EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2011 , Vol. 30 >Issue 8: 995 - 1005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.08.006

城市研究

20世纪60年代以来海港城市研究进展

展开
  • 1. 大连海事大学交通运输管理学院，大连 116026;
    2. 辽宁师范大学城市与环境学院，大连 116029
王海壮(1975-)，男，辽宁铁岭人，讲师，博士研究生，主要研究方向为海港城市地理与沿海地区规划。E-mail: whaizhuang@163.com

收稿日期: 2010-11-01

  修回日期: 2011-04-01

  网络出版日期: 2011-08-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40871063)。

收起

The Progresses of Seaport City Studies in the Last Fifty Years

Expand
  • 1. School of Transportation Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China;
    2. School of Urban & Environmental Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China

Received date: 2010-11-01

  Revised date: 2011-04-01

  Online published: 2011-08-25

Fold

摘要

作为一种特殊的城市类型，海港城市自20 世纪60 年代开始就受到国内外学术界的广泛关注，如今已有较为丰富的学术产出，可大体划归为港城关系、港口地域演化、港城一体规划和港城空间结构等研究主题，尽管前人曾对某一方面的研究进展作过评述性的工作，但仍缺乏比较系统全面的海港城市研究综述。本文搜集半个多世纪的国内外相关文献，根据研究主旨对其进行归类，而后按时间顺序对各个主题进行梳理、分析比较，再现其研究脉络，找出国内外研究的不足以及未来研究的方向。综述发现：全球对海港城市的关注度在增强，但国内缺乏连贯性；关注重点从港城演化转向港城关系，但国内港城关系研究视角相对狭窄；研究方法从定性转向定量，但仍缺少跨学科的综合手段；空间分析一直是海港城市研究的重要方法，但尺度与指标需要完善；海港城市过程及现状研究较多，缺少对未来新建港城的理论与实践指导。

关键词： 港城关系; 港口开发与地域演化; 海港城市

本文引用格式

王海壮, 栾维新 . 20世纪60年代以来海港城市研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011 , 30(8) : 995 -1005 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.08.006

Abstract

As a special urban type, seaport cities have aroused wide concern from academic communities at home and abroad since the 1960s. Nowadays, there are plenty of academic outputs in this field, which are classified into several research topics such as port-city relationship, port development and evolution, integrated planning of port and city, and spatial structure of port cities. Although several scholars reviewed some subjects in this field recently, there is not a complete literature review of seaport city studies. This paper collected academic works related in recent more than 50 years, sorted them out in term of study topics firstly, and then summed up, analyzed and compared these subjects to show the research context and to find study shortages and future directions in this field. After reviewing, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, the attention to seaport cities is increasing worldwide, but it lacks coherence at home. Secondly, research perspective has transferred from port-city evolution to port-city relationship, but the latter is relatively confined at home. Thirdly, the study method has changed from qualitative to quantitative analysis, but still lacks interdisciplinary approach. Fourthly, spatial analysis is an essential method all the time, and scale and indicators shall be supplemented in the future study. Finally, there are many studies in this field that focus on evolution process and status of seaport cities, but there are relatively few studies on theories and their applications to newly built seaport cities.

Key words： development and evolution of port; port-city relationship; seaport cities

参考文献

[1] 徐永健, 闫小培, 许学强. 西方现代港口与城市、区域发展研究述评. 人文地理, 2001, 16(4): 28-33.

[2] 王列辉. 国外港口体系研究评述. 经济地理, 2007, 27 (2): 291-295.

[3] Daamen T. Sustainable Development of the European Port-City Interface. ENHR Conference, Rotterdam, June 25-28, 2007.

[4] 王成金. 现代港口地理学的研究进展及展望. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(3): 243-251.

[5] Hayuth Y. The Port-Urban Interface: an Area in Transition. Area, 1982, 14(3): 219-224.

[6] Hoyle B S. Development Dynamics at the Port-City Interface// Hoyle B S, Pinder D A, Husain M S. Revitalising theWaterfront: International Dimensions of Dockland Redevelopment. London: Belhaven Press, 1988: 5-19.

[7] Hoyle B S. Identity and Interdependence: Transport and Transformation at the Port-City Interface. The 4th Project Meeting of the Ionian and Adriatic Cities and Ports Joint Cooperation. Koper, Slovenia, 31 March-1 April, 2006.

[8] Hoyle B S. The port-city interface: Trends, problems and examples. Geoforum, 1989, 20(4): 429-435.

[9] Zaremba P. Les principes du développement des villes portuaires. Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Centre Scientifique de Paris, Fasc, n° 32, 1962.

[10] Olivier D, Slack B. Rethinking the port. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(8): 1409-1427.

[11] Charlier J. The Regeneration of old port areas for new port uses//Hoyle B S, Hilling D. Seaport Systems and Spatial Change. Chichester:Wiley, 1992: 137-154.

[12] Norcliffe G, Bassett K, Hoare T. The emergence of postmodernism on the urban waterfront: Geographical perspectives on changing relationships. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(2): 123-134.

[13] Daamen T. Managing Aareas of Transition: An Approach to Complex Re-Development Questions in the Area between the European City and its Main Seaport. Planning Research Conference, London, April 5-7, 2006.

[14] Daamen T. Development Challenges in the Evolving Port-City Interface: Defining Complex Development Problems in the European Main Seaport-City Interface: Rotterdam and Hamburg. 10th International Conference Cities and Ports, Sydney, November 5-9, 2006.

[15] Lee S W, Song D W, Ducruet C. A tale of Asia’s world ports: The spatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum, 2008, 39(1): 372-385.

[16] Wiegmans B W, Louw E. Changing port-city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(4): 575-583.

[17] Hoyle B S, Pinder A. Cities and the sea: Change and development in contemporary Europe//Hoyle B S, Pinder D. European Port Cities in Transition. London: Belhaven Press, 1992: 1-19.

[18] Hoyle B S. The redevelopment of derelict port areas. The Dock & Harbour Authority, 1998, 79(887): 46-49.

[19] Bruttomesso R. Working on the water’s edge//Bruttomesso R. Waterfronts: A New Frontier For Cities On Water. Venice: International Center Cities onWater, 1993: 10-11.

[20] Millspaugh M L. Waterfronts as catalysts for city renewal// Marshall R. Waterfronts in Post-industrial Cities. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004: 74-85.

[21] Mollenkopf J H. The Contested City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983: 213-253.

[22] Hall P. Waterfronts: A new urban frontier//Bruttomesso R. Waterfronts: A New Frontier for Cities on Water. Venice: International Centre Cities onWater, 1993: 12-19.

[23] Hoyle B S. Global and local change on the port-city waterfront. The Geographical Review, 2000, 90(3): 395-417.

[24] Hoyle B S. Urban waterfront revitalization in developing countries: The example of Zanzibar's Stone Town. The Geographical Journal, 2002, 168(2): 141-162.

[25] Lindsay J C. Planning principles for the port-city interface[D]. Canada: University of Regina, 1989.

[26] Sieber R T. Waterfront revitalization in postindustrial port cities of North America. City & Society, 1991, 5(2): 120-136.

[27] Hoyle B S. Lamu: Waterfront revitalization in an east African port-city. Cities, 2001, 18(5): 297-313.

[28] Breen A, Rigby D. Urban Waterfronts: Cities Reclaim Their Edge. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

[29] Breen A, Rigby D. The New Waterfront: AWorldwide Urban Success Story. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996.

[30] Malone P. City, Capital and Water. New York: Routledge, 1996.

[31] Meyer H. City and Port: Urban Planning as a Cultural Venture in London, Barcelona, New York, and Rotterdam: Changing Relations between Public Urban Space and Large-scale Infrastructure. Utrecht: International Books, 2003.

[32] David L A G. Planning, design and managing change in urban waterfront redevelopment. Town Planning Review (UK), 1996, 67(3): 261-290.

[33] David L A G. Financing urban waterfront redevelopment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1997, 63 (2): 244-265.

[34] David L A G. Managing the changing political environment in urban waterfront redevelopment. Urban Studies, 1997, 34(1): 61-83.

[35] Hoyle B S. Urban renewal in east African port cities: Mombasa's old town waterfront. GeoJournal, 2001, 53 (2): 183-197.

[36] Gospodini A. Urban waterfront redevelopment in Greek cities: A framework for redesigning space. Cities, 2001, 18(5): 285-295.

[37] Dong L. Waterfront development: A case study of Dalian, China [D]. Canada: University ofWaterloo, 2004.

[38] Merckx F, Notteboom T E, Winkelmans W. Spatial models of waterfront redevelopment: the tension between city and port revisited. Proceedings of the IAME 2003 Conference, Busan (South Korea), September 3-5, 2003: 267-285.

[39] Butuner B. Waterfront Revitalization as a Challenging Urban Issue in Istanbul. 42nd ISoCaRP Congress, 2006.

[40] Lee S W, Ducruet C. Waterfront redevelopment and territorial integration in Le Havre (France) and Southampton (UK): Implications for Busan, Korea. Ocean Policy Research, 2006, 21(2): 127-156.

