地理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 807-817.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.05.012
蒋海兵1, 张文忠1, 祁毅2, 周亮3
收稿日期:
2012-09-01
修回日期:
2013-02-01
出版日期:
2013-05-25
发布日期:
2013-05-25
通讯作者:
张文忠(1966-),男,内蒙古呼和浩特人,研究员,博士生导师,从事城市和区域发展研究.E-mail: zhangwz@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:
蒋海兵(1978-),男,江苏建湖人,讲师,博士后,主要从事城市和区域发展研究.E-mail: jianghb@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
JIANG Haibing1, ZHANGWenzhong1, QI Yi2, ZHOU Liang3
Received:
2012-09-01
Revised:
2013-02-01
Online:
2013-05-25
Published:
2013-05-25
摘要: 随着中国区域交通基础设施快速发展,可达性研究受到学界与规划界广泛关注.本文通过梳理近20 年来国内外区域交通基础设施可达性研究的发展脉络,从可达性时空变化及其地域效应方面总结国内外区域交通可达性研究的各自特点与发展方向,判断未来国内相关研究主题.综合比较可知,区域交通可达性的空间格局与时空演变研究仍是国内外交通地理学的研究热点问题.国外研究评价指标丰富,空间分辨率不断提高,分析技术方法日益多样,研究内容更趋于多元化,不断拓宽了可达性研究与应用领域.国内研究发展快,但研究指标体系有待完善,空间分辨率仍有待提高,亟待考虑交通需求与政策干预等现实因素.
蒋海兵, 张文忠, 祁毅, 周亮. 区域交通基础设施可达性研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(5): 807-817.
JIANG Haibing, ZHANGWenzhong, QI Yi, ZHOU Liang. Research progress on accessibility to regional transportation infrastructure[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(5): 807-817.
Andersson D E, Shyr O F, Fu J. 2010. Does high-speed rail accessibility influence residential property prices: Hedonic estimates from southern Taiwan. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 166-174.Axhausen K W, Froelich P, Tschopp M. 2011. Changes in Swiss accessibility since 1850. Research in Transportation Economics, 31(1): 72-80.Bröcker J, Korzhenevych A, Schürmann C. 2010. Assessing spatial equity and efficiency impacts of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part B, 44(7): 795-811.Cao X S, Xue D S, Yan X P. 2005. A study on the urban accessibility of national trunk highway system in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(6): 903-910. [曹小曙, 薛德升, 阎 小培. 2005. 中国干线公路网络联结的城市通达性. 地 理学报, 60(6): 903-910.]Chen C L, Hall P. 2011. The impacts of high-speed trains on British economic geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 689-704.Chen H, Lu L, Zheng S T. 2011. The tourism spatial pattern evolution of the Pearl River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(10): 1427-1437. [陈浩, 陆林, 郑嬗婷. 2011. 珠 江三角洲城市群旅游空间格局演化. 地理学报, 66(10): 1427-1437.]Chen J, Lu F, Cheng C X. 2007. Advance in accessibility evaluation approaches and applications. Progress in Geography, 26(5): 100-110. [陈洁, 陆锋, 程昌秀. 2007. 可达性 度量方法及应用研究进展评述. 地理科学进展, 26(5): 100-110.]Condeco-Melhorado A, Gutiérrez J, Martín J. 2011. Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion. Transportation Research Part A, 45(3): 185-203.European Commission. 2004. Decision No 884/2004/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004. Official Journal of the European Union, L167: 1-36 Forslund U M, Johansson B. 1995. Assessing road investment: Accessibility changes, cost benefit and production effects.The Annals of Regional Science, 29(2): 155-174.Geurs K T, Van Wee B. 2004. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transports strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2): 127-140.Givoni M. 2006. Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: A review. Transport Reviews, 26(5): 593-611.Gutiérrez J, González R, Gómez G. 1996. The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(4): 227-238.Gutiérrez J. 2001. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Bardelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4): 229-242.Gutiérrez J, Condeco-Melhorado A, Martín J C. 2010. Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 141-152.Gutiérrez J, Condeco-Melhorado A, López E, et al. 2011. Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: A methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS. Journal of Transport Geography, 19 (4): 840-850.Halden D. 2003. Accessibility analysis concepts and their application to transport policy, programme and project evaluation// Pearman A, Mackie P, Nellthorp J. Transport projects programmes and policies: Evaluation needs and capabilities.Aldershot, UK: Ashgate: 227-242.Hansen W G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land-use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2): 73-76.Holl A. 2004. Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure: Empirical evidence from Spain.Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(3): 341-363.Holl A. 2007. Twenty years of accessibility improvements: The case of the Spanish motorway building programme.Journal of Transport Geography, 15(4): 286-297.Hou Q, Li S M. 2011. Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China, 1990-2020. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6): 1350-1360.Hu T J, Shen J S. 1999. Effect analysis of Jing-Hu High-Speed Railway on regional economic development. Economic Geography, 19(5): 101-104. [胡天军, 申金升. 1999. 京沪 高速铁路对沿线经济发展的影响分析. 经济地理, 19 (5): 101-104.]Huang X Y, Cao X S, Li T. 2011. The relationship between regional transport superiority and regional economic performance in Hainan. Geographical Research, 30(6): 985-999. [黄晓燕, 曹小曙, 李涛. 2011. 海南省区域交通 优势度与经济发展关系. 地理研究, 30(6): 985-999.]Jiang H B, Xu J G, Qi Y. 2010a. The Influence of Beijing- Shanghai High-Speed Railways on land accessibility of regional center cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65 (10): 1287-1298. [蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 2010a. 京沪高 铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响. 地理学报, 65(10): 1287-1298.]Jiang H B, Xu J G. 2010b. Delimitation of urban hinterland areas of the prefecture level or above in China based on traffic accessibility. Journal of Lanzhou University: Natural Sciences, 46(4): 58-64. [蒋海兵, 徐建刚. 2010b. 基于 交通可达性的中国地级以上城市腹地划分. 兰州大学 学报: 自然科学版, 46(4): 58-64.]Jin C, Huang Z F. 2012. Tourism regionalization in Yangtze River Delta based on accessibility. Geographical Research, 31(4): 745-757. [靳诚, 黄震方. 2012. 基于可达 性技术的长江三角洲旅游区划. 地理研究, 31(4): 745-757.]Jin F J, Wang J E. 2004. Railway network expansion and spatial accessibility analysis in China: 1906-2000. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59(2): 293-302. [金凤君, 王姣娥. 2004. 二十世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性. 地理学报, 59(2): 293-302.]Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X W. 2008. Discrimination method and its application analysis of regional transport superiority.Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(8): 787-798. [金凤君, 王成 金, 李秀伟. 2008. 中国区域交通优势的甄别方法及应 用分析. 地理学报, 63(8): 787-798. ]Keeble D, Owens P L, Thompson C. 1981. Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European community.Regional Studies, 16(6): 419-432.Keith D, Martin R. 2010. Applying accessibility measures to assess a transport intervention strategy: A case study of Bromsgrove. Journal of Maps, 6(1): 181-191.Kotavaara O, Antikainen H, Rusanen J. 2011. Population change and accessibility by road and rail networks: GIS and statistical approach to Finland 1970-2007. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 926-935.Laird J, Nellthorp J, Mackie P. 2005. Network effects and total economic impact in transport appraisal. Transport Policy, 12(6): 537-544.Li S M, Shum Y M. 2001. Impacts of the national trunk highway system on accessibility in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(1): 39-45.Linneker B, Spence N. 1996. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway.Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2): 77-92.Liu C L, Yu R L, Xiong J P, et al. 2009. Spatial accessibility of road network in Wuhan metropolitan area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(12): 1488-1497. [刘承良, 余瑞林, 熊 剑平, 等. 2009. 武汉都市圈路网空间通达性分析. 地理 学报, 64(12): 1488-1497.]Liu H L, Bao A M, Chen Xi, et al. 2008. The effect of transport accessibility on regional economic performance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(4): 428-434. [刘海隆, 包安明, 陈曦, 等. 2008. 新疆交通可达性对区域经济的影响分析. 地理学报, 63(4): 428-434.]Loo B P Y. 2002. The potential impacts of strategic highways on new town development: A case study of Route 3 in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part A, 36(1): 41-63.López S, Gutiérrez J, Gómez G. 2008. Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: An accessibility approach. European Planning Studies, 16(2): 277-301.Lu D D. 1995. Regional development and spatial structure.Beijing, China: Science Press: 117-124. [陆大道. 1995. 区域发展及其空间结构. 北京: 科学出版社: 117-124.]Lu D D. 2012. The proposition to avoid the over advance and inappropriate construction of China's transport infrastructures.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(1): 2-10. [陆大道. 2012. 关于避免中国交通建设过度超前的建议. 地理科 学, 32(1): 2-10]Lu F, Chen J. 2008. Location superiority and accessibility analysis on Wuhan metropolitan region. Progress in Geography, 27(4): 68-74. [陆锋, 陈洁. 2008. 武汉城市圈城市区 位与可达性分析. 地理科学进展, 27(4): 68-74.]Luo P F, Xu Y L, Zhang N N. 2004. Study on the impacts of regional accessibility of high-speed rail: A case study of Nanjing to Shanghai region. Economic Geography, 24 (3): 407-411. [罗鹏飞, 徐逸伦, 张楠楠. 2004. 高速铁路 对区域可达性的影响研究: 以沪宁地区为例. 经济地 理, 24(3): 407-411.]Lutter H, Puetz T, Spangenberg M. 1992. Accessibility and peripherality of community regions: The role of road, long-distance railways and airport networks, Report to Commission of the European Communities, DG XVI.Bonn: Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung.Martin J C, Reggiani A. 2007. Recent methodological developments to measure spatial interaction: Synthetic accessibility indices applied to high-speed train investments. Transport Reviews, 27(5): 551-571.Meng D Y, Fan K S, Lu Y Q, et al. 2010. Level and spatial pattern of interprovincial accessibility before and after train-speed upgrading. Progress in Geography, 29(6): 709-715. [孟德友, 范况生, 陆玉麒, 等. 2010. 铁路客运 提速前后省际可达性及空间格局分析. 地理科学进展, 29(6): 709-715.]Meng D Y, Lu Y Q. 2011. Impact of high-speed railway on accessibility and economic linkage of cities along the railway in Henan Province, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(5): 537-543. [孟德友, 陆玉麒. 2011. 高速铁路 对河南沿线城市可达性及经济联系的影响. 地理科学, 31(5): 537-543.]Monzón A, Ortega E, López E. 2013. Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas.Cities, 30(1): 18-30.Morris J M, Dumble P L,Wigan M R. 1978. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A, 13(2): 91-109.Páez A. 2004. Network accessibility and the spatial distribution of economic activity in eastern Asia. Urban Studies, 41(11): 2211-2230.Pereira M A, Sagalés O R. 2003. Spillover effects of public capital formation: Evidence from the Spanish regions.Journal of Urban Economics, 53(2): 238-256.Qi Y. 2008. The study on planning support system based on spatial accessiblity analysis of public transportations[D].Nanjing, China: Nanjing University. [祁毅. 2008. 基于公 共交通可达性分析的规划支持系统研究[D]. 南京: 南 京大学.]Ribeiro A, Antunes A P, Páez A. 2010. Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: Empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 125-132.Rienstra S, Rietveld P, Hilferink M, et al. 1998. Road infrastructure and corridor development//Lundqvist L, Mattson L G, Kim T J. Network infrastructure and the urban environment: Advances in spatial systems modelling. Berlin: Springer Verlag: 395-414.Sasaki K, Ohashi T, Ando A. 1997. High-speed rail transit impact on regional systems: Does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion? The Annals of Regional Science, 31(1): 77-98.Schürman C, Spiekermann K, Wegener M. 1997. Accessibility indicators. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung 39. Dortmund: Institut für Raumplanung, Universität Dortmund.Song C Q, Leng S Y. 2005. Some important scientific problems of integrative study of Chinese geography in 5 to 10 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(4): 546-552. [ 宋长 青, 冷疏影. 2005. 21 世纪中国地理学综合研究的主要 领域. 地理学报, 60(4): 546-552.]Spieckermann K, Wegener M. 1996. Trans-European networks and unequal accessibility in Europe. European Journal of Regional Development, 3(4): 35-42.Upchurch C, Kuby M, Zoldak M, et al. 2004. Using GIS to generate mutually exclusive service areas linking travel on and off a network. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (1): 23-33.Vandenbulcke G, Steenberghen T, Thomas I. 2009. Mapping accessibility in Belgium: A tool for land-use and transport planning? Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1): 39-53.Vickerman R W, Spiekermann K, Wegener M. 1999. Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1): 1-5.Wang C J, Ding J X, Yang W. 2011. Policy and spatial effect of expressway planning network in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1076-1088. [王成金, 丁金学, 杨 威. 2011. 中国高速公路规划网的空间效应与政策机 制. 地理学报, 66(8): 1076-1088.]Wang D G, Chen T, Li L, et al. 2012. Enlightenment and research of tourism impact on high-speed rail. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(3): 322-328. [ 汪德根, 陈田, 李立, 等. 国外高速铁路对旅游影响研究及启示. 地理科学, 32(3): 322-328.]Wang J E, Jin F J. 2005. Railway network organization and spatial service system optimization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(3): 371-380. [王姣娥, 金凤君. 2005. 中国铁路客运网络组织与空间服务系统优化. 地理学 报, 60(3): 371-380.]Wang Z B, Xu J G, Zhu C G, et al. 2010. The county accessibility divisions in China and its correlation with population distribution. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(4): 416-426. [王振波, 徐建刚, 朱传耿, 等. 2010. 中国县域 可达性区域划分及其与人口分布的关系. 地理学报, 65 (4): 416-426.]Wee V B, Geurs K. 2011. Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4): 350-367.Wei L H, Cong Y G. 2004. The influence of inter-cities express passenger train on spatial structure of metropolitan area. Economic Geography, 24(6): 834-837. [魏立华, 丛 艳国. 城际快速列车对大都市区通达性空间格局的影 响机制分析. 经济地理, 24(6): 834-837.]Weisbrod G, Treyz F. 1998. Productivity and accessibility: Bridging project-specific and macroeconomic analyses of transportation investments. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 1(3): 65-79.Willigers J, Van Wee B. 2011. High-speed rail and office location choices: A stated choice experiment for the Netherlands.Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 745-754.Wu W, Cao Y H, Cao W D, et al. 2006. Spatial structure and evolution of highway accessibility in the Yangtze River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(10): 1065-1074. [ 吴 威, 曹有挥, 曹卫东, 等. 2006. 长江三角洲公路网络的 可达性空间格局及其演化. 地理学报, 61(10): 1065-1074.]Wu W, Cao Y H, Cao W D, et al. 2009. Spatial pattern of regional comprehensive transportation cost. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 29(4): 485-492. [吴威, 曹有挥, 曹卫东, 等. 2009. 区域综合运输成本的空间格局研究. 地理科 学, 29(4): 485-492.]Wu W, Cao Y H, Liang S B. 2010. Temporal and spatial evolution of integrated transport accessibility in the Yangtze River Delta: 1986-2005. Progress in Geography, 29(5): 619-626. [吴威, 曹有挥, 梁双波. 2010. 20 世纪80 年代 以来长三角地区综合交通可达性的时空演化. 地理科 学进展, 29(5): 619-626.]Wu Y, Xu J G, Wang Z B, et al. 2008. GIS-based approach for the quantitative evaluation of accessibility in Yangzhong.Areal Research and Development, 27(5): 124-127. [吴扬, 徐建刚, 王振波, 等. 2008. 基于GIS 技术的扬中市可达 性定量研究. 地域研究与开发, 27(5): 124-127.]Zhang B, Jin F J, Yu L. 2007. Research on the optimization of highway network in Hunan Province and the evolution of spatial pattern in recent 20 years. Geographical Research, 26(4): 712-721. [张兵, 金凤君, 于良. 2007. 近20 年来湖 南公路网络优化与空间格局演变. 地理研究, 26(4): 712-721.]Zhang L, Lu Y Q, Zhao Y Z. 2009. Delimitation of central cities attracting scope based on time accessibility: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta. Geographical Research, 28(3): 803-816. [张莉, 陆玉麒, 赵元正. 2009. 基于时间 可达性的城市吸引范围的划分. 地理研究, 28(3): 803-816.]Zhang L, Lu Y Q. 2006. Assessment on regional accessibility based on land transportation network: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(12): 1235-1246. [张莉, 陆玉麒. 2006. 基于陆路交通网的区 域可达性评价. 地理学报, 61(12): 1235-1246.]Zhang N N, Xu Y L. 2005. Research on the impacts of high speed rail on regional development. Areal Research and Development, 24(3): 32-36. [张楠楠, 徐逸伦. 2005. 高速 铁路对沿线区域发展的影响研究. 地域研究与开发, 24 (3): 32-36.]Zhu B, Zhang X L, Gui D W, et al. 2010. The relationship between urban development and transport accessibility in Xinjiang. Progress in Geography, 29(10): 1239-1248. [朱 兵, 张小雷, 桂东伟, 等. 2010. 新疆城镇发展与交通可 达性相互影响. 地理科学进展, 29(10): 1239-1248.]Zhong Y X, Lu Y Q. 2009. Assessment of fair space of opportunities for regional development based on accessibility.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 29(6): 809-816. [钟业喜, 陆 玉麒. 2009. 基于可达性角度的区域发展机会公平性评 价. 地理科学, 29(6): 809-816.] |
[1] | 刘舟, 朱晟君. 外部知识环境与内资企业新出口市场开拓[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 194-206. |
[2] | 范擎宇, 杨山. 长三角地区城镇化协调发展的空间特征及形成机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 124-134. |
[3] | 陈晓艳, 徐冬, 黄睿, 胡小海, 黄震方, 张郴. 浙江省县域旅游经济增长的空间溢出效应[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1512-1521. |
[4] | 吕敏娟, 曹小曙. 1980—2016年黄土高原地区人口和可达性异速标度分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(11): 1884-1897. |
[5] | 张纯, 程志华, 于晓萍, 王亚群, 沈忱. 乌鲁木齐公共交通基础设施对低收入群体就业的影响研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 111-119. |
[6] | 初楠臣, 张平宇, 李鹤. 高速铁路情景下的俄罗斯远东铁路可达性及其空间效应研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 988-997. |
[7] | 史焱文, 李二玲, 李小建, 任世鑫. 农业产业集群创新通道及溢出效应——以山东寿光蔬菜产业集群为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 861-871. |
[8] | 湛东升, 张文忠, 谌丽, 虞晓芬, 党云晓. 城市公共服务设施配置研究进展及趋向[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 506-519. |
[9] | 阴姣姣, 王晓芳, 贾垚焱, 李春明, 王娟. 旅游扶贫重点村空间可达性分布特征及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1865-1876. |
[10] | 申犁帆, 张纯, 李赫, 王烨. 大城市通勤方式与职住失衡的相互关系[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1277-1290. |
[11] | 孟德友, 李小建. 中国省会城市高铁费用可达性及居民消费格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1055-1065. |
[12] | 孙铁山, 范颖玲, 齐云蕾. 北京公交就业可达性及其地区和人群差异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1066-1074. |
[13] | 陶印华, 申悦. 医疗设施可达性空间差异及其影响因素——基于上海市户籍与流动人口的对比[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1075-1085. |
[14] | 杨慧敏, 张香玲, 李立, 李小建, 王兵. 山区贫困县中小学空间格局变化与可达性分析——以河南省嵩县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(4): 556-566. |
[15] | 程敏, 连月娇. 基于改进潜能模型的城市医疗设施空间可达性——以上海市杨浦区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(2): 266-275. |
|