地理科学进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 139-148.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.002
周婧, 杨庆媛
收稿日期:
2011-05-01
修回日期:
2011-07-01
出版日期:
2012-02-25
发布日期:
2012-02-25
通讯作者:
杨庆媛(1966-),女,云南腾冲人,博士生导师,教授,主要从事国土资源管理与区域开发、区域经济研究。E-mail: yizyang@swu.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHOU Jing, YANG Qingyuan
Received:
2011-05-01
Revised:
2011-07-01
Online:
2012-02-25
Published:
2012-02-25
摘要: 农户层面研究对解析人地关系特别是农户与地理环境的相互作用所凸显的优越性与实践性收到学界的广泛推崇,成为当前学者研究农村发展与土地利用问题的重要手段。采用文献回顾法、归纳法,本文对国内外农户层面农村宅基地流转研究进行了归纳与对比分析。研究表明,国内外学者对宅基地流转的讨论对象与研究热点差异明显,研究方法与视角等也略有差异。国外学者对宅基地流转研究的关注度尚不多,已有成果主要集中在20世纪80 年代以前,研究多基于农户层面的问卷调查展开,偏重对流转过程中农户流转行为,流转区位选择,流转与逆城市化带来的影响展开;国内学者对宅基地流转的关注日益提升,研究内容涉及流转中农户权益保障的政策讨论,农户心理与行为响应分析,农户需求与收益分配研究,流转政策实施评价等方面,研究以经济地理学、行为经济学、社会学等理论为指导,以探求农户需求与保障农户权益为出发点展开讨论,大量运用调查数据展开实证讨论。今后研究应加强对流转过程中各个主体需求的讨论,并注重对农户生存与经济、社会与精神等需求层面关注,加强地理空间信息与社会经济环境相结合的研究,加强对农户模型与计量经济学方法的系统运用与校验。
周婧, 杨庆媛. 农户层面农村宅基地流转研究进展与述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 139-148.
ZHOU Jing, YANG Qingyuan. Review of the Researches on Rural Housing Land Transfer at Farm Household Level[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(2): 139-148.
[1] Healy R G, Short J L. The market for rural land. Washington, D C: Conservation Foundation, 1981. [2] Buttel F H. The political ecomomy of part-time farming. Geojournal, 1982, 6: 293-300. [3] Daniels T L, Nelson A C. Is oregon’sfar land preservation program working? Journal of the American Planning Association, 1986, 52: 22-32. [4] Grether D M, Mieszkowski P. Determinants of real estate values. Journal of Urban Economics, 1974, 1: 127-145. [5] Cobb S. The impact of site characteristics on housing cost estimates. Journal of Urban Economics, 1984, 15: 26-46. [6] Li M M, Brown H J. Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Economics, 1980, 56: 125-141. [7] Ridker G R, Henning J A. The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1967, 49: 246-257. [8] Diamond D B, Jr. The relationship between amenities and urban land prices. Land Economics, 1980, 56: 21-32. [9] Blomquist G, Worley L. Hedonic prices, demands for urban housing amenities, and benefit estimates. Journal of Urban Economics, 1981, 9: 212-221. [10] Goodman A. Externalities and non-monotonic price-distance functions. Journal of Urban Economics, 1979, 6: 21-328. [11] Coleman D, Salt J. The British Population. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 1992. [12] Dueker K J, Strathman J G, Levin I P, et al. Rural residential development within metropolitan area. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1983, 8: 121-129. [13] Dutt A K, Achmatowicz-Otok A, Mukhopadhyay A, et al. Urban and rural housing characteristics of Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1992, 22(2-4): 153-160. [14] Chaney P, Sherwood K. The resale of right to buy dwellings: A case study of migration and social change in rural England. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000, 16(1): 79-94. [15] Cervero R. Managing the traffic impacts of suburban office growth. Transportation Quarterly, 1984, 38: 533-550. [16] Hargitay S E, Yu S M. Property Investment Decisions: A Quantitative Approach. London: Spon, 1993. [17] Byrne P. Risk, Uncertainty and Decision-making in Property Development. London: Spon, 1996. [18] Newby H, Bell C, Rose D, et al. Property, Paternalism and Power: Class and Control in Rural England. London: Hutchinson, 1978. [19] Perdue R R, Long P T, Allen L. Rural resident tourism perceptions and attitudes. Annals of Tourism Research, 1987, 14(3): 420-429. [20] Allen L R. Rural residents' attitudes toward recreation and tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 1993, 31: 27-33. [21] Laquatra J. Rural landlords and rental housing energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 1992, 20(9): 815-824. [22] Shucksmith M. House Building in Britain’s Countryside.London: Routledge, 1990. [23] Forrest R, Murie A. Change on a rural council estate: An analysis of dwelling histories. Journal of Rural Studies, 1992, 8(1): 53-65. [24] Ryan R L. Preserving rural character in new England: Local residents' perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 61(1): 19-35. [25] Nelson A C. Towards a theory of the American rural residential land market. Journal of Rural Studies, 1986, 2(4): 309-319. [26] Cloke P J, Edwards G. Rurality in England and Wales 1981: A replication of the 1971 index. Regional Studies, 1986, 20(4): 289-306. [27] Forrest R, Murie A. The affluent homeowner: Labour market position and the shaping of housing histories. Sociological Review, 1988, 35: 370-403. [28] Hoggart K, Paniagua A. What rural restructuring? Journal of Rural Studies, 2001, 17: 41-62. [29] Newby H. Urbanisation and the rural class structure: Reflections on a case study//Butte F, Newby H. The Rural Ssociology of the Advanced Societies. London: Croom Helm, 1980. [30] Shucksmith M. No Homes for Locals. Gower: Farnborough, 1981. [31] Boyle P. Rural in-migration in England and wales 1980-1981. Journal of Rural Studies, 1995, 11: 65-78. [32] Gallent N, Tewdwr-Jones M. Rural Second Homes in Europe: Examining Housing Supply and Planning Control. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000. [33] Cloke P, Thrift N. Class and change in rural Britain// Marsden T, Lowe P, Whatmore S. Rural Restructuring: Global Processes and Their Responses. London: David Fulton, 1990. [34] Hawke N. The right to buy in rural areas: An investigation of section 19 of the housing act 1980. Leicester Polytechnic Law School, Leicester, 1985. [35] Keeble D E, Owens P L, Thompson C. The urban-rural manufacturing shift in the european community. Urban Studies, 1983, 20: 405-418. [36] Liu J C, Var T. Resident attitudes toward tourism impacts in Hawaii. Annals of Tourism Research, 1986, 13: 193-214. [37] Lowe P, Clark J, Seymour S, et al. Moralizing the Environment: Countryside Change, Farming and Pollution. London: UCL Press, 1997. [38] Department of the Environment. Housing and construction statistics (annual). London, 1991. [39] Sherwood K B. The local authority and local needs housing: A case study from south northamptonshire//Lewis G J, Sherwood K B. Proceedings of Institute of British Geographer's Rural Study Group Annual Conference. Leicester: University of Leicester, 1991: 95-113. [40] Bramley G, Smart G. Rural Incomes and Housing Affordability. Salisbury, Wilts: Rural Development Commission, 1995. [41] Brougham J E, Butler R W. A segmentation analysis of resident attitudes to the social impact of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 1981, 13(4): 569-590. [42] Cloke P J, Thrift N. Intra-class conflict in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 1987, 3: 321-333. [43] Murdoch J, Marsden T. Reconstituting rurality: Class, community and power in the development process. London: UCL Press, 1994. [44] Lonsdale R E, Seyler H L. Non-metropolitan industrialization. New York: JohnWiley, 1979. [45] Rothman R A. Residents and transients: Community reaction to seasonal visitors. Journal of Travel Research, 1978, 16(3): 8-13. [46] 韩清怀, 王海军. 论市场机制在宅基地使用权流转中的限度. 经济问题, 2010(6): 75-78. [47] 张恩碧, 徐杰. 宅基地置换对上海市郊农民消费生活的影响分析. 消费经济, 2008(4): 3-6. [48] 胡运霞. 农村宅基地换房流转绩效研究: 以天津市华明镇宅基地换房为例. 