农业外部性识别、评价及其内部化
收稿日期: 2006-11-01
修回日期: 2007-01-01
网络出版日期: 2007-02-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(70273046); 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所自然科学基金延伸项目.
Identification, Evaluation and Internalization of Externalities of Agriculture
Received date: 2006-11-01
Revised date: 2007-01-01
Online published: 2007-02-20
农业外部性包括外部经济性与不经济性两方面, 前者表现为农业在食物保障、经济、生 态、社会与文化等方面所具有的多元价值, 而后者主要体现在农业对环境造成的非点源污染。我 国农业在土壤、水、大气、生物多样性和景观五个方面均有外部性表现, 本文对其分别进行了识 别。目前对于农业外部性的定量评估, 由于农业外部性表现具有较强的地域性、评价方法缺乏标 准、评价者立场与视角不同而使结果不具可比性。由于无论是农业外部经济性或外部不经济性均 是资源的低效配置, 因此各国从外部性产生的根源———市场失灵或政策失灵入手, 努力促使农业 多元价值得到最优表现, 并对农业外部不经济性加以控制。各国技术实践表明, 可持续农业技术 体系成为农业外部成本内部化的可行手段之一。
吕耀,章予舒 . 农业外部性识别、评价及其内部化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007 , 26(1) : 123 -132 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.01.013
Externality of agriculture includes both external economy and external diseconomy. The external economy implies multiple roles of agriculture in food security, economic, ecological, social and cultural aspects besides providing food and fiber for human beings, while the external diseconomy is mainly focused on negative environmental impacts of agriculture, such as soil erosion, depleting water resources, non- point source pollution and greenhouse gas emission, etc. Externalities of agriculture in China in aspects of soil, water, air, biodiversity and landscape are identified and explained in detail. Many researches have been carried out on valuing the ecosystem services and external cost of agriculture, including a few about environmental cost in China. Yet the results can not be compared with each other simply because of numbers of reasons: strong regional characteristics of externalities, shortage of standard evaluating methods and different stands of evaluators. As both external economy and diseconomy are low efficient in resource allocation, the source of externality, whether from market failure or policy failure, or both, is being internalized by policy reform or technology amelioration. Objectives of both domestic agricultural policy and international trade one are to optimize multi- values of agriculture and to control the diseconomy of agriculture. Therefore, sustainable development of agriculture becomes one of preconditions. Policies and regulations that can protect rural environment, ensure food security and promote rural development have been attempted by Japan, USA and EU, etc., which have taken effects in different degrees. And sustainable agriculture technology has been proved to be one of feasible measures for internalizing external cost of agriculture, including: diversifying landscape, Integrated Pesticide Management, soil and water conservation, no tillage, and Best Management Practice, etc.
Key words： agriculture; evaluation; externality; identification; multi- value
[1] 王金南. 环境经济学———理论·方法·政策. 北京:清华大学出版社, 1994.
[2]
[日]祖田修著, 张玉林等译.农学原论. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
[3] 程序, 曾晓光, 王尔大. 可持续农业导论. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1997.
[4] 刘启明. 日本关于农业公益性定量评价的研究. 世界农业, 2002, ( 8) :13~16.
[5] Pretty J N, Brett C, Gee D, Hine R E, Mason C F, Morison J I L, Raven H, Rayment M and van der Bijl G. An assessment of the external costs of UK agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 2000, 65(2):113~136.
[6] Bowker J M, D D Diychuck. Estimating the Non- market Benefits of Agricultural Land Retention in Eastern Canada, Agricultural and Resource Economic Review, 1994, 23: 218~25.
[7] Drake L. The Non- market Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1992,19:351~364.
[8] Bullock C H, Kay J. Preservation and Change in the Upland Landscape: The Public Benefits of Grazing Management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,1997, 40(3):315~334.
[9] Willis K G, G D Garrod, and C M Saunders. Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Area Policy in England: A Contingent Valuation Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 1995,44:105~125.
[10] Hanley N, D MacMillan, R E Wright, C Bullock, I Simpson, D Parsisson and B Crabtree. Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998, 49(1):1~15.
[11] Paterson Robert G, Michael I Luger, Raymond J Burby, Edward J Kaiser, H Rooney Malcolm and Alicia C. Beard. Costs and Benefits of Urban Erosion and Sediment Control: The North Carolina Experience, Environmental Management, 1993,17(2):167~178.
[12] Alvarez B, Hanley N, Wright R, MacMillan D. Estimating the Benefits of Agri- environmental Policy: Econometric Issues in Open- ended Contingent Valuation Studies, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1999,42(1):23~43.
[13] Pretty J N, Brett C, Gee D, Hine R, Mason C, Morison J, Rayment M, van der Bijl G. and Dobbs T. Policy challenges and priorities for internalizing the externalities of modern agriculture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2001,44(2):263~283.
[14] Pretty J N. Agri- culture: Reconnecting People, Land and Nature. Earthscan Publications Limited. London, Sterling, VA, 2002.
[15] Hartridge O and Pearce D W. Is UK Agriculture Sustainable? Environmentally Adjusted Economics Accounts for UK Agriculture. London: CSERGE- Economics, University College London, 2001.
[16] Bailey A P, Rehman T, Park J, Keatunge J D H, Trainter R B. Towards a method for the economic evaluation of environmental indicators for UK integrated arable farming systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 1999,72:145~158.
[17] Pretty J N, Mason C F, Nedwell D B, Hine R E, Leaf S. and Dils R. Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003,37(2):201~208.
[18] Tegtmeier Erin M, Duffy Michael D. External costs of agricultural production in the United States. International Journal of agricultural sustainability, 2004,2(1):1:20.
[19] 张巨勇. 农业生产中外部成本内部化的对策分析. 商业研究,2005,14:174~176
[20] 潘锋. 第279 次香山科学会议: 生物固碳可为温室气体减排提供重要保障. http://www.sciencetimes.com.cn
[21] 彭奎,朱波. 试论农业养分的非点源污染与管理. 环境保护,2001,( 1) :15~17.
[22] 许丛军. 养在深闺待人识———关于双鸭山湿地的调查与思考.http://www.hlraohe.gov.cn/. 2003 年7 月.
[23] 王宏康. 水体污染及防治概论. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1991.
[24] 张秀敏, 马生伟. 抚仙湖流域综合治理规划方案研究. 环境科学研究, 1999,12(5):16~19.
[25] 桂森,孟繁艳,李学东等. 密云水库水质现状及发展趋势. 环境科学, 1999, 20 (2):110~112.
[26] 王明星. 中国稻田甲烷排放. 北京:科学出版社,2001.
[27] Agrometeorology Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Agricultural GHG Emissions by province level. Supplementary Report of ALGAS Project: (1). Dec. 15, 1998. http://lnadbg4.asiandevbank.org.
[28] 李波.中国的农业生物多样性保护及持续利用. 农业环境与发展,1999, 4:9~15.
[29] 吕耀, 程序. 太湖地区农田氮素非点源污染及环境经济分析. 上海环境科学,2000,( 4) : 143~145,148.
[30] 向平安,黄璜, 燕惠民,周燕, 郑华, 黄兴国. 湖南洞庭湖区水稻生产的环境成本评估. 应用生态学报, 2006,16 (11): 2187～2193.
[31] 毛显强,杨居荣,王华东. 二次生产函数模型在生产行为环境经济分析中的应用. 环境科学学报, 1997,17(4):480~485.
[32] 国家环境保护总局. 太湖水系水质保护研究. 国家“七五”科技攻关环境保护项目成果简介. 北京:科学出版社, 1992.
[33] 闫增强, 黄河, 李永宁. 我国西部地区农业外部经济性的简略分析.财经问题研究, 2004,( 1) :58~61.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |