长江经济带创新产出的空间特征和时空演化

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.007

地理科学进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1119-1128.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.007

长江经济带创新产出的空间特征和时空演化

张建伟^1,², 石江江¹, 王艳华², 赵建吉^2,^*()

1. 安阳师范学院资源环境与旅游学院,河南安阳 455000
2. 河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心暨黄河文明传承与现代文明建设河南省协同创新中心,河南开封 475001

收稿日期:2016-04-01 修回日期:2016-07-01 出版日期:2016-09-20 发布日期:2016-09-20
通讯作者: 赵建吉
作者简介:
作者简介：张建伟(1984-),男,河南周口人,博士后,讲师,主要从事城市和区域创新研究,E-mail: jwzhang12@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41501136,41301115,41430637,41501141); 中国博士后科学基金项目(2015M582180,2014T70673); 河南省高等学校哲学社会科学研究“三重”重大项目(2014-SZZD-20)

Spatial characteristics and dynamic change of innovation outputs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Jianwei ZHANG^1,², Jiangjiang SHI¹, Yanhua WANG², Jianji ZHAO^2,^*()

1. School of Resources Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
2. Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development & Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China

Received:2016-04-01 Revised:2016-07-01 Online:2016-09-20 Published:2016-09-20
Contact: Jianji ZHAO
Supported by:
Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41501136, No.41301115, No.41430637, No.41501141; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No.2015M582180, No.2014T70673; Major Program of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Henan Province, No.2014-SZZD-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文以县(市、区)作为空间分析单元,以专利授权量作为创新产出指标,对1986-2014年长江经济带853个县域创新产出的时空特征进行ESDA分析。结果发现：①长江经济带创新产出的绝对差异在2001年前增长缓慢,其后增长迅猛,2012年后开始降低;相对差异呈现“增加—缩小—缓慢增加—缩小”的态势,其年度空间关联性呈增长趋势;②长江经济带创新产出县域分布呈现出分散、集中、相对集中扩散的态势,创新产出较高的县(市、区)为长三角地区地级市区、经济发达县(市、区)以及中西部地区省会城市市区;③显著空间关联类型总体格局稳定,局部变化明显,县(市、区)显著空间的关联类型以正相关类型为主,显著低低集聚关联类型占主导地位,低低集聚地区主要在西部地区,且有向中部扩展的态势;④长江经济带创新产出空间格局演变过程中,科技创新资源禀赋、教育水平与研发投入、技术溢出与扩散、政策与制度因素的作用较为显著。

关键词: 创新产出, 空间特征, 空间自相关, 时空演化, 长江经济带

Abstract:

This article analyzes the spatial distribution of innovation outputs—measured by the number of patent authorization—in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, using exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) method, based on the statistical data of 853 county-level cities from 1986 to 2014.The results are as follow: (1) The absolute difference of innovation output growth of the Yangtze River Economic Belt slowed before 2001, followed by a rapid growth in 2012, then began to decrease again. But the relative difference showed an increase-decrease-increase slowly-decrease trend, with increasing annual spatial correlation; (2) Innovative outputs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt counties showed dispersion, concentration, relative concentration spatial patterns. Counties/districts with higher innovation outputs were the urban districts of prefectural-level cities, economically developed counties, and the urban districts of provincial capital cities in the midwest. (3) The overall pattern of significant spatially correlated type areas was stable, while local changes were significantly. Positive correlation type was dominant at the county level, especially the significant low-low correlation type. Low-low correlation areas were mainly in the western region, but showed a tendency to extend to the central area. (4) Resource endowment, education level and R & D investment, technology spillover and diffusion, and policy and institution played a significant role in the process of change of innovation output spatial pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

Key words: innovation output, spatial characteristics, spatial autocorrelation, spatial and temporal evolution, Yangtze River Economic Belt

张建伟, 石江江, 王艳华, 赵建吉. 长江经济带创新产出的空间特征和时空演化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(9): 1119-1128.

Jianwei ZHANG, Jiangjiang SHI, Yanhua WANG, Jianji ZHAO. Spatial characteristics and dynamic change of innovation outputs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1119-1128.

图/表 3

参考文献 32

1	段学军, 邹辉, 王磊. 2015. 长江经济带建设与发展的体制机制探索[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(11): 1377-1387. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.005
	[Duan X J, Zou H, Wang L.2015. Institutions and mechanisms for developing the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(11): 1377-1387.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.005
2	樊杰, 王亚飞, 陈东, 等. 2015. 长江经济带国土空间开发结构解析[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(11): 1336-1344. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.001
	[Fan J, Wang Y F, Chen D, et al.2015. Analysis on the spatial development structure of the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(11): 1336-1344.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.001
3	方成, 赵磊, 杨宏浩. 2014. 浙江省创新产出空间相关性及其影响因素研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 28(7): 15-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2014.07.004
	[Fang C, Zhao L, Yang H H.2014. A research on spatial autocorrelation of innovation output and its influencing factors in Zhejiang Province[J]. East China Economic Management, 28(7): 15-21.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2014.07.004
4	方创琳, 周成虎, 王振波. 2015. 长江经济带城市群可持续发展战略问题与分级梯度发展重点[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(11): 1398-1408. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.007
	[Fang C L, Zhou C H, Wang Z B.2015. Sustainable development strategy and priorities of spatially differentiated development of urban agglomerations along the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(11): 1398-1408.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.007
5	蒋天颖. 2014. 浙江省区域创新产出空间分异特征及成因[J]. 地理研究, 33(10): 1825-1836. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201410004
	[Jiang T Y.2014. Spatial differentiation and its influencing factors of regional innovation output in Zhejiang Province[J]. Geographical Research, 33(10): 1825-1836.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201410004
6	李国平, 王春杨. 2012. 我国省域创新产出的空间特征和时空演化: 基于探索性空间数据分析的实证[J]. 地理研究, 31(1): 95-106.
	[Li G P, Wang C Y.2012. Spatial characteristics and dynamic changes of provincial innovation output in China: An investigation using the ESDA[J]. Geographical Research, 31(1): 95-106.]
7	刘凤朝, 刘靓, 马荣康. 2015. 区域间技术交易网络、吸收能力与区域创新产出: 基于电子信息和生物医药领域的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 33(5): 774-781.
	[Liu F C, Liu L, Ma R K.2015. Interregional technology transaction network, absorptive capacity and regional innovation output: Analysis based on the electronic information and biological medicine fields[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 33(5): 774-781.]
8	刘凤朝, 邬德林, 马荣康. 2015. 专利技术许可对企业创新产出的影响研究: 三种邻近性的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 36(4): 91-100.
	[Liu F C, Wu D L, Ma R K.2015. Patent technology licensing and innovation performance of licensee firms: The moderating effects of three different types of proximity[J]. Science Research Management, 36(4): 91-100.]
9	柳卸林. 2005. 2004-2005年中国区域创新能力分析报告[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 26(12): 5-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0241.2005.12.001
	[Liu X L.2005. Report on regional innovation capability in 2004-2005 China[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 26(12): 5-14.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0241.2005.12.001
10	陆大道. 2014. 建设经济带是经济发展布局的最佳选择: 长江经济带经济发展的巨大潜力[J]. 地理科学, 34(7): 769-772.
	[Lu D D.2014. Economic belt construction is the best choice of economic development layout: The enormous potential for the Changjiang River Economic Belt[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(7): 769-772.]
11	牛欣, 陈向东. 2013. 城市创新跨边界合作与辐射距离探析: 基于城市间合作申请专利数据的研究[J]. 地理科学, 33(6): 659-667.
	[Niu X, Chen X D.2013. The cooperation innovation across city boundary and radiation distance: Based on the cross-city cooperation-patent application data[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(6): 659-667.]
12	仇方道, 佟连军, 朱传耿, 等. 2009. 省际边缘区经济发展差异时空格局及驱动机制: 以淮海经济区为例[J]. 地理研究, 28(2): 451-463.
	[Qiu F D, Tong L J, Zhu C G, et al.2009. Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism of economic development discrepancy in provincial border-regions: A case study of Huaihai Economic Zone[J]. Geographical Research, 28(2): 451-463.]
13	苏方林. 2010. 地级市R&D知识溢出的GWR实证分析[J]. 数理统计与管理, 29(1): 41-51.
	[Su F L.2010. An empirical analysis on China's regional R & D knowledge spillovers on using GWR[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 29(1): 41-51.]
14	孙锐, 石金涛. 2006. 基于因子和聚类分析的区域创新能力再评价[J]. 科学学研究, 24(6): 985-990. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2006.06.032
	[Sun R, Shi J T.2006. Secondary analyses on regional innovation ability in China using factor and cluster method[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 24(6): 985-990.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2006.06.032
15	孙威, 李文会, 林晓娜, 等. 2015. 长江经济带分地市承接产业转移能力研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(11): 1470-1478. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.014
	[Sun W, Li W H, Lin X N, et al.2015. Capacity to undertake industrial transfer of cities and prefectures in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(11): 1470-1478.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.014
16	王春杨, 张超. 2014. 中国地级区域创新产出的时空模式研究: 基于ESDA的实证[J]. 地理科学, 34(12): 1438-1444.
	[Wang C Y, Zhang C.2014. Spatial-temporal pattern of prefecture-level innovation outputs in China: An investigation using the ESDA[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(12): 1438-1444.]
17	吴玉鸣. 2007. 大学、企业研发与区域创新的空间统计与计量分析[J]. 数理统计与管理, 27(2): 318-324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1566.2007.02.023
	[Wu Y M.2007. A spatial econometric analysis of university, enterprise research & development and regional innovation[J]. Application of Statistics and Management, 27(2): 318-324.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1566.2007.02.023
18	许治, 邓芹凌. 2013. 国家创新型城市创新能力的地区差异与收敛效应: 基于技术成就指数的研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 34(1): 67-77.
	[Xu Z, Deng Q L.2013. The differences and convergence effect among national innovative cities' innovation abilities: Based on Technology Achievement Index[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 34(1): 67-77.]
19	薛宝琪. 2013. 中原经济区经济空间格局演化分析[J]. 经济地理, 33(1): 15-20.
	[Xue B Q.2013. Analysis of spatial pattern evolution of economy in Central Plains Economic Region[J]. Economic Geography, 33(1): 15-20.]
20	虞孝感, 王磊, 杨清可, 等. 2015. 长江经济带战略的背景及创新发展的地理学解读[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(11): 1368-1376. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.004
	[Yu X G, Wang L, Yang Q K, et al.2015. Background of the Yangtze River Economic Belt development strategy and geography interpretation of its innovative development[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(11): 1368-1376.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.11.004
21	赵建吉, 曾刚. 2013. 基于技术守门员的产业集群技术流动研究: 以张江集成电路产业为例[J]. 经济地理, 33(2): 111-116.
	[Zhao J J, Zeng G.2013. The study on technological gatekeepers in technological flow of the industrial clusters: A case study of IC industrial cluster in Zhangjiang hi-tech park[J]. Economic Geography, 33(2): 111-116.]
22	中国科技发展战略研究小组, 中国科学院大学中国创新创业管理研究中心. 2015. 中国区域创新能力评价报告[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社.
	[Chinese Research Group of Science and Technology for Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences Research Center of Innovation and Entrepreneurship University. 2015. Zhongguo quyu chuangxin nengli pingjia baogao[M]. Beijing, China: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press.]
23	周立, 吴玉鸣. 2006. 中国区域创新能力: 因素分析与聚类研究: 兼论区域创新能力综合评价的因素分析替代方法[J]. 中国软科学, (8): 96-103.
	[Zhou L, Wu Y M.2006. Factor analysis and cluster study on regional innovation capability of China's 31 provinces: An alternative to synthetically evaluation on regional innovation capability with factor analysis[J]. China Soft Science, (8): 96-103.]
24	Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A.2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge[J]. Research Policy, 31(7): 1069-1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
25	Audretsch D B, Feldman M P.2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation[C]//Henderson J V, Thisse J. Handbook of urban and regional economics, vol.4. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland Publishing: 2713-2739.
26	Bottazzi L, Peri G.2003. Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data[J]. European Economic Review, 47(4): 687-710.
27	Caniëls M C J, Verspagen B.2001. Barriers to knowledge spillovers and regional convergence in an evolutionary model[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11(3): 307-329. doi: 10.1007/s001910100085
28	Freeman C.2002. Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems-complementarity and economic growth[J]. Research Policy, 31(2): 191-211. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6
29	Greunz L.2003. Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 37(4): 657-680. doi: 10.1007/s00168-003-0131-3
30	Jaffe A B.1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value[J]. The American Economic Review, 76(12): 984-1001.
31	Moreno R, Paci R, Usai S.2005. Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions[J]. Environment and Planning A, 37(10): 1793-1812.
32	Simmie J.2003. Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge[J]. Regional Studies, 37(6-7): 607-620.

