产业地理集中研究进展
收稿日期: 2005-12-01
修回日期: 2006-02-01
网络出版日期: 2006-03-25
基金资助
国家自然基金资助项目(40401015)阶段性成果.
A Literature Review on Geographical Concentration of Industries
Received date: 2005-12-01
Revised date: 2006-02-01
Online published: 2006-03-25
贺灿飞,刘洋 . 产业地理集中研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006 , 25(2) : 59 -69 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.02.007
The geographical concentration of employments and establishments is pervasive. Companies and plants are not distributed uniformly in space, but rather agglomerate in some places. Both location theories and trade theories could be applied to explain the geographical concentration of industries. Classical and neoclassical location theories emphasize the role of transportation costs, labor costs, demand and locational interdependence in promoting spatial clustering of industries. Behavioralists stress the importance of uncertainties, information and knowledge. Strategic perspectives highlight the strategic interactions between related economic agents in locational decisions. Structural location theories relate industrial locations to industrial organization and industrial linkages. In the existing theoretical literature, three broad families of trade models are related to geographic concentration: the neoclassical trade models, new trade models and new economic geography models. In the neoclassical trade theories, the spatial pattern is formed through inter-industry specialization with industries settling in locations with comparative advantages. New trade models are characterized by increasing returns to scale, product differentiation and monopolistic competition. Scale economies provide regions with incentives to specialize even in the absence of differences in their technology or resoure endowments, and make firms to concentrate their production in a few locations. In the new economic geography models, the distribution of economic activities becomes entirely endoenous. Geographic concentration is driven by the interaction of transportation costs and scale economies, which creates demand and cost linkages. Empirical studies on geographical concentration of industries confirm a variety of significant variables including resource endowment, market demand, internal scale economies, external economies, industrial linkages and trade liberalization.
[1] Weber A. Theory of the Location of Industries. Trans C J. Friedrich. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.
[2] Losch A. The Economics of Location. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1939.
[3] Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 1929, (39): 41~57.
[4] Greenhut M. Plant Location in Theory and in Practice. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1956.
[5] Isard W. Location and Space Economy. New York: John Wiley, 1956.
[6] Webber M J. The Impact of Uncertainty on Location. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1972.
[7] Knickerbocker F T. Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1973.
[8] Scott A. Industrial organization and location: division of labor, the firm and spatial process. Economic Geography, 1986, (63): 215~231.
[9] Ohlin B. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.
[10] Brulhart M. Economic geography, industry location and trade: the evidence . World Economy, 1998, 775~801.
[11] Surico P. Geographic concentration and increasing returns. Journal of Economic Survey, 2004, (17): 693~708.
[12] Krugman P. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 1980, (70): 950~959.
[13] Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 1991, (99): 483~499.
[14] Venables A. Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries. International Economic Review, 1996,37( 2):341~359.
[15] Marshall A. Principles of Economics: An Introductory (9th Ed). London: Macmillan, 1890.
[16] Henderson J V. Efficiency of Resource Usage and City Size. Journal of Urban Economics, 1986, (19): 47~70.
[17] Carlino A. Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Location. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Social Science Division, 1978.
[18] Chinitz B. Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburg. American Economic Review, 1961, (51): 279~289.
[19] Fujita M and Thisse J F. Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1996, (10): 339~378.
[20] Duranton G and Puga D. Micro-foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies. NBER Working Paper 9931, 2003.
[21] Porter M. The Competitive advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, 1990.
[22] Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House, 1969.
[23] Gordon I R. and McCann P. Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?. Urban Studies, 2000, (37): 513~532.
[24] Sorenson O. and Audia P G. The Social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940~1989. AJS, 2000, (106): 424~462.
[25] Ellison G. and Glaeser E L. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, (105): 889~927.
[26] Rosenthal S. and Strange C. The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 2001, (50): 191~229.
[27] Maurel F. and Sedillot B. A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1999, (29): 575~604.
[28] Braunerhjelm P. and Johansson D. The determinants of spatial concentration: the manufacturing and service sectors in an international perspective. Industry and Innovation, 2003, (10): 41~63.
[29] Devereux M P, Griffith R and Simpson H. The geographic distribution of production activity in the UK. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2004, (34): 533~564.
[30] Kim S. Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities: the trends in U.S. regional manufacturing structure, 1860-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, (110): 881~908.
[31] Kim S. Regions resources and economic geography: sources of US regional comparative advantage, 1880-1987. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1999, (29): 1~32.
[32] Kim Y, Barkley D L. and Henry M S. Industry characteristics linked to establishment concentrations in non-metropolitan areas. Journal of Regional Science, 2000, (40): 231~259.
[33] Ellison G and Glaeser E L. The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration?. American Economic Review, 1999, (89): 311~316.
[34] Haaland J I, Kind H.J, Knarvik K H. and Torstensson J. What determines the economic geography of Europe. CEPR Discussion Paper, 1999, (2072).
[35] Davies D R. and Weinstein D E. Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation, European Economic Review, 1999, 43, 379~407.
[36] Paluzie, E., Pons, J. and Tirado, D. Regional integration and specialization patterns in Spain. Regional Studies, 2001, (35): 28~296.
[37] Audretsch B. and Feldman M. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 1996, 86(3): 630~640.
[38] Jaffee A. Manuel T. and Rebecca H. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 557~598.
[39] Brulhart M. Evolving geographical concentration of European manufacturing industries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 2001, (137): 215~243.
[40] Amiti M. Specialization patterns in Europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 1999, (135): 573~593.
[41] Sjoberg O. and Sjoholm F. Trade liberalization and the geography of production: agglomeration, concentration and dispersal in Indonesia’s manufacturing industry. Economic Geography, 2004, (80): 287~310.
[42] Hanson G H. North American economic integration and industry location. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, (14): 30~44.
[43] Fan C C. and Scott A J. Industrial agglomeration and development: a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Economic Geography, 2003, (79): 295~319.
[44] Wen M. Relocation and agglomeration of Chinese industry. Journal of Development Economics, 2004, (73): 329~347.
[45] Bai C, Du Y, Tao Z. and Tong S. Local protectionism and regional specialization: evidence from China’s industries. Journal of International Economics, 2004, (63): 397~417.
[46] Batisse C. and Poncet S. Protectionism and industry localization in Chinese provinces. European Regional Science Association conference papers, 2003(ersa03p147).
[47] 杨宝良. 我国三次产业地理集聚的区位分析. 探求, 2003, (3): 51~54.
[48] 贺灿飞, 谢秀珍. 中国制造业地理集中与省区专业化. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2): 212~222.
[49] 崔 蕴. 上海市制造业各行业地理集中度分析. 城市发展研究, 2004, 11(6): 82~84,59.
[50] Krugman P. and Venables A. Globalization and the inequality of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(4): 857~880.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |