半城市化地区的识别方法及其驱动机制研究进展

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 半城市化地区是动态变化的区域,许多国家的半城市化地区是发展最快的区域,在空间、社会、经济以及环境等方面具有重要意义。半城市化地区显著的过渡性、动态性和不稳定等复杂特征已得到地理学、城市规划、经济学、生态学等领域学者的广泛关注。本文首先分析了“半城市化地区”概念内涵,重点辨析了城市边缘区、Desakota、城乡结合部等概念与半城市化地区的异同,并尝试提出了本文对半城市化地区的定义。而后梳理了国内外“半城市化地区”空间识别、类型识别和驱动机制的研究进展,总结分析了研究方法的演变、争议或薄弱之处。最后,在综合分析国内外相关研究成果基础之上,进行了简要述评,并提出未来研究需要更多关注中国半城市化地区的形成机理、人文思想与计量方法的深入融合以及半城市化地区内部类型研究。

关键词: 半城市化地区, 空间识别, 类型识别, 驱动机制

Abstract: The peri-urban area is a dynamically changing area. Peri-urban areas in many countries are among the fastest growing regions, which have great strategic significance in space, social, economic and environmental aspects. Distinctive characteristics of peri-urban area, such as transition, dynamic and instability have attained attention of many scholars in the field of geography, urban planning, economics, and ecology. Peri-urban concept replaces urban fringe, desakota and city-village combination section in the third phase of rural-urban transition area. After delineating the content and context of periurban area, the distinction and likeness between urban fringe, desakota, city-village combination section, and peri-urban area have been discussed. This article focuses on spatial recognition, type identification and driving mechanism in the literature and the evolution, controversy or weaknesses in the research method, and finds that the method is changing from qualitative research to the corporation of it with quantitative research, and the research perspective expands more broad to social, economic, environmental aspects and many levels related with globalization and decentralization. This article provides a brief comment on comprehensive analysis of current research works, at last, suggests that more attention should be paid to the field of the driving mechanism in China’s peri-urban area, compromises of quantitative measurement with humanism ideas, and typology inside the peri-urban area in the future.

Key words: driving mechanism, peri-urban area, spatial identification, type identification

陈贝贝. 半城市化地区的识别方法及其驱动机制研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 210-220.

CHEN Beibei. Review on Identification Method and Driving Mechanism of Peri-urban Area[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(2): 210-220.

