离散选择模型研究进展

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.10.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文从离散选择模型(discrete choice model, DCM)体系的一般原理和应用价值出发,总结了各经典模型的基本理论和典型应用,并概括了近来年一些重要的研究新动向。多项Logit模型(multinomial logit model, MNL)是离散选择模型体系的基础,具有简洁、可靠、易实现等优点,但也存在固有的理论缺陷,由此产生了对更加精细化模型的需求。替代的精细化模型中,嵌套Logit模型(nested logit model, NL)常用于处理备选项相关、“都不选”备选项、数据合并等问题,一般极值模型(generalized extreme value model, GEV)体系是其更一般的形式;混合Logit模型(mixed logit model, MXL)可用于解决随机偏好问题和多种相关问题,包括备选项相关、面版数据相关、随机系数相关、数据合并等,与之类似的潜在类别模型也有着广泛应用;多项Probit模型(multinomial probit model, MNP)具有极高的灵活性,但其复杂的模型设定与庞大的运算量大大制约了其应用范围。本文在研究新动向上介绍了4个重要的研究关注点：由多种经典模型形式相结合而成的复杂模型;面向RP/SP数据、定序、排序、多选等不同数据类型的适宜模型;基于各种受限理性选择策略的更为真实的模型;以及考虑选择的时空背景的模型。

关键词: 离散选择模型, 精细化, 适用性, 新动向

Abstract:

This article takes the general principles and application values of the discrete choice model system as a departure point and summarizes the classical model forms with respect to their basic theories and typical applications. Important latest developments are also introduced. Multinomial logit (MNL) model is the basis of the discrete choice model system, with the advantages of simplicity, reliability, and easy implementation. However, it also has some inherent theoretic defects, which led to the need for more refined models. Nested logit model is usually used to deal with problems of correlation among alternatives, no-choice alternative, and data enrichment. Its more general form is the generalized extreme value (GEV) model system; mixed logit model is suitable for handling random preference and some kinds of correlation problems, such as correlation among alternatives, panel data, random coefficients, and data for enrichment. A similar model form named latent class model is also widely used. Multinomial probit (MNP) model is highly flexible. However, its application is limited due to the complexity of model specification and very high computation demands. With regard to the new development of discrete choice model system, four important areas are introduced. These include complex new models derived from the combination of classical models; models suitable for dealing with revealed preference/stated preference (RP/SP), ordered, ranked, and multiple choice data; models based on bounded rationality choice which is more close to reality; and models considering the spatiotemporal background of choice.

Key words: discrete choice model, refining, applicability, new trends

王灿, 王德, 朱玮, 宋姗. 离散选择模型研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(10): 1275-1287.

Can WANG, De WANG, Wei ZHU, Shan SONG. Research progress of discrete choice models[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(10): 1275-1287.

参考文献 107

1	蔡嘉璐, 王德, 朱玮. 2011. 南京东路商业步行街消费者行为变化研究: 2001年与2007年的比较[J]. 人文地理, 26(6): 89-97.
	[Cai J L, Wang D, Zhu W.2011. Study on changes of consumer behavior in East Nanjing Road: a comparison of the year 2001 and 2007[J]. Human Geography, 26(6): 89-97.]
2	陈梓烽, 柴彦威. 2014. 通勤时空弹性对居民通勤出发时间决策的影响: 以北京上地—清河地区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 21(12): 65-76.
	[Chen Z F, Chai Y W.2014. Modelling the choice of departure time for commuting trip chains incorporating space-time flexibility variables: evidence from the Shangdi-Qinghe area of Beijing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 21(12): 65-76.]
3	关宏志. 2004. 非集计模型: 交通行为分析的工具[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社.
	[Guan H Z.2004. Disaggregate model: a tool of traffic behavior analysis[M]. Beijing, China: China Communications Press.]
4	马静, 柴彦威. 2011. 休息日与工作日居民购物时空间决策因素及差异比较[J]. 地理科学, 31(1): 29-35.
	[Ma J, Chai Y W.2011. Spatio-temporal choice of individuals' shopping behavior and their differences between weekday and weekend[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(1): 29-35.]
5	聂冲, 贾生华. 2005. 离散选择模型的基本原理及其发展演进评介[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, (11): 151-159.
	[Nie C, Jia S H.2005. Research on the theoretical basis and evolution of discrete choice models[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, (11): 151-159.]
6	潘晖婧, 朱玮, 王德. 2014. 基于路径选择行为的自行车出行环境评价和改善[J]. 上海城市规划, (2): 12-18.
	[Pan H J, Zhu W, Wang D.2014. Evaluation and improvement of bicycle travel environment based on the cycling route choice behavior[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, (2): 12-18.]
7	王德, 马力. 2009. 2010年上海世博会参观者时空分布模拟分析[J]. 城市规划学刊, (5): 64-70.
	[Wang D, Ma L.2009. Simulation analysis of spatiotemporal distribution of visitors in Shanghai World EXPO 2010[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (5): 64-70.]
8	王德, 王灿, 朱玮, 等. 2015. 基于参观者行为模拟的空间规划与管理研究: 青岛世园会的案例[J]. 城市规划, 39(2): 65-70.
	[Wang D, Wang C, Zhu W, et al.2015. Large-scale exposition planning and management optimization based on visitors' behavior simulation: a case study of Qingdao international horticultural exposition 2014[J]. City Planning Review, 39(2): 65-70.]
9	余建辉, 董冠鹏, 张文忠, 等. 2014. 北京市居民居住: 就业选择的协同性研究[J]. 地理学报, 69(2): 147-155.
	[Yu J H, Dong G P, Zhang W Z, et al.2014. The correlated decision process of house moving and job change and its heterogeneity: a case study of Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(2): 147-155.]
10	张文佳, 柴彦威. 2009. 居住空间对家庭购物出行决策的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 28(3): 362-369.
	[Zhang W J, Chai Y W.2009. The Influence of residential space on household shopping tour decision-making behaviors[J]. Progress in Geography, 28(3): 362-369.]
11	赵艳枝. 2006. 外来人口的居留意愿与合理流动: 以北京市顺义区外来人口为例[J]. 南京人口管理干部学院学报, 22(4): 17-19.
	[Zhao Y Z.2006. Residing preference and rational floating of migrant population: an example from district Shunyi, Beijing[J]. Journal of Nanjing College for Population Programme Management, 22(4): 17-19.]
12	郑思齐, 符育明, 刘洪玉. 2004. 利用排序多元Logit模型研究城市居民的居住区位选择[J]. 地理科学进展, 23(5): 86-93.
	[Zheng S Q, Fu Y M, Liu H Y.2004. A study on location choice decision of urban residents using ordered Logit model[J]. Progress in Geography, 23(5): 86-93.]
13	朱玮, 庞宇琦, 王德, 等. 2012. 公共自行车系统影响下居民出行的变化与机制研究: 以上海闵行区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, (5): 76-81.
	[Zhu W, Pang Y Q, Wang D, et al.2012. Travel behavior change after the introduction of public bicycle systems: a case study of Minhang district, Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (5): 76-81.]
14	朱玮, 王德. 2008. 南京东路消费者的空间选择行为与回游轨迹[J]. 城市规划, 32(3): 33-40.
	[Zhu W, Wang D.2008. Space choice behavior and multi-stop tracks of consumers in East Nanjing Road[J]. City Planning Review, 32(3): 33-40.]
15	Adamowicz W, Swait J, Boxall P, et al.1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1): 65-84.
16	Attanasio O P, Meghir C, Santiago A.2012. Education choices in Mexico: using a structural model and a randomized experiment to evaluate Progresa[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(1): 37-66.
17	Báez-Montenegro A, Bedate A M, Herrero L C, et al.2012. Inhabitants' willingness to pay for cultural heritage: a case study in Valdivia, Chile, using contingent valuation[J]. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2): 235-258.
18	Bąk A, Rybicka A.2005. Application of discrete choice methods in consumer preference analysis[M]//Baier D, Wernecke, K-D. Innovations in classification, data science, and information systems. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer: 305-312.
19	Behrens C, Pels E.2012. Intermodal competition in the London-Paris passenger market: high-speed rail and air transport[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(3): 278-288.
20	Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S R.1985. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand[M]. Cambridge, UK: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
