土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法
收稿日期: 2005-12-01
修回日期: 2006-03-01
网络出版日期: 2006-05-25
基金资助
科技部十五攻关项目( 2001BA606A- 01) 的阶段性成果.
The Progr ess and Prospect of Land Use Conflicts
Received date: 2005-12-01
Revised date: 2006-03-01
Online published: 2006-05-25
于伯华,吕昌河 . 土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006 , 25(3) : 106 -115 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.03.013
Varied demands of society for the limited land are leading to an overlay of interests and thus to land use conflicts. Moreover, the conflicts are exacerbated by the rapid increase of population and urban expansion on both regional and global scale, which is an obstacle for sustainable land use. It is becoming increasingly challenging for local and national government over land management. Thereby, the study of land use conflicts plays an important role in the realization of sustainable land use. This article examines the causes of land use conflicts from both physical and social - economic dimensions, and regards that scarces of land resource and increasing conflicting demands for land should be responsible for land use conflicts. Conflicts among economical, environmental and social objectives are this articles main contents. Farmingpastoral region, water - land ecotone and urban - rural fringe are the three hotspots of multiple conflicts. The article also describes familiar methods used in the study of resource use conflicts, with a hope to help the study of land use conflicts. There is still a long way to define and understand the concept of land use conflict and its connotation, to pursue its driving forces and countermeasures. In the future the emphases of land use conflicts study should focus on tracing and monitoring the dynamics of land use conflicts in order to create a better basis for understanding the conflicts and also on the contrast of internal and external conflicts from the context of occurrence and evolution. The models or tools should also be developed at the same time in order to reduce land use conflicts in terms of a regional management of environment and natural resources.
[1] William M. Adams, Dan Brockington, Jane Dyson, et al. Managing Tragedies: Understanding Conflict over Common Pool Resources. Science, 2003, 302: 1915~1916.
[2] 张德. 组织行为学. 北京: 高等教育出版社. 1999, 75.
[3] David J. Campbell, Helen Gichohi, Albertmwangi, et al. Land use conflict in kajiado District, Kenya. Land Use Policy, 2000, 17: 337~348.
[4] 李平, 李秀彬, 刘学军. 我国现阶段土地利用变化驱动力的宏观分析. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2): 129~138.
[5] 刘盛和. 城市土地利用扩展的空间模式与动力机制. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(1):43~50.
[6] 周道纬, 卢文喜, 夏丽华等. 北方农牧交错带东段草地退化与水土流失. 1999, 21(5):57~61.
[7] 于伯华, 吕昌河. 基于DPSIR 概念模型的农业可持续发展宏观分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2004, 14(5): 68~72.
[8] Grimble R, and K Wellard. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experience and opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 1997, 55(2):173~193.
[9] 蔡玉梅, 董柞继, 邓红蒂等. FAO 土地利用规划研究进展评述. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(1):70~78.
[10] FAO. Resolving conflict over land. 1998. (Available online at http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/9810/spot4.htm).
[11] United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management. Land Use Planning Handbook. 2004. (Available online at http://www.nplnews.com/dox/blmplanning/ib2004~128attach2.pdf).
[12] Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada, Adaptation Division. Adapting in 1999 and beyond: key issues affecting the agriculture and agri- food sector and rural agricultural communities, 1998, (Available online at http://www.agr.calpolicy/adapt).
[13] Anantha K. Duraiappah, Gerrishon Ikiara, Mutsembi Manundu, et al. Land Tenure, Land Use, Environmental Degradation and Conflict Resolution: a PASIR Analysis for the Narok District, Kenya. Working Paper No 33, 2000. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, and Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam.
[14] 李秀彬. 土地利用变化的解释. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3) :195~203.
[15] David J. Campbell, Helen Gichohi, Albert Mwangi, et al. Land use conflict in Kajiado District, Kenya. Land Use Policy, 2000, 17: 337~348.
[16] Harry Spaling and John R. Wood. Greed, need or creed? Farmland ethics in the rural urban fringe. Land use policy, 1996, 15(2):105~118.
[17] 何彤慧, 姜玲. 由宁夏中部地区的资源开发看生态建设的整体性. 经济地理, 2002, 22(5):612~615.
[18] Iain Fraser, Tony Chisholm. Conservation or cultural heritage? Cattle grazing in the Victoria Alpine National Park. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33:63~75.
[19] Hilson G.. An overview of land use conflicts in mining communities. Land Use Policy, 2002, 19:65~73.
[20] Paul Cloke, Paul Milbournej, and Chris Thomasj. From Wasteland to Wonderland: Opencast Mining, Regeneration and the English National Forest. Geoforum, 1996, 21(2): 159~174.
[21] 杨勤业, 张豪禧, 叶庆华. 黄河北干流晋陕蒙接壤地区环境冲突分析研究. 地理科学进展, 1999, 18(3):193~200.
[22] Lorne Owen, Wayne Howard, Mark Waldron. Conflicts over farming practices in Canada: the role of interactive conflict resolution approaches. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000, 16:475~ 483.
[23] Moleele N. M. & Mainah J. Resource use conflicts: the future of the Kalahari ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 54: 405~423.
[24] 支玲, 任恒棋, 李卫忠. 西部退耕还林(草)生态目标的冲突与协调. 西北林学院学报, 2003, 18(3):103~107. ]25] 徐新良, 刘纪远, 庄大方等. 中国林地资源时空动态特征及驱动力分析. 北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(1): 41~46.
[26] 高清竹, 何立环, 江源等. 农牧交错带典型区农业与牧业用地互动关系研究. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2), 209~214.
[27] 李景保, 朱翔, 蔡炳华等. 洞庭湖区湿地资源可持续利用途径研究. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(3):287~392.
[28] William C. Sullivan, Olin M. Anderson & Sarah Taylor Lovell. Agricultural buffers at the rural–urban fringe: an examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 69: 299~313.
[29] Ducrot R., Le Page C., Bommel P., et al. Articulating land and water dynamics with urbanization: an attempt to model natural resources management at the urban edge. Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28: 85~106.
[30] Mark A. Edelman, Jon Roe, and David B. Patton. Land Use Conflict: When city and county Clash. A Project of the National Public Policy Education Committee in Cooperation with the Farm Foundation, 1999.
[31] 谈明洪, 李秀彬, 吕昌河. 20 世纪90 年代中国大中城市建设用地扩张及其对耕地的占用. 中国科学D 辑, 2004, 34 (12): 1157~1165.
[32] 谈明洪, 吕昌河. 城市用地扩展与耕地保护. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1):52~58.
[33] 王万英, 李海林. 森林利用的冲突与调解途径理论探讨. 云南地理环境研究, 1999, 11(1):30~36.
[34] 毛留喜, 宇振荣, 程序等. 北方农牧交错带人口胁迫与耕地利用的相互关系. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(4): 11~14.
[35] Andrew J.S. Potential application of mediation to land use conflicts in small scale mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2003, 11: 117~130.
[36] Lorne Owen, Wayne Howard, Mark Waldron. Conflicts over farming practices in Canada: the role of interactive conflict resolution approaches. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000, 16:475~ 483.
[37] Mungai D N, Ong C K, Kiteme B, et al. Lessons from two long- term hydrological studies in Kenya and Sri Lanka. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004, 104:135~143.
[38] Alastair Orr and Blessings Mwale. Adapting to Adjustment: Smallholder Livelihood Strategies in Southern Malawi. World Development, 2001, 29(8):1325~1343.
[39] 葛全胜, 赵名茶, 郑景云等. 中国陆地表层系统分区初探. 地理学报, 2002, 57(5):515~522.
[40] Bouman B A M, Schipper R A. & Nieuwenhuyse A. et al. Quantifying economic and biophysical sustainability trade- offs in land use exploration at the regional level: a case study for the Northern Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 114:95~109.
[41] Lu C.H, M K van Ittersum. A trade- off analysis of policy objectives for Ansai, the Loess Plateau of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004 102, 235~246.
[42] Lu C.H, Van Ittersum M K, Rabbinge R.. A scenario exploration of strategic land use options for the Loess Plateau in northern China, Agricultural Systems, 2004, 79:145~170.
[43] George Johnson, Jean L. Coleman, David G. Pitt. Feedlots and Land- Use Conflict, 2002. (Available online at http://www.asu. edu/caed/proceedings02/JOHNSON/johnson.htm).
[44] K chelea H. & Dabbert S. An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between farmers and nature conservationists- an application of the decision support system MODAM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park. Agricultural Systems, 2002, 74:241~255.
[45] 刘文强, 孙永广, 顾树华等. 水资源分配冲突的博弈分析. 系统工程理论与实践, 2002, 1:16~25.
[46] Becker Nir & Easter K W, Water diversion from the great lakes: is a cooperative approach possible?. Water Resources Development, 1997, 13(1): 53~65.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |