地理科学进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 1149-1159.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.008

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

领域化理论视角下的乡村旅游社区社会空间变迁——以丹霞山青湖塘村为例

翁时秀(), 杨继荣   

  1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-07 修回日期:2019-10-05 出版日期:2020-07-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
  • 作者简介:翁时秀(1984— ),男,浙江瑞安人,副教授,研究方向为旅游地理学与旅游规划。E-mail: wengshx8@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41771008);国家自然科学基金项目(41201139);国家科技基础性工作专项重点项目(2013FY111900)

Understanding the changing social space of rural tourism community based on territorialization theory: A case study of Qinghutang Village, Mount Danxia

WENG Shixiu(), YANG Jirong   

  1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2019-05-07 Revised:2019-10-05 Online:2020-07-28 Published:2020-09-28
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(41771008);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41201139);Special Program for Key Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(2013FY111900)

摘要:

乡村地区的旅游发展带来乡村社会空间的快速变迁与重构。对此,现有研究主要侧重空间生产过程的分析,而空间生产与权力关系之间的联系尚未充分理论化。论文以丹霞山青湖塘村为例,借助领域化理论,分析了多元主体的领域化行为所引发的乡村旅游社区社会空间变迁,总结了其中交织的权力—空间关系及社会空间变迁机制。结果发现:乡村旅游社区社会空间变迁是一个持续的领域化过程,是由“领域的社会组织”与“社会的领域组织”之间的交互作用所引致的,在这个过程中,无论是自上而下的管控权力还是自下而上的抵制权力,只有通过领域建构实现空间化才能实现真正的控制,权力关系正是在空间化中实现了生产与再生产。基于此,论文对旅游地社会空间变迁中的“权力—空间关系”进行了初步理论化,并讨论了领域化分析对于旅游社区产权制度实践、旅游地空间治理等问题所具有的启示意义。

关键词: 领域化, 社会空间, 乡村旅游社区, 丹霞山

Abstract:

Rural tourism development led to a process of rapid change and reconstruction of rural communities. Social space theory provides a new paradigm for understanding these phenomena. However, Chinese research of social space in tourism is generally in the stage of introduction, mainly focusing on the analysis of spatial production process and failing to link the spatial production process with power relations and power production and reproduction from the perspective of power-space interaction. One of the cores of social space theory is the interaction between power and space, while the territorialization theory endogenous of human geography is an important perspective to analyze the power-space relationship in the real world. Therefore, taking Qinghutang Village of the Danxia Mountain as an example, this study analyzed how the multiple stakeholders of rural tourism community promote the transformation of social space using the territorialization theory focusing on power-space relations, and further summarized the power-space relationships intertwined in this process and the mechanism of social space change. Through the analysis of Qinghutang Village, this study found that local residents, management committee of Mount Danxia, and tourism capital territorialized around the space of Qinghutang Village with the rapid tourism development in the Danxia Mountain. The local residents built a relatively independent territory for tourism development through the exchange of land resources. The management committee expanded the administrative territory to the community by means of transferring land property and controlling the settlement, while the tourism capital built the market territory through the transformation of land ownership and construction of tourism consumption space. It is the reconstruction of the power relationship pattern that promoted the transformation of the social space of Qinghutang Village. In this process, the implementation of powers is subject to the manipulation and control of the community spaces by the subjects of power, that is, through territorialization. It is in the process of territorialization that power used spaces to enter the core of community life and production, and promoted the reconstruction of tourism community through the reproduction of spaces. This article argues that the social spatial change of rural tourism community is a continuous process of territorialization, which is caused by the interaction between "social organization of territory" and "territorial organization of the society". The multiple stakeholders in the rural tourism community construct the corresponding territory, and then implement their own powers within the relatively clear territory.The intervention of new powers and the construction of new territories will break the existing power relationship pattern and territory structure, leading to the transformation of social space. In this process, whether it is top-down governance power or bottom-up resistance power, real control can only be realized through the spatialization of territories construction, and powers have been spatialized in the process of territorialization, and also achieved its own production and reproduction. The analysis based on territorialization has important implications for the practice of property rights systems in tourism communities and the tourism space governance.

Key words: territorialization theory, social space, rural tourism community, Mount Danxia