粤港澳大湾区发展的理论框架与发展战略探究

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.002

地理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 1597-1608.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.002

所属专题：粤港澳大湾区

粤港澳大湾区发展的理论框架与发展战略探究

赵晓斌¹(), 强卫¹, 黄伟豪², 线实^3,^*()

1. 香港大学中国发展研究中心,香港 999077
2. 明德学院,香港 999077
3. 广州大学地理科学学院,广州 510006

收稿日期:2018-11-30 修回日期:2018-12-15 出版日期:2018-12-28 发布日期:2018-12-28
通讯作者: 线实
作者简介:
作者简介：赵晓斌(1957-),男,中国香港人,博士,研究方向为城市与区域研究,经济与金融地理,E-mail: sxzhao@hku.hk。
基金资助:
香港研究资助局主题研究计划项目(T31/717/12R);国家自然科学基金项目(41771127)

Theoretical framework and development strategy of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Simon Xiaobin ZHAO¹(), Wei QIANG¹, David Waiho WONG², Shi XIAN^3,^*()

1. International Center for China Development Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
2. Centennial College, Hong Kong 999077, China
3. School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2018-11-30 Revised:2018-12-15 Online:2018-12-28 Published:2018-12-28
Contact: Shi XIAN
Supported by:
Hong Kong Research Grants Council's Theme-based Research Scheme Project, No.T31/717/12R;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41771127

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

粤港澳大湾区是在“一带一路”倡议下,由珠三角经济圈的强化合作而产生的新地理概念。作为新兴的全球化港湾,粤港澳大湾区如何突破新自由主义框架理论,探索出符合社会主义市场经济体制的发展路径,是当前决策者和规划者需要思考的重要问题。本文简要梳理了现有的城市群、区域增长极理论,新经济地理集群理论,全球产业链网络理论并结合大湾区现状优势,对湾区发展战略定位与发展路径进行探究,认为可通过粤港澳三方通力合作,创造一个内生型的经济与产业本土增长模式为主要方向。具体表现为：首先,要以先进制造业为立足点、实现自我创新的产业升级,形成完善的制造业产业链,并成为全球生产网络的重要节点与区域性枢纽;其次,大湾区还应利用自身的科研与教育、金融与创新资源优势,推进“一国两制三关税区”、尤其是与香港在大湾区建设中的全方位参与联动,完善产权制度,加强合规和规则经济的市场经济体系建设,将大湾区打造为中国的科创中心及全球性金融中心。

关键词: 粤港澳大湾区, 先进制造业, 全球生产网络, 金融与创新

Abstract:

The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is a new geographical concept arising from the enhanced cooperation of the Pearl River Delta Economic Zone under China's Belt and Road Initiative. As a new global bay area, how to make a theoretical breakthrough in neoliberalism framework and explore the development pathway in line with the socialist market economic system is an important issue that policymakers and planners need to think about. Based on a systematic review of the existing theories in urban agglomeration, regional growth pole theory, the cluster theory in new economic geography, and the global production network theory, this article seeks for a theoretical framework and grounding for understanding the development issues in the Greater Bay Area. In line with the existing advantages of the Greater Bay Area, this article identifies the strategic positioning and development pathway for the area, and argues that creating a new development model of endogenous growth with indigenous innovation is the first development priority for the Greater Bay Area. That is, through deepening the cooperation between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau under "one country, two systems, three tariff zone," the Greater Bay Area could first achieve the transformation and upgrading in advanced manufacturing industry and secure a strategic position as an important regional hub in the global production network. Second, the Greater Bay Area should also use its own strengths in education, scientific research, and international financial services to develop China's innovation hub and global financial center with strong property rights, compliance, and rule-based economic system.

Key words: Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, advanced manufacturing industry, global production network, finance and innovation

赵晓斌, 强卫, 黄伟豪, 线实. 粤港澳大湾区发展的理论框架与发展战略探究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1597-1608.

Simon Xiaobin ZHAO, Wei QIANG, David Waiho WONG, Shi XIAN. Theoretical framework and development strategy of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1597-1608.