21	Bhat C R, Castelar S.2002. A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(7): 593-616.
22	Bhat C R, Gossen R.2004. A mixed multinomial logit model analysis of weekend recreational episode type choice[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(9): 767-787.
23	Bhat C R, Guo J.2004. A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(2): 147-168.
24	Bhat C R, Sidharthan R.2011. A simulation evaluation of the maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimator for mixed multinomial probit models[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(7): 940-953.
25	Borgers A W J, Smeets I M E, Kemperman A D A M, et al.2006. Simulation of micro pedestrian behaviour in shopping streets[M]//van Leeuwen J P, Timmermans H J P. Progress in design & decision support systems in architecture and urban planning. Heeze, Netherland: Eindhoven University of Technology: 101-116.
26	Borgers A M J, Timmermans H J P.2005. Modelling pedestrian behaviour in downtown shopping areas[C]//Proceedings of computers in urban planning and urban management conference. London, UK: CUPUM.
27	Börjesson M.2008. Joint RP-SP data in a mixed logit analysis of trip timing decisions[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(6): 1025-1038.
28	Breffle W S, Morey E R, Lodder T S.1998. Using contingent valuation to estimate a neighbourhood's willingness to pay to preserve undeveloped urban land[J]. Urban Studies, 35(4): 715-727.
29	Brownstone D, Train K.1998. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1): 109-129.
30	Bunch D S, Kitamura R.1989. Multinomial probit model estimation revisited: testing of new algorithms and evaluation of alternative model specifications for trinomial models of household car ownership[R]. Research Report UCD-TRG-RR-89-4. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
31	Campbell D, Hess S. October, 2009. Outlying sensitivities in discrete choice data: causes, consequences and remedies[C]//Proceedings of the European Transport Conference. Netherland: Association of European Transport.
32	Campbell D, Hutchinson W G, Scarpa R.2006. Lexicographic preferences for rural environmental landscape improvements: implications on individual-specific willingness to pay estimates[R]. RERC Working Paper N610.
33	Chatterjee K.2011. Modelling the dynamics of bus use in a changing travel environment using panel data[J]. Transportation, 38(3): 487-509.
34	Chintagunta P K, Nair H S.2011. Structural workshop paper-discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing[J]. Marketing Science, 30(6): 977-996.
35	Dargay J, Hanly M.2007. Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(10): 934-948.
36	De Dios Ortúzar J.1983. Nested logit models for mixed-mode travel in urban corridors[J]. Transportation Research Part A: General, 17(4): 283-299.
37	De Dios Ortúzar J, Simonetti C.2008. Modelling the demand for medium distance air travel with the mixed data estimation method[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(6): 297-303.
38	Dow J K, Endersby J W.2004. Multinomial probit and multinomial logit: a comparison of choice models for voting research[J]. Electoral studies, 23(1): 107-122.
39	Espino R, de Dios Ortúzar J, Román C.2007. Understanding suburban travel demand: flexible modelling with revealed and stated choice data[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(10): 899-912.
40	Feo M, Espino R, García L.2011. An stated preference analysis of Spanish freight forwarders modal choice on the south-west Europe Motorway of the Sea[J]. Transport Policy, 18(1): 60-67.
41	Ferdous N, Eluru N, Bhat C R, et al.2010. A multivariate ordered-response model system for adults' weekday activity episode generation by activity purpose and social context[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(8-9): 922-943.
42	Goos P, Vermeulen B, Vandebroek M.2010. D-optimal conjoint choice designs with no-choice options for a nested logit model[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140(4): 851-861.
43	Greene W H.2012. NLOGIT version 5 reference guide[S]. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software.
44	Greene W H, Hensher D A.2003. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8): 681-698.
45	Greene W H, Hensher D A.2012. Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model[J]. Applied Economics, 45(14): 1897-1902.
46	Greene W H, Hensher D A, Rose J M.2005. Using classical simulation-based estimators to estimate individual WTP values[M]//Scarpa R, Alberini A. Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer: 17-33.
47	Grigolon A B, Borgers A W J, Kemperman A D A M, et al.2014. Vacation length choice: a dynamic mixed multinomial logit model[J]. Tourism Management, 41: 158-167.
48	Haaijer R, Kamakura W A, Wedel M.2001. The ‘no-choice'alternative in conjoint choice experiments[J]. International Journal of Market Research, 43(1): 93-106.
49	Hayakawa K, Tsubota K.2014. Location choice in low-income countries: evidence from Japanese investments in East Asia[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 33: 30-43.
