中国东部沿海沿边城市旅游气候舒适度评价
网络出版日期: 2009-09-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(40271052)；国家社会科学基金项目（03BJY0088)
Evaluation of Tourism Climate Comfortableness of Coastal Cities in the Eastern China
Online published: 2009-09-25
在温湿指数、风寒指数和着衣指数测定的基础上，构建了一个新的综合气候舒适度评价模型，该模型具有可比较和可加和等特点。运用新的模型，分析了我国东部沿海26个热点城市气候舒适度，划分出适宜于旅游活动的等级和时段分布，并对气候舒适度的南北变化进行了分析。依据最适期的年内分布将其划分为3种旅游气候类型：夏适型气候以哈尔滨为代表，春秋适宜型气候以北京和南京为代表，冬适型气候以海口为代表。从气候舒适度指数的南北差异来看，夏季气候舒适度指数随纬度升高而增大，北方具有更高的旅游气候舒适性；冬季气候舒适度随纬度降低而升高，南方具有更高的旅游气候舒适性。调查了4个代表城市的入境旅游客流量年内变化，揭示了入境客流量年内变化和南北差异，划分出旅游旺季、旅游平季和旅游淡季，其中哈尔滨客流量年内变化呈“W”形，北京和南京的客流量年内变化呈“M”形，海口的客流量年内变化上“凹”弧形。在客流量月指数与气候舒适度指数比较的基础上，通过对特殊因子的数值化，采用虚拟变量的回归分析方法，建立了入境旅游客流量月指数模拟模型。
马丽君,孙根年,王洁洁 . 中国东部沿海沿边城市旅游气候舒适度评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009 , 28(5) : 713 -722 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.05.009
A new comprehensive comfort index is founded based on assignment of THI, WCI and ICL. This new index has some peculiarity like comparable, plus able and so on. The climate comfortable degree of 26 cities in eastern China is analyzed by the new index; the grades of fitness and its timely distribution are divided. The North-South variation of climate comfortable degree is analyzed. The 26 cities are divided into three types based on the distribution of comfortable period of a year. The annual comprehensive comfort index in 25°N is the highest, the annual comprehensive comfort index goes up as the latitude reduces in the north of 25°N, the annual comprehensive comfort index goes down as the latitude reduces in the south of 25°N. In summer the comprehensive comfort index goes up as the latitude increases. This shows that the north has a more comfort climate. In winter the comprehensive comfort index goes up as the latitude reduces. This shows that the south has a more comfort climate. Monthly variation of inbound tourists in the four typical cities are surveyed, the monthly variation of inbound tourists and its differences between North and South are revealed, and the dull season and busy season for tourism are divided. Monthly variation of inbound tourists in Harbin presents a “W-shaped” pattern, monthly variation of inbound tourists in Beijing and Nanjing a “M-shaped” pattern, and Haikou’s monthly variation of inbound tourists a wide “U-shaped” pattern. Based on the comparison of monthly index of tourists and climate comfort degree and numerical valued special factors, the simulated model of the monthly index of inbound tourists is founded by the way of OLS.
[1] Terjung W H. Physiologic climates of the contentious United States: A bioclimatic classification based on man.Annal A.A.G., 1966, 5(1): 141-179.
[2] Oliver J E . Climate and Man’s Environment: An Introduction to Applied Climatology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc, 1973: 195-206.
[3] Houghton D D . Handbook of Applied Meteorology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc, 1985: 778-811.
[4] Thom E C. A new concept for cooling degree days.Air Condition: Heat & Ventilation, 1957, 54: 73 -80.
[5] Thom E C. Cooling degree days. Air Condition: Heat & Ventilation, 1958, 55: 65-72.
[6] Terjung W H. World pattern of the distribution of monthly comfort index. Int. J. Biometeorol, 1968, 12: 119-151.
[7] 陆鼎煌, 陈健, 崔森, 等. 北京居住楼区绿化的夏季辐射效益. 北京林业大学学报, 1984, 34(1): 28-26.
[8] 周蕾芝, 周国模, 应媚. 旅游活动的适宜气候指标分析. 气象科技, 1998, (1): 60-63.
[9] 任健美, 牛俊杰, 胡彩虹,等. 五台山旅游气候及其舒适度评价. 地理研究, 2004, 23(6): 856-861.
[10] 杨贤为, 邹旭恺, 马天健,等. 黄山旅游气候指南. 气象, 1999, 25(11): 50-54.
[11] 刘文杰, 李红梅. 西双版纳旅游气候资源. 自然资源学报, 1997, (2): 62-66.
[12] 长安, 葛全胜, 方修琦, 等. 青藏铁路旅游线气候适宜性分析. 地理研究, 2006, 26(3): 533-540.
[13] 何大章, 张声粦. 海南岛气候区划. 地理学报, 1985, 40(2)：169-177.
[14] 王传琛, 刘际松. 杭州城市气候. 地理学报, 1982, 37(2)：164-172.
[15] 范业正, 郭来喜. 中国海滨旅游地气候适宜性评价. 自然资源学报, 1998, 13(4): 304-311.
[16] 李秋, 仲桂清. 环渤海地区旅游气候资源评价. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(2): 149-153.
[17] 刘清春, 王铮,许世远. 中国城市旅游气候舒适性分析. 资源科学, 2007, 29(1): 133-140.
[18] De Freitas C. Human climates of northern China. Atmospheric Environment, 1979, 13: 71-77.
[19] 马丽君, 孙根年, 李馥丽,等. 陕西省旅游气候舒适度评价. 资源科学, 2007, 29(6)：40-44.
[20] 孙根年, 马丽君. 西安旅游气候舒适度与客流量年内变化相关性分析. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(7)：34-39.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |