东部旅游特色山区乡村发展分化及其驱动力——以浙江省平阳县为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.09.004

地理科学进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1460-1472.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.09.004

东部旅游特色山区乡村发展分化及其驱动力——以浙江省平阳县为例

钱家乘¹(), 张佰林¹^,^*(), 刘虹吾¹, 高阳², 王昭颖¹, 连小云¹

1.天津工业大学经济与管理学院,天津 300387
2.中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院,北京 100193

收稿日期:2019-08-26 修回日期:2019-11-07 出版日期:2020-09-28 发布日期:2020-11-28
通讯作者: 张佰林
作者简介:钱家乘(1996— ),男,浙江温州人,硕士生,主要研究方向为农村发展与土地利用转型。E-mail: qianjiacheng315@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41801193);国家社会科学基金项目(19CGL037)

Development differentiation of rural areas with tourism characteristics in eastern mountainous areas and its driving forces: A case study of Pingyang County, Zhejiang Province

QIAN Jiacheng¹(), ZHANG Bailin¹^,^*(), LIU Hongwu¹, GAO Yang², WANG Zhaoying¹, LIAN Xiaoyun¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
2. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2019-08-26 Revised:2019-11-07 Online:2020-09-28 Published:2020-11-28
Contact: ZHANG Bailin
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41801193);National Social Science Fund of China(19CGL037)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

乡村旅游被认为是山区乡村振兴的有效模式,但即使在旅游山区,仍存在大量传统农村。论文以浙江省平阳县为例,运用参与式农村评估、GIS与遥感技术相结合,选取典型旅游村水口村和农业村法洪村,从农户生计变迁、乡村土地利用转型、宅基地功能演变3个方面分析旅游特色山区乡村发展及其分化。结果表明:① 生存型生计阶段(1949—1977年),法洪村和水口村高度依赖农业;组合型生计阶段(1978—2013年),两村由单一农业生计向农业和外出务工组合转变;发展型生计阶段(2014—2018年),法洪村以外出务工为主,水口村以旅游经营和外出经商并重。② 1978年前,两村地类变更主要是林地转为耕地;1978—2014年,主要是林地转为建设用地;2014年后,法洪村耕地转为林地、住宅用地,水口村林地、耕地转为旅游相关用地。③ 1978年前,两村宅基地均以农业生产功能为主;1978—2014年,两村宅基地的农业生产功能开始衰退;2014年后,法洪村以生活居住功能为主,水口村以旅游接待功能为主。④ 两村发展分化是自然环境、人文景观、能人带动、市场变化等综合影响的结果。研究认为,即使是在旅游特色山区,也只有自然和人文景观独特、有能人带动、顺应市场变化的乡村,才能较好地发展乡村旅游,大部分资源禀赋一般的乡村仍将以传统农业为主,因此,山区乡村振兴要顺势而为、择优助推。

关键词: 山区, 乡村发展, 分化, 驱动力, 土地利用转型, 平阳县

Abstract:

Rural tourism is considered an effective mode of rural revitalization in mountainous areas, but even in mountainous tourist areas, there still exist a large number of traditional rural areas. Taking Pingyang County of Zhejiang Province as an example, this study used participatory rural appraisal method and GIS and remote sensing technologies to compare a typical tourist village (Shuikou Village) and an agricultural village (Fahong Village). This study analyzed the rural development and its differentiation in mountainous areas with tourism characteristics from three aspects: the change of farmers' livelihood, the transformation of rural land use, and the functional change of homestead. The results show that: 1) During the survival livelihood stage (1949-1977), the two villages were highly dependent on agriculture for livelihoods; During the combined livelihood stage (1978-2013), the two villages changed from a single agriculture-oriented livelihood to a combination of agriculture and migrant worker livelihood; During the development-oriented livelihood stage (2014-2018), Fahong Village mainly depended on migrant workers, while Shuikou Village formed a livelihood structure that attached equal importance to tourism and business. 2) Before 1978, land use change in the two villages was mainly from forest land to cultivated land. Before 2014, land use change in the two villages was mainly conversion from forest land to construction land. After 2014, Fahong Village mainly converted cultivated land to forest land and residential land, while Shuikou Village mainly converted forest land and cultivated land to tourism-related land. 3) Before 1978, the functions of homesteads in the two villages were mainly agricultural production. Before 2014, the agricultural production function of homesteads in both villages had begun to decline. After 2014, homesteads in Fahong Village are dominated by living function while those in Shuikou Village are dominated by tourist reception function. 4) The development of the two villages into different land use and livelihood strategy types is the result of the comprehensive influence of natural environment, human landscape, elite leadership, market changes, among others. The study shows that even in the mountainous areas with tourism characteristics, only those villages with unique natural and human landscapes and capable people to lead and adapt to market changes can better develop rural tourism. Most of the villages with ordinary resource endowments are still dominated by traditional agricultural economy. Therefore, rural revitalization in mountainous areas should consider local environmental and resource conditions and select villages with favorable conditions to promote targeted development.

Key words: mountainous area, rural development, differentiation, driving force, land use transition, Pingyang County

钱家乘, 张佰林, 刘虹吾, 高阳, 王昭颖, 连小云. 东部旅游特色山区乡村发展分化及其驱动力——以浙江省平阳县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1460-1472.

QIAN Jiacheng, ZHANG Bailin, LIU Hongwu, GAO Yang, WANG Zhaoying, LIAN Xiaoyun. Development differentiation of rural areas with tourism characteristics in eastern mountainous areas and its driving forces: A case study of Pingyang County, Zhejiang Province[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1460-1472.

图/表 15

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

图2

表5

表6

表7

表8

表9

表10

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 31

[1]	费孝通. 江村经济: 中国农民的生活 [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2001: 24-39.
	[ Fei Xiaotong. Peasant life in China: A field study of country life in the Yangtze Valley. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press, 2001: 24-39. ]
[2]	周国华, 贺艳华, 唐承丽, 等. 中国农村聚居演变的驱动机制及态势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2011,66(4):515-524.
	[ Zhou Guohua, He Yanhua, Tang Chenli, et al. Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlements evolution in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(4):515-524. ]
[3]	陈秧分, 刘玉, 李裕瑞. 中国乡村振兴背景下的农业发展状态与产业兴旺途径[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):632-642.
	[ Chen Yangfen, Liu Yu, Li Yurui. Agricultural development status and industrial prosperity path under the background of rural revitalization in China. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):632-642. ]
[4]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):637-650.
	[ Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):637-650. ]
[5]	王永生, 刘彦随. 中国乡村生态环境污染现状及重构策略[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):710-717.
	[ Wang Yongsheng, Liu Yansui. Pollution and restructuring strategies of rural ecological environment in China. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):710-717. ]
[6]	郭远智, 周扬, 韩越. 中国农村人口老龄化的时空演化及乡村振兴对策[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):667-683.
	[ Guo Yuanzhi, Zhou Yang, Han Yue. Population aging in rural China: Spatial-temporal pattern and countermeasures for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):667-683. ]
[7]	龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2009,64(4):426-434.
	[ Long Hualou, Liu Yansui, Zou Jian. Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in eastern coastal China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009,64(4):426-434. ]
[8]	刘艳华, 徐勇. 中国农村多维贫困地理识别及类型划分[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(6):993-1007.
	[ Liu Yanhua, Xu Yong. Geographical identification and classification of multi-dimensional poverty in rural China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(6):993-1007. ]
[9]	王瑜, 汪三贵. 农村贫困人口的聚类与减贫对策分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015,32(2):98-109.
	[ Wang Yu, Wang Sangui. Clustering analysis of the rural poverty population and poverty reduction strategies. China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition, 2015,32(2):98-109. ]
[10]	朱鹤, 刘家明. 山岳型景区建设下乡村聚落的多维重构: 基于云丘山旅游景区微观案例的实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(12):2490-2502.
	[ Zhu He, Liu Jiaming. Rural settlement reconstructing driven by mountain scenic spot construction: An empirical study of Yunqiu Mountain Scenic Spot. Geographical Research, 2018,37(12):2490-2502. ]
[11]	王少华. 洛阳白云山旅游区乡村聚落格局演变与机理研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2019,38(2):117-123.
	[ Wang Shaohua. Evolution and mechanism of rural settlement pattern in Baiyun Mountain tourist area, Luoyang City. Areal Research and Development, 2019,38(2):117-123. ]
[12]	崔晓明, 陈佳, 杨新军. 乡村旅游影响下的农户可持续生计研究: 以秦巴山区安康市为例[J]. 山地学报, 2017,35(1):85-94.
	[ Cui Xiaoming, Chen Jia, Yang Xinjun. Research on sustainable livelihoods impacted by rural tourism: A case study of Ankang in Qinling and Bashan Mountainous areas. Mountain Research, 2017,35(1):85-94. ]
[13]	吴吉林, 刘水良, 周春山. 乡村旅游发展背景下传统村落农户适应性研究: 以张家界4个村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017,37(12):232-240.
	[ Wu Jilin, Liu Shuiliang, Zhou Chunshan. Peasant households adaptability under the bankground of rural tourism development in traditional villages: A case study of 4 traditional villages in Zhangjiajie. Economic Geography, 2017,37(12):232-240. ]
[14]	席建超, 王新歌, 孔钦钦, 等. 旅游地乡村聚落演变与土地利用模式: 野三坡旅游区三个旅游村落案例研究[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(4):531-540.
	[ Xi Jianchao, Wang Xinge, Kong Qinqin, et al. Spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism: A comparative study of three villages in Yesanpo tourism area, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(4):531-540. ]
[15]	Wang X G, Xi J C, Yang D Y, et al. Spatial differentiation of rural touristization and its determinants in China: A Geo-detector based case study of Yesanpo scenic area[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016,7(6):464-471.
[16]	韩非, 蔡建明, 刘军萍. 大都市郊区乡村旅游地发展的驱动力分析: 以北京市为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2010,24(11):195-200.
	[ Han Fei, Cai Jianming, Liu Junping. Driving force analysis on rural tourism destination development in suburbs: A case of Beijing. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2010,24(11):195-200. ]
[17]	Fotiadis A, Nuryyev G, Achyldurdyyeva J, et al. The impact of EU sponsorship, size, and geographic characteristics on rural tourism development[J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(8):2375. doi: 10.3390/su11082375.
[18]	席建超, 刘孟浩. 中国旅游业基本国情分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(8):1569-1580.
	[ Xi Jianchao, Liu Menghao. Analysis of basic national conditions of China's tourism industry. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(8):1569-1580. ]
[19]	Zhang B L, Jiang G H, Cai W M, et al. Productive functional evolution of rural settlements: Analysis of livelihood strategy and land use transition in eastern China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017,14(12):2540-2554.
[20]	张佰林, 张凤荣, 周建, 等. 农村居民点功能演变的微尺度分析: 山东省沂水县核桃园村的实证[J]. 地理科学, 2015,35(10):1272-1279.
	[ Zhang Bailin, Zhang Fengrong, Zhou Jian, et al. Functional evolution of rural settlement based on micro-perspective: A case study of Hetaoyuan Village in Yishui County, Shandong Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(10):1272-1279. ]
[21]	李小建, 周雄飞, 郑纯辉, 等. 欠发达区地理环境对专业村发展的影响研究[J]. 地理学报, 2012,67(6):783-792.
	[ Li Xiaojian, Zhou Xiongfei, Zheng Chunhui, et al. Development of specialized villages in various environments of less developed China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(6):783-792. ]
[22]	金其铭. 我国农村聚落地理研究历史及近今趋向[J]. 地理学报, 1988,43(4):311-317.
	[ Jin Qiming. The history and current trends of research on rural settlement geography in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1988,43(4):311-317. ]
[23]	冯应斌, 杨庆媛. 基于农户分化的村域居民点用地特征分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(21):248-258.
	[ Feng Yingbin, Yang Qingyuan. Analysis on characteristics of rural residential land at village level based on differentiation of rural household. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015,31(21):248-258. ]
[24]	张佰林, 姜广辉, 曲衍波. 经济发达地区农村居民点生产居住空间权衡关系解析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(13):253-261.
	[ Zhang Bailin, Jiang Guanghui, Qu Yanbo. Trade-off of productive and dwelling space of rural settlement in developed areas. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019,35(13):253-261. ]
[25]	朱会义, 李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J]. 地理学报, 2003,58(5):643-650.
	[ Zhu Huiyi, Li Xiubin. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003,58(5):643-650. ]
[26]	冯应斌, 杨庆媛. 农户宅基地演变过程及其调控研究进展[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(3):442-448.
	[ Feng Yingbin, Yang Qingyuan. A review of research on the rural homestead evolution process and its regulation. Resources Science, 2015,37(3):442-448. ]
[27]	姚娟, 马晓冬. 后生产主义乡村多元价值空间重构研究: 基于无锡马山镇的实证分析[J]. 人文地理, 2019,34(2):135-142.
	[ Yao Juan, Ma Xiaodong. Study on the reconstruction of multi-value space in post-productivist countryside: A case study of Mashan Town in Wuxi. Human Geography, 2019,34(2):135-142. ]
[28]	叶滢, 莫明浩, 章定富. 江西区域经济发展的文化因素分析[J]. 经济地理, 2007,27(3):400-403.
	[ Ye Ying, Mo Minghao, Zhang Dingfu. An analysis on cultural factors in Jiangxi regional economic development. Economic Geography, 2007,27(3):400-403. ]
[29]	孙艺惠, 陈田, 王云才. 传统乡村地域文化景观研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008,27(6):90-96.
	[ Sun Yihui, Chen Tian, Wang Yuncai. Progress and prospects in research of the traditional rural cultural landscape. Progress in Geography, 2008,27(6):90-96. ]
[30]	李小建, 罗庆, 杨慧敏. 专业村类型形成及影响因素研究[J]. 经济地理, 2013,33(7):1-8.
	[ Li Xiaojian, Luo Qing, Yang Huimin. The type formation of specialized villages. Economic Geography, 2013,33(7):1-8. ]
[31]	贺爱琳, 杨新军, 陈佳, 等. 乡村旅游发展对农户生计的影响: 以秦岭北麓乡村旅游地为例[J]. 经济地理, 2014,34(12):174-181.
	[ He Ailin, Yang Xinjun, Chen Jia, et al. Impact of rural tourism development on farmer's livelihoods: A case study of rural tourism destinations in northern slop of Qinling Mountains. Economic Geography, 2014,34(12):174-181. ]