50	Hensher D A.1999. HEV choice models as a search engine for the specification of nested logit tree structures[J]. Marketing Letters, 10(4): 333-343.
51	Hensher D A, Bradley M.1993. Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models[J]. Marketing Letters, 4(2): 139-151.
52	Hensher D A, Li Z.2010. Accounting for differences in modelled estimates of RP, SP and RP/SP direct petrol price elasticities for car mode choice: a warning[J]. Transport Policy, 17: 191-195.
53	Hensher D A, Rose J M, Greene W H.2005. Applied choice analysis: a primer[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54	Hensher D A, Rose J M, Greene W H.2008. Combining RP and SP data: biases in using the nested logit ‘trick': contrasts with flexible mixed logit incorporating panel and scale effects[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(2): 126-133.
55	Hess S.2007. Posterior analysis of random taste coefficients in air travel behaviour modelling[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4): 203-212.
56	Hess S.2010. Conditional parameter estimates from mixed logit models: distributional assumptions and a free software tool[J]. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3(2): 134-152.
57	Hess S, Ben-Akiva M, Gopinath D, et al. December, 2009. Advantages of latent class over continuous mixture of logit models in capturing heterogeneity[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research. Jaipur, India: Transport Research Laboratory.
58	Hess S, Fowler M, Adler T, et al.2012. A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study[J]. Transportation, 39(3): 593-625.
59	Hess S, Hensher D A.2010. Using conditioning on observed choices to retrieve individual-specific attribute processing strategies[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(6): 781-790.
60	Hess S, Polak J W.2005. Mixed logit modelling of airport choice in multi-airport regions[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(2): 59-68.
61	Hess S, Rose J M.2009. Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated on repeated choice data[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(6): 708-719.
62	Hole A R.2008. Modelling heterogeneity in patients' preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment[J]. Journal of Health Economics, 27(4): 1078-1094.
63	Johansson M V, Heldt T, Johansson P.2006. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(6): 507-525.
64	Jou R C, Hensher D A, Hsu T L.2011. Airport ground access mode choice behavior after the introduction of a new mode: a case study of Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(3): 371-381.
65	Jumbe C B L, Angelsen A.2011. Modeling choice of fuelwood source among rural households in Malawi: a multinomial probit analysis[J]. Energy Economics, 33(5): 732-738.
66	Koppelman F S, Wen C H.2000. The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34(2): 75-89.
67	Kumar S, Kant S.2007. Exploded logit modeling of stakeholders' preferences for multiple forest values[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(5): 516-526.
68	Lapparent M, Cernicchiaro G.2012. How long to own and how much to use a car? A dynamic discrete choice model to explain holding duration and driven mileage[J]. Economic Modelling, 29(5): 1737-1744.
69	Lee M, Khelifa A, Garrow L A, et al.2012. An analysis of destination choice for opaque airline products using multidimensional binary logit models[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(10): 1641-1653.
70	LeSage J P.2000. Bayesian estimation of limited dependent variable spatial autoregressive models[J]. Geographical Analysis, 32(1): 19-35.
71	Li Z B, Wang W, Liu P, et al.2012. Physical environments influencing bicyclists' perception of comfort on separated and on-street bicycle facilities[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(3): 256-261.
72	Lijesen M G.2006. A mixed logit based valuation of frequency in civil aviation from SP-data[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(2): 82-94.
73	Lindberg K, Veisten K.2012. Local and non-local preferences for nature tourism facility development[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 4: 215-222.
74	Lo H K, Yip C W, Wan Q K.2004. Modeling competitive multi-modal transit services: a nested logit approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 12(3-4): 251-272.
75	Louviere J J, Hensher D A, Swait J D.2000. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76	Marcucci E, Gatta V.2011. Regional airport choice: consumer behaviour and policy implications[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(1): 70-84.
77	McFadden D.1978. Modeling the choice of residential location[J]. Transportation Research Record, 673: 72-77.
78	McFadden D. July, 2000. Disaggregate behavioral travel demand's RUM side: a 30-year retrospective[C]//Presented at conference on the international association of travel behavior research. Brisbane, Australia: IABR.
