外城乡记忆的传承和传播,但这远远不够。人文地理学的人地关系传统和空间思维可以助力城乡记忆研究迈向更深层次,为城乡发展的人文关怀注入活力。首先,应明确城乡记忆和文化遗产的关系。城乡记忆和文化遗产保护虽有区别,但是相互依存。城乡记忆表现为一个社区的集体记忆,包括传统、习俗、价值观等无形文化元素,而文化遗产保护主要侧重于保护有形文化资产。文化遗产的保护可以延续城乡记忆,城乡记忆和文化遗产保护之间的相互作用对城乡文化的延续至关重要[78]。其次,关注城乡空间中少数族群及弱势群体的记忆话语权。记忆的产生、分配和消费应进行批判性分析。在西方,身份差异如黑人、移民和土著族群等,无法获得表达记忆的空间,精英群体的记忆作为中心被政府优待,加剧了社群成员与社会间的潜在矛盾[79⇓-81]。因此,未来的研究应着眼于少数民族和弱势群体,维护社群记忆的公正性,保障去权力化的非精英异质群体的利益,从而增强社会的整体身份认同感和归属感[82]。最后,强化理论探索。目前,对城乡记忆的组成、资源、载体和媒介的研究还比较零散,尚未形成一个全面且结构化的谱系。虽然各学科都在一定程度上研究了城乡记忆,但相较于哈布瓦赫、阿斯曼等提出的创新性理论,仍缺乏探索性和创造性的工作。未来的研究可以多加关注城乡记忆符号与功能的演变、城乡记忆的生态保护机制和传播模式。
致谢
真诚感谢匿名评审专家在论文评审中所付出的时间和精力,对中外理论研究的反思和对话等方面提出的宝贵意见和建议,使本文获益匪浅。
参考文献
文化景观视角下我国城乡历史聚落“景观—文化”构成关系解析: 以西南地区历史聚落为例
[J].
The composition and connotation study between landscape media and cultural mechanisms in China's historic settlement from the perspective of "cultural landscape" case studies on historical settlements in the southwest area
“景观记忆”在城市文化景观设计中的应用
[J].
The application of "landscape memory" in urban cultural heritage landscape design
基于社会生态记忆的青山湖绿道场景构建策略
[J].
The construction strategy of Qingshan Lake greenway based on social ecological memory
新型城镇化建设中“留住乡愁”的理论与实践探索
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlyj201507001
[本文引用: 1]
全国新型城镇化工作会议提出,要“让居民望得见山、看得见水、记得住乡愁”。“乡愁”是内心深处一种对家乡、对曾经生活过的地方的记忆、怀念与向往,是内心深处一份最柔软的情感,是一种精神需求。新型城镇化要记住的“乡愁”,一方面是要保护好家乡的历史文化、历史记忆和人文精神,另一方面是要保留好这些地方文化基因,传承乡土文明。“留住乡愁”的前提是加强文化保护。乡愁可以通过新型城镇化建设过程中切实保护传统村镇文化遗产和风貌,保留文化基因、传承文化记忆、打造文化品牌与特色景观等方式,达到满足城镇化居民家乡情感、生活情感、历史情感、文化情感等精神需求的目的。“留住乡愁”的关键是大力开展特色小城镇的建设,以就地城镇化为依托,“满天星斗式”的小城镇分布格局与特色旅游小镇建设是实现新型城镇化的重要路径之一。“湖湘风情旅游小镇”建设是“留住乡愁”的有益尝试和积极探索,能为充满人性关怀的新型城镇化建设,创造一个真正充满诗意的美丽家园。
The theory and practice exploration of ''remembering nostalgia'' in the construction of new urbanization
DOI:10.11821/dlyj201507001
[本文引用: 1]
The national working conference of new urbanization proposed that to improve the level of urban construction, we should let the residents see mountain, see water, and remember the nostalgia. Nostalgia is a kind of memory, missing or longing for hometown or the places you have once lived in your deep heart; Nostalgia is the softest inner emotion and a kind of spiritual demands. On the one hand, the nostalgia which the new urbanization should remember is to protect its historical culture, historical memory and humanistic spirit of the hometown; on the other hand, the nostalgia should preserve the historical gene of these places and inherit rural civilization. The foundation of remembering the nostalgia is to intensify culture protection. And by means of protecting cultural heritage and style of the traditional settlements practically, preserving cultural gene, inheriting cultural memory, creating cultural brand and characteristic landscape etc., the nostalgia can meet the spiritual demand of the residents’ homesickness, life emotion, historical emotion and cultural emotion in the process of new urbanization construction. The key of remembering the nostalgia is to promote the construction of small characteristic towns vigorously. Relying on site urbanization, the significant ways of achieving new urbanization are star-studded layout of small towns and the construction of characteristic tourism small town. The construction of Hunan's characteristic tourism small town is an attempt to remember the nostalgia, and it could help to create a beautiful homeland filled with poetics for new urbanization construction which is full of humanistic care.
迁移中的记忆与乡愁: 城乡记忆的演变机制和空间逻辑
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlyj201701001
[本文引用: 1]
应不应记忆?能不能记忆?愿不愿记忆?让不让记忆?记忆存在于真实前行的生活,是活着的,不是死去的;记忆不是唯精英权贵,草根民众记忆亦弥足珍贵;珍视记忆中蕴含的历史文脉,但记忆的保护不等同于遗产的保护,亦应正视记忆与现代发展存在的某些不相容;记忆不是虚幻之谈,而是文化自信、城乡复兴的源泉。时间之河不会回淌,改变了的城乡空间再也无法回到从前,今天对城乡未来的反思本质上就是对社会发展的反思。结合国际研究的比较,针对中国当下的语境,就城乡记忆的演变机制和空间逻辑,地理、规划、建筑、文物、旅游等领域的理论和实践讨论在此交汇。伴随着城乡社会的不断变化,记忆和乡愁的保存和发展是为了展现过去的历史,适宜今天的生活,愉悦未来的创造。
Memory and homesickness in transition: Evolution mechanism and spatial logic of urban and rural memory
DOI:10.11821/dlyj201701001
[本文引用: 1]
About our urban and rural memory, should we remember? Can we remember? Are we willing to remember? Are we allowed to remember? Existing in the real life, memory is alive rather than dead. Memory not only belongs to the elite, grassroots' memory is also precious. Historical context implicated in the memory should be cherished without equating the protection of memory with the protection of urban heritage, and also should we face the incompatibility between the memory and the development of modern time. Memory is not unreal talk, but the source of cultural self-confidence as well as urban and rural revival. The time of the river never backflows, the changed urban and rural space can no longer return to the past, thus the reflection of the future of urban and rural today is essentially the reflection of social development. Combined with the comparison of international research, in terms of the evolution mechanism and spatial logic of urban and rural memory in the current context of China, here converged the theory and practice discussion in the fields of geography, planning, architecture, cultural relics and tourism. With the constant change of society, the preservation and development of memory and homesickness is to show the history of the past, accommodate with life of today, and delight the creation of the future.
国外人文地理学关于记忆研究的进展与启示
[J].
A review and revelation on memory studies of foreign human geography
文本、冲突与展演视角下的西方记忆地理研究评述
[J].
A review of western geographies of memory in the perspectives of text, conflict and performance
地理学视角下文化记忆空间研究进展与启示
[J].
DOI:10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003559
[本文引用: 1]
通过梳理文化记忆理论,归纳文化记忆演变历程和发展脉络,以国内外地理学1 527篇重点文献为支撑,借助文献计量和可视化工具CiteSpace从关键词共现聚类、主题路径演化及研究趋势分析国内外文化记忆空间研究的主要内容和进展。通过综述当前国内外文化记忆空间研究的前沿热点,以期建构地理学视角下文化记忆的研究范式,改进文化记忆研究方法,为文化记忆理论的本土应用和多学科融合提供借鉴与参考。从分析结果看,国外文化记忆空间研究的主题多集中于:1)日常生活景观的记忆表征研究;2)记忆中的政治与仪式研究等方面。国内研究主题主要包括:1)集体、社会记忆中的文化与地方研究;2)空间承载的城市与乡村记忆研究;3)文旅推动下的遗产记忆再现研究等方面。尽管近年来国内外关于文化记忆空间研究的文献逐渐增加,对于纪念性景观、遗产建筑、仪式庆典、战争创伤、民族记忆等的关注度增高,但文化记忆空间研究并未形成具体的理论范式,绝大多数文献仅仅关注文化记忆与其他领域的融合,而对文化记忆空间的内涵、媒介转换机制、空间识别方法的研究相对较少。从国内外研究的内容及趋势来看,西方学者更注重对移民、权利、自由意志、女性、权力政治、战争创伤的研究;对空间的关注主要集中在城市、情感与权利空间。国内地理学者注重从记忆的非物质载体去解构地域化、中国化的文化记忆与地方认同,研究多以明显的政策导向为主,战争遗址、红色旅游地、传统村寨、特色民俗与节庆仪式等成为文化记忆空间研究的重要主题。未来,地理学研究应将文本、仪式、语言等实践过程通过非表征手段进行刻画,以物态化的方式将记忆重新引入人类研究的视野;同时应明确界定城市与乡村文化记忆的内涵,以影像数字化手段将遗产、移民与旅游作为文化记忆空间研究的新主题。
Research progress and implication of cultural memory space from the perspective of geography
DOI:10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003559
[本文引用: 1]
Cultural memory is a spiritual, inner, and middle world composed of self-consciousness, memory, and behavior that expresses the cultural phenomenon, local emotions, and identity generated by human practice in the present world space. Geography pays more attention to the human-land relationship and spatial perception in the formation of cultural memory and constructs a unique cultural memory space. This space is the agglomeration of figurative cultural relics in space, as well as the spiritual representation of non-figurative places, such as art, text, and folklore in space. By systematically analyzing the theory of cultural memory, this study summarizes the process of evolution and development context of cultural memory. Based on 1,527 key domestic and international studies on geography, this study analyzes the main content and progress of global cultural memory space research from the perspective of keyword co-occurrence clustering, theme path evolution, and research trend, with the assistance of CiteSpace—the bibliometrics and visualization tool. By reviewing the frontier hot spots of cultural memory space research at home and abroad, this study aims to construct a research paradigm of cultural memory from the perspective of geography, improve the research methods of cultural memory, and provide a reference for the local application and multidisciplinary integration of cultural memory theory. The analysis results focus the research topics of foreign cultural memory space primarily on: 1) the memory representation of the landscape of daily life; and 2) political and ritual studies in memory. Domestic research topics primarily include: 1) cultural and local studies in collective and social memory; 2) research on urban and rural memory carried by space; and 3) research on heritage memory reproduction, promoted by cultural tourism. The literature on cultural memory space at home and abroad has gradually increased in recent years, as has the attention paid to memorial landscape, heritage buildings, ritual celebrations, war trauma, and national memory; however, the research on cultural memory space has not formed a specific theoretical paradigm. Most of the literature only focuses on the integration of cultural memory and other fields, and relatively few studies address the connotation of cultural memory space, media conversion mechanisms, and spatial identification methods. The perspective of the content and trends in domestic and foreign research indicates that Western scholars pay more attention to the study of migration, rights, free will, women, power politics, and war trauma. The focus on space is mainly on cities, emotions, and rights. Domestic geographers focus on deconstructing regionalized and China-seized cultural memory and local identity from the intangible carrier of memory. Most studies are based on obvious policy orientations. War sites, red tourist sites, traditional villages, characteristic folk customs, and festival ceremonies have become important themes in the study of cultural memory space. In the future, geography research should depict the practical process of text, ritual, and language through non-representational means and re-introduce memory into human research in a materialized way. Simultaneously, the connotation of urban and rural cultural memory should be clearly defined, and heritage, immigration, and tourism should be adopted as the new themes of cultural memory space research through digital images.