一级类	二级类	三级类	备注
耕地	—	—	一般基本农田、示范区基本农田
林地	—	—	生长乔木、竹类、灌木的土地
水域及水利设施用地	水域用地	—	河流水面、坑塘水面
商服用地	零售商业用地	—	小商铺、小超市、煤气站、农药销售点
	餐饮用地	—	饭店、餐厅、农家乐等用地
	旅馆用地	—	专业化旅游民宿
工矿仓储用地	仓储用地	—	农业生产、物资存放场所的土地
住宅用地	农村宅基地	住宅用地	农村用于生活居住的宅基地
		混合住宅用地	半自住的农家旅馆
公共管理与公共服务用地	文化设施用地	—	村委会、村民活动中心、宗祠、文化馆
公共管理与公共服务用地	公用设施用地	—	水、电、卫生服务设施
特殊用地	—	—	宗教的场所、旅游服务设施建筑
交通运输用地	交通场站用地	—	村庄内公共停车场、公共交通场站
	农村道路	—	村巷道路
其他土地	设施农用地	—	存放农产品、加工场地
	空闲地	—	未利用地(本文不考虑)

主要功能	宅基地内部空间类型
农业生产功能	庭院、禽圈、猪圈、仓储间
生活居住功能	住房(卧室、厨房、餐厅、客厅、厕所)、储物间、旱厕
旅游接待功能	客房、农家乐餐厅、公共大厅、商铺、前台

村庄	农业经济			非农经济
村庄	类型	人数占比/%	收入占比/%	类型	人数占比/%	收入占比/%
法洪村	蔬菜;鸡、鸭	8	5	外出务工为主、少数就近上班	92	95
水口村	水稻、甘薯、蔬菜;鸡、鸭	19	15	旅游经营、外出经商	81	85

地类代码	721	087	009	111	106	003	001	S1
721	43699	0	0	0	0	7308	5061	56068
087	0	899	0	0	0	0	0	899
009	0	0	897	0	0	0	0	897
111	0	0	0	39702	406	40	0	40147
106	0	0	0	114	17146	0	0	17259
003	13019	1300	0	707	993	2026458	248068	2290546
001	5745	1198	0	0	0	5851	346549	359343
S2	62463	3397	897	40523	18544	2039658	599678	2765160

地类代码	721	087	009	111	106	003	089	001	S1
721	55194	141	0	0	30	1166	0	2174	58705
087	0	1288	0	0	0	0	0	0	1288
009	0	0	3760	0	93	0	0	0	3853
111	0	0	0	66577	605	0	0	0	67182
106	0	0	93	605	23176	0	0	0	23874
003	14886	105	0	0	83	3051071	13	247326	3313484
089	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
001	6440	0	0	1311	0	262	248	162805	171065
S2	76520	1534	3853	68492	23987	3052498	261	412306	3639451

东部旅游特色山区乡村发展分化及其驱动力——以浙江省平阳县为例

Development differentiation of rural areas with tourism characteristics in eastern mountainous areas and its driving forces: A case study of Pingyang County, Zhejiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

地类代码	721	087	009	111	122	106	051	003	001	S1
721	46789	0	0	0	0	0	0	9661	6014	62463
087	0	899	0	0	2498	0	0	0	0	3397
009	0	0	897	0	0	0	0	0	0	897
111	0	0	0	39792	0	730	0	0	0	40523
122	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
106	0	0	0	406	0	17781	0	358	0	18544
051	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
003	23401	0	265	0	506	5708	76	1947763	61940	2039658
001	32892	0	0	0	0	5682	370	5711	555021	599677
S2	103082	899	1162	40198	3003	29902	446	1963493	622975	2765160

