福祉地理学研究新进展
收稿日期: 2009-11-01
修回日期: 2010-05-01
网络出版日期: 2010-08-25
Advances in the Researches on Well-being Geography
Received date: 2009-11-01
Revised date: 2010-05-01
Online published: 2010-08-25
经济学、社会学、心理学和地理学对福祉皆有研究。福祉反映的是人们良好的生活状态,在日益重视社会建设的中国,民生福祉是人文地理学研究不可忽视的重要命题。本文在文献分析的基础上概括了福祉地理学的研究特点,梳理出国内外福祉地理学研究按GDP扩展、地域社会指标以及满意度和幸福感等展开的3条主要路径,并从健康与福祉、区位与福祉、生态环境与福祉、居住与福祉以及地方、文化与福祉等视角概述了福祉地理学的最新研究进展,最后对福祉地理学的研究提出展望：要进行跨学科合作；将主观和客观2种研究方法相结合；研究框架要进行重构；深化健康的福祉地理学研究；拓展人居地理学的研究以及推进福祉的地方与文化研究等。
王圣云,沈玉芳 . 福祉地理学研究新进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010 , 29(8) : 899 -905 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.08.001
Well-being is a kind of state of good life which has been studied by economies, sociology, psychology and geography. Well-being geography is an important branch of human geography. The concept and methodology of well-being as well as the philosophy and theory of human geography are the basis of well-being geography. With increasing attentions to society construction in China, the research on well-being is important and cannot be ignored. This paper generalizes the characters of well-being geography based on literature review, recalls and states advances researches in geography of well-being, summarizes the research ways of well-being geography based on GDP expansion, regional social indicators and degree of satisfaction and happiness, and reviews the advances in well-being geography from the perspective of health, location, environment, residence and humanism. Finally, future research directions of well-being geography are put forward and some conclusions are drawn. Above all, the authors believe that the geography of well-being takes spatial unbalance of well-being as a core. But it must be pointed out that geography of well-being in the past remains at describing the spatial differences in the level of well-being, and it is not enough. So, in order to study well-being deeply, different research methods in geography and other disciplines should be used together, and the research framework of geography of well-being should be rebuilt. Besides, subjective well-being is associated with objective well-being and it is an important index for evaluating well-being. The combination of subjective well-being with objective well-being is needed.
Key words： new advances in researches; well-being; well-being geography
[1] 克拉瓦尔. 地理学思想史: 3版. 郑胜华, 刘德美等, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
[2] Smith D M. Human Geography of a Welfare Approach. London: Edward Arnold, 1977.
[3] 李旭旦. 人文地理概说. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985.
[4] Nicholas H. Geography and the Quality of Life. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1982, 72(4), 445-456.
[5] Coates B E, Johnston R J, Knox P L. Geography and Inequality. London: Oxford University Press, 1977.
[6] 保罗·诺克斯, 史蒂文·平奇. 城市社会地理学导论. 柴彦威, 张景秋等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005.
[7] R J 约翰斯顿. 人文地理学词典. 北京:商务印书馆, 2005.
[8] 埃里克·诺依迈耶.强与弱：两种对立的可持续性范式. 王寅通, 译. 上海: 上海世纪出版集团, 2006.
[9] Carola G, Stephan K. Growth, income distribution and well-being in transition countries. Economics of Transition, 2001, 9(2): 359-394.
[10] Roberto E, Pedro P, Manuel P. The spatial distribution of welfare in the European Union. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie, 2006, 97(4): 331-342.
[11] Jackson T, Stymne S. Sustainable Economic Welfare in Sweden: A Pilot Index 1950-1992. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 1996.
[12] Matthews J, Munday M, Roberts A. An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Wales: 1990-2000: 2003.
[13] Andresj M. The evolution of well-being: in Spain 1980-2001. A Regional Analysis Social Indicators Research, 2006, 76: 283-316.
[14] Kirk H. Sustaining economic welfare: Estimating changes in total and per capita wealth. Environment Development and Sustainability, 2003(5): 419-436.
[15] Osberg L, Sharp A. An index of economic well-being for selected OECD countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 2002, 48(3): 291-316.
[16] 袁志刚. 中国经济增长: 制度、结构、福祉. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2006.
[17] 向书坚. 福利水平的可持续性评价研究. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2007(1): 3-9.
[18] 王树同, 赵振军. 从流量到存量：中国经济高增长中的低经济福利问题. 河北学刊, 2005, 25(4): 65-68.
[19] 许学强, 胡华颖, 叶嘉安. 广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析. 地理学报, 1989, 44(4): 385-397.
[20] 郑静, 许学强, 陈浩光. 广州市社会空间的因子生态再分析. 地理研究， 1995， 14(2): 15-26.
[21] 郭利平, 陈忠暖. 云南特困乡的因子生态分析与类型划分:以文山州为例. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2001(6): 740-744.
[22] 陈立新. 社会指标与社会协调发展. 长沙: 湖南大学出版社, 2005.
[23] 伊恩·莫法特. 可持续发展: 原则、分析和政策.宋国君, 译. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2002: 39-40.
[24] Scottfrey R, Feng Xiangsong. Human well-being in Chinese cities. Social Indicators Research, 1997, 42(1): 77-101.
[25] 周长城. 中国生活质量:现状与评价. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003.
[26] 连玉明. 中国城市生活质量报告(No.1). 北京: 中国时代经济出版社, 2006.
[27] 易松国, 风笑天. 城市居民主观生活质量研究: 武汉、北京、西安三地调查资料的比较分析. 华中理工大学学报:社会科学版, 1997(3): 81-84.
[28] 张立华, 杜宏巍, 刘雪芹. 因子分析在城镇居民生活质量评估中的应用. 河北理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 2008(1): 28-32.
[29] 潘秋玲, 王兴中. 城市生活质量空间评价研究：以西安市为例. 人文地理, 1997(6): 29-37.
[30] 林南, 王玲, 潘允康, 等. 生活质量的结构与指标: 1985年天津千户户卷调查资料分析. 社会学研究, 1987(6): 21-26.
[31] 周长城. 全面小康: 生活质量与测量. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2003.
[32] Blanchflower D G, Oswald A J. Happiness and the human development index: The Paradox of Australia. Australian Economic Review, 2005, 38(3): 307-318.
[33] Leigh A, Wolfers J. Happiness and the human development index: Australia is not a paradox. Australian Economic Review, 2006, 39(2): 176-184.
[34] 卢淑华, 韦鲁英. 生活质量与人口特征关系的比较研究: 北京、西安、扬州三市部分地区调查. 北京大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 1991(3): 1-7.
[35] 程国栋, 徐中民, 徐进祥. 建立中国国民幸福生活核算体系的构想. 地理学报, 2005, 60(5): 883-893.
[36] Barbara K. Clarification and integration of similar quality of life concepts. Journal Nursing Scholarship, 1999, 31:215-220.
[37] Andrew M. Area-based positive discrimination and the distribution of well-being. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers， 1981, 6(1): 53-67.
[38] Knox P L, Cottam M B. A welfare approach to rural geography: Contrasting perspectives on the quality of highland life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. New Series, 1981, 6(4): 433-450.
[39] 周长城. 主观生活质量: 指标构建及其评价. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2008.
[40] Fleuret S, Atkinson S. Well-being, health and geography: A critical review and research agenda. New Zealand Geographer, 2007, 63: 106-11.
[41] Hall E. Creating spaces of wellbeing for people with learning disabilities: A commentary. New Zealand Geographer, 2007, 63: 130-134.
[42] Eckermann L. Gendering indicators of health and well-being：is quality of life gender neutral？Social Indicators Research, 2000, 52: 29-54.
[43] Eckersley R, Dixon J, Douglas B. The Social Origins of Health and Well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[44] Levine R. Geography of Time. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
[45] 刘宝, 蒋烽, 胡善联. 人群健康的地区差距. 中国卫生资源, 2006(1):13-19.
[46] Thomas J W. Location and Well-Being: An Introduction to Economic Geography. San Francisco: Harper & Row Press, Inc., 1980.
[47] 李小建. 经济地理学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.
[48] 千年生态系统评估项目概念框架工作组. 生态系统与人类福祉: 评估框架. 张永民, 译. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2007.
[49] Prescott-Allen R. The Wellbeing of Nations: A Country-by-country Index of Quality of Life and the Environment. Island Press. Washington D.C., 2001: 342.
[50] 彼得.S.温茨. 现代环境伦理. 宋玉波, 朱丹琼, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2007: 281-285.
[51] 李雪铭, 姜斌, 杨波. 人居环境: 地理学研究面临的一个新课题. 地理学与国土研究, 2000(2): 75-78.
[52] 宁越敏, 查志强. 大都市人居环境评价和优化研究: 以上海市为例. 城市规划，1999(6): 14-19.
[53] 陈传康. 风水现代化及其旅游开发意义. 人文地理， 1996(1): 46-50.
[54] 刘沛林. 风水:中国人的环境观. 上海:上海三联书店, 1995.
[55] 俞孔坚. 景观: 文化、生态与感知. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998, 96.
[56] Veenhoven R. Subjective Measures of Well-being. United Nations University，2007.
[57] 早川和男. 居住福利论: 居住环境在社会福利和人类幸福中的意义. 李恒, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005.
[58] 周运清. 中国城镇居民住房居住质量. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2008.
[59] 汤茂林. 我与“人文主义地理学”一文. 社会科学论坛: 学术评论卷, 2007(1): 92-96.
[60] 皮特. 现代地理学思想. 周尚意等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007.
[61] Ruth P, Gail T. Placing Well-Being: A Maori Case Study of Cultural and Environmental Specificity. Eco Health， 2007, 4: 445-460.
[62] Daniel F N. Subjective well-being, poverty and ethnicity in South Africa: insights from an exploratory analysis. Social Indicators Research， 2007, 80: 313-341.
[63] Richard E, Eckersley R, et al. Culture, Health and Well-being. The Social Origins of Health and Well-being. Cambridge University Press， 2001.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |