地理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1650-1661.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.11.008
宋涛1,2,3, 蔡建明1, 倪攀4, 杜姗姗5, 丁悦1,2
收稿日期:
2013-03-01
修回日期:
2013-08-01
出版日期:
2013-11-25
发布日期:
2013-11-25
通讯作者:
蔡建明(1961- ),男,山西运城人,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事城市地理与城市可持续发展研究。E-mail:caijm@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:
宋涛(1983- ),男,山西太原人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为城市可持续发展及旅游地理。E-mail:songtaosongtao77@163.com
基金资助:
SONG Tao1,2,3, CAI Jianming1, NI Pan4, DU Shanshan5, DING Yue1,2
Received:
2013-03-01
Revised:
2013-08-01
Online:
2013-11-25
Published:
2013-11-25
摘要: 城市新陈代谢是城市投入资源、能源、人力,产出产品、服务、废弃物的有机过程。本文从城市新陈代谢的宏观系统模拟、土地要素的新陈代谢响应及微观尺度的新陈代谢测度三大视角进行了系统概述。在此基础上,系统介绍了城市代谢系统的物质流、能量流、净初级生产力的人类占用及社会代谢多尺度综合评估等研究方法。城市新陈代谢投入产出指标体系构建以输入、输出端的量化为主,亦包括生态环境效率、人类福利福祉等具体指标。未来城市新陈代谢的研究应进一步深入研究城市新陈代谢内部物质、能流的交换、转换机制,在城市资源环境预警、可持续发展政策制订和绿色社区规划设计中融入城市新陈的研究理念,构建合理有效的城市新陈代谢指标体系。
宋涛, 蔡建明, 倪攀, 杜姗姗, 丁悦. 城市新陈代谢研究综述及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(11): 1650-1661.
SONG Tao, CAI Jianming, NI Pan, DU Shanshan, DING Yue. Review and prospects of urban metabolism research[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(11): 1650-1661.
Alberti M. 1996. Measuring urban sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4): 381-424.Ayres R U, Kneese A V. 1969. Production, consumption and externalities. American Economic Review, 59(3): 282-297.Baccini P, Bader H P. 1996. Regionaler stoffhaushalt-erfassung, bewertung und steuerung. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Baloccoa C, Papeschib S, Grazzinia G, et al. 2004. Using exergy to analyze the sustainability of an urban area. Ecological Economics, 48(2): 231-244.Boyden S, Millar S, Newcombe K, et al. 1981. The ecology of a city and its people. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press.Cencic O, Rechberger H. 2008. Material flow analysis with software STAN. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Management, 18(1): 3-7.Chen B, Chen C Q. 2006. Exergy analysis for resource conversion of the Chinese society 1993 under the material product system. Energy, 31(8-9): 1115-1150.Chen S Q, Chen B. 2012. Determining carbon metabolism in urban areas though network environ theory. Environmental Sciences, 13(8): 2246-2255.Chen X Q, Zhao T T, Guo Y Q, et al. 2003. Material input and output analysis of chinese economy system. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 7l(4): 538-547. [陈效逑, 赵婷婷, 郭玉泉, 等. 2003. 中国经济系统的物 质输入与输出分析. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 7l(4): 538-547.]David B, Bernadette O, Richard M. 2009. Assessment of total urban metabolism and metabolic inefficiency in an Irish city-region.Waste Management, 29(10): 2765-2771.Duan Q L. 2008. Regional difference of ecological footprints of cropland in Jiangsu Province based on emergy analysis. Progress in Geography, 27(4): 96-102. [段七零. 2008. 基于能值分析的江苏省耕地生态足迹区域差异. 地理科学进展, 27(4): 96-102.]Fischer-Kowalski M. 1997. Society's metabolism: On the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star//Redclift M, Woodgate G R. The international handbook of environmental sociology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Fischer-Kowalski M. 1998. Society's etabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1): 61-78.Geng Y, Liu Y, Liu D, et al. 2011. Regional societal and ecosystem metabolism analysis in China: A Mmulti-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism(MSIASM) approach. Energy, 36(8): 4799-4808.Giampietro M, Mayumi K. 1997. A dynamic model of socioecononmic systems based on hierarchy theory and its application to sustainability. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(4): 453-469.Haber H, Schulz N B, Plutzar C, et al. 2004a. Human appropriation of net primary production and species diversity in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 102(2): 213-218.Haber H, Wackernage M, Krausmann F, et al. 2004b. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: A comparison. Land Use Policy, 21(3): 279-288.Hall M H, 2011. A preliminary assessment of socio-ecological metabolism for three neighborhoods within a rust belt urban ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 223(1): 20-31.Hanya T, Ambe Y. 1976. A Study on the metabolism of cities// Science Council of Japan. Science for a Better Environment. Tokyo: Science Council of Japan: 228-233.Huang S L, Hsu W L. 2003. Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei's urban construction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2): 61-74.Huang S L, Lee C L, Chen C W, 2006. Socioeconomic metabolism in Taiwan: Emergy synthesis versus material flow analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 48(2): 166-196.Huang S L, Wong J H, Chen T C. 1998. A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(1): 15-27.Iorgulescu R, Polimeni J. 2009. A multi-scale integrated analysis of the energy use in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland and Hungary. Energy, 34(3): 341-347.Kennedy C, Cuddihy J, Engel-Yan J. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2): 43-59.Kennedy C, Pincetl S, Bunje P. 2011. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9): 1965-1973.Krausmann F, Haber H. 2002. The process of industrialization from the perspective of energetic metabolism: Socioeconomic energy flows in Austria 1830-1995. Ecological Economics, 41(2): 177-201.Lee C L, Huang S L, Chan S L. 2009. Synthesis and spatial dynamics of socio-economic metabolism and land use change of Taipei Metropolitan Region. Ecological Modelling, 220(21): 2940-2959.Li F, Zhang Y, Liu G Y. 2009. Assessment of energy-based urban material metabolism. Environmental Science and Technology, 32(10): 108-112. [李芳, 张妍, 刘耕源. 2009. 基于能值分析的城市物质代谢研究. 环境科学与 技术, 32(10): 108-112.]Li G. 2005. The analysis of material flow of ecological environmental costs of external trade of China. Statistical Research, (9): 60-65. [李刚. 2005. 中国对外贸易生态环境 代价的物质流分析. 统计研究, (9): 60-65.]Li S C, Cai Y L. 2002. Emergy-based analysis on land sustainability. Economic Geography, 22(3): 346-350. [李双成, 蔡运龙. 2002. 基于能值分析的土地可持续利用态势研 究. 经济地理, 22(3): 346-350.]Li X Q, Hua L Z. 2012. Landscape aesthetic assessment based on experiential paradigm assessment technology. ActaEcologica Sinica, 32(10): 2965-2974. [李旋旗, 花利忠. 2012. 基于系统动力学的城市住区形态变迁对城市代 谢效率的影响. 生态学报, 32(10): 2965-2974]Li Y T, Zhang Y, Yang N J. 2010. Ecological network model analysis of China's endosomatic and exosomatic societal metabolism. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2(2): 1400-1406.Liang S, Zhang T Z. 2012. Comparing urban solid waste recycling from the viewpoint of urban metabolism based on physical input-output model: A case of Suzhou in China. Waste Management, 32(1): 220-225.Liu G Y, Yang Z F, Chen B, et al. 2011. Ecological network determination of sectoral linkages, utility relations and structural characteristics on urban ecological economic system. Ecological Modelling, 222(15): 2825-2834.Liu J R, Wang R S, Wang Z. 2003. Metabolism and driving forces analysis of Chinese urban households. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(12): 2673-2676. [刘晶茹, 王如松, 王 震. 2003. 中国城市家庭代谢及其影响因素分析. 生态 学报, 23(12): 2673-2676.]Liu W, Ju M T, Chu C L, et al. 2011. Material and energy flow analysis and empirical study in regional environmental- economic system. Journal of Natural Resources, 26 (8): 1435-1445. [刘伟, 鞠美庭, 楚春礼, 等. 2011. 区域环 境-经济系统物质流与能流分析方法及实证研究. 自然 资源学报, 26(8): 1435-1445.]Liu Y. 2010. Analyzing the relationship between urban form and urban material metabolism efficiency. Urban Studies, 17(6): 27-31. [刘勇. 2010. 城市形态与城市物质代谢效 率的相关性分析. 城市发展研究, 17(6): 27-31.]Long A H,Wang H, Cheng G D, et al. 2008. Human appropriation of net primary production in the middle reach of Heihe River Basin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19 (4): 853-858. [龙爱华,王浩, 程国栋, 等. 2008. 黑河流域 中游地区净初级生产力的人类占用. 应用生态学报, 19 (4): 853-858.]Luo TW, Ouyang Z Y,Wang X K, et al. 2005. Dynamics of urban food-carbon consumption in Beijing households. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25(12): 3252-3258. [罗婷文, 欧阳志 云, 王效科, 等. 2005. 北京城市化进程中家庭食物碳消 费动态. 生态学报, 25(12): 3252-3258.]Ma Q F, Huang X J. 2008. Responses of metabolism during the process of land use change. Transactions of the CSAE, 24(Suppl.): 6-11. [马其芳, 黄贤金. 2008. 区域土 地利用变化的物质代谢响应. 农业工程学报, 24(增刊): 6-11.]Ma Q F, Huang X J, Yu S T, et al. 2007. Review on the research of metabolism. Journal of Natural Resources, 22 (1): 141-152. [马其芳, 黄贤金, 于术桐, 等. 2007. 物质代 谢研究进展综述. 自然资源学报, 22(1): 141-152.]Maclaren V. 1996. Developing indicators of urban sustainability: A focus on the canadian experience. Toronto: ICURR(Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research) Press.Marco A, Luigi C, Francesco C, et al. 2009. Environmental driving forces of urban growth and development: An emergy-based assessment of the city of Rome, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(3-4): 238-249.Marulla J, Pino J, Tello E, et al. 2010. Social metabolism, landscape change and land-use planning in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 497-510.Mayumi K. 1991.Temporary emancipation from land: from the industrial revolution to the present time. Ecological Economics, 4(1): 35-56.Marull J, Pino J, Tello E, et al. 2010. Social metabolism, landscape change and land-use planning in the BarcelonaMetropolitan Region. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 497-510.Newcombe K, Kalina J D, Aston A R. 1978. The metabolism of a city: The case of Hong Kong. A Journal of the Human Environment, 7(1): 3-5.Newman P W G, Birrel R, Holmes D. 1996. Human settlements in state of the environment Australia. Melbourne, Australia: The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.Newman P W G. 1999. Sustainability and cities: Extending the metabolism model. Land Use and Urban Planning, 44 (4): 219-226.Odum H T. 1986. Emergy in ecosystems//Poluin Ned. Ecosystem Theory and Application. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 37-369.Peng J, Wang Y L, Wu J S. 2007. Human appropriation of net primary production: An approach for ecological assessment of regional sustainable development. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(1): 153-158. [彭建, 王仰麟, 吴健生. 2007. 净初级生产力的人类占用: 一种衡量区域可持续 发展的新方法. 自然资源学报, 22(1): 153-158.]Rappaport R A. 1971. The flow of energy in an agricultural society. Scientific American, 224 (3): 117-133.Rosen M A. 2002. Assessing energy technologies and environmental impacts with the principles of thermodynamics. Applied Energy, 72(1): 427-441.Rosen M A, Dincer I. 1999. Exergy analysis of waste emissions. International Journal of Energy Research, 23(13): 1153-1163.Rotmans J, Vansselt M B, Vellinga P. 2000. An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3): 265-276.Schmidt B, leek F. 1993. A universal ecological measure. Fresenius Environental Bulletin, 2(1): 407-412.Song W, Chen B M, Shi W J, et al. 2011. Evaluation for cultivated land resources security of China in 2007. Progress in Geography, 30(11): 1449-1455. [宋伟, 陈百明, 史文 娇, 等. 2011. 2007 年中国耕地资源安全评价. 地理科学 进展, 30(11): 1449-1455.]Ulgiati S, Brown M T. 2009. Emergy and ecosystem complexity. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14(1): 310-321.Wall G. 1987. Exergy conversion in the Swedish society. Resources and Energy, 9(1): 55-73.Wang G G, Yang D G, Zhang X H, et al. 2012. Modified ecological footprint model based on emergy analysis and its application. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 29(3): 352-358. [王国刚, 杨 德刚, 张新焕, 等. 2012. 基于能值理论的生态足迹改进 模型及其应用. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 29(3): 352-358.]Wang T S. 2008. The Multiple-Scale Iintegrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism(MSIASM) of China's social and economic progress and sustainability[D]. Lanzhou, China: Northwest Normal University. [王天送. 2008. 中国社会经济系统发展与可持续性的“社会代谢多尺度综合 评估[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学.]Wolman A. 1965. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3): 179-190.Wouter B, Klaas J N. 1999. Energy requirements of household consumption: A case study of the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 28(2): 367-383.Wrbka T, Erb K H, Schulz N B, et al. 2004. Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes: An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy, 21 (3): 289-306.Wright D H. 1990. Human impacts on energy flow through natural ecosystems and implications for species endangerment. A Journal of the Human Environment, 19(4): 189-194.Wu Y Q, Yan M C. 2011. Simulation analysis of urban metabolic efficiency in Guangzhou City. Resources Science, 33(8): 1555-1562. [吴玉琴, 严茂超. 2011. 广州城市代谢 效率的模拟分析. 资源科学, 33(8): 1555-1562]Wu Y Q, Yan M C, Xu L F. 2009. Review on the research of Emergy-based urban metabolism. Ecology and Environment, 18(3): 1139-1145. [吴玉琴, 严茂超, 许力峰. 2009. 城市生态系统代谢的能值研究进展. 生态环境学报, 18 (3): 1139-1145.]Xia C Y. 2005. Review on the studies of economy-wide material flow analysis. Journal of Natural Resources, 20(3): 415-421. [夏传勇. 2005. 经济系统物质流分析研究述 评. 自然资源学报, 20(3): 415-421.]Xu M, Jia X P, Shi L, et al. 2008. Societal metabolism in Northeast China: Case study of Liaoning Province. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(8-9): 1082-1086.Xu Z M, Zhang Z Q, Cheng G D, et al. 2003. Ecological footprint calculation and development capacity analysis of China in 1999. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14 (2): 280-285. [徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋, 等. 2003. 中国 1999 年生态足迹计算与发展能力分析. 应用生态学报, 14(2): 280-285.]Zhang L X, Hu Q H. 2011. A critical review on material and energetic metabolism for urban ecosystem: Resource metabolism and its contents. Journal of Natural Resources, 26(10): 1801-1810. [张力小, 胡秋红. 2011. 城市物质能 量代谢相关研究述评: 兼论资源代谢的内涵与研究方 法. 自然资源学报, 26(10): 1801-1810.]Zhang Y, Yang Z F. 2007a. Emergy analysis of urban material metabolism and evaluation of eco-efficiency in Beijing. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 27(11): 1892-1899. [张 妍, 杨志峰. 2007. 北京城市物质代谢的能值分析与生 态效率评估. 环境科学学报, 27(11): 1892-1899.]Zhang Y, Yang Z F. 2007b. Eco-efficiency of urban material metabolism: A case study of Shenzhen. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(8): 3124-3131. [张妍, 杨志峰. 2007. 城市物质 代谢的生态效率: 以深圳市为例. 生态学报, 27(8): 3124-3131.]Zhang Y, Li S S, Brian D F, et al. 2011. Analysis of an urban energy metabolic system: Comparison of simple and complex model results. Ecological Modelling, 223(1): 14-19.Zhang Y, Yang Z F, Fath B D. 2010. Ecological network analysis of an urban water metabolic system: Model development, and a case study for Beijing. Science of the Total Environment, 408(20): 4702-4711.Zhang Y, Yang Z F, Yu X Y. 2009. Evaluation of urban metabolism based on emergy synthesis: A case study for Beijing, Ecological Modelling, 220(13-14): 1690-1696. |
[1] | 薛岚. 国外乡村舒适性研究综述与启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12): 2129-2138. |
[2] | 赵瑞东, 方创琳, 刘海猛. 城市韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731. |
[3] | 黄洵, 黄民生. 基于能值分析的城市可持续发展水平与经济增长关系研究——以泉州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(1): 38-47. |
[4] | 江净超, 朱阿兴, 秦承志, 刘军志, 陈腊娇, 吴辉. 分布式水文模型软件系统研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(8): 1090-1100. |
[5] | 王慧芳, 周恺. 2003-2013年中国城市形态研究评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(5): 689-701. |
[6] | 闫梅, 黄金川. 国内外城市空间扩展研究评析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(7): 1039-1050. |
[7] | 唐承财, 钟林生, 成升魁. 旅游地可持续发展研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(6): 984-992. |
[8] | 朱大运, 王建力. 青藏高原冰芯重建古气候研究进展分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(10): 1535-1544. |
[9] | 王士君, 冯章献, 刘大平, 张紫雯. 中心地理论创新与发展的基本视角和框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(10): 1256-1263. |
[10] | 刘云刚. 中国城市地理学研究的统计分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6): 681-690. |
[11] | 于涛方, 吕拉昌, 刘云刚, 孙斌栋, 汪明峰. 中国城市地理学研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(12): 1488-1497. |
[12] | 陈蕾, 孟晓晨. 北京市居住—就业空间结构及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(10): 1210-1217. |
[13] | 杨建明. 全球气候变化对旅游业发展影响研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(8): 997-1004. |
[14] | 吴丰林,方创琳,赵雅萍. 城市产业集聚动力机制与模式研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(10): 1201-1208. |
[15] | 董玉祥. 中国的海岸风沙研究:进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(2): 26-35. |
|