城市更新之研究

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.08.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市更新是城市发展到一定阶段所必然经历的再开发过程，不同的时代背景和地域环境中的城市更新具有不同的动因机制、开发模式、权力关系，进而产生不同的经济、环境、社会效应。追溯近年来英文文献中大量出现的有关“urban regeneration”的研究及中国近30 年来城市更新相关文献，总结地理学视角对城市更新的研究范围、研究领域及研究特点，论述与城市更新相关的理论，阐述城市更新的形成机制，分析各地区在不同阶段采用的更新政策，更新模式，更新手段和方法，以及更新参与主体和更新后的效果，对比分析国内外城市更新研究内容及特点。从城市更新同城市建设、经济发展的内在联系机制, 城市更新中微观个体的行为研究, 可持续发展观下的综合城市更新研究等3个方面，总结对未来中国城市更新发展的可借鉴性启示。

关键词: 城市更新, 更新策略, 文化主导

Abstract: “Urban regeneration”is a re-development process which is an inevitable experience at certain urbanization stage, and urban regeneration under different backgrounds and geographical environments has different motivation mechanism, development mode and power relations, and has different economic, environmental and social effects. Based on the English literature in recent years about "urban regeneration" and the literature about urban renewal in China in the past 30 years, this paper summed up the studies on urban regeneration from the perspectives of geography, including the research scope, the study characteristics and the theories related to urban regeneration, to explain the formation mechanism of urban regeneration, the regeneration policy, the regeneration mode, the regeneration tools and the methodologies, as well as the developers in the regeneration project and the regeneration effects in different regions at different developing stages. Urban renewal movement originated the massive urban renewal activities in the West after World War II. Because this kind of physical renewal destructed the previous social fabric and the integrity of the internal space, it was widely questioned. The term “urban regeneration”originally referred to an urban renaissance strategy which responded to the decline of old industrial cities after the transfer of the global industrial chain in the West, especially in Britain. Then it gradually evolved to a city's comprehensive urban redevelopment activities, including other improvement areas within the city, to stimulate economic growth, to enhance urban vitality and to improve the competitiveness. With the “globalization”and“localization”, the researchers in the world began to show concern on various types of urban renewal movement and re-urbanization strategy. This paper summed up three future research directions of urban regeneration, including the internal mechanism between urban regeneration, city construction and economic development, the micro-study of the individual behavior in urban regeneration and integrated urban redevelopment under the concept of sustainable development, and gave some suggestions to studies on future urban redevelopment in China.

Key words: culture-led urban regeneration, regeneration policy, urban regeneration

严若谷, 周素红, 闫小培. 城市更新之研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(8): 947-955.

YAN Ruogu, ZHOU Suhong, YAN Xiaopei. Studies of Urban Regeneration[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 30(8): 947-955.

参考文献

[1] Sassen S. Restructuring and the American city. Annual Review of Sociology, 1990, 16(4): 465-490.

[2] Hutton T. The new economy of the inner city. Cities, 2004, 21(2): 89-108.

[3] Eksted E. Neo-industrial Organizing: Renewal by Action and Knowledge Formation in a Project intensive Economy. New York: Routledge, 1999.

[4] Walker R A. Is there a service economy? The changing capitalist division of labor. Science & Society, 1985, 49 (1): 42-83.

[5] Harvey D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geographical Annular, 1989, 71(1): 3-17.

[6] Huu P H, Wakely P. Status, quality and the other trade-off: Towards a new theory of urban residential location. Urban Studies, 2000, 37(1): 7-35.

[7] Fraser J A. Beyond gentrification: Mobilizing communities and claiming space. Urban Geography, 2004, 25(5): 437-457.

[8] Marilyn L, Paul W. From enterprise to empowerment: The evolution of an Anglo-American approach to strategic urban economic regeneration. Strategic Change, 2004, 13(4): 219-229.

[9] Paddison R. City marketing-image reconstruction and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 1993, 30(2): 339-349.

[10] Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

[11] Pine J P, Gilmore J H. The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.

[12] Maclaren P M. Changing approaches to planning in an ‘entrepreneurial city’: The case of Dublin. European Planning Studies, 2001, 9(4): 437-457.

[13] Jacobs K. Waterfront redevelopment: A critical discourse analysis of the policy-making process within the Chatham Maritime project. Urban Studies, 2004, 41 (4): 817-832.

[14] Durose C, Lowndes V. Neighborhood governance: Contested rationales within a multi-level setting: A study of Manchester. Local Government Studies, 2010, 36(3): 341-359.

[15] Andrew B, Tim H, Margaret Harrison. Selling cities: Promoting new images for meetings tourism. Cities, 2002, 19 (1): 61-70.

[16] Norma M R, Deborah L. branding the design metropolis: The case of Montréal, Canada. Area, 2006, 38(4): 364-376.

[17] Pollard J S. From industrial district to 'urban village'? Manufacturing, money and consumption in Birmingham's Jewellery Quarter. Urban Studies, 2004, 41(1): 173-193.

[18] McCarthy J. The application of policy for cultural clustering: Current practice in Scotland. European Planning Studies, 2006, 14(3): 397-408.

[19] Masayuki S. Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study. Cities, 2010, 27(1): S3-S9.

[20] Grodach C. Beyond Bilbao: Rethinking flagship cultural development and planning in three California cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2010, 29(3): 353-366.

[21] Ponzini D, Rossi U. Becoming a creative city: The entrepreneurial mayor, network politics and the promise of an urban renaissance. Urban Studies, 2010, 47(5): 1037-1057.

[22] Lin C Y, Hsing W C. Culture-led urban regeneration and community mobilisation: The case of the Taipei Baoan Temple Area, Taiwan. Urban Studies, 2009, 46(7): 1317-1342.

[23] Sharp J, Pollock V, Paddison R. Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(6): 1001-1023.

[24] Bromley R D F, Tallon A R, Thomas C J. City centre regeneration through residential development: Contributing to sustainability. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(13): 2407-2429.

[25] Kocabas A. Urban conservation in Istanbul: Evaluation and re-conceptualization. Habitat international, 2006, 30 (1): 107-126.

[26] John E, Nicholas D. Privatism and partnership in urban regeneration. Public Administration, 1992, 70(3):359-368.

[27] Vivien L, Chris S. Dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 1998, 76(2): 313-333.

[28] Wrigley N, Guy C, Lowe M. Urban regeneration, social inclusion and large store development: The seacroft development in context. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(11): 2101-2114.

[29] Lowe M. The regional shopping centre in the inner city: A study of retail-led urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(3): 449-470.

[30] Evans G. Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(6): 959-983.

[31] Calvin J. Mega-events and host-region impacts: Determining the true worth of the 1999 Rugby World Cup. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2001, 3(3): 241-251.

[32] Miles S. 'Our tyne': Iconic regeneration and the revitalization of identity in Newcastle Gateshead. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(5): 913-926.

[33] Seo J K. Re-urbanization in regenerated areas of Manchester and Glasgow: New residents and the problems of sustainability. Cities, 2002, 19(2): 113-121.

[34] Mee K N. Property-led urban renewal in Hong Kong: Any place for the community? Sustainable Development, 2002, 10(3): 140-146.

[35] Fernando D O. Madrid: Urban regeneration projects and social mobilization. Cities, 2007, 24(3): 183-193.

[36] Rossi U. The multiplex city: The process of urban change in the historic centre of Naples. European urban and regional studies, 2004, 11(2): 156-169.

[37] Hemphill L, Berry J, McGreal S. An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance (Part 1): Conceptual foundations and methodological framework. Urban Studies, 2004, 41(4): 725-755.

[38] Raco M. The social relations of organizational activity and the new local governance in the UK. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(3): 437-456.

[39] Henderson S, Bowlby S, Raco M. Refashioning local government and inner-city regeneration: The Salford experience. Urban Studies, 2007, 44(8): 1441-1463.

[40] Mark W. 'In the shadow of hierarchy': Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands. Area, 2003, 35(1): 6-14.

[41] Jonathan S D. Partnerships versus regimes: Why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2003, 25(3): 253-270.

[42] Davies J S. Conjuncture or disjuncture? An institutionalize analysis of local regeneration partnerships in the UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2004, 28(3): 570-588.

[43] Ilka W, Rick B. Exploring the realities of the sustainable city through the use and reuse of vacant industrial buildings. European Environment, 1997, 7(6): 194-202.

[44] Severcan Y C, Barlas A. The conservation of industrial remains as a source of individuation and socialization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2007, 31(3): 675-682.

[45] Christian M R. Inner-city economic revitalization through cluster support: The Johannesburg clothing industry. Urban Forum, 2001, 12(1): 49-70.

[46] Richards G, Wilson J. The impact of cultural events on city image: Rotterdam, cultural capital of Europe 2001. Urban Studies, 2004, 41(10): 1931-1951.

[47] Liddle J. Regeneration and economic development in Greece: De-industrialisation and uneven development. Local Government Studies, 2009, 35(3): 335-354.

[48] McGreal S, Berry J, Lloyd G, et al. Tax-based mechanisms in urban regeneration: Dublin and Chicago models. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(10): 1819-1831.

[49] Guy S, Henneberry J, Rowley S. Development cultures and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(7): 1181-1196.

[50] Yang Y R, Chang C H. An urban regeneration regime in China: A case study of urban redevelopment in Shanghai's Taipingqiao area. Urban Studies, 2007, 44(9): 1809-1826.

[51] Del SazSalazar S, GarciaMenendez L. The non-market benefits of redeveloping dockland areas for recreational purposes: The case of Castellon, Spain. Environment and Planning, 2003, 35(12): 2115-2129.

[52] Nijkamp P, van der Burch M, Vindigni G. A comparative institutional evaluation of public-private partnerships in Dutch urban land-use and revitalization projects. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(10): 1865-1880.

[53] Silvia G. Urban regeneration and democratization of information access: CitiStat experience in Baltimore. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(6): 2012-2019.

[54] 吴良镛. 北京市的旧城改造及有关问题. 建筑学报, 1982(2): 8-18.

[55] 丁健. 苏联的旧城改造及其指标体系. 外国经济与管理, 1988(10): 11-15.

[56] 耿慧志. 论我国城市中心区更新的动力机制. 城市规划汇刊, 1999(3): 27-31.

[57] 董楠楠. 浅析德国经济萎缩地区的城市更新. 国际城市规划, 2009(1): 123-127.

[58] 冯圆圆. 英国城市复兴经验及其对中国的启示. 特区经济, 2009(1): 83-85.

[59] 金杭杭, 沈丹. 试论工业建筑再利用对城市更新的影响. 浙江建筑, 2009(3): 9-11.

[60] 倪敏东. 国外“棕地”改造的启示: 以武汉“龟山北”地区城市设计为例. 国际城市规划, 2009(2): 21-27.

[61] 马航. 深圳城中村改造的城市社会学视野分析. 城市规划, 2007(1): 26-32

[62] 马星.“城中村”问题的形成与更新改造. 特区经济, 2007(1): 150-152.

[63] 张润梅. 试析城中村形成的原因. 商场现代化, 2007 (10): 217-219.

[64] 孟天广. 公共治理、利害相关者与城中村改造模式创新. 商业时代, 2007(3): 8-9.

[65] 陈连姝. 对“城中村”改造成本的探析. 商场现代化, 2007(2): 67-69.

[66] 李志刚. 快速城市化下“转型社区”的社区转型研究. 城市发展研究, 2007, 14(5): 145-155.

[67] 章振东. PPP 融资模式对我国城中村改造的启示. 会计之友, 2007(12): 35-38.

[68] 汪坚强.“民主化”的更新改造之路: 对旧城更新改造中公众参与问题的思考. 城市规划, 2002, 26(7): 43-46.

[69] Andrew R, Bromley R D F, Thomas C J. Swansea. Cities, 2005, 22(1): 65-76.

[70] Haase D, Haase A, Kabisch S. Guidelines for the "Perfect Inner City", discussing the appropriateness of monitoring approaches for re-urbanization. European Planning Studies, 2008, 16(8): 1075-1100.