从地理学视角看城市历史文化景观集体记忆的研究
[J].
A geographical study on the collective memory of urban historical cultural landscape
Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology
[J].DOI:10.1111/bjep.1933.3.issue-2 URL [本文引用: 1]
Bergson's non-archival theory of memory
[J].
DOI:10.1177/1750698008093797
URL
[本文引用: 1]
Literal and metaphorical associations between memory and archives are found throughout traditional and contemporary thinking about memory. Despite a long-running tendency in the western tradition to doubt the adequacy of archival metaphors for memory, and despite much recent research that implicitly treats memory in terms of dynamic mnemonic and memorial processes, imprint/substrate models epitomized by Plato's wax tablet seem extraordinarily resistant to attempts to think memory beyond them. Henri Bergson's Matter and Memory, in which he makes a radical separation between the processes of recollection and `pure memory', provides both an argument for the tenacity of the memory—archive relation and an alternative, non-archival model of memory. In this article, I suggest the possible implications of this model for the way we think about both memory and the archive, and on the basis of this point towards Bergson's potential significance for the emergent field of memory studies.
Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire
[J].DOI:10.2307/2928520 URL [本文引用: 3]
Collective memory and cultural identity
[J].
Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship
[J].
The city and topologies of memory
[J].
DOI:10.1068/d201t
URL
[本文引用: 1]
The relationship of space and time has become a vexed issue in accounts in the postmodern metropolis. Rich and enlivening accounts use spatial categories to describe the interrelationships of elements of the city—moving from historicism to geography, to gloss Jameson's development of cognitive mapping. Postmodern geographies utilising the ideas of cognitive mapping show marked similarities with the accounts of time and space describing classical and medieval arts of memory and the Romantic writings of Flaubert on Athens. However, spatialised accounts of the city often seem to replicate problematic divisions of space and time that also underlay historicist accounts and merely invert the latter's priorities. The work of Bergson offers key insights into how this division occurred and a sense of temporality that may be lost in spatial metaphors. This is a sense of difference and alterity that we trace in the work of Proust and argue can be brought to inform the urban theatre of memories through a careful reworking of ideas suggested by de Certeau and Derrida. In this paper we take the case of Athens, bringing together East and West, ancient and modern, original and copy, as a grounding to discuss these issues. We suggest a sense of time- space as both fragmented and dynamic; a sense of the historical sites as creating instability and displacement in collective memory.
Spatial syntagma and identity of a place: Sensing, relating to, and knowing a place
[J].DOI:10.1080/10911359.2013.876377 URL [本文引用: 1]
Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory
[M].
Evolution of the architectural and heritage representation
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.006 URL [本文引用: 1]
The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory
[J].
DOI:10.1177/0042098012440463
URL
[本文引用: 1]
Experience is conceptualised in both academic and policy circles as a more-or-less direct effect of the design of the built environment. Drawing on findings from a research project that investigated people’s everyday experiences of designed urban environments in two UK towns, this paper suggests at least two reasons why sensory encounters between individuals and built environments cannot in fact be understood entirely as a consequence of the design features of those environments. Drawing from empirical analysis based on surveys, ethnographic ‘walk-alongs’ and photo-elicitation interviews, we argue that distinct senses of place do depend on the sensory experiencing of built environments. However, that experiencing is significantly mediated in two ways. First, it is mediated by bodily mobility: in particular, the walking practices specific to a particular built environment. Secondly, sensory experiences are intimately intertwined with perceptual memories that mediate the present moment of experience in various ways: by multiplying, judging and dulling the sensory encounter. In conclusion, it is argued that work on sensory urban experiencing needs to address more fully the diversity and paradoxes produced by different forms of mobility through, and perceptual memories of, built environments.
Wounded cities: Memory-work and a place-based ethics of care
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.10.008 URL [本文引用: 1]
Walking with the ghosts of the past: Unearthing the value of residents' urban nostalgias
[J].
DOI:10.1177/0042098015588683
URL
[本文引用: 2]
Nostalgia has historically been negatively characterised by desire to reconnect with an idealised past lost to the ‘destructive’ forces of modernity, but studies across the social sciences have recently sought to re-appraise the creative and embodied significance of individuals’ recollections. This paper contributes to this developing debate by empirically exploring the value of individual remembering in relation to the urban material landscape. First, drawing on recently collected go-along data from long-term residents of two UK cities, Birmingham and Coventry, it is argued that nostalgia could be considered a more progressive force in urban life, especially amongst residents in cities that have undergone and are undergoing physical change as a consequence of ‘official’ attempts to reconstruct, regenerate and/or repackage particular urban spaces; developing a richer understanding of the interplay between official and unofficial nostalgias can better inform planning decisions that are more likely to be socially acceptable and supported by local communities. Second, though there are clear advantages of developing a fuller theoretical and methodological consideration of urban nostalgia, this paper then uses go-along data to demonstrate that much remains to be learnt from exploring how the material urban environment can encourage and/or limit individual efforts to keep potentially distressing aspects of their past concealed.
A integrating heritage to the study of urban memory: Narratives about Mexico City
[J].
A matter of time: Examining collective memory in historical perspective in postwar Berlin
[J].DOI:10.1111/johs.2005.18.issue-1-2 URL [本文引用: 1]
Unraveling the threads of history: Soviet-Era Monuments and post-soviet national identity in Moscow
[J].DOI:10.1111/1467-8306.00303 URL [本文引用: 1]
Cast in stone: Monuments, geography, and nationalism
[J].
DOI:10.1068/d130051
URL
[本文引用: 1]
Since the 19th century at least public monuments have been the foci for collective participation in the politics and public life of villages, towns, and cities. They have acted as important centres around which local and national political and cultural positions have been articulated. I argue that monuments are an important, but underutilised, resource for the geographer interested in debates surrounding national identity. Through a variety of examples, I explore the ways in which examinations of the sociology, iconography, spatialisation, and gendering of statues reveal important ways in which national ‘imagined communities’ are constructed.
