地理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 785-796.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.05.004

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展的空间效应及驱动机制研究

朱媛媛1,2(), 周笑琦1,2, 顾江1,2, 陈京1,2,*()   

  1. 1.华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430079
    2.湖北省发展和改革委员会/华中师范大学武汉城市圈研究院,武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-13 修回日期:2021-10-21 出版日期:2022-05-28 发布日期:2022-07-28
  • 通讯作者: *陈京(1989— ),男,湖北宜昌人,博士,讲师,研究方向为产业地理与区域发展。E-mail: jing.chen@ccnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱媛媛(1985— ),女,河南兰考人,博士,副教授,硕导,研究方向为区域发展与城乡规划、文化地理学。E-mail: zhuyy990@ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42071170);国家自然科学基金项目(42001136);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1100804-03)

Spatial effect and driving mechanism of the integrated development of culture-tourism industries in the middle Yangtze River Basin urban agglomeration

ZHU Yuanyuan1,2(), ZHOU Xiaoqi1,2, GU Jiang1,2, CHEN Jing1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    2. Academy of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, Hubei Development and Reform Commission & Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2021-09-13 Revised:2021-10-21 Online:2022-05-28 Published:2022-07-28
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(42071170);National Natural Science Foundation of China(42001136);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD1100804-03)

摘要:

“文—旅”产业融合发展为产业结构高质量转型、空间统筹优化和区域经济韧性提升赋能。在由“宏观—中观—微观”三维尺度复合而成的城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展理论基础上,论文构建了城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展评价指标体系,以长江中游城市群为研究对象,借助耦合协调模型和极化指数模型对2010—2019年区域“文—旅”产业融合发展水平进行测算并分析其空间效应,并探究该区域“文—旅”产业融合发展的驱动机制。结果显示:① 长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展的各子系统间具有较强的互动关系,但多数城市暂未达到良性发展状态;② 研究期内,长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展的空间效应表现出“极化效应”显著、“回程效应”与“扩散效应”微弱的特征;③ 长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展在空间上呈现以“武汉—长沙—南昌”为核心的“核心—边缘”结构;④ 长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展是在资源禀赋基础力、居民消费需求力、基础设施保障力、规模效益催动力、人力资源潜在力、经济发展拉动力“六力”共同驱动下形成的。最后,根据长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展现状,提出强化区域联动、瞄准核心驱动力等针对性建议,推动长江中游城市群区域一体化建设和地方经济高质量发展。

关键词: "文-旅"产业融合, 耦合协调, 空间效应, 驱动机制, 长江中游城市群

Abstract:

The integrated development of culture-tourism industries enables the high-quality transformation of regional industrial structure, overall spatial optimization, and improvement of regional economic resilience. Based on the theory of integrated development of culture-tourism industries in urban agglomerations incorporating the macro, meso, and micro scales, this study constructed the evaluation indicator system of integrated development of culture-tourism industries of urban agglomerations, and the middle Yangtze River Basin urban agglomeration was taken as the research object. The coupling coordination model and polarization index model were used to calculate the integrated development level of culture-tourism industries in the urban agglomeration from 2010 to 2019, and the spatial effect was analyzed. The driving mechanism of integrated development of culture-tourism industries was also explored. Four highlighted results are unveiled: 1) There is a strong interactive relationship between the subsystems of the integrated development of culture-tourism industries in the urban agglomeration. Most cities have not reached a benign development state. 2) During the study period, the spatial effect of the integrated development of culture-tourism industries in the region was characterized by polarization, while the "return effect" and "diffusion effect" were weak. 3) A core-periphery structure with Wuhan-Changsha-Nanchang as the cores was present. 4) The integrated development of culture-tourism industries in the region was jointly driven by six factors: Resource endowment, consumption demand, infrastructure support, scale efficiency, economic development, and human resource potential. According to the status of the integrated development of culture-tourism industries in the urban agglomeration, this article put forward specific recommendations of strengthening regional linkage and targeting the core driving factors to promote the regional integration construction and high-quality development of local economy in the middle Yangtze River Basin urban agglomeration.

Key words: integrated development of culture-tourism industries, coupling coordination, spatial effect, driving mechanism, middle Yangtze River Basin urban agglomeration