图/表 6

表1

表2

图1

表3

表4

图2

参考文献 73

[1]	陈强, 赵程程. 2011. 德国政府创新集群策动的演化路径研究及启示[J]. 德国研究, (3): 57-63.
	[Chen Q, Zhao C C.2011. Initiative innovation cluster: An investigation of the development patterns of German policies and outcrops[J]. German studies, (3): 57-63.]
[2]	洪银兴. 2018. 完善产权制度和要素市场化配置机制研究[J]. 中国工业经济, (6): 5-14.
	[Hong Y X.2018. Study on improving ownership system and market-based factor allocation mechanism[J]. China Industrial Economics, (6): 5-14.]
[3]	Amin A, Thrift N.1992: Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16: 571-587.
[4]	Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A.2009. Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate[J]. Research Policy, 38(2): 318-337.
[5]	Brenner T.2006. Identification of local industrial clusters in Germany[J]. Regional Studies, 40(9): 991-1004.
[6]	Coe N M, Hess M, Yeung H W, et al.2004. 'Globalizing' regional development: A global production networks perspective[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British geographers, 29(4): 468-484.
[7]	Cooke P,Uranga M G, Etxebarria G.1998. Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective[J]. Environment and Planning A, 30(9): 1563-1584.
[8]	Duranton G, Puga D.2000. Diversity and specialisation in cities: Why, where and when does it matter?[J]. Urban Studies, 37(3): 533-555.
[9]	Duranton G, Puga D.2001. Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products[J]. American Economic Review, 91(5): 1454-1477.
[10]	Ellison G, Glaeser E L.1997. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach[J]. Journal of political economy, 105(5): 889-927.
[11]	Ellison G, Glaeser E L.1999. The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration?[J]. American Economic Review, 89(2): 311-316.
[12]	Ellison G, Glaeser E L, Kerr W R.2010. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomerationpatterns[J]. American Economic Review, 100(3): 1195-1213.
[13]	Friedman J R.1966. Regional development policy: A case study of Venezuela[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[14]	Friedmann J.1986. The world city hypothesis[J]. Development and change, 17(1): 69-83.
[15]	Glaeser E L, Kallal H D, Scheinkman J A, et al.1992. Growth in cities[J]. Journal of political economy, 100(6): 1126-1152.
[16]	Harvey D.1975. The geography of capitalist accumulation: A reconstruction of the Marxian theory[J]. Antipode, 7(2): 9-21.
[17]	Harvey D.1981. The spatial fix: Hegel, von Thunen, and Marx[J]. Antipode, 13(3): 1-12.
[18]	Harvey D.2007. A brief history of neoliberalism[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[19]	Helpman E, Krugman P R.1985. Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy[M]. Cambridge: MIT press.
[20]	Henderson J, Dicken P, Hess M, et al.2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development[J]. Review of international political economy, 9(3): 436-464.
[21]	Henderson V, Lee T, Lee Y J.2001. Scale externalities in Korea[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 49(3): 479-504.
[22]	Hirschman A O.1958. The strategy of economic development[R]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[23]	Iammarino S, Rodríguez-Pose A, Storper M.2018. Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications[J]. Jurnal of Economic Geography, doi:10.1093/jep/lby021.
[24]	Jacobs J.1985. The Economies Of Cities[M] New York: Random House.
[25]	Koizumi R, Wakabayashi Y.2015. Changes in the spatial patterns of occupational structure in the Tokyo metropolitan area after the bubble economy[M]//Singh R. Urban Development Challenges, Risks and Resilience in Asian mega cities. Springer, Tokyo: 351-366.
[26]	Krugman P.1991. Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of political economy, 99(3): 483-499.
[27]	Krugman P.1999. The role of geography in development[J]. International regional science review, 22(2): 142-161.
[28]	Krugman P, Venables A J.1995. Globalization and the inequality of nations[J]. The quarterly journal of economics, 110(4): 857-880.
[29]	Lee E K S, Zhao S X, Xie Y.2012. Command and control cities in global space-economy before and after 2008 geo-economic transition[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(3): 334-342.
[30]	Liu W, Dunford M.2016. Inclusive globalization: Unpacking China's belt and road initiative[J]. Area Development and Policy, 1(3): 323-340.
[31]	Liu W, Dunford M, Gao B.2018. A discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neo-liberal to inclusive globalization[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(9): 1199-1214.
[32]	Lucas Jr R E.1988. On the mechanics of economic development[J]. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1): 3-42.
[33]	Martin R, Sunley P.1998. Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development[J]. Economic geography, 74(3): 201-227.
[34]	Martin R, Tyler P, Storper M, et al.2018. Globalisation at a critical conjuncture?[J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1): 3-16.
[35]	Moretti E.2012. The new geography of jobs[M]. Boston: MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
[36]	Myrdal G, Sitohang P.1957. Economic theory and under-developed regions[M]. London, UK: Duckworth.
[37]	Parrilli M D, Heras H A.2016. STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances[J]. Research Policy, 45(4): 747-756.
[38]	Perroux F.1950. Economic space: Theory and applications[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1): 89-104.
[39]	Porteous D.1999. The development of financial centres: Location, information externalities and path dependence[J]. Money and the space economy, 95-114.
[40]	Romer P M.1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth[J]. Journal of political economy, 94(5): 1002-1037.
[41]	Rondinelli D A,Vastag G.1997. Analyzing the international competitiveness of metropolitan areas: The MICAM model[J]. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(4): 347-366.
[42]	Sassen S.2001. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo[M]. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[43]	Schumpeter J A.1991. Theory of economic development[M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[44]	Scott A J.2001. Globalization and the rise of city-regions[J]. European planning studies, 9(7): 813-826.
[45]	Scott A J, Agnew J, Soja E W, et al.2001. Global city-regions[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[46]	Scott A J, Storper M.2003. Regions, globalization, development[J]. Regional studies, 37(6-7): 579-593.
[47]	Stiglitz J E.2002. Globalization and its Discontents[M]. New York: Norton & Company.
[48]	Storper M.1997. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy[M]. New York: Guilford Press.
[49]	Storper M.2011. Why do regions develop and change? The challenge for geography and economics[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 333-346.
[50]	Storper M, Chen Y, DePaolis F.2002. Trade and the location of industries in the OECD and European Union[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(1): 73-107.
[51]	Storper M, Venables A J.2004. Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy[J]. Journal of economic geography, 4(4): 351-370.
[52]	Taylor P J.2001. Specification of the world city network[J]. Geographical analysis, 33(2): 181-194.
[53]	Taylor P J, Catalano G, Walker D R F.2002. Exploratory analysis of the world city network[J]. Urban Studies, 39(13): 2377-2394.
[54]	Taylor P J, Derudder B.2004. World city network: A global urban analysis[M]. London, UK: Routledge.
[55]	Taylor P J, Derudder B, Hoyler M, et al.2013. New regional geographies of the world as practised by leading advanced producer service firms in 2010[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3): 497-511.
[56]	Taylor P J, Ni P, Derudder B, et al.2009. The way we were: command-and-control centres in the global space-economy on the eve of the 2008 geo-economic transition[J]. Environment and Planning A, 41(1): 7-12.
[57]	The Economist.2018. Liberalism the economist at 175: Reinventing liberalism for the 21st century[N]. The Economist, 2018-09-13.
[58]	Walker R, Schafran A.2015. The strange case of the bay area[J]. Environment and Planning A, 47(1): 10-29.
[59]	Wang C C, Lin G C S.2012. Dynamics of innovation in a globalizing china: Regional environment, inter-firm relations and firm attributes[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 397-418.
[60]	Wang Z, Han Y, Hu M.2016. The global geopolitical and geopolinomical structure from the evolution of geographicnatures[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 6: 940-955.
[61]	Wei Y D, Li W, Wang C.2007. Restructuring industrial districts, scaling up regional development: A study of the Wenzhou model, China[J]. Economic Geography, 83(4): 421-444.
[62]	Yamawaki H.2002. The evolution and structure of industrial clusters in Japan[J]. Small Business Economics, 18(1-3): 121-140.
[63]	Yang C.2006. The Pearl River Delta and Hong Kong: An evolving cross-boundary region under "one country, two systems"[J]. Habitat International, 30(1): 61-86.
[64]	Yang C.2007. Divergent hybrid capitalisms in China: Hong Kong and Taiwanese electronics clusters in Dongguan[J]. Economic Geography, 83(4): 395-420.
[65]	Yang C.2012. Restructuring the export-oriented industrialization in the Pearl River Delta, China: Institutional evolution and emerging tension[J]. Applied Geography, 32(1): 143-157.
[66]	Yeung H W.2009. Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective[J]. Regional Studies, 43(3): 325-351.
[67]	Zhang X, Kloosterman R C.2016. Connecting the 'workshop of the world': Intra-and extra-service networks of the Pearl River Delta city-region[J]. Regional Studies, 50(6): 1069-1081.
[68]	Zhao X B.2013. Information exchange, headquarters economy and financial centers development: Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Contemporary China, 22: 1006-1027.
[69]	Zhao X B, Chan R C K, Chan N Y M.2012. Spatial polarization and dynamic pathways of foreign direct investment in China 1990-2009[J]. Geoforum, 43(4): 836-850.
[70]	Zhao X B, Chan R C K, Sit K T O.2003. Globalization and the dominance of large cities in contemporary China[J]. Cities, 20(4): 265-278.
[71]	Zhao X B, Guo N S, Li C L K, et al.2017. Megacities, the world'slargest cities unleashed: Major Trends and dynamics in contemporary global urban development[J]. World Development, 98: 257-289.
[72]	Zhao X B, Zhang L.2007. Foreign direct investment and the formation of global city-regions in China[J]. Regional Studies, 41(7): 979-994.
[73]	Zhao X B, Zhang L, Wang D T.2004. Determining factors of the development of a national financial center: The case of China[J]. Geoforum, 35(5): 577-592.