The Berlin Wall after the Berlin Wall: Site into sight
[J].
DOI:10.1177/1750698015613972
URL
[本文引用: 1]
How did the Berlin Wall disappear as a border and re-appear as a site of memory? This article examines how the material space of the Wall was erased and reintroduced as worthy of commemoration. It shows how the Wall was first taken “out of time” (de-temporalized) and then re-temporalized within narratives of trauma, consumption, and the political through three key sites of commemoration—the Berlin Wall Memorial at Bernauer Strasse, Checkpoint Charlie, and the East Side Gallery. Independently and as part of the city’s official “concept” for memorializing the Wall, these sites connect the city as much to its search for new frontiers of possible futures as they do to its past. Examining them allows us to explore the role of temporality and materiality in the construction of collective memory.
Beyond the intangible/tangible binary: An analysis of historic built environments in Valencia, Spain
[J].
The role of urban landscapes in the formation of urban identity and urban memory relations: The case of Van/Turkey
[J].DOI:10.1080/02665433.2022.2090418 URL [本文引用: 1]
From number to name: Symbolic capital, places of memory and the politics of street renaming in New York City
[J].
国内外乡村记忆地理研究进展与展望
[J].
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.06.2018278
[本文引用: 1]
在地理学的文化转向思潮中,记忆研究逐渐受到地理学者的重视。在全球化时代,不同地方的文化将突破时空界限,在广域范围内形成全方位的沟通、交流与互动。本研究对1990至2017年国内外有关乡村记忆的研究文献进行梳理和评述。结果发现:①记忆是多学科的研究议题,近年来逐渐受到地理学者的关注。不同于国外重视对地方、景观等记忆的空间感知研究,国内更关注人对曾经生活过的地方的情感依恋。②乡村记忆作为一种地方性表达,在理性语境中与全球互动融合的同时也逐渐消解,急需进行保护与传承。③本文尝试从范式、视角、尺度、理论、内容和方法层面初步建立乡村记忆地理的研究体系,未来研究应从服务国家战略、推动地理学主导的学科交叉、构建理论体系、拓展全球-地方视阈内容集成、运用多元分析方法等方面加以深化,以期为乡村理论研究和实践发展提供有力的支撑。
Research progress and prospect of rural memory geography
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.06.2018278
[本文引用: 1]
In the era of globalization, cultures in different places will break through the boundaries of time and space, and form a comprehensive range of communication and interaction in a wide area. This study reviewed the literature on rural memory at home and abroad from 1990 to 2017. The results show that: ① Rural memory is a multidisciplinary research topic, which has attracted more and more attention from geographers in recent years. Unlike foreign researchers who pay more attention to spatial perception of memory such as place and landscape, domestic scholars pay more attention to people's emotional attachment to places they have lived.②Rural memory, as a local expression, gradually disappears when it merges with the global interaction in the rational context, and needs to be protected and inherited immediately.③This paper attempts to establish a preliminary research system of rural memory geography from the aspects of paradigm, perspective, scale, theory, content and method. In order to provide more powerful support for rural theoretical research and economic and social practice development, the future research should serve the national strategy of new-type urbanization and rural rejuvenation. Besides, the multi-disciplinary cross-research, which is led by geography, would be promoted. The theoretical system of rural memory research would be constructed. The integration of rural memory research content from the perspective of global-local nexus would be expanded. And the multi-analysis method which combines traditional and emerging methods would be used.
空间、记忆与地域诗学传承: 以广州南园和岭南诗歌的互动为例
[J].
Space, memory and inheritance of regional poetry: Based on interaction between Nanyuan Garden in Guangzhou and poems of Lingnan
非虚构写作与中国记忆: 文学与历史学跨学科对话
[J].
Non-fiction writing and Chinese memory: An interdisciplinary dialogue between literature and history
传说·历史·历史记忆: 从20世纪的新史学到后现代史学
[J].
Legend, history and historical memory: From the new historical studies in the 20th century to postmodern historical studies
中国“城市记忆”理论与实践述评
[J].
A review on the theory and practice of city memory in China
近年来我国档案与记忆研究综述
[J].
Research overview on archive and memory in recent years
The construction and destruction of a colonial landscape: Monuments to British monarchs in Dublin before and after independence
[J].DOI:10.1006/jhge.2002.0441 URL [本文引用: 1]
The aesthetics of absence: Rebuilding Ground Zero
[J].
DOI:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.311
URL
[本文引用: 1]
In this article, I examine the narratives and meanings that have been projected onto the space of Ground Zero in New York City since September 11, 2001, how they have been deployed for various political agendas, and how they have informed the ways in which the site will be rebuilt and memorialized. I investigate the changing meanings attributed to the dust and the footprints of the World Trade Center buildings and the debates over architectural designs and the proposed memorial.
Curating the selective memory of gentrification: The Wulixiang Shikumen Museum in Xintiandi, Shanghai
[J].DOI:10.1080/13527258.2020.1821237 URL [本文引用: 1]
Homage to a new town in an old one: Dequel's bust of Pier Paolo Vergerio il Giovane
[J].
Personal encounters with trees: The lived significance of the private urban forest
[J].
The street as locus of collective memory
[J].
DOI:10.1068/d55j
URL
[本文引用: 1]
In discussing the role of streets and urban spaces as a locus of collective memory, I draw a distinction between overt commemoration of public memory and the accumulation of group memories in the setting of the everyday street. Community struggles over postwar street clearances stimulated interest in the physical layout of the public realm as a gestalt for shared memory, a theme of earlier work on memory and urbanism by Maurice Halbwachs. I show how Aldo Rossi and colleagues put the concept onto a practical footing by making morphological analysis the basis for urban infill, repair, and extension, most ambitiously and controversially in the ‘critical reconstruction’ of modern Berlin.
Kitsch geographies and the everyday spaces of social memory
[J].
