EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2004 , Vol. 23 >Issue 1: 89 - 95

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2004.01.010

区域发展与农业经济

西方城市居住区位决策与再选择模型的评述

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    2. 四川师范大学旅游学院,成都 610066
张文忠(1966-),男,呼和浩特人,博士,副研究员。主要从事城市与区域经济研究。E-mail:zhangwz@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2003-08-01

  修回日期: 2003-10-01

  网络出版日期: 2004-01-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40071030);中国科学院创新工程重点项目(KZCX2-SW-318-02)。

收起

The Comment on Research of Western Intra-urban Residential Relocation Models

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geography Sciences and Natural Resources, CAS, Beijing 100101;
    2. Department of Tourism, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066

Received date: 2003-08-01

  Revised date: 2003-10-01

  Online published: 2004-01-24

Fold

摘要

城市居民居住区位选择行为影响着居住空间结构，城市社会分异、种族隔离、人口迁居和住宅郊区化在很大程度上都是居民住宅区位再选择行为作用的结果，因此，研究居住区位对探讨城市内部空间结构等问题具有重要意义。本文主要分析了西方城市居民居住区位再选择行为模型构建的基础和研究视角，并且重点介绍和评述了西方居住区位决策与再选择的主要模型。

关键词： 居住区位; 模型; 选择行为

本文引用格式

张文忠, 刘旺 . 西方城市居住区位决策与再选择模型的评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2004 , 23(1) : 89 -95 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2004.01.010

Abstract

Urban inhabitants’ housing choice behavior affects urban residential spatial structure. Further more, urban inhabitants’ housing choice behavior is relevant to segregation on residential spatial structure, race discrimination, residential mobility and suburbanization. So many scholars pay more attention to housing choice behavior. This paper mainly introduces the theory frame of housing choice behavior research and methodology and important models Housing market and inhabitant’s social attributes influence residential location decision process and relocation choice behaviors. Housing’ location is fixed and housing is expensive and everlasting. So present stock and developing trend of housing market determine household’s residential location decision process and household’s relocation choice behavior. Inhabitants’ social attributes include income, profession, age, education degree, household structure, race and religion. Inhabitant’s location process exhibits some regular spatial preferences because of age, household scale, income and workplace. There has been a sharp dichotomy between micro-level and macro-level analyses in past research. Under assumption of utility maximum, micro-level research mainly focuses on mechanism of consumer housing choice behavior. On the contrary, macro-level research mainly focuses on equilibrium of housing market, the relationship between mobility probability, population, income and present housing condition. This paper mainly introduces main residential location decision process and relocation choice behavior models and authors make some comments on them.

Key words： choice behavior; household residential relocation; model

参考文献


[1] Wolpet,J. Behavioral aspect of the decision to migrate, Papers of the Regional Science Association,1965 (15):159~169.

[2] Grisby,W. Housing Markets and Public Policy, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1963:53~90.

[3] 市南文一. 都市内家庭移动的诸属性探讨--以秋田市中央区为例. 人文地理学研究, 1981:139~163.

[4] 渡边良雄. 东京大都市圈的城市系统. 古今书院, 1982:252~271.

[5] Frank W.Porell. Models of Intra-urban Residential Relocation, Kluwer.Nijhoff Publishing(USA), 1982:12~68.

[6] G.Thomas Kingsley and Margery Austin Turner. Housing Markets and Residential Mobility, University Press of America, Washington, D.C.,1993:50~120.

[7] 彼得.尼茨坎普
[美],安虎森 刘海军等译.区域和城市经济学手册. 经济科学出版社，2001.

[8] Alonso,W.A. Location and land use, Harvard Universty Press,1964.

[9] Muth,R.F. The spatial structure of the housing market, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1961(7).

[10] Huff,J.F. and W.C.V.Clark. Cumulative stress and cumulative inertia a behavioral model of the decision to move,Environment and Planning,1978:1101~1119.

[11] Rossi,P.H. Why families move: a study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility, Glencoe,Illinois,1955.

[12] Brown,L. and Moore,E. The intra-urban migration process: a prospective, Geografiska Annaler, 1970,Series B:1~13.

[13] Speare,A.S.Goldstein and W.Frey. Residential mobility and migration and metropolitan change,Cambridge,Mass,Ballinger,1975.

[14] Smith,T. Housing, University of California,BerkeleyPress,1970.

[15] Cronin,F. An economic analysis of intraurban search and mobility using alternative benefit measures, Washington,D.C, The Urban Institute,1979.

[16] Smith,T. W.A.V.Clark J.O.Huff and P.Shapiro. A decision making and search model for intra-migration, Geographical Analysis,1979(11):1~22.

[17] Simmons,J. Patterns of residential movement in metropolitan Toronto, University of Toronto, Dept. of Geography Research Publication, 1974.

[18] Wilson,A.G. Entropy in urban and regional modeling,London,1970.

[19] Quigley,J.M. Housing demand in the short run: analysis of polytomous choice,Econometric Society, New York,1973.

[20] Quigley,J.M. Housing demand in the short run: analysis of polytomous choice, Exploration in Economic Research,1976(3):76~102.

[21] Mcfadden D. Modelling the choice of residential location in spatial interaction theory and planning models,1978;75~96.

[22] Seong Woo Lee and Dowell Myers, Local housing-market effects on tenure choice
[J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2003（18）: 129~157.

[23] Alpana Sivam Housing supply in Delhi, Cities, 2003(20): 135~141.

[24] Deniz Erinsel Onder. A new housing group for sub-residential area in Samarkand, Cities, 2002(19): 327~339.

[25] Hua,C. The Equilibrium of Housing Vacancy and Waiting Time, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University,1977.

[26] Kamhon Kan. Residential mobility with job location uncertainty, Journal of Urban Economics, 2002(52):501~523.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