[1]	范擎宇, 杨山. 长三角地区城镇化协调发展的空间特征及形成机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 124-134.
[2]	冯润东, 王开泳. 区域经济一体化视角下“行政区经济”约束强度的定量测度及时空演化分析——以成德绵地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1447-1459.
[3]	付占辉, 梅林, 郑茹敏, 王彤彤. 东北地区城市女性就业水平空间分异机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318.
[4]	金贵, 胡毅航, 陈碧园. 长江经济带市域尺度减贫成效测度及其时空演替[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 972-981.
[5]	郭庆宾, 骆康, 刘承良. 长江经济带城市群要素集聚能力差异的比较研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 542-552.
[6]	施利锋,黄贤金. 中国大运河沿线城市扩张时空差异研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1206-1216.
[7]	段学军,邹辉,陈维肖,王雅竹,叶磊. 长江经济带形成演变的地理基础[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1217-1226.
[8]	张翼鸥, 谷人旭, 马双. 中国城市间技术转移的空间特征与邻近性机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 370-382.
[9]	王光耀, 赵中秋, 祝培甜, 李玉峰, 苏智杰, 刘健. 长江经济带乡村功能区域差异及类型划分[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1854-1864.
[10]	谢家艳, 曾刚. 长三角地区复杂知识的空间特征及地方知识库类型[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1968-1976.
[11]	刘樱, 周春山, 黄婉玲, 朱倩琼. 大都市区农村土地非农化空间特征及机理——以广州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1119-1130.
[12]	何丹, 金凤君, 戴特奇, 孙颖, 周真杨. 北京市公共文化设施服务水平空间格局和特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(9): 1128-1139.
[13]	侯纯光, 程钰, 任建兰, 陈延斌. 中国创新能力时空格局演变及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(10): 1206-1217.
[14]	丁镭, 黄亚林, 刘云浪, 刘超, 程胜高. 1995-2012年中国突发性环境污染事件时空演化特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(6): 749-760.
[15]	樊杰, 王亚飞, 陈东, 周成虎. 长江经济带国土空间开发结构解析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11): 1336-1344.

长江经济带创新产出的空间特征和时空演化

Spatial characteristics and dynamic change of innovation outputs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0