人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015

地理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 139-151.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015

所属专题：人地系统

人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务

赵文武^1,^2,^*(), 刘月^1,², 冯强^1,², 王亚萍^1,², 杨思琪^1,²

1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875
2. 北京师范大学地理科学学部陆地表层系统科学与可持续发展研究院,北京 100875

收稿日期:2018-01-11 修回日期:2018-01-19 出版日期:2018-01-28 发布日期:2018-01-28
作者简介:
作者简介：赵文武(1976-),男,山东曹县人,教授,主要从事自然地理与景观生态研究,E-mail: zhaoww@bnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(L1624026);中国科学院学部学科发展战略研究项目(2016-DX-C-02)

Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems

Wenwu ZHAO^1,^2,^*(), Yue LIU^1,², Qiang FENG^1,², Yaping WANG^1,², Siqi YANG^1,²

1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2018-01-11 Revised:2018-01-19 Online:2018-01-28 Published:2018-01-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.L1624026;Research Project on the Development Strategy of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.2016-DX-C-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态系统服务是连接自然环境与人类福祉的桥梁,是人地系统耦合研究的核心内容。本文在构建生态系统服务与人地系统耦合研究框架的基础上,系统梳理了生态系统服务评估、生态系统服务权衡、生态系统服务影响因素、生态系统服务供给流动与需求等研究前沿,提出了未来生态系统服务研究的重点领域。主要研究结论认为：①国际生态系统服务模型发展迅速,SAORES模型是中国生态系统服务模型优化与参数本地化的突出代表;②生态系统服务权衡具有相对复杂的时空尺度,权衡分析的前提是辨析不同尺度生态系统结构—过程—功能—服务的作用机制;③自然因素是生态系统服务时空分布的基础,土地利用能改变生态系统结构、功能与生态系统服务变化,社会经济因素会导致生态系统服务权衡的差异;④为明晰生态系统服务供给与需求耦合关系,需进一步识别生态系统服务流的运移路径;⑤未来生态系统服务研究需加强生态系统服务对全球变化的响应特征和机制分析、面向可持续发展目标的生态系统服务供给流动与需求研究、生态系统服务的动态评价集成与优化、生态系统服务与人地系统耦合、生态系统服务与大数据集成等。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 评估, 权衡, 驱动机制, 供给与需求, 人地系统耦合

Abstract:

Ecosystem services bridge the natural environment and human well-being, and are the key content of coupled human-environment system research. This article puts forward a framework of research on ecosystem services for coupled human-environment systems, and systematically reviews the research hotspots of ecosystem services evaluation, ecosystem services trade-offs, ecosystem services driving factors, ecosystem supply-flow-demand, and identifies the key areas for future ecosystem services research. This article argues that: (1) international research on ecosystem services models have experienced a rapid development, and SAORES model is the outstanding representative of ecosystem service evaluation model in China; (2) ecosystem service trade-off analyses are relatively complex, and its mechanism depends on distinguish the relationships among ecosystem structure-process-function-service at multiple spatial and temporal scales; (3) natural factors are the basis of ecosystem services distribution, land use change can modify ecosystem structure, function, and services, and social and economic factors can lead to differences in ecosystem services trade-off and demand; (4) in order to clarify the coupling relationship between ecosystem service supply and demand, it is urgently needed to further identify the pathes of ecosystem service flowes; (5) future research of ecosystem services should include strengthening the analyses on the response of ecosystem services to global change, ecosystem services supply and demand flow focusing on the sustainable development aspect, integration and optimization of the dynamic evaluation of ecosystem services, the coupling of ecosystem services and human-environment systems, and the integration of ecosystem services and big data.

Key words: ecosystem services, assessment, trade-offs, driving mechanism, supply and demand, coupled human and environment system

赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 王亚萍, 杨思琪. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.

Wenwu ZHAO, Yue LIU, Qiang FENG, Yaping WANG, Siqi YANG. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.

图/表 2

参考文献 88

[89]	Sutherland W J, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth P R, et al.2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(4): 617-627. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x
[90]	Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A, et al.2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices[J]. Nature, 418: 671-677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014 pmid: 12167873
[91]	Tscharntke T, Klein A M, Kruess A, et al.2010. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management[J]. Ecology Letters, 8(8): 857-874. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
[92]	Ulgiati S, Brown M T.2009. Emergy and ecosystem complexity[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14(1): 310-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.05.028
[93]	Vauhkonen J, Ruotsalainen R.2017. Assessing the provisioning potential of ecosystem services in a Scandinavian boreal forest: Suitability and tradeoff analyses on grid-based wall-to-wall forest inventory data[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 389: 272-284. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.005
[94]	Vermaat J E, Wagtendonk A J, Brouwer R, et al.2016. Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach[J]. Hydrobiologia, 769(1): 121-135. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z
[1]	戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 2015. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 30(11): 1250-1259. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
	[Dai E F, Wang X L, Zhu J J, et al.2015. Progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 30(11): 1250-1259.] doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250
[95]	Villa F, Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, et al.2011. Scientific instruments for climate change adaptation: Estimating and optimizing the efficiency of ecosystem service provision[J]. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 11(1): 83-98. doi: 10.7201/earn.2011.01.04
[96]	Vogdrup-Schmidt M, Strange N, Olsen S B, et al.2017. Trade-off analysis of ecosystem service provision in nature networks[J]. Ecosystem Services, 23: 165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.011
[2]	戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 2016. 生态系统服务权衡: 方法、模型与研究框架[J]. 地理研究, 35(6): 1005-1016. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201606001
	[Dai E F, Wang X L, Zhu J J, et al.2016. Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs[J]. Geographical Research, 35(6): 1005-1016.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201606001
[97]	Volk M.2015. Modelling ecosystem services: Current approaches, challenges and perspectives[J]. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, 5: 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.05.002
[98]	Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Liu Z P.2013. Vertical distribution and influencing factors of soil water content within 21-m profile on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geoderma, 193-194: 300-310. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.011
[3]	傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 2016. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J]. 资源科学, 38(1): 1-9. doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.01.01
	[Fu B J, Yu D D.2016. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Resources Science, 38(1): 1-9.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.01.01
[99]	Watanabe M D B, Ortega E.2014. Dynamic emergy accounting of water and carbon ecosystem services: A model to simulate the impacts of land-use change[J]. Ecological Modelling, 271: 113-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.006
[100]	Wei W, Chen D, Wang L X, et al.2016. Global synthesis of the classifications, distributions, benefits and issues of terracing[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 159: 388-403. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.010
[4]	傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠. 2017. 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 37(2): 341-348.
	[Fu B J, Yu D D, Lü N.2017. An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(2): 341-348.]
[101]	White C, Halpern B S, Kappel C V.2012. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(12): 4696-4701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114215109
[102]	Xiong W, Holman I, Lin E, et al.2012. Untangling relative contributions of recent climate and CO2 trends to national cereal production in China[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4): 044014, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044014. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044014
[5]	傅伯杰, 张立伟. 2014. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(4): 441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
	[Fu B J, Zhang L W.2014. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 441-446.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[103]	Zavaleta E S, Pasari J D, Hulvey K D, et al.2010. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(4): 1443-1146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906829107 pmid: 20080690
[104]	Zheng Z M, Fu B J, Feng X M.2016. GIS-based analysis for hotspot identification of tradeoff between ecosystem services: A case study in Yanhe Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 26(4): 466-477. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0816-z
[6]	傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等. 2009. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J]. 地球科学进展, 24(6): 571-576. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001
	[Fu B J, Zhou G Y, Bai Y F, et al.2009. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571-576.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001
[7]	李锋, 王如松, 赵丹. 2014. 基于生态系统服务的城市生态基础设施: 现状、问题与展望[J]. 生态学报, 34(1): 190-200. doi: 10.5846/stxb201307181908
	[Li F, Wang R S, Zhao D.2014. Urban ecological infrastructure based on ecosystem services: Status, problems and perspectives[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(1): 190-200.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201307181908
[8]	李双成, 王珏, 朱文博, 等. 2014. 基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架[J]. 地理学报, 69(11): 1628-1639. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201411004
	[Li S C, Wang J, Zhu W B, et al.2014. Research framework of ecosystem services geography from spatial and regional perspectives[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(11): 1628-1639.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201411004
[9]	李文华, 李芬, 李世东, 等. 2006. 森林生态效益补偿的研究现状与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 21(5): 677-688. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2006.05.001
	[Li W H, Li F, Li S D, et al.2006. The status and prospect of forest ecological benefit compensation[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 21(5): 677-688.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2006.05.001
[10]	李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 2009. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 24(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2009.01.001
	[Li W H, Zhang B, Xie G D.2009. Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 24(1): 1-10.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2009.01.001
[11]	刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦. 2016. 生态系统服务流研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 27(7): 2161-2171. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.005
	[Liu H M, Fan Y L, Ding S Y.2016. Research progress of ecosystem service flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(7): 2161-2171.] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.005
[12]	马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 2017. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 72(7): 1277-1289. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707012
	[Ma L, Liu H, Peng J, et al.2017. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(7): 1277-1289.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707012
[13]	欧阳志云, 王如松. 2000. 生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 22(5): 45-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6055.2000.05.010
	[Ouyang Z Y, Wang R S.2000. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 22(5): 45-50.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6055.2000.05.010
[14]	欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 1999. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 19(5): 607-613. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/15/12/025
	[Ouyang Z Y, Wang X K, Miao H.1999. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(5): 607-613.] doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/15/12/025
[15]	欧阳志云, 郑华, 谢高地, 等. 2016. 生态资产、生态补偿及生态文明科技贡献核算理论与技术[J]. 生态学报, 36(22): 7136-7139. doi: 10.5846/stxb201611142310
	[Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Xie G D, et al.2016. Accounting theories and technologies for ecological assets, ecological compensation and scientific and technological contribution to ecological civilization[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(22): 7136-7139.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201611142310
[16]	彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 等. 2017. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展: 从认知到决策[J]. 地理学报, 72(6): 960-973.
	[Peng J, Hu X X, Zhao M Y, et al.2017. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(6): 960-973.]
[17]	肖玉, 谢高地, 安凯, 等. 2012. 基于功能性状的生态系统服务研究框架[J]. 植物生态学报, 36(4): 353-362. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00353
	[Xiao Y, Xie G D, An K, et al.2012. A research framework of ecosystem services based on functional traits[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36(4): 353-362.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00353
[18]	肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 2016. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 36(10): 3096-3102. doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274
	[Xiao Y, Xie G D, Lu C X, et al.2016. Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(10): 3096-3102.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274
[19]	谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞. 2006. 生态系统服务研究: 进展、局限和基本范式[J]. 植物生态学报, 30(2): 191-199.
	[Xie G D, Xiao Y, Lu C X.2006. Study on ecosystem services: Progress, limitation and basic paradigm[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 30(2): 191-199.]
[20]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 2015. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 37(9): 1740-1746.
	[Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang C S, et al.2015. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 37(9): 1740-1749.]
[21]	谢高地, 张钇锂, 鲁春霞, 等. 2001. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 16(1): 47-53. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2001.01.009
	[Xie G D, Zhang Y L, Lu C X, et al.2001. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1): 47-53.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2001.01.009
[22]	杨莉, 甄霖, 潘影, 等. 2012. 生态系统服务供给—消费研究: 黄河流域案例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 26(3): 131-138.
	[Yang L, Zhen L, Pan Y, et al.2012. Ecosystem services supply and consumption: A case in Yellow River watershed, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 26(3): 131-138.]
[23]	赵文武, 王亚萍. 2016. 1981-2015年我国大陆地区景观生态学研究文献分析[J]. 生态学报, 36(23): 7886-7896. doi: 10.5846/stxb201604240775
	[Zhao W W, Wang Y P.2016. A bibliometric analysis of landscape ecology in China mainland between 1981 and 2015[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(23): 7886-7896.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201604240775
[24]	Adhikari K, Hartemink A E.2016. Linking soils to ecosystem services-a global review[J]. Geoderma, 262: 101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009
[25]	Ayanu Y Z, Conrad C, Nauss T, et al.2012. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: A review of remote sensing applications[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(16): 8529-8541. doi: 10.1021/es300157u pmid: 22816512
[26]	Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B, et al.2013. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 4: 117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
[27]	Bagstad K J, Villa F, Batker D, et al.2014. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments[J]. Ecology and Society, 19(2): 64. doi: 10.5751/ES-06523-190264
[28]	Bai Y, Zheng H, Ouyang Z Y, et al.2013. Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: A case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(2): 709-718. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-2154-5
[29]	Balvanera P, Pfisterer A B, Buchmann N, et al.2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services[J]. Ecology Letters, 9(10): 1146-1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x pmid: 16972878
[30]	Barnett A, Fargione J, Smith M P.2016. Mapping trade-offs in ecosystem services from reforestation in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley[J]. BioScience, 66(3): 223-237. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv181
[31]	Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J.2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394-1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x pmid: 19845725
[32]	Biesemans J, van Meirvenne M, Gabriels D.2000. Extending the RUSLE with the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average off-site sediment accumulation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55(1): 35-42. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:1(76)
[33]	Boerema A, Rebelo A J, Bodi M B, et al.2017. Are ecosystem services adequately quantified[J] Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2): 358-370. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12696
[34]	Bouma J.2014. Soil science contributions towards sustainable development goals and their implementation: Linking soil functions with ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 177(2): 111-120. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201300646
[35]	Boumans R, Roman J, Altman I, et al.2015. The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): Simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems[J]. Ecosystem Services, 12: 30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.004
[36]	Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, et al.2014. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands: Concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification[J]. Landscape Online, 34: 1-32. doi: 10.3097/LO.201434
[37]	Costanza R.2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 141(2): 350-352. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020
[38]	Costanza R, D'Arge R, de Groot R, et al.1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387: 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[39]	Costanza R, Groot R D, Braat L, et al.2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go[J]. Ecosystem Services, 28: 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
[40]	Costanza R, Groot R D, Sutton P, et al.2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
[41]	Daily G C.1997. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington DC: Island Press.
[42]	de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al.2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making[J]. Ecological Complexity, 7(3): 260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
[43]	de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J.2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393-408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
[44]	Fang J Y, Piao S L, Field C B, et al.2003. Increasing net primary production in China from 1982 to 1999[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(6): 293-297. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0294:INPPIC]2.0.CO;2
[45]	Fang X N, Zhao W W, Fu B J, et al.2015. Landscape service capability, landscape service flow and landscape service demand: A new framework for landscape services and its use for landscape sustainability assessment[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 39(6): 817-836. doi: 10.1177/0309133315613019
[46]	Fedoroff N V, Battisti D S, Beachy R N, et al.2010. Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century[J]. Science, 327: 833-834. doi: 10.1126/science.1186834 pmid: 20150494
[47]	Feng Q, Zhao W W, Fu B J, et al.2017. Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 607-608: 1250-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.079 pmid: 28732403
[48]	Fierer N, Leff J W, Adams B J, et al.2012. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(52): 21390-21395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215210110 pmid: 23236140
[49]	Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P.2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making[J]. Ecological Economics, 68(3): 643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
[50]	Frank S, Fürst C, Witt A, et al.2014. Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning-trade-offs from reducing water erosion[J]. Landscape Ecology, 29(8): 1377-1391. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3
[51]	Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, et al.2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species[J]. Nature Communications, 4: 1340. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2328 pmid: 20
[52]	Gissi E, Gaglio M, Reho M.2016. Sustainable energy potential from biomass through ecosystem services trade-off analysis: The case of the Province of Rovigo (Northern Italy)[J]. Ecosystem Services, 18: 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.004
[53]	Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al.2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19): 7565-7570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201040109 pmid: 22529388
[54]	Hu H T, Fu B J, Lü Y H, et al.2015. SAORES: A spatially explicit assessment and optimization tool for regional ecosystem services[J]. Landscape Ecology, 30(3): 547-560. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0126-8
[55]	Iverson A L, Marín L E, Ennis K K, et al.2015. Do polycultures promote win-wins or trade-offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(6): 1593-1602. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12334
[56]	Jones L, Norton L, Austin Z, et al.2016. Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services[J]. Land Use Policy, 52: 151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014
[57]	Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts T H, et al.2011. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services[M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[58]	Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, et al.2012. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 29(3): 521-535. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008