DOI:10.1068/a3866
URL
[本文引用: 1]
Given recent developments in retheorising the spatialities of memory, in this study I move beyond established foci upon monuments and fixed sites of memory to consider some of the more ordinary places where memory erupts. In contrast to the high-profile, waterfront regeneration projects that often draw academic attention, I focus upon one of the more routine docklands that are less regularly analysed—namely ‘Victoria Dock Village’ in Hull. I discuss the ways a maritime-heritage aesthetic was employed by the developers to brand and market this site. Thereafter, I discuss how residents negotiated these aesthetics and a sense of local heritage through two planning debates. To do this I adapt recent reconceptualisations of kitsch in critical and material culture studies. These reconceptualisations take a category that academics have dismissed traditionally as vulgar, banal, ‘low’ culture, and suggest that the repetitive familiarity, reassuring predictability, and nostalgic sentimentality of kitsch prove comforting in an increasingly uncertain, disembedded world. I explore the degree to which residents engage with these kitsch landscapes, and whether they feel more rooted as a consequence. I also suggest that a greater emphasis upon everyday understandings of more ordinary places may contribute to wider analyses of how place identities are constructed and continually remade by the quotidian practices and negotiation of social memory.
Collective memory and urban regeneration in urban spaces: Reproducing memories in Baharestan Square, city of Tehran, Iran
[J].
Looking forward, looking back: Collective memory and neighborhood identity in two urban parks
[J].DOI:10.1002/symb.2017.40.issue-1 URL [本文引用: 1]
Social-ecological memory in urban gardens: Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001 URL [本文引用: 1]
Memory, uncertainty and industrial ruination: Walker riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne
[J].DOI:10.1111/ijur.2010.34.issue-2 URL [本文引用: 1]
Mining memories in a rural community: Landscape, temporality and place identity
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.005 URL [本文引用: 1]
Urban memory: History and amnesia in the modern city
[M].
Collective city memory: Field experience on the effect of urban computing on community
[C]//
“城市记忆工程”: 档案部门传承与建构社会记忆的亮点工程
[J].
"The urban memory project": A highlight project of inheriting and constructing social memory carried by archives
传统聚落文化景观基因的符号机制
[J].
DOI:10.11821/dlxb202004009
[本文引用: 1]
传统聚落文化景观基因是解读传统聚落景观蕴含的深层次地学特征的重要切入点。然而该理论目前尚未从符号学的视角探索文化景观基因的符号机制。对此,本文首先从符号哲学的视角系统地分析了文化景观基因的特征:① 文化景观基因是宏观的聚落意象与微观的细节特征、物质外观表征与内在文化寓意、整体性特征与局部自我更新、定性与定量分析方法、优势性与内涵丰富性的辩证统一;② 文化景观基因有着多样的形态特征和复杂的空间结构,具有非线性、自组织和自迭代的重要特征。其次,论文探索了文化景观基因符号机制的概念,论述了文化景观基因的符号特征、分类和相应的表达方法,明确了构建文化景观基因符号的理论依据。最后,运用VC#.net程序语言开发了文化景观基因符号库原型程序,并给出了相应的实例。本文研究工作表明,开展文化景观基因符号机制的探索,对于完善传统聚落文化景观基因理论,促进文化景观基因资源的数字化等深化应用,具有重要的意义。
The semiotic mechanism of cultural landscape genes of traditional settlements
DOI:10.11821/dlxb202004009
[本文引用: 1]
The concept of cultural landscape genes of traditional settlements (CLGTS) was proposed by Chinese scholars in 2003. Since then, CLGTS has been playing a key role in capturing the deep-level geographic features of traditional settlements. However, there is a lack of work on covering CLGTS from the perspective of semiotics. Now, people are often involved in difficulties when they are trying to explore the nature of cultural landscapes of traditional settlements through using CLGTS. Obviously, it is of great significance to explore the concepts and methods of semiotic mechanism of CLGTS under the support of semiology. To lock this issue, we outline the dialectical features of CLGTS through the following five aspects. (1) For a given traditional settlement, its whole image at the macro-scale is in accordance with its cultural landscape genes at the micro-scale. (2) For the cultural landscape gene of a given traditional settlement, its core characterizations are in accordance with its appearance features. (3) For a given traditional settlement, its self-updating mechanism at local scale is in accordance with its global characterizations. (4) CLGTS can be treated as the scientific analysis method merged with the quantitative and qualitative approaches for dissecting the cultural features of traditional settlements. (5) For a given traditional settlement, its outstanding features of cultural landscape are in accordance with its rich cultural connotation. Then, this work proves the diversity of forms and complexity of spatial structures of CLGTS through ample examples. To some extent, this reveals the nonlinearity, self-organization, as well as self-iteration features of CLGTS. Based on the above, this research presents a conceptual framework of semiotic mechanism of CLGTS. Within the framework, we further summarize the symbols' main features, classifications, and expression ways of CLGTS. Through this work, we make clear the requisite theoretical conditions of making symbols of CLGTS by employing GIS. Ultimately, based on the aforementioned conceptual framework, this paper develops a prototype program for making symbols of CLGTS. The test results of the prototype program with a case of ancient village of Hunan Province show that it can run well in serving to establish a symbol database of CLGTS for a given region. Hence, this research proves that semiotic mechanism of CLGTS will make sense of perfecting the theory of CLGTS and forwarding its digital protection.
传统村落景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应: 以侗族村寨为例
[J].
DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.05.593
[本文引用: 1]
将侗族传统村落景观基因识别为鼓楼、萨坛、围鼓楼布局、杉山溪田等的基础上,建构结构方程模型,通过对通道芋头、黎平肇兴、三江高定3个侗寨的272份调查数据分析发现:① 侗寨景观的4个基因均对地方认同建构产生积极作用,且呈现“萨坛>围鼓楼布局>杉山溪田>鼓楼”强弱顺序;② 景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应是意向认同>情感认同>认知认同;③ 在地方认同测量模型中,居住时间、出生地、职业、收入、村落发展、教育程度、居民类型、鼓楼、萨坛、围鼓楼布局、杉山溪田等因素对地方认同的影响明显;④ 在个人特征、社会经济、景观基因3个测量模型中,居住时间对个人特征影响最明显,村落发展对社会经济影响最强,萨坛对景观基因感知贡献最大;⑤ 个人特征、社会经济因素共变后通过景观基因感知对地方认同产生间接效应。
The effect of traditional village landscape genes in construction place identity: Taking the Dong Mininortiy Village as an example
DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.05.593
[本文引用: 1]
The interpretation of inheritance and development of traditional village culture is inseparable from the interpretation of village landscape. It is important to explore the role of the Dong Mininortiy Village Landscape gene in construction of place identity to the national cultural heritage protection. Based on recognition of Dong Mininortiy traditional village landscape gene as Drum Tower, Sa Altar, surrounded Drum tower layout, and China fir paddy field, this article studies the effect of landscape gene in construction place identity relyling on construction structural equation model with 272 questionnaires in Tongdao Taro, Zhaoxing in Liping, Gaoding in Sanjiang. 1) Village landscape gene has an active effect on construction place identity, and the order is Sa altar > surrounded Drum tower layout > China fir paddy > Drum Tower; 2) Effect of landscape gene in construction place identity is the intention identity > emotional identity > recognition identity; 3) In the measurement model of place identity, the following factors have obvious influence on place identity, as residence time, birthplace, occupation, income, level of education, the development of villages, residents type, Drum Tower, Sa Altar, surrounded Drum tower layout, China fir paddy, ect.; 4) In the three measurement models of the personal characteristics, social economy and landscape gene, individual living time has the most influence on personal characteristics, village development has the strongest influence on the social economy, and Sa Altar has the greatest contribution to landscape gene perception; 5) Personal characteristics and social economy have indirect effects on the place identity through the landscape gene sense.
城镇化进程中历史街区的空间重构与文化实践: 广州永庆坊案例
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.015
[本文引用: 1]
在新时代的城镇建设中,中国倡导发展具有历史记忆和文化脉络的新型城镇。历史街区是地方历史文化得以延续的载体,其更新改造是落实新型城镇化战略的重要内容。论文以空间生产理论作为理论框架,对广州永庆坊空间重构过程和主体文化实践进行剖析。研究发现:文化是永庆坊改造得以推进的关键因素,其文化价值得到官方认可后,开始在文化保护的框架下开展了更新改造工作。更新改造后的永庆坊由原来的居住空间转变为文化消费空间,本土文化与外来文化的杂糅对外来游客文化体验满意度造成一定负面影响。在永庆坊的更新改造案例中,文化作为重要能动力量参与历史街区多主体的空间生产,这在一定程度上丰富了空间生产的文化维度。从实践层面上看,这一案例对落实新型城镇化战略具有参考意义,在城镇化建设中应构建具有地方历史文化特色的新型城镇。
Spatial reconstruction and cultural practice of the regeneration of historic blocks in the process of urbanization: A case study of Yongqing Fang, Guangzhou City
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.015
[本文引用: 1]
During the process of urban construction in the new era, the Chinese government advocates for the development of beautiful towns and cities with historic memories and cultural context. The renewal and development of historic blocks, which are the carrier of local history and culture, is a vital part of implementing the new urbanization strategy. Based on Foucault's and Harvey's theories of the production of space, this research analyzed the process of spatial reconstruction and subjects' cultural practice of Yongqing Fang, Guangzhou City. We found that culture was a crucial factor for the smooth transformation of Yongqing Fang. With the efforts of the residents with cultural identity and other social agents, the cultural value was officially recognized and protected. Hence, the renewal of Yonqing Fang could be gradually carried out under the framework of cultural protection. After the renewal, Yongqing Fang was transformed from a living space to a cultural consumption space, where cultural production and consumption showed a high degree of commercialization. The local culture was mixed with exotic culture, resulting in low satisfaction of tourists' cultural experience. The case of Yongqing Fang highlights culture as an active factor that directly plays a role in the multi-subject spatial production of historic districts, which enriches the theory of spatial production from the perspective of culture. This case is of reference for the implementation of the new urbanization strategy. In the process of urbanization, we should build towns and cities with locally historic and cultural characteristics.
时光轴里的旅游体验: 历史文化街区日常生活的集体记忆表征及景观化凝视
[J].
The space-time Axis of tourist experience: The representation and landscape gaze of collective memory regarding everyday life in historical streets
滨水区工业遗产保护与城市记忆延续研究: 以杭州运河拱宸桥西工业遗产为例
[J].
DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.02.183
[本文引用: 1]
工业遗产是社会工业文化的重要表征,承载着城市近现代化发展过程中的文化历史景观和记忆,为城市保留和建构了社会公共记忆的空间与素材。产业结构的转型和文脉保护意识的觉醒,使得滨水区遗存和集聚的码头、仓库、工厂成为近现代工业遗产。以杭州运河拱宸桥西工业遗产的博物馆化发展模式为案例,重点解析和梳理了滨水区工业遗产通过形态保护全面化、功能定位平民化、遗产展示活态化、运作机制创新化和展陈手法数字化等措施,有效延续城市记忆。最后,将杭州运河工业遗产的城市记忆延续归纳为“双层模式”,并访谈了多利益主体对其的评价,以期为未来类似研究提供一个比较参考。
Waterfront industrial heritage protection and prolonging the spirit of the city: A case study of the industrial heritage area in the west side of Gongchen Bridge
港口城市的集体记忆“码头遗产”: 以上海为例
[J].
Study on collective memories in port cities: A case study of Shanghai
习近平关于乡愁重要论述的核心要义与现实价值
[J].
The core thoughts and realistic value of Xi Jinping's important expositions on nostalgia
制造地理视角下乡村传统工艺类非物质文化遗产的生产实践
[J].
