模型应用

公共服务设施可达性及其对新建住房价格 的影响———以北京中心城为例

展开
  • 1. 清华大学房地产研究所, 北京100084|
    2. 英国剑桥大学土地经济系, 剑桥CB2 1QY|
    3. 清华大学建筑学院, 北京100084
王松涛(1980-)| 男, 汉族, 辽宁人, 清华大学房地产研究所与英国剑桥大学土地经济系联合培 养博士生, 研究方向为城市与房地产经济学、住房市场中的政府干预.

收稿日期: 2007-10-01

  修回日期: 2007-11-01

  网络出版日期: 2007-11-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目( 70603017) 资助.清华大学基础研究基金(JC2007001)资助.

Spatial Accessibility of Housing to Public Services and Its Impact on Housing Pr ice: A Case Study of Beijing' s Inner City

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Real Estate Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China|
    2. Department of Land Economics, Cambridge UniversityCambridge CB2 1QY, U.K.|
    3. School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received date: 2007-10-01

  Revised date: 2007-11-01

  Online published: 2007-11-25

摘要

本文基于北京市公共服务设施的地理空间信息数据, 采用最短距离指标定量分析了商品 住房对教育、医疗、体育、文化、商业、绿地公园等6 大类公共服务设施的空间可达性( 以下简称 “可达性”) , 并通过Hedonic 特征价格模型定量分析可达性对商品住房价格的影响。研究结果表 明: 1) 按照“最短距离”可达性比较, 商品住房对绿地公园、医院和健身场所可达性最好, 而对大型 商场、文化设施、体育场馆的可达性较差; 2) 按照商品住房的区位和价格比较, 城市四环以内和高 价商品住房组别对公共服务设施的可达性明显优于其它组别; 3) 特征价格模型的定量分析表明, 重点高中、球类场馆、文化设施和绿地公园这4 种公共服务设施的可达性越好, 则商品住房价格 越高, 即目前北京市公共服务设施的规划布局在一定程度上被资本化入商品住房价格。

本文引用格式

王松涛, 郑思齐, 冯杰 . 公共服务设施可达性及其对新建住房价格 的影响———以北京中心城为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007 , 26(6) : 87 -94 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.06.009

Abstract

Based on the GIS data o f Beijing’s public facilities, this paper evaluates the accessibility of housing to six types of public facilities, namely educational facility, medical care facility, sports facility, culture facility, shopping facility and parks, in Beijing’s inner city. By calculating the Nearest - Distance Accessibility from newly built residential projects to each category of public facilities as well as employing the traditional Hedonic price model, this paper empirically tested the impact of accessibility to public facilities on housing prices. The results of this paper show that, firstly, in terms of Nearest- Distance Accessibility Criteria, parks, hospitals and gyms are the most easily accessible public facilities while shopping centers, culture facilities and Sports Center (as expressed by ‘Game’in the paper) are among the hardest accessible group. Secondly, when grouping the housing units by location and price level, it turns out that houses within 4th Ring Road as well as higher price groups will enjoy better accessibility to public facilities. Third, there exists positive correlation between the accessibility of housing to key high schools, sports centers, cultural facilities and parks and the housing prices, which implies that the externalities of these public facilities shall have well been capitalized into housing prices.

参考文献


[1] 何剑华, 郑思齐. 新建地铁能提升住房价格吗?———以北京地铁13 号线为例. 城市开发, 2004, 6: 36~38.

[2] 王轶军, 郑思齐, 龙奋杰. 城市公共服务的价值估计、受益者分析和融资模式探讨. 城市发展研究, 2007( 4) .

[3] 郑捷奋, 刘洪玉. 深圳地铁建设对站点周边住房价值的影响. 铁道学报, 2005, (10).

[4] 郑思齐, 符育明, 刘洪玉. 城市居民对居住区位的偏好: 支付意愿梯度模型的估计. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(1): 97~104.

[5] 郑思齐, 张文忠. 住房成本与通勤成本的空间互动关系———来自北京市场的微观证据及其宏观含义. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(2): 35~43.

[6] Cheshire P, S Shepherd. On the Price of Land and the Value of Amenities, Economics, 1995, 62(246): 247~267.

[7] Cheshire P, S Shepherd. Estimating the Demand for Housing, Land and Neighborhood Characteristics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1998, 60(3): 357~382.

[8] DiPasquale D, W Wheaton. Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffes, N J.

[9] Kim J, Zhang M. Determining Transit' s Impact on Seoul Commercial Land Values. International Real Estate Review, 2005, 8(1): 1~26.

[10] Julien B, Lanoie P. The effect of noise barriers on the market value of adjacent residential properties. International Real Estate Review, 2007, 10(2): 109~127.

文章导航

/