论文

居民对生活质量评估与区域经济发展的定量分析

展开
  • 河南大学环境与规划学院,河南开封475001
李小建(1954-),男,教授,博士生导师。从事经济地理学教学和研究工作。E-mail:xjli@henu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2002-04-01

  修回日期: 2002-08-01

  网络出版日期: 2002-09-24

基金资助

河南省科技攻关重点项目;河南大学自然科学基金项目资助

An Assessment of Household Living Quality and Its Relationship with Regional Economic Development

Expand
  • College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001 China

Received date: 2002-04-01

  Revised date: 2002-08-01

  Online published: 2002-09-24

摘要

通过对全国 1 5个省份 1 9个县 (市 )近万户调查数据的分析得出 :居民对自己生活状况的主观评价与区域经济发展水平并不呈现显著正相关关系 ;居民对自己生活状况的满意程度在城乡间、县际间存在一定差异 ,一般为城市高于农村。不同县域居民对影响其生活质量的主要因子的认识有很强的一致性。区域发展研究中 ,应当关注居民生活质量评估指标。

本文引用格式

李小建, 乔家君 . 居民对生活质量评估与区域经济发展的定量分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002 , 21(5) : 484 -490 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2002.05.010

Abstract

Interview data from 9970 households reveals that satisfactory level of household living quality assessed by individuals does not follow a significant relationship with the level of regional economic development indicated by GDP per capita. Regions with relevant higher per capita GDP sometimes associate with lower level of satisfaction. This is because, firstly, the expected level by the households in the better-developed regions is usually higher. People have financial capacity as well as time to enjoy recreation in nice environments. Secondly, some relevant wealthy regions associate with environment pollution and transport congestion, while some poor region residents enjoy their moderate yet not wealthy life. Another finding concerns that the satisfactory degree varies among counties, cities and rural districts. In general, people in city show higher satisfactory degree than in rural district. People in different counties identify similar patterns and structures in assessing impact factors. The most satisfactory factor is the relationship of family members while the most unsatisfactory factor is the job opportunity and payment.

参考文献

[1]  O gbu rn W F.Social change in 1928[J].A m erican J ou rna l of S ociology,1929,34(5):6-10

[2]  Bauer R A.Social Ind icato rs[M].Cam b ridge,M A:M IT P ress,1966.

[3]  N anett K W.A ssessm en t of quality of life in clin ical trials of card iovascu lar therap ies[J].T he A m erican J ou rna l ofCa rd iology,1984,54:909-913.

[4]  W alter O S.State of science 1986:quality of life and function statu s as target variab les fo r research[J].Ch ron icDisease,1984,40(6):465-471.

[5]  王彦,姚景鹏.生活质量—一种新型的健康测量工具[J].中华护理杂志,2001,36(5):375-377.

[6]  J ud ith A F.T he effect of p ercu taneou s tran slum inal co ronaryan-g iop lasty on quality of life[J].P rog ress in Ca rd iovascu la r N u rsing,1990,5(4):132-140.

[7]  N eil k A.M ethodo log ic issues in assessing the quality of life of cancer p atien ts[J].Cancer,1991,67:844-850.

[8]  杨德森.社区人群众生活质量研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(3):136-139.

[9]  张卫红.郭敏社会生活质量改善之设想[J].成人高教学刊,1996(2):38-42.

[10]  厉复魁.吉林省社会生活质量的预测与分析[J].人口学刊,1995(6):47-59.
文章导航

/