研究专题:京津冀协同发展

城市地理研究中的单分形、多分形和自仿射分形

  • 陈彦光
展开
  • 北京大学城市与环境学院城市与经济地理系,北京 100871

作者简介:陈彦光(1965— ),男,河南罗山人,教授,博士,从事城市和理论地理学研究。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2018-02-25

  要求修回日期: 2018-07-06

  网络出版日期: 2019-01-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41671167)

Monofractal, multifractals, and self-affine fractals in urban studies

  • CHEN Yanguang
Expand
  • Department of Urban and Economic Geography, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received date: 2018-02-25

  Request revised date: 2018-07-06

  Online published: 2019-01-22

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41671167.

Copyright

《地理科学进展》杂志 版权所有

摘要

分形几何学在城市地理研究中具有广泛的应用,然而很多基本概念却让初学者感到迷惑。如何区分单分形、自仿射分形与多分形,是一个基本而重要的问题。简单分形容易理解,而真实的地理现象很少是单分形的。城市生长过程具有自仿射特征,而城市空间格局却具有多分形性质。作者发现,各种分形的共性在于三个方面:标度律、分数维和熵守恒。论文基于标度、分维和熵守恒公式,借助隐喻城市生长的规则分形来区分单分形、多分形和自仿射分形,讨论分形系统演化的机理、分形与空间自相关和空间异质性的联系,同时澄清一些在地理分形研究中的常见错误概念。最后以城市位序-规模分布为例,说明并对比单分形和多分形在城市地理研究中的建模与应用思路。

本文引用格式

陈彦光 . 城市地理研究中的单分形、多分形和自仿射分形[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019 , 38(1) : 38 -49 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.01.004

Abstract

Fractal geometry provides a powerful tool for scale-free spatial modeling and analyses in geography. However, a number of basic concepts are puzzling. The three common fractals, that is, monofractal (unifractal), multifractals, and self-affine fractal, are often misunderstood by students of geography. This article clarifies some confusing fractal concepts for urban fractal modeling and fractal dimension analysis. Using simple mathematical models based on three growing fractals that bear an analogy to urban growth, we can distinguish the three types of common fractal structure. The similarities and differences between monofractal, multifractals, and self-affine fractal are as follows: 1) A monofractal is a simple self-similar fractal that bears only one scaling factor (scaling ratio), and a multifractal object is a complex fractal system that bears at least two scaling factors for different parts. Each scaling factor dominates all different scales and is independent of directions and levels. 2) A self-affine fractal bears different scaling factors in different directions of growth or at different levels of scales. The basic feature of self-affine growing fractal is anisotropy, which differs from the isotropic self-similar growing fractals. 3) Both self-affine fractal and multifractals may possess two scaling factors, but there are essential differences between self-affine fractals and multifractals. A self-affine fractal often takes on the form of bi-fractals, which can be reflected by two scaling ranges on a log-log plot. However, there is only one scaling range for a multifractal pattern. As an example, two-scaling fractal modeling is applied to the rank-size distributions of cities to illustrate the concept of urban multifractals. By comparison with these multifractal models, we can better understand monofractals and self-affine fractals in geographical research.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

[1]
陈彦光. 2008. 分形城市系统: 标度、对称和空间复杂性 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社.

[Chen Y G.2008. Fractal urban systems: Scaling, symmetry, and spatial complexity. Beijing, China: Science Press. ]

[2]
陈彦光. 2015. 简单、复杂与地理分布模型的选择[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(3): 321-329.地理分布的数学建模是空间分析的基本途径之一,但空间维度建模素为科学研究的难题。由于数学新方法的发展和复杂性研究的兴起,地理空间建模的一些传统困难有望解决。本文通过两类地理分布的对比分析,论述地理建模的关键在于简单分布的特征尺度和复杂分布的标度。地理分布包括空间分布和规模分布,其本质均为概率分布和广义的数学空间分布,而概率分布可以分为简单分布和复杂分布。简单分布具有特征尺度,平均值有效,概率结构清楚;复杂分布没有特征尺度,平均值无效,概率结构不明确。对于简单分布,应该采用有尺度分布函数开展尺度分析;对于复杂分布,理当采用无尺度分布函数开展标度分析。分形几何学、异速生长理论和无尺度网络理论都是复杂系统分析的定量方法,这些方法的综合集成,可望为地理分布建模和地理系统的空间分析提供有效的数理工具。

[Chen Y G.2015. Simplicty, complexity, and mathematical modeling of geographical distributions. Progress in Geography, 34(3): 321-329. ]

[3]
陈彦光. 2017. 城市形态的分维估算与分形判定[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(5): 529-539.

[Chen Y G.2017. Approaches to estimating fractal dimension and identifying fractals of urban form. Progress in Geography, 36(5): 529-539. ]

[4]
陈勇, 陈嵘, 艾南山, 等. 1993. 城市规模分布的分形研究[J]. 经济地理, 13(3): 48-53.

[Chen Y, Chen R, Ai N S, et al.1993. On the fractal property of city-size distributions. Economical Geography, 13(3): 48-53. ]

[5]
王放, 李后强. 1995. 非线性人口学导论 [M]. 成都: 四川大学出版社.

[Wang F, Li Q.1995. Introduction to nonlinear demography . Chengdu, China: Sichuan University Press. ]

[6]
周一星. 1998. 主要经济联系方向论[J]. 城市规划, 22(2): 22-25.

[Zhou Y X.1998. Major directions of economic linkages: Some theoretical considerations. City Planning Review, 22(2): 22-25. ]

[7]
朱晓华. 2007. 地理空间信息的分形与分维 [M]. 北京: 测绘出版社.

[Zhu X H.2007. Fractals and fractal dimensions of spatial geo-information . Beijing, China: Surveying and Mapping Press. ]

[8]
Anselin L.1996. The moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association[M]// Fischer M, Scholten H J, Unwin D. Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS. London, UK: Taylor & Francis: 111-125.

[9]
Appleby S.1996. Multifractal characterization of the distribution pattern of the human population[J]. Geographical Analysis, 28(2): 147-160.

[10]
Ariza-Villaverde A B, Jimenez-Hornero F J, De Rave E G.2013. Multifractal analysis of axial maps applied to the study of urban morphology[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 38: 1-10.

DOI

[11]
Batty M, Longley P A.1994. Fractal cities: A geometry of form and function [M]. London, UK: Academic Press.

[12]
Batty M.2010. Space, scale, and scaling in entropy maximizing[J]. Geographical Analysis, 42(4): 395-421.

DOI

[13]
Benguigui L, Blumenfeld-Lieberthal E, Czamanski D.2006. The dynamics of the Tel Aviv morphology[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(2): 269-284.

DOI

[14]
Benguigui L, Daoud M.1991. Is the suburban railway system a fractal?[J]. Geographical Analysis, 23(4): 362-368.

[15]
Chen Y G.2011. Derivation of the functional relations between fractal dimension and shape indices of urban form[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(6): 442-451.

DOI

[16]
Chen Y G.2012a. The rank-size scaling law and entropy-maximizing principle[J]. Physica A, 391(3): 767-778.

DOI

[17]
Chen Y G.2012b. Zipf's law, 1/f noise, and fractal hierarchy[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 45(1): 63-73.

[18]
Chen Y G.2015. The distance-decay function of geographical gravity model: Power law or exponential law?[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 77: 174-189.

[19]
Chen Y G.2016. The evolution of Zipf's law indicative of city development[J]. Physica A, 443: 555-567.

DOI

[20]
Chen Y G, Lin J Y.2009. Modeling the self-affine structure and optimization conditions of city systems using the idea from fractals[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 41(2): 615-629.

[21]
Chen Y G, Wang J J.2013. Multifractal characterization of urban form and growth: The case of Beijing[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(5): 884-904.

DOI

[22]
Chen Y G, Zhou Y X.2003. The rank-size rule and fractal hierarchies of cities: Mathematical models and empirical analyses[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(6): 799-818.

DOI

[23]
Chen Y G, Zhou Y X.2004. Multi-fractal measures of city-size distributions based on the three-parameter Zipf model[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 22(4): 793-805.

[24]
Cheng Q.1995. The perimeter-area fractal model and its application in geology[J]. Mathematical Geology, 27(1): 69-82.

DOI

[25]
Couclelis H.1997. From cellular automata to urban models: New principles for model development and implementation[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(2): 165-174.

DOI

[26]
Feder J.1988. Fractals [M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.

[27]
Frankhauser P.1994. The fractal aspects of urban structures[M]. Paris, French: Economica.

[28]
Frankhauser P.1998. The fractal approach: A new tool for the spatial analysis of urban agglomerations[J]. Population: An English Selection, 10(1): 205-240.

[29]
Goodchild M F, Mark D M.1987. The fractal nature of geographical phenomena[J]. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 77(2): 265-278.

DOI

[30]
Goodchild M F.1980. Fractals and the accuracy of geographical measures[J]. Mathematical Geology, 12(2): 85-98.

DOI

[31]
Goodchild M F.2004. GIScience, geography, form, and process[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4): 709-714.

[32]
Grassberger P.1983. Generalized dimensions of strange attractors[J]. Physics Letters A, 97(6): 227-230.

DOI

[33]
Halsey T C, Jensen M H, Kadanoff L P, et al.1986. Fractal measure and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets[J]. Physical Review A, 33: 1141-1151.

DOI

[34]
Hentschel H E, Procaccia I.1983. The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors[J]. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 8: 435-444.

DOI

[35]
Hurst H E, Black R P, Simaika Y M.1965. Long-term storage: An experimental study[M]. London, UK: Constable.

[36]
Imre A R, Bogaert J.2004. The fractal dimension as a measure of the quality of habitat[J]. Acta Biotheoretica, 52(1): 41-56.

DOI

[37]
Jullien R, Botet R.1987. Aggregation and fractal aggregates [M]. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

[38]
Lam N S-N, De Cola L.1993. Fractals in geography[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall.

[39]
Longley P A, Batty M, Shepherd J.1991. The size, shape and dimension of urban settlements[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16(1): 75-94.

DOI

[40]
Mandelbrot B B.1982. The fractal geometry of nature[M]. New York, USA: W. H. Freeman and Company.

[41]
Murcio R, Masucci A P, Arcaute Eet al.2015. Multifractal to monofractal evolution of the London street network[J]. Physical Review E, 92: 062130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE. 92.062130.

[42]
Stanley H E, Meakin P.1988. Multifractal phenomena in physics and chemistry[J]. Nature, 335: 405-409.

DOI

[43]
Tobler W.2004. On the first law of geography: A reply[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2): 304-310.

DOI

[44]
Vicsek T.1989. Fractal growth phenomena [M]. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

[45]
Wang J F, Liu X H, Peng L, et al.2012. Cities evolution tree and applications to predicting urban growth[J]. Population & Environment, 33(2-3): 186-201.

[46]
White R, Engelen G.1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns[J]. Environment and Planning A, 25(8): 1175-1199.

DOI

[47]
White R, Engelen G.1994. Urban systems dynamics and cellular automata: Fractal structures between order and chaos[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 4(4): 563-583.

[48]
Wilson A G.2000. Complex spatial systems: The modelling foundations of urban and regional analysis[M]. Singapore: Pearson Education.

[49]
Wilson A G.2010. Entropy in urban and regional modelling: Retrospect and prospect[J]. Geographical Analysis, 42(4): 364-394.

DOI

文章导航

/