[59]	Lal R.2011. Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems[J]. Food Policy, 36(S1): S33-S39. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.12.001
[60]	Lautenbach S, Volk M, Strauch M, et al.2013. Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48: 98-112. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.006
[61]	Lester S E, Costello C, Halpern B S, et al.2013. Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning[J]. Marine Policy, 38: 80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022
[62]	Liu J G, Li S X, Ouyang Z Y, et al.2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28): 9477-9482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706436105 pmid: 18621700
[63]	Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, et al.2010. Valuing ecosystem services: Theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1): 54-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x
[64]	Locatelli B, Imbach P, Wunder S.2014. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica[J]. Environmental Conservation, 41(1): 27-36. doi: 10.1017/S0376892913000234
[65]	Lu N, Fu B J, Jin T T, et al.2014. Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 29(10): 1697-1708. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0101-4
[66]	MacDonald D H, Bark R H, Coggan A.2014. Is ecosystem service research used by decision-makers? A case study of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia[J]. Landscape Ecology, 29(8): 1447-1460. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0021-3
[67]	Marshall J M.2014. Influence of topography, bare sand, and soil pH on the occurrence and distribution of plant species in a lacustrine dune ecosystem[J]. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 141(1): 29-38. doi: 10.3159/TORREY-D-13-00043.1
[68]	Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, Garcíal-Lorente M, et al.2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences[J]. PLoS One, 7(6): e38970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 pmid: 22720006
[69]	Milne E, Banwart S A, Noellemeyer E, et al.2015. Soil carbon, multiple benefits[J]. Environmental Development, 13: 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.005
[70]	Mina M, Bugmann H, Cordonnier T, et al.2017. Future ecosystem services from European mountain forests under climate change[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2): 389-401. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12772
[71]	Mouillot D, Villéger S, Scherer-Lorenzen M, et al.2011. Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality[J]. PLoS One, 6(3): e17476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017476 pmid: 21423747
[72]	Odum H T.1986. Emergy in ecosystems[M]//Polunin N. Ecosystem theory and application. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[73]	Oken K L, Essington T E.2016. Evaluating the effect of a selective piscivore fishery on rockfish recovery within marine protected areas[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(9): 2267-2277. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw074
[74]	Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al.2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital[J]. Science, 352: 1455-1459. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2295 pmid: 27313045
[75]	Power A G.2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554): 2959-2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
[76]	Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M.2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11): 5242-5247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 pmid: 2841950
[77]	Rodríguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al.2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28. doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128
[78]	Rutgers M, van Wijnen H J, Schouten A J, et al.2012. A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 415: 39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.041 pmid: 21704358
[79]	Sandifer P A, Sutton-Grier A E, Ward B P.2015. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 12: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007
[80]	Sauer T J, Norman J M, Sivakumar M V K.2011. Sustaining soil productivity in response to global climate change: Science, policy, and ethics[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 11(2): 531-531. doi: 10.1002/9780470960257.ch8
[81]	Schirpke U, Scolozzi R, De Marco C, et al.2014. Mapping beneficiaries of ecosystem services flows from natura 2000 sites[J]. Ecosystem Services, 9: 170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.003
[82]	Schröter M, Barton D N, Remme R P, et al.2014. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway[J]. Ecological Indicators, 36: 539-551. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018
[83]	Serna-Chavez H M, Schulp C J E, van Bodegom P M, et al.2014. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 39: 24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
[84]	Sherrouse B C, Clement J M, Semmens D J.2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services[J]. Applied Geography, 31(2): 748-760. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002
[85]	Stewart K J, Grogan P, Coxson D S, et al.2014. Topography as a key factor driving atmospheric nitrogen exchanges in arctic terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 70: 96-112. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.005
[86]	Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg P H.2014. Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe[J]. Ecological Indicators, 38: 198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010
[87]	Su C H, Fu B J.2013. Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 101: 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.12.014
[105]	Zoderer B M, Stanghellini P S L, Tasser E, et al.2016. Exploring socio-cultural values of ecosystem service categories in the central Alps: The influence of socio-demographic factors and landscape type[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 16(7): 2033-2044. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0922-y
[88]	Su C-H, Fu B-J, He C-S, et al.2012. Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: A case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China[J]. Acta Oecologica, 44: 46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.11.006

