地理科学进展

地理科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 319-326.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.03.010

• 土地利用变化 • 上一篇    下一篇

农业资源利用效率的重新诠释与评价——以江苏省常熟市和江西省泰和县为例

宋伟1|陈百明1|陈曦炜1,2|唐秀美1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所|北京 |100101； |2. 中国科学院研究生院|北京 |100049
  • 出版日期:2010-03-25 发布日期:2010-03-25
  • 作者简介:宋伟(1981-)|男|山东沂源人|助研|博士|主要研究农业资源利用效率和土地整理。E-mail: songw.06b@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划子课题(2008BAB38B02-3)；山东省软科学研究项目(2009RKA372)

Reinterpretation and Evaluation for Use Efficiency of Agricultural Resources: A Case Study of Changshu in Jiangsu Province and Taihe in Jiangxi Province

SONG Wei1, CHEN Baiming1, CHEN Xiwei1,2, TANG Xiumei1,2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China|
    2. Gradate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Online:2010-03-25 Published:2010-03-25

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要：

本文重新诠释了农业资源利用效率的内涵，并建立一个新的农业资源利用效率评价框架和指标体系，以此完善和发展农业资源利用效率评价的理论与方法。论文选用多因素综合评价公式测算了常熟市与泰和县的农业资源利用生产率，运用包络分析法(DEA)计算了常熟市与泰和县的粮食生产配置效率。研究表明：①农业资源利用效率可以分解为农业资源利用生产率和生产配置效率两部分，生产配置效率又可进一步分解为纯技术效率和规模效率；②常熟市与泰和县的农业资源利用效率评价分值分别为0.967和0.984，农业资源利用生产率评价分值分别为0.953和0.922，生产配置效率分别为0.684和0.733；③常熟市粮食生产配置效率略低于泰和县，主要原因是常熟市粮食生产资源投入的冗余度(劳动、化肥、资本投入的冗余度分别为28.36%、23.45%和20.48%)高于泰和县(劳动、化肥、资本投入的冗余度分别为8.84%、8.83%和10.58%)；④农业资源利用生产率的高低并不总与生产配置效率一致，农业资源利用效率评价应能兼顾这两者。

关键词: 农业资源利用效率；利用生产率；生产配置效率；常熟；泰和

Abstract:

The concept for Use Efficiency of Agricultural Resources (UEAR) was reinterpreted in this paper firstly. Then, a new evaluation framework for UEAR was established so as to develop the evaluation theory and method for UEAR. Method of Synthetically Multivariate Equation was adopted to calculate the Use Ratio and Productivity of Agricultural Resources (URPAR), and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate the Allocation Efficiency of Agricultural Resources (AEAR). This paper can be concluded as: 1) The concept of UEAR includes two parts i.e. URPAR and AEAR. AEAR still can be analyzed as concepts of Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE) and Scale Efficiency (SE). 2) UEAR of Changshu and Taihe is 0.967 and 0.984 respectively, URPAR 0.953 and 0.922, and AEAR 0.684 and 0.733 respectively. 3) The AEAR is lower in Changshu than that in Taihe because the percentage of redundant input for agricultural resources in grain production is higher in Changshu than that in Taihe. The percentage of redundant input for labors, fertilizers and capital in Changshu are 28.36%, 23.45% and 20.48% respectively while those of Taihe are only 8.84%, 8.83% and 10.58% respectively. 4)The evaluation results of URPAR are not always in accordance with AEAR. Therefore, the evaluation of UEAR should consider both the URPAR and AEAR.

Key words: allocation efficiency of agricultural resources, Changshu, Taihe, use efficiency of agricultural resources, use ratio and productivity