局地土地利用变化现实情景研究
收稿日期: 2006-06-01
修回日期: 2006-09-01
网络出版日期: 2006-11-25
基金资助
国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2005CB422006)与重庆市教委重点资助项目(KJ060310)资 助的部分内容.
A Realism Scenar io Analysis of Land- use Change at a Local Level
Received date: 2006-06-01
Revised date: 2006-09-01
Online published: 2006-11-25
局地土地利用变化表现为时序短、空间倾向性强且多为人类强制干扰, 其变化过程与结果 是区域尺度响应与反馈国家尺度、全球尺度最有效的途径。城市化、农业结构调整和土地整理是 目前我国局地土地利用变化的几种主要利用方式。城市化是一个不可逆过程, 农村景观转为城市 景观, 改变了诸如地表反照率、粗糙度等下垫面特征, 局地生境与物种的数量与种类发生改变, 逐 步形成以人类为主的均质化景观格局; 农户微观土地利用选择行为是局地农业产业结构调整的 原动力, 不同类型农户在投资、生产与经营等经济活动的差异将导致局地土壤结构、水分、养分等 土壤条件及环境改变; 土地整理是一个复杂的系统工程, 在一定程度上改变了局地土壤性状与土 壤生物, 更甚的是改变了局地斑块- 廊道- 基质模式的景观格局。因此, 为进一步加深局地土地利 用变化情景的理解, 厘定“人- 地协调系统”的理论框架, 进行局地土地利用变化的情景模拟和生 态环境效应研究将是未来局地土地利用变化的研究方向。
王成,魏朝富,邵景安,李阳兵,蒋伟 . 局地土地利用变化现实情景研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006 , 25(6) : 76 -86 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.06.009
Land- use change represents an implication of short- scheduling, better spatial orien-tation and anthropogenic compelling disturbance at the local level. Its processes and results are the most efficient approach for regional - level responses and national - and global - level feedbacks. Urbanization, agrarian structure transformation and land arrangement are presently the driving forces resulting in land- use change at the local level in China. Urbanization is an irreversible process. This process will result in the transformation from county's landscape to city's landscapes, accelerate the change of the characters of underlying surfaces such as surface albedoes and surface roughness, and in crease varieties of the habitat types and species diversities. Consequently, a new patterns of human homogenized landscape will be formed at the local level. Farmer's microcosmic choices of land- use styles are a kind of motility, which results in agrarian structure transformation. The differences in farmer's investment, production and management will lead to the changes of soil quality and environment. Land arrangement is a complex systematic engineering. Its implementation will change the local landscape structure, soil quality and hydrological process. Moreover, these results will influence correspondingly local ecologic environment. Thus, in order to profoundly understand local land use change, conceiving the theoretic frames of“human- land harmonious system”, simulating land use change and evaluating ecologic benefit of land- use change will be the orientation of future research in land- use change at the local level.
Key words: at the local level; land- use change; prospect; realistic scenario
[1] Liu J Y, Tian H Q, Liu M L, et al. China’s changing landscape during the 1990S: Large~scale land transformations estimated with satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32: 1~5.
[2] 彭建, 王仰麟, 张源等. 滇西北生态脆弱区土地利用变化及其生态效应. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 629~638.
[3] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 王军等. 土地利用结构与生态过程. 第四纪研究, 2003, 23(3): 247~253.
[4] Jordan G, Van Rompaey A, Szilassi P, Csillag G, et al. Historical land use changes and their impact on sediment fluxes in the Balaton basin (Hungary). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2005, 108(2): 119~133.
[5] Mccusker B. Land use and cover change as an indicator of transformation on recently redistributed farms in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Human Ecology, 2004, 32(1): 49~75.
[6] 杨风亭, 刘纪远, 庄大方等. 中国东南红壤丘陵区土地利用变化的生态环境效应研究进展. 地理科学进展. 2004, 23 (5): 43~55.
[7] Hall B, Motzkin G, David R. Three hundred years of forest and land- use change in Massachusetts, USA. Journal of Biogeography, 2002, 29: 1319~1335.
[8] 周广胜, 许振柱, 王玉辉. 全球变化的生态系统适应性. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(4): 642~649.
[9] 彭少麟. 全球变化现象及其效应. 生态科学, 1997, 16(2): 1~8.
[10] Liu X H, Andersson C. Assessing the impact of temporal dynamics on land- use change modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28(1~2): 107~124.
[11] Dezso Z, Bartholy J, Pongracz R, et al. Analysis of land- use/land- cover change in the Carpathian region based on remote sensing techniques. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2005, 30(1~3): 109~115.
[12] 于兴修, 杨桂山. 中国土地利用/覆被变化研究的现状与问题. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(1): 51~57.
[13] 后立胜, 蔡运龙. 土地利用/覆被变化研究的实质分析与进展评述. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(6): 96~104.
[14] Shao J A, Ni J P, Wei C F, et al. Land use change and its corresponding ecological responses: a review. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2005, 15(3): 305~328.
[15] 陈宜瑜, 陈泮勤,葛全胜等.全球变化研究进展与展望.地学前缘, 2002, 9(1): 11~18.
[16] 陈述彭, 岳天祥.全球环境变化的系统研究方法浅议.自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 3~8.
[17] Turner II B L, Moss R H, Skole DL. Relating land use and global land- cover change: A proposal for an IGBP~HDP Core Project. IGBP Report No.24. HDP Report No.5. Stochholm: International Geosphere~Biosphere Programme, 1993.
[18] 李家洋, 陈泮勤, 葛全胜等. 全球变化与人类活动的相互作用. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4):371~377.
[19] 刘燕华, 葛全胜, 张雪芹. 关于中国全球环境变化人文因素研究发展方向的思考. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19 (6): 879~ 895.
[20] 周广胜, 许振柱, 王玉辉. 全球变化的生态系统适应性. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(4): 642~649.
[21] 孙枢. 对我国全球变化与地球系统科学研究的若干思考. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(1): 6~10.
[22] 李家洋, 陈泮勤, 葛全胜等.全球变化与人类活动的相互作用. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4):371~377.
[23] Pavon D, Venturea M, Ribas A, et al.. Land use change and socio- environmental conflict in the Alt Emporda county (Catalonia, Spain). Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 54: 543~552.
[24] 叶笃正, 符淙斌, 董文杰. 全球变化科学进展与未来趋势. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(4): 467~469.
[25] Klepeis P, TurnerⅡ B L. Integrated land history and global change science: the example of the Southern Yucatan Peninsular Region project. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18: 27~29.
[26] Lambin, E F, Turner II B L, Geist H J, et al. The causes of land- use and land- cover change, moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 2001, 11: 261~269.
[27] Verburg P H, De G H J, Koning, K K, et al. A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modeling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecological Modelling, 1999, 116: 45~61.
[28] Grubler A. In Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, 287~328.
[29] Upadhyay T P, Prem L. Sankhayan, B S. A review of carbon sequestration dynamics in the Himalayan region as a function of land- use change and forest/soil degradation with special reference to Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 105: 449~465.
[30] Verburg P H, Veldkamp T, Bouma J. Land use change under conditions of high population pressure: the case of Java. Global Environmental Change, 1999, 9: 303~312.
[31] Giupponi C, Ramanzin M, Sturaro E, et al. Climate and land use changes, biodiversity and agri- environmental measures in the Belluno province, Italy. Environment Science & Policy, 2006, in press.
[32] 李平, 李秀彬, 刘学军. 我国现阶段土地利用变化驱动力的宏观分析. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 129~138.
[33] Kraaif T, Milton S J. Vegetation changes (1995–2004) in semi~arid Karoo shrubland, South Africa: Effects of rainfall, wild herbivores and change in land use. Journal of Arid Environments, 2006, 64(1): 174~192.
[34] Verbist B, Putra A E D, Budidarona S, Factors driving land use change: Effects on watershed functions in a coffee agroforestry system in Lampung, Sumatra. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85(3): 254~270.
[35] Committee on Global Change. Research Strategies for the U.S. Global change Research Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990.
[36] 耿元波, 董云社, 孟维奇. 陆地碳循环研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2000, 19(4): 297~305.
[37] Shao J A, Huan X X, Gao M, et al. Response of CH4 emission from paddy fields to land management practices at a microcosmic cultivation scale. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 17(4): 691~698.
[38] Stophenne N, Lambin E E. A dynamic simulation model of land - use changes in Sudamo~sahelian countries of Africa (SALU ). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 2001, 85: 145~161.
[39] 史培军, 宋长青, 景贵飞. 加强我国土地利用/覆盖变化及其对生态环境安全影响的研究. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 161~168.
[40] 史培军, 王静爱, 陈婧等. 当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2): 115~126.
[41] Antrop M. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future? Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 70: 21~34.
[42] George C S, Samuel P L, Ho S. China’s land resources and land- use change: insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy, 2003, 20: 87~107.
[43] King C, Lecomte V L, Bissonnais Y, et al. Remote sensing data as an alternative input for the ‘STREAM’runoff model. Catena, 2005. 62(2~3): 125~135.
[44] Liu J Y, Liu M L, TIAN H Q, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of China’' s cropland during 1990~2000: An analysis based on Landsat TMdata. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 98(4): 442~456.
[45] Jessel B, JACOBS J. Land use scenario development and stakeholder involvement as tools for watershed management within the Havel River Basin. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 2005, 35(3): 220~233.
[46] Soini E. Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85(3): 306~323.
[47] 倪金生, 李琦, 曹学军. 遥感与地理信息系统基本原理和实践. 北京:电子工业出版社, 2004.
[48] 张永民, 赵士洞, Ver burg P H. 科尔沁沙地及其周围地区土地利用变化的情景分析. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(1):29~ 37.
[49] 王成, 魏朝富, 高明等.土地利用变化对区域生态健康的影响. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(2): 2296~2300.
[50] Reid R S, Kruska R L., Muthui, et al. Land- use and land- cover dynamics in response to changes in climatic, biological and socio~political forces: the case of southwestern Ethiopia. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15: 339~355.
[51] 葛全胜, 戴君虎. 20 世纪前、中期中国农林土地利用变化及驱动因素分析. 中国科学D 辑地球科学, 2005, 35(1): 54~63.
[52] Turner II B L, Clark W C, Kates R W, et al. The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
[53] Liu S H. Spatial Patterns and Dynamic Mechanisms of Urban Land Growth in China: Case Studies of Beijing and Shanghai, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Interim Report IR~02~005. Luxemburg, IIASA, 2002, 38.
[54] Liu J Y, Zhan J Y, Deng X Z. Spatio- temporal Patterns and Driving Forces of Urban Land Expansion in China during the Economic Reform Era. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2005, 34(6): 450~455.
[55] 边学芳, 吴群, 刘玮娜. 城市化与中国城市土地利用结构的相关分析. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3): 73~78.
[56] 鲁奇, 战金艳, 任国柱. 北京近百年城市用地变化与相关社会人文因素简论. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6): 688~69.
[57] 周文华, 王如松. 城市生态安全评价方法研究. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(7): 848~852.
[58] 周启星, 王如松. 城镇化过程生态风险评价案例研究. 生态学报, 1998, 18(4): 338~342.
[59] 周启星, 王美娥, 张倩茹等. 小城镇土地利用变化的生态效应分析. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(4): 651~654.
[60] Pickett S T A, Cadenasso M L, Grove J M, et al. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial cological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32: 127~157.
[61] 史培军, 李晓兵, 张文生等. 论生物资源开发与生态建设的“双健康模型”. 资源科学, 2004, 26(3): 2~8.
[62] 管驰明, 崔功豪. 100 多年来中国城市空间分布格局的时空演变研究. 地域研究与开发, 2004, 23(5): 28~32.
[63] 张世银. 1%的城市化水平测度与现状研究. 科技情报开发与经济, 2005, 15(2): 152~155.
[64] Tian G J, Liu J Y, Xie Y C, et al. Analysis of spatio- temporal dynamic pattern and driving forces of urban land in China in 1990s using TMimages and GIS. Citys, 2005, 22(6): 400~410.
[65] Liu J Y, Zhan J Y, Deng X Z. Spatio- temporal patterns and Driving Forces of Urban land Expansion in China during the Economic Reform Era. Ambio, 2005, 34(6): 450~455.
[66] Liu J Y, Tian H Q, Liu M L, et al. China’s changing landscape during the 1990S: Large- scale land transformations estimated with satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32:1~5.
[67] 胡业翠, 刘彦随, 邓旭升. 土地利用/覆被变化与土地资源优化配置的相关分析. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(2): 51~57.
[68] 丁忠义, 郝晋珉, 李新波等. 农业产业结构调整中土地利用结构及其与粮食产量关系分析. 资源科学, 2005, 27(4):95~99.
[69] 黄贤金, 彭补拙, 张建新等. 区域产业结构调整与土地可持续利用关系研究. 经济地理, 2002, 13(1): 425~429
[70] 孔祥斌, 张凤荣, 徐艳等. 集约化农区近50 年耕地数量分析驱动机制分析. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 12~20
[71] 欧阳进良, 宋春梅, 宇振荣等. 黄淮平原农区不同类型农户的土地利用方式选择及其环境影响. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 1~9
[72] 胡云锋, 刘纪远, 庄大方等. 不同土地利用/土地覆盖下土壤粒径分布的分维特征. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(2): 336~339.
[73] 王静,宋林华,向昌国等.不同植被类型覆盖下土壤CO2 浓度对洞穴景观的影响. 地理研究, 2004, 23(1): 71~77.
[74] 巩杰, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰等. 黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用和植被恢复对土壤质量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(12): 292~2296.
[75] 许明祥, 刘国彬, 温仲明等. 黄土丘陵区小流域土壤特性时空动态变化研究. 水土保持通报, 2000, 20(1): 21~23.
[76] 李阳兵, 谢德体. 不同土地利用方式对岩溶山地土壤团粒结构的影响. 水土保持学报, 2001, (4): 122~125.
[77] 王军, 傅伯杰, 邱扬等. 黄土丘陵区土地利用与土壤水分的时空关系. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(6): 521~524.
[78] Zhang Q J, Fu B J, Chen L D, et al. Dynamics and driving factors of agricultural landscape in the semiarid hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China. Agrivultre, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004, 103: 535~543.
[79] 彭群, 龙花楼, 罗明等. 西部地区土地整理生态评价. 经济地理, 2003, 23(6): 822~825.
[80] 王庆日, 吴次芳. 农地整理工程措施的生态可持续性评价研究. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(4): 70~73.
[81] 张正峰, 陈百明. 土地整理的效益分析. 农业工程学报, 2003, 19(2): 210~213.
[82] Stophenne N, Lambin E. A dynamic simulation model of land- use changes in Sudamo~sahelian countries of Africa (SALU) Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 145~161.
[83] 罗明, 张惠远. 土地整理及其生态环境影响综述. 资源科学, 2002, 24(2): 60~63.
[84] 张妍, 杨志峰, 李巍. 农牧交错地带的生态评估对土地整理的启示. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(4): 555~563.
[85] 高向军, 罗明, 张惠远. 土地利用和覆被变化( LUCC) 研究与土地整理. 农业工程学报, 2001, 17(4): 151~155.
[86] 王军, 罗明, 龙花楼.土地整理生态评价的方法与案例. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(3): 363~367.
[87] 叶艳妹, 吴次芳. 土地整理对土壤性状的影响及其重建技术和工艺研究. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2002, 28 (3): 267~271.
[88] Wei C F, Gao M, Shao J A, et al. Soil aggregate and its response to land management practices. China Particuology, 2006, 4(5): 211~219.
[89] 徐建春. 联邦德国乡村土地整理的特点及启示. 中国农村经济, 2001, 6: 75~80.
[90] 杨庆媛. 西南丘陵山地区土地整理与区域生态安全研究. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 698~708.
[91] 杨相和. 对西部地区土地整理若干问题的思考. 国土经济, 2002, 5: 43~44.
[92] 陈利顶, 徐建英, 傅伯杰等. 斑块边缘效应的定量评价及其生态学意义. 生态学报, 2004, 24(9): 1827~1832.
/
〈 | 〉 |