人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务

Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 88

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	孟贵, 王开泳, 王甫园, 董瑶嘉. 中国行政区划研究30年：进展、启示与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(5): 982-997.
[2]	魏峰群, 马文硕, 杨蕾洁. 传统村落活态化价值认知与多维弹性评估模型研究——基于陕北地区案例实证[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(4): 701-715.
[3]	方建, 陶凯, 牟莎, 方佳毅, 杜士强. 复合极端事件及其危险性评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(3): 587-601.
[4]	田一聪, 田明, 李鹏, 吴致蕾. 西藏自治区城镇化与生态系统服务协调发展研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(10): 1947-1960.
[5]	刘汉初, 孙中瑞, 吴佳雨, 虞虎, 杨显明, 周道静. 基于生态系统服务视角的西藏自然景观美学评估及空间分异特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(10): 1961-1972.
[6]	宁嘉辰, 吴吉东, 唐茹玫, 陈笑娟, 许映军. 多灾种风险评估方法述评——基于5份国际权威报告的对比分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(1): 197-208.
[7]	王蓉, 赵雪雁, 兰海霞. 脱贫山区乡村振兴基础水平评价及其影响因素——以陇南山区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(8): 1389-1402.
[8]	朱媛媛, 周笑琦, 顾江, 陈京. 长江中游城市群“文—旅”产业融合发展的空间效应及驱动机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(5): 785-796.
[9]	刘迪, 陈海, 荔童, 张行, 耿雨. 黄土丘陵沟壑区村域生态系统服务簇的时空分异及其地形梯度分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(4): 670-681.
[10]	孙东琪, 鲁嘉颐, 张明斗, 牛方曲. 借用规模与集聚阴影视角下中国小城镇服务功能评估——以苏南地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(2): 199-213.
[11]	王菲, 陈报章, 陈婧, 张慧芳, 郭立峰. 华北平原冬小麦—夏玉米轮作区DLM与CLM5模型模拟对比研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(2): 289-303.
[12]	张燕杰, 武俊喜, 潘影, 张宪洲. 净初级生产力的人类占用研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(2): 341-350.
[13]	何珮婷, 刘丹媛, 卢思言, 何小钰, 李桦, 杨柳, 林锦耀. 基于最大熵模型的深圳市内涝影响因素分析及内涝风险评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(10): 1868-1881.
[14]	杨蕤, 刘洋. 基于模糊评价模型的民用机场无人机监测系统评估方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(9): 1540-1549.
[15]	郭丽佳, 李畅, 彭红松, 钟士恩, 章锦河, 虞虎. 节能减排约束下中国省域旅游生态效率评估及空间格局研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(8): 1284-1297.