[41] Oliva S. The Effects of Waterfront development on Housing Prices: The case of Eastern Baltimore [D]. MD: University of Maryland, 2006.

[42] Sairinen R, Kumpulainen S. Assessing social impacts in urban waterfront regeneration. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2006, 26(1): 120-135.

[43] Salina M A, Abdul H N. The social impact of urban waterfront landscapes: Malaysian perspectives. Proceedings Real Corp Tagungsband, 2009: 529-533.

[44] Ducruet C, Jeong O-J. European port-city interface and its Asian application. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2005.

[45] Ducruet C, Lee S W. Frontline soldiers of globalization: Port-city evolution and regional competition. GeoJournal, 2006, 67(2): 107-122.

[46] Ducruet C. Port-city relationships in Europe and Asia. Journal of International logistics and trade, 2006, 4(2): 13-35.

[47] Ducruet C. A metageography of port-city relationships// Wang J, Olivier D, Notteboom T E, et al. Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2007: 157-172.

[48] Bird J H. The Major Seaports of the United Kingdom. London: Hutchinson, 1963.

[49] Bird J H. Seaports and Seaport Terminals. London: Hutchinson, 1971.

[50] Slack B, Wang J J. The challenge of peripheral ports: An Asian perspective. GeoJournal, 2003, 56(2): 159-166.

[51] Robinson R. Industrial strategies and port development in developing countries: The Asian case. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 1985, 76(2): 133-143.

[52] Klink v. The port network as a new stage in port development: The case of Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A, 1998, 30(1): 143-160.

[53] Peter J M N. Port cities. International Institute for Asia Studies, Newsletter#37[EB/OL]: http://www.iias.nl/nl/37/ IIAS_NL37_32.pdf.

[54] Notteboom T E, Rodrigue J-P. Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management, 2005, 32(3): 297-313.

[55] Waltraud K. Port cities as areas of transition: Comparative ethnographic research//Waltraud K, Mijal G-T, Kathrin W, et al. Port Cities as Areas of Transition: Ethnographic Perspectives. Columbia, US: Bellwether Publishing, Ltd., 2008: 7-23.

[56] Jo J C, Ducruet C. Maritime trade and port evolution in a socialist developing country: Nampo-gateway of North Korea. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 2006, 51(1): 3-24.

[57] Chioma J. Port development in Nigeria: Trends and patterns. Journal of Transportation Security, 2009, 2(4): 107-119.

[58] Rodrigue J P, Comtois C, Slack B. The Geography of Transport Systems. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2009.

[59] Andrzej T. The port as part of city planning. Littoral 2002: The Changing Coast. Eurocoast/EUCC, Porto-Portugal Ed, 2002.

[60] José Luis E L. port activities and port-city relations. Ionas Second Project Meeting, Brindisi, January 22, 2005.

[61] Günter W. The Transformation of European Port Cities: Final Report on the New EPOC Port City Audit. Institut Arbeit undWirtschaft, 2006.

[62] European Regional Development Fund, IACP. Plan the city with the port: Strategies for Redeveloping City-Port Linking Spaces. PCP Project, Newsletter#1, 2007.

[63] Swedish Environmental Research Institute. Spatial and Environmental Impact of Port Development-case study for the port of G?teborg. 2007.

[64] McGee T G. The Southeast Asian City: A Social Geography of the Primate Cities. London: G. Bell & Sons Ltd., 1967.

[65] Sommer J W. The internal structure of African cities// Knight C G, Newman J L. Contemporary Africa Geography and Change. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1976: 306-320.

[66] Soffer A, Shimon S. The port city: A subgroup of the Middle Eastern city model. Ekistics, 1986(53): 102-110.

[67] Dutt A K, Xie Y, Costa F J, et al. City forms of China and India in global perspective//Dutt A K, Costa F J, Surinder A, et al. The Asian City: Processes of Development, Characteristics and Planning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994: 25-51.

[68] Rodrigue J-P. Transportation and territorial development in the Singapore extended metropolitan region. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 1994, 15(1): 56-74.

[69] Gleave M B. Port activities and the spatial structure of cities: The case of Freetown, Sierra Leone. Journal of transport geography, 1997, 5(4): 57-275.

[70] Noble A G, Panditharatne B L. Colombo and the pattern of South Asia and port city models//Dutt A K, Noble A G, Venugopal G, et al. Challenges to Asian Urbanization in the 21st Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003: 53-66.

[71] Eliot E. Chorotype de la métropole portuaire d’Asie du Sud. Mappemonde, 2003, 69(1): 7-10.

[72] Koide H. General equilibrium analysis of urban spatial structure: The port-city model reconsidered. Journal of Regional Science, 1990, 30(3): 325-347.

[73] Fujita M, Mori T. The role of ports in the making of major cities: Self-agglomeration and hub-effect. Journal of Development Economics, 1996, 49(1):93-120.

[74] 马裕祥. 宁波港口城市发展的经济地理分析. 杭州大学学报: 理学版, 1980(3): 106-114.

[75] 陈航. 海港形成发展与布局的经济地理基础. 地理科学, 1984, 4(2): 125-131.

[76] 杨葆亭. 我国中古海港城市历史发展阶段及其规律探讨. 城市规划, 1983(4): 51-59.

[77] 吴传钧, 高小真. 海港城市的成长模式. 地理研究, 1989, 8(4): 10-15.

[78] 陈航. 海港地域组合及其区划的初步研究. 地理学报, 1991, 46(4): 480-486.

[79] 陈航. 论海港地域组合的形成机制与发展过程. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6): 501-507.

[80] 李加林. 河口港城市形态演变的分析研究-兼论宁波城市形态的历史演变及发展. 人文地理, 1998, 13(2): 50-53.

[81] 吕月娥. 日治時期基隆港口都市形成歷程之研究[D]. 台湾: 私立中原大学, 2001.

[82] 邢海峰, 柴彦威. 大城市边缘新兴城区地域空间结构的形成与演化趋势: 以天津滨海新区为例. 地域研究与开发, 2003, 22(2): 21-25.

[83] 钟镇远, 阮晓彦, 钟国平. 港口发展对城市空间影响研究: 以天津港为例//中国城市规划学会. 和谐城市规划: 2007 年中国城市规划年会论文集. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江科学技术出版, 2007: 1106-1111.

[84] 赵建军. 青岛市城市地域拓展的历史及特点概述. 青岛大学师范学院学报, 2004, 21(4): 85-89.

[85] 赵鹏军, 吕斌. 港口经济及其地域空间作用对鹿特丹港的案例研究. 人文地理, 2005, 20(5): 108-111.

[86] 牟凤云, 张增祥, 谭文斌, 等. 广州城市空间形态特征与时空演化分析. 地理信息科学, 2007, 9(5): 94-98.

[87] 李加林, 朱晓华, 张殿发. 群组型港口城市用地时空扩展特征及外部形态演变: 以宁波为例. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2): 275-284.

[88] 刘露. 天津城市空间结构与交通发展的相关性研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2008.

[89] 高小真. 短缺经济中的港市相互作用. 地域研究与开发, 1990, 9(2): 14-16, 20.

[90] 杜其东, 陶其钧, 汪诚彪. 国际经济中心城市港口比较专题系列研究之: 港口与城市关系研究. 水运管理, 1996(1): 5-10.

[91] 许继琴. 港口城市成长的理论与实证探讨. 地域研究与开发, 1996, 16(4): 11-14.

[92] 罗萍. 我国港口与城市互动发展的趋势. 综合运输, 2006(10): 16-20.

[93] 刘文. 天津港城互动发展现状分析. 中国水运, 2007, 5 (10): 37-38.

[94] 丁仕堂. 港城关系对城市空间结构的影响研究[D]. 上海: 上海同济大学, 2008.

[95] 刘扬, 卢明华. 港口对城市发展影响的研究: 以辽宁营口港为例. 首都师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 30 (3): 92-96.

[96] 张铁. 新形势下大连港与大连市协调发展研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2004.

[97] 王丹阳. 大连港口与城市互动发展实证分析与对策研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2006.

[98] 陈芸芸. 港城互动发展研究[D]. 大连海事大学, 2007.

[99] 白杉. 港城互动机理和演化进程研究: 以大连市为例[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2007.

[100] 陈航. 港城互动的理论与实证研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2009.

[101] 庄佩君, 汪宇明. 港—城界面的演变及其空间机理. 地理研究, 2010, 29(6): 1105-1116.

[102] 潘云章, 钱汉书. 海港城市规划浅议. 城市规划, 1982 (6): 26-28.

[103] 郑弘毅, 蒋宁玲. 我国海港城市性质及其拟定方法. 城市规划, 1982(6): 29-32.

[104] 武廷海. 当前海港城市总体布局中的误区. 现代城市研究, 1994(2): 13-16.

[105] 张谦益. 海港城市岸线利用规划若干问题探讨. 城市规划, 1998(2): 50-52.

[106] 郝之颖. 新建海港城市发展探究: 大连长兴岛港城规划发展研究为例. 现代城市研究, 2007(5): 10-18.

[107] 科研成果汇编组. 现代海港城市规划. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江人民出版社, 1985.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