地表过程

黄土丘陵区地表水和地下水对降水的响应——以康沟小流域为例

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京100049;
    3. 中国科学院水土保持研究所, 杨陵712100
党丽娟(1988-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水文与水资源等领域的研究工作。E-mail: danglijuan@gmail.com

收稿日期: 2010-10-01

  修回日期: 2011-01-01

  网络出版日期: 2011-01-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40771086);国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD09B10).

Responses of the Surface Water and Groundwater to Precipitation in the Loess Hilly-gully Region:A Case Study of Kanggou Watershed

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Institute of Soil andWater Conservation, CAS, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received date: 2010-10-01

  Revised date: 2011-01-01

  Online published: 2011-01-25

摘要

以“退耕还林”为主体的黄土丘陵区生态环境建设在过去10 年来取得了显著成效。为揭示“退耕还林”政策实施以来黄土丘陵区的降水与地表水和地下水的关系,本文以延安康沟流域为例,根据1997-2006 年延安站的逐日气象数据和康沟流域地表径流、泉水、井水水位实测水文数据,以及康沟流域地形地貌和土地利用等资料,利用相关分析法分析了康沟流域的降水、地表径流及地下水的时空变化特征,探讨了降水与地表水、地下水之间的关系,揭示了地表水和地下水对降水补给响应时间的差异性。分析结果表明:地表径流量与降水量有极好的季节响应关系,地表径流呈现为峰、谷交替曲线形态,降水少的年份出现单峰值,降水多的年份具有双峰值。降水量的多少和季节分配直接影响着井水、泉水的变化,同样降水条件下,井水的变化较泉水更敏感,泉水响应降水的时间大约滞后22~30 天,井水为7~10天。

本文引用格式

党丽娟, 徐勇, 徐学选 . 黄土丘陵区地表水和地下水对降水的响应——以康沟小流域为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011 , 30(1) : 87 -94 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.01.011

Abstract

The construction of eco-system in the loess hilly-gully region which was based on de-farming and afforestation policy has made remarkable improvement in the past decade. To probe into the relationship between precipitation and surface water and groundwater since the de-farming and afforestation policy was implemented, taking the Kanggou watershed in Yanan as an example, based on the daily meteorology data from Yan'an station during 1997-2006, and the actual measured data of runoff, spring flow, well level, landforms and land-use, this study was conducted by correlation analysis and GIS spatial analysis. This paper analysed the spatio-temporal variation of precipitation, surface water and groundwater in Kanggou watershed, explored the relationship between precipitation and surface runoff, and groundwater runoff, and revealed different responses to the precipitation of the surface water and the groundwater. Results are as follows: (1) There is a close connection between runoff and precipitation. The largest surface runoff occurs in the wet season with the peak precipitation. The distribution of precipitation and the surface water is basically consistent all the year. The runoff concentrates in May to September, accounting for 66.83% of the total annual runoff. The surface runoff forms a curve with peak and valley in turns, having a single peak with limited precipitation and double peaks with abundant precipitation. (2) There is a clear difference of surface runoff between morning and afternoon in the same day, and the difference between noon and afternoon is small. The average difference of surface runoff is 21.16 m3/d. The annual surface runoff varies significantly. One of the possible reasons is the difference of the wet year, normal year and dry year caused by the recharge of precipitation, and the other reason is the effects of eco-environment management in recent years. (3) The amount and the seasonal distribution of the precipitation directly affect the springs and wells, and wells are more sensible than springs under the same conditions. The response time of the wells to rainfall recharge is as long as 22 to 30 days, and the response time of springs is only 7 to 10 days. The reason is that groundwater runoff flow in rock gaps and soils is very slow. Also, the groundwater system contains giant storage vacuum, which makes permeation and discharge become limited. So the system relies on the concentrated or discontinuous recharge by precipitation as the only source of the storage, and then recharges to the other aquifers when seasons change.

参考文献

[1] 刘淑燕, 余新晓, 信忠保, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域土地利用变化对水沙关系的影响. 地理科学进展,2010, 29(5): 566-571.

[2] 李景玉, 张楠, 王荣彬. 黄河流域土壤侵蚀产沙模型研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(2): 103-111.

[3] 琚彤军, 刘普灵, 郑世清, 等. 黄土丘陵区生态恢复重建过程中流域降雨及其水沙变化特征研究. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(2): 57-60.

[4] 杨文治. 黄土高原土壤水资源与植树造林. 自然资源学报, 2001,16(5): 433-438.

[5] 史敏华, 李新平. 晋西黄土丘陵沟壑区植被自然恢复及技术对策. 干旱区研究,2003, 20(2):139-143.

[6] 徐勇, 田均良, 沈洪泉, 等. 生态重建模式的评价方法:以黄土丘陵区为例. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 621-628.

[7] 徐勇, 杨波, 刘国彬, 等. 黄土高原作物产量及水土流失地形分异模拟. 地理学报, 2008, 63(11): 1218-1226.

[8] 李子君, 周培祥, 毛丽华. 我国水土保持措施对水资源影响研究综述. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(4): 49-57.

[9] 候喜禄, 曹清玉. 陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区植被减沙效益研究. 水土保持通报, 1990, 10(2): 19-25.

[10] 方海燕, 蔡强国, 陈浩, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区岔巴沟下游泥沙传输时间尺度动态研究. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5): 77-87.

[11] 徐学选, 琚彤军, 郑世清. 延安燕沟流域次降雨泥沙来源分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(3):38-42.

[12] 徐学选, 刘江华, 高鹏, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被的土壤水文效应. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(8): 1347-1351.

[13] 杜丽娟, 柳长顺, 王冬梅. 黄土高原水土流失区森林资源价值核算. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(1): 92-95.

[14] 徐学选, 刘文兆, 高鹏, 等. 黄土丘陵区土壤水分空间分布差异性探讨. 生态环境, 2003, 12(1): 52-55.

[15] 陈建峰. 降雨入渗补给规律的分析研究. 地下水, 2010,32(2): 30-31.

[16] 琚彤军, 刘普灵, 郑世清. 燕儿沟流域泥沙监测初报. 水土保持研究, 2000, 7(2): 176-178.

[17] 刘普灵, 郑世清, 琚彤军, 等. 黄土高原燕沟流域生态环境建设模式及效益研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(3): 175-178.

[18] 徐学选, 刘文兆, 王炜. 黄土丘陵区生态建设对流域水文环境影响研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(2):155-157.

[19] 张玲, 贾在强, 欧阳秋明. 章丘泉水地下水位与降水关系分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(27): 11931-11932,11939.

[20] 史良胜, 蔡树英, 杨金忠. 降水入渗补给系数空间变异性分析. 水资源研究, 2006, 27(9): 1-5.

[21] 王国卿. 柳林泉域降水补给的时滞研究. 地下水, 2007,39(4): 53-55.
文章导航

/