小城镇建设, 2008(4): 77-81. [49] 徐倩, 夏敏. 农户宅基地使用权流转意愿及其影响因素研究: 以山东省齐河县为例. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 卷 (21): 11394-11396. [50] 刘旦. 江西省宅基地置换模式研究: 以都昌县四乡镇为例. 江西农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2009(4): 33-37. [51] 刘旦, 陈赢. 农村宅基地置换模式及其效益评估: 基于江西的调查和农户视角. 湖南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2009(6): 43-46. [52] 邱道持, 赵亚萍, 石永明, 等. 农村宅基地流转激励机制研究: 以重庆市璧山县为例. 西南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008(10): 136-140. [53] 袁丰, 陈江龙, 黄天送,等. 基于SCM的经济发达地区农村宅基地置换研究: 以海门市为例. 资源科学, 2009, 31 (8): 1378-1385. [54] 徐波, 莫小龙. 农村宅基地流转模式探究: 以陕西省武功县为例. 甘肃科技纵横, 2010(3): 65-67. [55] 耿宏儒. 对农村宅基地使用权流转及抵押问题的调查与思考: 以陕西省西乡县为例. 西部金融, 2009(3): 54-55. [56] 赵亚萍, 邱道持, 石永明, 等. 农村宅基地流转驱动力分析: 以重庆市璧山县为例. 经济研究导刊, 2008(7): 52-53. [57] 周婧, 杨庆媛, 张蔚, 等. 贫困山区不同类型农户对宅基地流转的认知与响应: 基于重庆市云阳县568 户农户调查. 中国土地科学, 2010(9): 11-17. [58] 张竟竟. 城乡统筹背景下河南省农村宅基地流转问题研究. 特区经济, 2010(9): 186-188. [59] 王新军, 罗继润, 宋俊. 农村居住模式的新探索: 奉贤青村镇农民宅基地置换试点规划. 上海建设科技, 2004 (6): 12-13. [60] 南亚刚, 陈景升. 农户宅基地使用权流转意愿分析: 以吉林市为例. 商业经济, 2010(22): 14-16. [61] 张秀智, 丁锐. 经济欠发达与偏远农村地区宅基地退出机制分析:案例研究. 中国农村观察, 2009(6): 23-30. [62] 张怡然, 邱道持, 李艳, 等. 农民工进城落户与宅基地退出影响因素分析: 基于重庆市开县357 份农民工的调查问卷. 中国软科学, 2011(2): 62-68. [63] 赵国玲, 杨钢桥. 农户宅基地流转意愿的影响因素分析: 基于湖北二县市的农户调查研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009(12): 1121-1124. [64] 章波, 唐健, 黄贤金, 等. 经济发达地区农村宅基地流转问题研究: 以北京市郊区为例. 中国土地科学, 2006(1): 34-38. [65] 朱新华, 柴涛修, 陈利根. 宅基地使用权流转制度改革的制度经济学解析. 中国土地科学, 2009(4): 34-37. [66] 伍振军, 张云华, 孔祥智. 宅基地置换增值收益分配: 基于j市的案例研究. 江汉论坛, 2010(9): 11-16. [67] 诸培新, 曲福田, 孙卫东. 农村宅基地使用权流转的公平与效率分析. 中国土地科学, 2009(5): 26-29. [68] 周京奎, 吴晓燕, 胡云霞. 集体建设用地流转模式创新的调查研究: 以天津滨海新区东丽区华明镇宅基地换房为例. 调研世界, 2010(7): 24-26. [69] 杨秀, 勇应辉, 王新军. 宅基地置换小区居民满意度评价体系研究. 华中建筑, 2010(1): 54-56. [70] 钟太洋, 黄贤金, 马其芳, 等. 区域兼业农户水土保持行为特征及决策模型研究. 水土保持通报, 2005, 25(6): 96-100. [71] 张文忠. 金山区廊下镇万春苑农民宅基地置换试点实例介绍. 上海城市规划, 2005(6): 6-9. [72] 崔宝敏. 天津市“以宅基地换房”的农村集体建设用地流转新模式. 中国土地科学, 2010(5): 37-40. [73] Furuseth O J, Pierce J T. A Comparative analysis of farmland preservation programmes in North America. Canadian Geographer, 1982, 26: 191-200. |
[1] | 胡国建, 陆玉麒. 基于企业视角的城市网络研究进展、思考和展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596. |
[2] | 任嘉敏, 马延吉. 地理学视角下绿色发展研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1196-1209. |
[3] | 邹利林, 刘彦随, 王永生. 中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 298-309. |
[4] | 杨俊, 由浩琳, 张育庆, 金翠. 从传统数据到大数据+的人居环境研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 166-176. |
[5] | 湛东升, 张文忠, 谌丽, 虞晓芬, 党云晓. 城市公共服务设施配置研究进展及趋向[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 506-519. |
[6] | 李满春, 姚梦汝, 汪侠, 刘小强, 陈焱明. 基于引文分析法的“点-轴系统”理论研究述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 164-174. |
[7] | 曹小曙, 胡培婷, 刘丹. 电动汽车充电站选址研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 139-152. |
[8] | 徐银凤, 汪德根. 中国城市空间结构的高铁效应研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230. |
[9] | 杨喜平, 方志祥. 移动定位大数据视角下的人群移动模式及城市空间结构研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 880-889. |
[10] | 王云, 马丽, 刘毅. 城镇化研究进展与趋势——基于CiteSpace和HistCite的图谱量化分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(2): 239-254. |
[11] | 许昕, 赵媛, 张新林, 曾通刚, 夏四友, 谢倩倩, 孙琪. 中国老年地理学研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(10): 1416-1429. |
[12] | 吕一河, 傅微, 李婷, 刘源鑫. 区域资源环境综合承载力研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 130-136. |
[13] | 郑景云, 方修琦, 吴绍洪. 中国自然地理学中的气候变化研究前沿进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 16-27. |
[14] | 彭建, 毛祺, 杜悦悦, 苏冲, 张甜, 胡熠娜, 王仰麟. 中国自然地域分区研究前沿与挑战[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 121-129. |
[15] | 张红霞, 苏勤, 陶玉国. 住宿业节能减碳研究进展及启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(6): 774-783. |
|