	珠三角		北京		上海
	2012 2015		2012 2015		2012 2015
先进制造业/亿元 (占工业总产值比重/%)	9668.83 (51.9%)	12561.56 (53%)	1396.1 (7.81%)	1681.3 (7.31%)	—	—
高技术制造业/亿元 (占工业总产值比重/%)	5211.67 (28%)	7116.99 (30.1%)	3031.6 (19.44%)	3499.4 (20.05%)	6824.99 (21.4%)	6809.93 (21.7%)

行业	2010年	2015年
铁路、船舶、航空航天和其他运输设备制造业	5061.54	1203.25
计算机、通信和其他电子设备制造业	18573.08	29463.68
电气机械和器材制造业	8819.65	11532.47
仪器仪表制造业	1372.56	814.82
专用设备制造业	1307.20	2191.89
医药制造业	639.59	1026.73
合计(占工业总产值比重/%)	35773.62(49.61%)	46234.84(45.48%)

	2010年/亿元	2010年占GDP百分比/%	2015年/亿元	2015年占GDP百分比/%	2015年比2010年增长/%
广东省	808.75	1.74	1798.17	2.43	122.34
广州	118.77	1.11	209.80	1.16	76.64
深圳	333.31	3.41	732.39	4.18	119.73
香港	—	—	182.70	0.76	—
澳门	—	—	—	—	—
上海	481.70	2.76	936.14	3.65	94.34
浙江省	494.23	1.78	1011.18	2.36	104.60
江苏省	857.95	2.10	1801.23	2.57	109.95
南京	75.09	1.50	136.83	1.41	82.22
杭州	101.83	1.71	302.19	3.01	196.76
宁波	85.70	1.66	177.85	2.22	107.53
北京	821.80	5.69	1384.00	5.84	68.41
天津	229.56	2.49	510.18	3.08	122.24
河北省	155.40	0.76	352.10	1.18	126.58

	专利申请量/件	专利授权量/件
广东省	627834	332652
浙江省	377115	213805
江苏省	514402	227187
河北省	61288	35348
广州	118575	60270
深圳	177184	94292
香港	3907	2888
澳门	206	139
上海	131740	72806
南京	75591	32225
杭州	75938	42311
宁波	62104	36993
北京	185928	106948
天津	86996	41675

粤港澳大湾区发展的理论框架与发展战略探究

Theoretical framework and development strategy of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 73

相关文章 12

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郑智, 刘卫东, 宋周莺, 叶尔肯·吾扎提, 梁宜. “一带一路”生产网络及中国参与程度[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 951-962.
[2]	吴炫, 杨家文. 流动量与关注度视角下的城市网络结构——以广州、深圳为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1843-1853.
[3]	潘峰华,方成. 从全球生产网络到全球金融网络：理解全球-地方经济联系的新框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(10): 1473-1481.
[4]	李郇, 周金苗, 黄耀福, 黄玫瑜. 从巨型城市区域视角审视粤港澳大湾区空间结构[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1609-1622.
[5]	卢佩莹, 王波. 从区域一体化看融合交通——以粤港澳大湾区和港深广高铁线为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1623-1632.
[6]	安宁, 马凌, 朱竑. 政治地理视野下的粤港澳大湾区发展思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1633-1643.
[7]	林珲, 张鸿生, 林殷怡, 魏姗, 吴志峰. 基于城市不透水面—人口关联的粤港澳大湾区人口密度时空分异规律与特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1644-1652.
[8]	刘锦, 田银生. 粤港澳大湾区背景下的珠三角城市群产业—人口—空间交互影响机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1653-1662.
[9]	黄耿志, 张虹鸥, 王洋, 金利霞, 陈昆仑. 西方劳工地理学研究进展及对中国的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(10): 1185-1195.
[10]	罗芊, 贺灿飞, 郭琪. 基于地级市尺度的中国外资空间动态与本土产业演化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(11): 1369-1380.
[11]	毕秀晶, 汪明峰, 宁越敏. 软件产业发展的经济地理学分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6): 658-669.
[12]	宗会明,周素红,闫小培. 经济地理学视角下的物流活动研究进展及启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(8): 906-912.