参考文献

[1] 刘盛和. 中国半城市化现象及其研究重点. 地理学报, 2004, 59(增刊): 101-108.
[2] Liu Jiaming. Factors of spatial distribution of recreation areas in peri-urban Beijing. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(5): 741-775.
[3] 刘盛和, 张擎. 杭州市半城市化地区空间分布变化, 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 982-992.
[4] 袁弘, 陈田, 谢婷. 半城市化地区非农土地利用及整合研究进展. 地域研究与开发, 2008, 27(1): 88-93.
[5] 刘江, 崔胜辉, 唐立娜, 等. 半城市化地区住区形态及空间分布特征: 以厦门市集美区为例. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(5): 579-585.
[6] Louis H. Die geographische Gliederung von Gross: Berlin: Stuttgart Engelhorn, 1936: 146-171.
[7] Gottmann J. Megalopolis: The urbanization of the northeastern Seaboard. Economic Geography, 1957, 33(3): 121-132.
[8] Bryant C R. The role of local actors in transforming the urban fringe. Journal of Rural Studies, 1995, 11(3): 255-267.
[9] Nkambwe M. Monitoring land use change in an African tribal village on the rural-urban fringe. Applied Geography, 1996, 16(1): 305-317.
[10] Spaling H, Wood J R. Greed, need or creed? Farmland ethics in the rural urban fringe. Land Use Policy, 1998, 15 (2): 105-118.
[11] Berry D. Retaining agricultural activities under urban pressures: A review of land use conflicts and policies. Policy Sciences, 1978, 9(2): 153-178.
[12] Erika N. Growth and urban differentiation on the urban periphery: A case study from Szeged, Hungary. GeoJournal, 1999, 46(3): 221-230.
[13] Allen A. Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field. Environment and Urbanization, 2003, 15(1): 135-148.
[14] Eakin H, Lerner M. Adaptive capacity in evolving peri-urban spaces: Responses to flood risk in the upper Lerma River valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(1): 14-22.
[15] Annemarie S. Spatial and temporal patterns of urban dynamics in Chengdu, 1975-2002. Discussion Paper of Asia/ Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, 2003.
[16] Bharat D. Peri-urban environments and community driven development: Chennai, India. Cities, 2003, 20(5): 341-352.
[17] Bryant C. The peri-urban zone: The structure and dynamics of a strategic component of metropolitan regions. Canadian Journal of Regional Sciense, 2003, 26(2/3): 231-240.
[18] David L, Axel W D. Defining periurban: Understanding rural-urban linkages and their connection to institutional contexts. The TenthWorld Congress, IRSA, Rio, 2000.
[19] Darla K M. Pattern-based evaluation of peri-urban development in Delaware County, Ohio, USA: Roads, Zoning and Spatial Externalities. Progress in Spatial Analysis, 2010: 149-169.
[20] Fiona M. On the edge of sustainability: Perspectives on peri-urban dynamics. Social, Technological and Environmental Pathways to Sustainability Center, 2009.
[21] Mbiba B, Huchzermeyer M. Contentious development: Peri-urban studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Progress in Development Studies, 2002, 2(2): 113-131.
[22] Leaf M. A tale of two villages: globalization and peri-urban change in China and Vietnam. Cities, 2002, 19(1): 23-31.
[23] Nkambwe M. Customary land tenure saves the best arable agricultural land in the peri-urban zones of an African city: Gaborone, Botswana. Applied Geography, 2005, 25 (1): 29-46.
[24] Sadiki1 P. Peri-urban transformation in South Africa: Experiences from Limpopo Province. GeoJournal, 2002, 57 (1/2): 75-81.
[25] Thapa R B. Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques: A case study of Hanoi. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(2): 225-239.
[26] Ford T. The social effect of population growth in the periurban region: The case of Adelaide. Journal of Population Research, 2001, 18(1): 40-51.
[27] Mbiba B, Huchzermeyer M. Contentious development: periurban studies in sub-Saharan Africa.Progress in Envelopments Studies, 2002, 2(2): 113-131.
[28] Pahl R E. Urbs in Rure: The Metropolitan Fringe in Hertfordshire. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 1965: 2-20.
[29] Pryor R J. Defining the rural-urban fringe. Social Forces, 1968, 47(2): 202-215.
[30] Rakodi C. Review of the Poverty Relevance of the Peri-urban Interface Production System Research, Report for the DFID Natural Resources Systems Research Programme, Sanderson, 1998.
[31] Webster D. On the edge: Shaping the future of peri-urban East Asia. Stanford University: The Asia Pacific Research Center, 2002.
[32] 曹卫东. 中国西部典型地区半城市化的机制研究: 以成都新津县为例[D]. 安徽师范大学, 2005.
[33] Buxton M. State of the peri-urban regions: A review of the literature. Change and Continuity in peri-urban Australia. RMIT University, 2006.
[34] 叶可. 北京大兴区: 半城市化地区土地利用布局及变化研究. 中国建设信息, 2007(8): 64-66.