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.11.010
[本文引用: 1]
随着西方第三次工艺复兴浪潮的兴起,“制造文化”成为西方地理学者关注的新兴话题,而传统工艺制造的具身和物质层面的生产形式也得到关注。论文以传统工艺类非物质文化遗产——贵州安顺石头寨布依族蜡染技艺为例,基于制造地理的理论视角剖析了布依族蜡染的生产实践。研究发现:蜡染生产是一种具身性、物质性、地方性和关系性的实践。在身体、家庭、工坊、社区和线上等不同空间,手工艺人的身体是蜡染生产实践的主体,通过具身练习提升蜡染技能,并充分发挥能动性对产品进行创新,同时制造实践也引发了手工艺人正面或负面的身体体验;蜡染生产流程具有鲜明的物质性特征,物质的活力和能动性引导着手工艺人进行“人与物质”的合作生产;地方自然环境、传统文化等地方要素是蜡染生产的基础和条件,同时蜡染的生产实践又塑造地方的身份和特性;蜡染生产不仅是手工艺人表达自我的创造性实践,同时建构了特定的社会文化关系。研究有助于加强对经济生产实践中的文化维度的关注,为文化经济的理论研究提供了重要实证,同时通过对手工艺人的身体技能、具身体验等方面的关注,也有助于在非遗保护实践中提供更具关怀性的保障措施。
Production practice of rural traditional craft intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of geographies of making
DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.11.010
[本文引用: 1]
With the rise of the third wave of craft revival in the West, "making culture" has become an emerging topic concerned by Western geographers, and the embodiment and material production forms of traditional craft making have also received attention. This research selected Shitouzhai Bouyei batik, a traditional craft intangible cultural heritage in Guizhou Province as a case study. Based on the perspective of geographies of making, we analyzed the production practice of Bouyei batik. The research found that batik production is an embodied, material, local, and relational practice. In different spaces such as human body, family, workshop, community, and online, the body of the craftsman is the subject of the batik production practice and through embodied practice, the batik skills can be improved, and the products can be innovated by using their agency. The making practice also shapes the body of the craftsman, resulting in positive or negative embodied experience. The batik production process has distinct material characteristics, and the agency of materials guide a craftsman to carry out human and material cooperative production; Local elements such as local natural environment and traditional culture are the basis and conditions of batik production, and the production practice of batik also shapes the identity and characteristics of the place; Batik production is not only a creative practice for craftsmen to express themselves, but also to construct a specific sociocultural relations. The research helps to strengthen the attention to the cultural dimension in the practice of economic production, and provides important empirical evidence for the theoretical study of cultural economy. By paying attention to the physical skills and embodied experience of the craftsmen, it also helps to provide more caring safeguards in the practice of intangible cultural heritage protection.
作为时间概念的城市: 记忆与乌托邦的两个维度
[J].
City as a conception of time: On its two dimensions of memory and utopia
乡村文化记忆资源的“文—旅”协同评价模型与应用: 以苏州金庭镇为例
[J].
DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200705
[本文引用: 1]
乡村文化记忆资源是乡村“文—旅”协同的链接点。基于文化记忆理论从文化信息层、物质载体层与社会行为层解析其内涵和协同框架,构建“文—旅”空间协调度、文化记忆连续性和旅游市场认同度的协同评价模型,以苏州金庭镇为例进行实证分析。结果表明:(1)时间格局上,旅游景点与生活生产类空间关联性不断提升,与功能象征类空间依赖减弱,与社会表征类和精神意识类空间关系有所降低但维持高度耦合水平。(2)空间格局上,与生活生产类空间呈极核带状格局,与其余三类空间呈现一核多极格局。(3)旅游景点与生活生产类空间协同关系从“文—旅”空间协调度、文化记忆连续性转向旅游市场认同度为主导,其余空间以“文—旅”空间协调度为主导。(4)影响协同关系的机制包括记忆延续与文化交融、空间优化与旅游融合和社会支持与政策保障等。研究结论可为乡村旅游地的文化振兴和文旅融合提供理论指导和应用模式。
Establishment and application of "culture-tourism" synergies assessment model of rural cultural memory resources: A case study of Jinting Town in Suzhou
DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200705
[本文引用: 1]
Rural cultural revitalization is an important part of the strategy of rural revitalization in the New Era. Rural cultural memory resources are the key point of "culture-tourism" synergies in rural tourism destinations. Based on cultural memory theory, we define the concepts of rural cultural memory resources, and construct a "culture-tourism" synergies evaluation model. The "culture-tourism" synergies of rural cultural memory resources involve the comprehensive coordination of cultural information layer, material carrier layer and social behavior layer, so as to construct a three-dimensional evaluation model of "culture-tourism" coordination, cultural memory continuity and tourism market recognition. Taking Jinting town in Suzhou as a typical example, this study evaluates its "culture-tourism" synergies and discusses its spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing mechanism. The results show that: (1) In different stages of tourism development in the study area, the dependence on the construction of scenic spots and the spaces of life and production has been continuously enhanced, the dependence on the functional symbol spaces has been weakened, and the relationship with the social representation spaces and the spiritual consciousness spaces has been reduced, but the level of coupling coordination has been maintained. (2) The "culture-tourism" synergies of rural cultural memory resources show that half of the area of life and production spaces reaches a medium and high level of coupling coordination, presenting a pole-core & zonal pattern. With the other three types of space, one third of them has reached the level of medium and high coupling coordination, showing a pattern of one core and multiple poles. (3) The synergies between the rural cultural memory resources and scenic spots are as follows: the living and production space is dominated by "culture-tourism" spatial coordination, cultural memory continuity, and gradually turns to tourism market recognition as the dominant form, and other types of space are always dominated by "culture-tourism" spatial coordination. These synergies are influenced by the multiple driving mechanisms as memory continuity and cultural integration, spatial optimization and tourism integration, and social support and policy guarantee. The research results provide theoretical guidance and application model for the cultural revitalization and "culture-tourism" integration of rural tourism destinations.
Memory in a global age: Discourses, practices and trajectories
[M].