79	McFadden D, Train K.2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response[J]. Journal of applied Econometrics, 15(5): 447-470.
80	McKee D.2006. A dynamic model of retirement in Indonesia[R]. CCPR Working Paper Series, No.5.California Center for Population Research.
81	Montgomery M.2002. A nested logit model of the choice of a graduate business school[J]. Economics of Education Review, 21(5): 471-480.
82	Müller S, Haase K.2014. Customer segmentation in retail facility location planning[J]. Business Research, 7(2): 235-261.
83	Páez A.2006. Exploring contextual variations in land use and transport analysis using a probit model with geographical weights[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(3): 167-176.
84	Papola A.2004. Some developments on the cross-nested logit model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(9): 833-851.
85	Rasciute S, Pentecost E J.2010. A nested logit approach to modelling the location of foreign direct investment in the Central and Eastern European Countries[J]. Economic Modelling, 27(1): 32-39.
86	Sarma S, Simpson W.2007. A panel multinomial logit analysis of elderly living arrangements: evidence from aging in Manitoba longitudinal data, Canada[J]. Social Science &Medicine, 65(12): 2539-2552.
87	Schmidheiny K, Brülhart M.2011. On the equivalence of location choice models: conditional logit, nested logit and Poisson[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(2): 214-222.
88	Shen J Y.2009. Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data[J]. Applied Economics, 41(22): 2915-2924.
89	Smith M D.2005. State dependence and heterogeneity in fishing location choice[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(2): 319-340.
90	Suárez A, Rodrı́guez del Bosque I, Rodrı́guez-Poo J M, et al.2004. Accounting for heterogeneity in shopping centre choice models[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(2): 119-129.
91	Swait J.2001. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 35(10): 903-928.
92	Teichert T, Shehu E, von Wartburg I.2008. Customer segmentation revisited: the case of the airline industry[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1): 227-242.
93	Teye C, Davidson P, Culley R.2014. Simultaneously accounting for inter-alternative correlation and taste heterogeneity among long distance travelers using mixed nested logit (MXNL) Model so as to improve toll road traffic and revenue forecast[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 1(1): 24-35.
94	Todd P E, Wolpin K I.2010. Structural estimation and policy evaluation in developing countries[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1): 21-50.
95	Train K E.2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
96	Treiman T, Gartner J.2006. Are residents willing to pay for their community forests? Results of a contingent valuation survey in Missouri, USA[J]. Urban Studies, 43(9): 1537-1547.
97	Varela E, Jacobsen J B, Soliño M.2014. Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management[J]. Ecological Economics, 106: 91-104.
98	Wang X K, Kockelman K M, Lemp J D.2012. The dynamic spatial multinomial probit model: analysis of land use change using parcel-level data[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 77-88.
99	Wen C H, Koppelman F S.2001. The generalized nested logit model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 35(7): 627-641.
100	Wen C H, Lai S C.2010. Latent class models of international air carrier choice[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(2): 211-221.
101	Wen C H, Wang W C, Fu C.2012. Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2): 545-554.
102	Yai T, Iwakura S, Morichi S.1997. Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 31(3): 195-207.
103	Yang C W, Sung Y C.2010. Constructing a mixed-logit model with market positioning to analyze the effects of new mode introduction[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 175-182.
104	Ye F, Lord D.2014. Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 1: 72-85.
105	Zhou B, Kockelman K M.2008. Neighborhood impacts on land use change: a multinomial logit model of spatial relationships[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(2): 321-340.
106	Zhu W, Timmermans H.2008. Bounded rationality choice model incorporating attribute threshold, mental effort and risk attitude: illustration to pedestrian walking direction choice decision in shopping streets[M]//Klingsch W W F, Rogsch C, Schadschneider A, et al. Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2008. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer: 425-437.
107	Zwerina K.1997. Discrete choice experiments in marketing[M]. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

[1]	戚伟, 刘盛和, 金浩然. 中国城市规模划分新标准的适用性研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(1): 47-56.
[2]	刘希林, 尚志海. 自然灾害风险主要分析方法及其适用性述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11): 1486-1497.
[3]	燕月, 陈爽, 李广宇, 余成. 城市紧凑性测度指标研究及典型城市分析——以南京、苏州建设用地紧凑度为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(5): 733-742.