EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2007 , Vol. 26 >Issue 1: 26 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.01.003

本刊特稿

基于EOS/MODIS 数据的NDVI 与 EVI 比较研究

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所农业资源研究中心, 石家庄050021|
    2. 河北省气象科学研究所, 石家庄050021|
    3. 国家林业局, 北京100714
李红军(1973-), 男, 山西曲沃人, 助理研究员, 博士生, 主要从事3S 技术与生态水文研究。 Email:lhj@sjziam.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2006-10-01

  修回日期: 2007-01-01

  网络出版日期: 2007-02-20

基金资助

中科院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCXZ-YW-N-037和KZCX3-SW-446);河北省节水农业重点实验室开放基金项目(0508021-HBKLA-01) .

收起

Comparison of NDVI and EVI based on EOS/MODIS data

Expand
  • 1. Center for Agricultural Resources Institute of Genetics and Development Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, China|
    2. Meteorological Institute of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050021, China|
    3. State Forestry Administration, Beijing, 100714,China

Received date: 2006-10-01

  Revised date: 2007-01-01

  Online published: 2007-02-20

Fold

摘要

作为NOAA/AVHRR 归一化植被指数(NDVI) 的延续和发展, EOS/MODIS 归一化植被指 数(NDVI) 和增强植被指数( EVI) 在许多领域得到广泛应用。应用数理统计和地统计学方法对二 者进行的对比研究表明: NDVI 在植被生长旺盛期容易达到饱和, 而EVI 则能克服这一现象, 比 较真实地反映植被的生长变化过程; 相同空间分辨率下, EVI 取值范围、标准差与变异系数均高 于NDVI, NDVI 数据比较均一, 其空间相关性高于EVI, EVI 更能反映研究区域内植被空间差异。 关键词:MODIS; 归一化植被指数(NDVI) ; 增强植被指数( EVI) ; 对比

关键词： MODIS; 对比; 归一化植被指数(NDVI); 增强植被指数(EVI)

本文引用格式

李红军,郑力,雷玉平,李春强,周戡 . 基于EOS/MODIS 数据的NDVI 与 EVI 比较研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007 , 26(1) : 26 -32 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.01.003

Abstract

As the continuation and development of NOAA/AVHRR NDVI, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI) of MODIS have been comprehensively used in many fields. In order to investigate the difference between NDVI and EVI derived from MODIS, comparative study of these two vegetation indices was conducted by statistics and geo- statistic methods (semi- variance function). By the comparison of the two kinds of vegetation index distribution maps in different period, it is demonstrated that EVI improve the sensitivity for well- vegetated areas where NDVI is saturated when plants grow well, which will be helpful in monitoring plants growth status. At same resolution, i.e. 250m, 500m and 1000m, by means of the geo- statistics, the results show that range, variance and variation coefficient of EVI is higher than that of NDVI, the value of NDVI is even, and its spatial relativity is higher than that of EVI, which all show that EVI is more sensitive to the spatial heterogeneity of plants in research area.

Key words： comparison; enhanced vegetation index (EVI); MODIS; normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)

参考文献


[1] Jordan C F. Derivation of leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology, 1969,50:663~666.

[2] Deering D W. Rangeland reflectance characteristics measured by aircraft and spacecraft sensors.Texas A&M University, College Station, TX,1978,338.

[3] 王正兴, 刘闯, Huete Alfredo. 植被指数研究进展: 从AVHRR- NDVI 到MODIS- EVI. 生态学报, 2003,23(5):979~986.

[4] Liu H Q, Huete A R. A feedback based modification of the NDVI to minimize canopy background and atmospheric noise. IEEE Tans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 1995, 33:457～465.

[5] 郭铌. 植被指数及其研究进展. 干旱气象, 2003, 21( 4) : 71~75.

[6] 王正兴, 刘闯, 陈文波等. MODIS 增强型植被指数EVI 与NDVI 初步比较. 武汉大学学报( 信息科学版) 2006, 31 ( 5) : 407~410.

[7] 程乾, 黄敬峰, 王人湖. MODIS 和NOAA/AVHRR 植被指数差异初步研究. 科技通报, 2005, 21( 2) : 205~209.

[8] 张霞, 张兵, 卫征等. MODIS 光谱指数监测小麦长势变化研究. 中国图象图形学报, 2005, 10( 4) : 420~424.

[9] 毛任钊, 李红军. 基于TM数据源的农田光谱异质性研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2003, 11( 3) : 106~109.

[10] 李哈滨, 王政权, 王庆成. 空间异质性定量研究理论与方法. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9( 6) : 651~657.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