Sustainable regeneration through the cultural conversion of urban heritage
[J].As the industrial structure rapidly changed, the buildings and facilities at the helm of the previous industrialization era lost their original functions and became idle. These spaces contain elements of local history, culture, and time and provide the basis for this study. Therefore, it focuses on the role of a city’s sustainable media if they are converted to fit the city’s social and local context. In this study, we examine sustainable regeneration by adopting the methodology of the “new directions in planning theory” method, which means a contradictory approach to the sustainable values of long-standing industrial heritages from both physical and cognitive perspectives. We argue that its physical appearance, landscaping, and tectonic relation, composed of a specific spectrum of time accumulation, help people experience a sense of collective memory. In this way, a sense of time and place are embedded in materiality and are important to consider when moving toward urban sustainability. Our findings have implications for a new perspective on concrete regeneration strategies.
Touring memories of the erased city: Memory, tourism and notions of 'home'
[J].DOI:10.1080/14616688.2014.1000957 URL [本文引用: 1]
Tourism and the dynamics of transnational mnemonic encounters
[J].
DOI:10.1177/1750698019856059
URL
[本文引用: 1]
The turn towards transnational memory has largely focused on particular sites and modes of remembering, focusing on the creation of memories between and beyond nation-states in institutional politics, the media, migration and to a lesser degree social movements. Despite its significance for encountering other people’s past, international tourism remains under-examined in the scholarship due to a focus on macro-developments, a polarisation along a binary of cosmopolitan versus conflictive memories and a discounting of memories shaped by commercialised logics. Drawing on a case study of Russian tourism in Tallinn, Estonia, this article makes the case for a closer examination of tourist encounters as part of research on transnational memory. It examines how tourism works as an arena for the production and circulation of memories through direct transnational encounters, refracting and modifying macro-political memories within a commercialised service environment. We analyse the role of tour guides as mnemonic intermediaries and show how in their work with Russian tourists they navigate pasts that form the subject of on-going memory conflicts at the level of international politics. Their representational strategies deemphasise contested pasts and avoid conflicts through neutrality and compromise. At the same time, tourist encounters can also be used to create spaces for dialogue and the formation of positive relations. Overall, the article demonstrates both the productivity and frictions of tourist settings for transnational remembering and makes the case for considering more ambiguous cases in transnational memory research.
The role of tourism in the production of cultural memory: The case of 'homesick tourism' in Poland
[J].
DOI:10.1177/1750698015591871
URL
[本文引用: 1]
Individual and collective forms of memory are driving forces behind the phenomenon of ‘homesick tourism’, the journeys undertaken by German expellees and refugees to their former homes in what is now Poland. Based on a content analysis of travel reports written by homesick tourists, this article applies concepts and theoretical approaches in the field of Memory Studies to the field of tourism, arguing that travelling can be considered an extension of the process of remembering. With reference to specific examples, it is illustrated how the encounter of ‘personal memory sites’ impacts autobiographical memory and how the activities of the homesick tourists and the transnational exchange and circulation of memory facilitated through personal contacts contributes to the emergence of new discourses about the past and ultimately the production of cultural memory.
Heritage: Critical approaches
[J].DOI:10.1177/1750698014534789 URL [本文引用: 1]
Muslim minorities as Germany's past future: Islam critics, holocaust memory, and immigrant integration
[J].
DOI:10.1177/1750698019856057
URL
[本文引用: 1]
A new cohort of Turkish- and Arab-background public intellectuals in Germany locate the root of problems of migrant communities in a resemblance between Islamic culture and Nazi ideology. Islam critics promote the idea that if, like the children of Nazis before them, children of Muslims can rebel against their fathers sexually liberate themselves, they will also be able to embrace the democratic values of German society. In their best-seller books, Islam critics aim to include migrants in the German national temporal framework and also enable a new interpretation of German history not as an anomaly, an evolutionary modernization story gone terribly wrong, but as an historical model that other nationalities should also pass through and come out of. By studying how highly popular Islam critics position Muslims in relation to memory of National Socialism in Germany, this article asks what kind of transformation (and reproduction) is German Holocaust memory and public political culture is undergoing in its perception of its relationship with its Nazi past on one hand and its multi-ethnic present and future on the other hand. It also asks what role Muslims and other minorities play in shaping, reacting to, and corresponding with these transformations. By focusing on the unlikely promise of inclusion of the Muslim minority in the German national temporality through path-dependent repetition, it argues that national memory cultures are formed in relation to and with the help of minorities who are being simultaneously incorporated and excluded from the present at once.
Street naming and the politics of belonging: Spatial injustices in the toponymic commemoration of Martin Luther King Jr
[J].
From collection to community to collections again: Urban Indigenous women, material culture and belonging
[J].
DOI:10.1177/1359183515610362
URL
[本文引用: 1]
First Story Toronto – a community organization dedicated to the Indigenous histories of Toronto, Canada – is steward to a collection of items mostly made and collected during the 20th century. With origins in the Anglican Church Women, the collection reflects a time when policies and actions of the state and churches internalized colonial processes within Canada. Yet the donation of the ACW material to a Native woman and housing advocate in 1976 hints at the shifting political and cultural contexts of this collection. Native crafts were used by Indigenous women in the city in displays of both Indigenous sovereignty and multiculturalism. Recently, the collection has been taken up by another group of Indigenous women in the Memory, Meaning-Making and Collections project. Handling sessions with artefacts and ‘talking circles’, initially designed to research the role of objects in collective memory and life-history processes, have been appropriated by the participating seniors toward their own goals. The collection has become a source of continuing education, sparking the women to teach and learn beadwork and quillwork; compare life experiences among urban Indigenous people; question history-making processes; and visit museum stores to handle collections and learn with curators. The histories intersecting with this collection thus push back against a range of tropes, provide more nuanced insights into the lives and values of urban Indigenous women in Canada, and the ways collections are used in articulations of belonging among Indigenous peoples.
Integrating heritage assets in large commercial complexes: De-contextualization and re-signification of memory in Shanghai
[J].
/
〈 |
|
〉 |