地类代码	721	087	009	111	106	051	003	089	001	S1
721	75363	0	0	0	0	308	226	0	623	76520
087	0	1516	0	0	18	0	0	0	0	1534
009	0	0	3760	0	93	0	0	0	0	3853
111	0	0	0	67725	767	0	0	0	0	68492
106	0	18	0	605	23365	0	0	0	0	23987
051	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
003	4927	0	0	158	557	0	2980810	0	66046	3052498
089	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	261	0	261
001	16428	0	0	0	0	0	3041	0	392837	412306
S2	96718	1534	3760	68488	24800	308	2984078	261	459505	3639451

地类代码	721	087	009	111	106	051	003	064	001	S1
721	102921	0	0	0	0	115	46	0	0	103082
087	0	899	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	899
009	0	0	1162	0	0	0	0	0	0	1162
111	0	0	0	39468	730	0	0	0	0	40198
122	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3003	0	3003
106	0	0	0	730	29171	0	0	0	0	29902
051	0	0	0	0	0	446	0	0	0	446
003	7424	0	0	139	1511	0	1952960	1309	150	1963493
064	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
001	1046	3041	0	3565	2066	0	203534	1579	408144	622975
S2	111390	3940	1162	43902	33478	561	2156541	5891	408294	2765160

地类代码	721	087	009	111	106	054	051	003	722	089	001	105	053	S1
721	89877	2044	654	851	771	918	310	0	300	230	141	10	612	96718
087	0	1079	0	0	18	0	0	0	0	436	0	0	0	1534
009	0	0	3667	0	93	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3760
111	73	0	0	66938	667	176	0	319	0	0	300	15	0	68488
106	0	165	0	713	23202	0	0	0	0	18	0	142	560	24800
054	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
051	0	0	0	0	0	0	308	0	0	0	0	0	0	308
003	2834	0	2283	2647	3229	1551	0	2962658	0	1969	0	6906	0	2984078
722	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
089	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	261	0	0	0	261
001	0	0	5625	6685	2060	1379	0	152575	0	130	284222	2716	4112	459505
105	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
053	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
S2	92784	3288	12229	77834	30041	4024	618	3115551	300	3044	284664	9789	5284	3639451

[1]	郭倩, 廖和平, 王子羿, 刘愿理, 李涛. 秦巴山区村域稳定脱贫测度及返贫防控风险识别——以重庆市城口县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 232-244.
[2]	姜宛贝, 刘卫东, 刘志高, 韩梦瑶. 中国化石能源燃烧碳排放强度非均衡性及其演变的驱动力分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1425-1435.
[3]	罗庆, 王冰冰, 樊新生, 李小建. 山区县人口分布的时空特征及主要影响因素分析——以河南省嵩县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1073-1084.
[4]	葛玉娟, 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬. 山区耕地细碎化对土地利用集约度影响——以贵州省亚鱼村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1095-1105.
[5]	黄晗, 李寻欢, 周扬. 中国丘陵山区农村贫困时空格局及其演变机制研究——以江西省于都县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 938-950.
[6]	赵雪雁, 刘江华, 王伟军, 兰海霞, 马平易, 杜昱璇. 贫困山区脱贫农户的生计可持续性及生计干预——以陇南山区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 982-995.
[7]	李裕瑞, 常贵蒋, 曹丽哲, 龙花楼. 论乡村能人与乡村发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1632-1642.
[8]	何仁伟,方方,刘运伟. 贫困山区农户人力资本对生计策略的影响研究——以四川省凉山彝族自治州为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1282-1893.
[9]	杨忍,罗秀丽,陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328.
[10]	戈大专,周礼,龙花楼,乔伟峰,李裕瑞. 农业生产转型类型诊断及其对乡村振兴的启示——以黄淮海地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1329-1339.
[11]	罗静,蒋亮,罗名海,田玲玲,陈国磊,田野,吴益坤. 武汉市新城区乡村发展水平评价及规模等级结构研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1370-1381.
[12]	马晓冬,李鑫,胡睿,KHUONG ManhHa. 基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392.
[13]	文琦, 郑殿元, 施琳娜. 1949—2019年中国乡村振兴主题演化过程与研究展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1272-1281.
[14]	陈秧分, 刘玉, 王国刚. 大都市乡村发展比较及其对乡村振兴战略的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1403-1411.
[15]	刘洋, 吕建树, 毕军. 流域陆地生态系统水体净化服务表征及驱动力分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 588-599.