[35] Wissink G. American Cities in Perspective: With Special Reference to the Development of Their Fringe Areas. Assen, The Netherlands: Royal Vangorcum, 1962.
[36] 顾朝林. 中国大城市边缘区研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.
[37] 周捷. 大城市边缘区理论及对策研究: 武汉市实证分析[D]. 同济大学, 2007.
[38] MeGee T. The emergence of Desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis//Ginsburg N, Koppel B, McGee T. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991.
[39] 于峰.“大都市连绵区”与“城乡互动区”: 关于戈特曼与麦吉城市理论的比较分析. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(1): 46-59.
[40] 国务院关于加强城乡规划监督管理的通知. 2008-03[2011-01-20]. http://www.chengdu.gov.cn/Gov-InfoOpens2/detail_ruleOfLaw.jsp?id=feCG0BibZjm1vJq1NJUe.
[41] 郑艳婷, 刘盛和, 陈田. 试论半城市化现象及其特征: 以广东省东莞市为例. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 760-768.
[42] 张晓军. 国外城市边缘区研究发展的回顾及启示. 国外城市规划, 2005, 20(4): 72-75.
[43] Russwurm L H. The development of an urban corridor system Toronto to Stratford Area 1941-1966. University of Waterloo, 1970.
[44] Desai A, Gupta S S. Problem of changing land-use pattern in the rural-urban fringe. Concept Publishing Company, 1987.
[45] Webster D, Muller L. Challenges of peri-urbanization in the Lower Yangtze Region: The Case of the Hangzhou- Ningbo Corridor. Discussion Paper of Asia/Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, 2002.
[46] 许新国, 陈佑启, 姚艳敏, 等. 城乡交错带空间边界界定方法的研究: 以北京市为例. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38 (2): 995-998.
[47] 陈佑启. 试论城乡交错带及其特征与功能. 经济地理, 1996, 16(3): 27-31.
[48] 陈佑启. 城乡交错带名辨. 地理学与国土研究, 1995, 11 (l): 43-50.
[49] 程连生, 赵红英. 北京城市边缘带探讨. 北京师范大学学报, 1995, 31(1): 128-129.
[50] 钱紫华, 陈晓键. 城市边缘区的界定方法研究: 以西安为例. 中山大学研究生学报, 2006, 26(1): 54-62.
[51] 林坚. 城乡结合部的地域识别与土地利用研究: 以北京中心城地区为例. 城市规划, 2007, 31(8): 36 -45.
[52] 蔡栋, 李满春, 陈振杰, 等. 基于信息熵的城市边缘区的界定方法研究: 以南京市为例. 测绘科学, 2010, 35(3): 106-109.
[53] 曹广忠, 缪杨兵, 刘涛. 基于产业活动的城市边缘区空间划分方法: 以北京主城区为例.地理研究, 2009, 28 (3): 771-780.
[54] 杨山, 陈升. 快速城市化地区城乡结合部及其用地结构演变: 以无锡市为例.地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1255-1263.
[55] 方晓. 浅议上海城市边缘区的界定. 地域研究与开发, 1999, 18(4): 65-68.
[56] 杨山, 任瑞芳, 洪灿辉. 无锡市城乡耦合地域范围的演变. 城市问题, 2010, 178(5): 78-83.
[57] 李世峰. 大城市边缘区地域特征属性界定方法. 经济地理, 2006, 26(3): 478-486.
[58] 李世峰, 白人朴. 基于模糊综合评价的大城市边缘区地域特征属性的界定. 中国农业大学学报, 2005, 10( 3): 99-104.
[59] 夏鸿雁. 石家庄城市边缘区的界定及其发展初探[D]. 河北大学, 2008.
[60] 张秀丽. 乌鲁木齐市边缘区研究[D]. 新疆大学, 2010.
[61] 孙世民, 李世峰. 基于熵权的城乡结合部地域特征属性模糊界定研究. 运筹与管理, 2005, 14(6): 82-88.
[62] 荆芳. 开封市城市边缘区土地利用研究[D]. 河南大学, 2008.
[63] 许新国, 陈佑启, 姚艳敏, 等. 城乡交错带空间边界界定研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(17): 265-269.
[64] Ilbery B. Indonesia Property Report: Future City Development// 编著者. Agricultural Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
[65] Burnley I, Murphy P. Residential location choice in Sydney's perimetro-politan region. Urban Geography, 1995, 16(2): 123-143.
[66] McKenzie F. Beyond the Suburbs: Population change in the major exurban regions of Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1996.
[67] Adrian G A. Globalization regional development and mega-city expansion in Latin America: Analyzing Mexico City's peri-urban hinterland. Cities, 2003, 20(1): 3-21.
[68] 贾若祥, 刘毅.中国半城市化问题初探. 城市发展研究, 2002, 9(2): 19-23.
[69] 张丽. 成都市半城市化地区城乡一体化的实证研究: 以成都市新津县为例[D]. 西南交通大学, 2007.
[70] Choy D L, Sutherland C, Scott S. Peri-urabn case study south-east Queensland. Research Report No3.of“Change and continuity in peri-urban Austrialia”Project, Griffith University, Nathan, 2007.
[71] 黄云凤. 半城市化地区结构与功能特征及其管理研究: 以厦门市集美区为例[D]. 中国科学院研究生院, 2009.
[72] 姚永玲. 北京城乡结合部管理研究. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009.
[73] 徐和平. 美国郊区化的经验与教训. 开发研究, 2007 (3): 133-139.
[74] 陈雪明. 美国城市化和郊区化历史回顾及对中国城市的展望. 国外城市规划, 2003, 18(1): 51-56.
[75] 孙群郎. 美国现代城市郊区化动因初探. 世界历史, 2003(1): 8-15.
[76] 何重达. 浅析美国和中国的城市郊区化机制. 中国国土资源经济, 2009(9): 32-36.
[77] 唐乐乐. 郑州市城市边缘区空间形态及其发展研究[D]. 河南大学, 2008.
[78] 杨杰. 廊坊市城乡结合部土地利用变化及其驱动机制研究[D]. 河北农业大学, 2008.
[79] 黄靖, 蔡建明. 东莞半城市化地区发展透视. 地理与地理信息科学, 2007, 23(2): 65-69.
[80] 聂仲秋. 城乡结合部和谐发展研究：以西安为例[D]. 西北农林科技大学, 2008.
[81] 吴佳莉. 城乡结合部空间扩展的动力机制和发展模式研究: 以柳州市为例[D]. 华中农业大学, 2008.
[82] 周李萌. 城市边缘区域土地利用变化及其驱动力分析[D]. 西北大学, 2010.
[83] 张宁, 方琳娜, 周杰, 等. 北京城市边缘区空间扩展特征及驱动机制. 地理研究, 2010, 29(3): 471-480.
[84] Webster D R, Cai J M, Muller L, et al. Emerging Third Stage Peri-Urbanization: Functional Specialization in the Hangzhou Peri-Urban Region. Discussion Paper of Asia/ Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, 2003.
[85] 刘盛和, 叶舜赞, 杜红亮, 等. 半城市化地区形成的动力机制与发展前景初探: 以浙江省绍兴县为例. 地理研究, 2005, 24(4): 601-612.
[86] Buxton M, Tieman G, Bekessy S, et al. Peri-Urban Case Study: Bendigo Corridor. Research Report No2.of “Change and continuity in peri-urban Austrialia”Project, RMIT University, Melbourne, 2007.
[87] Kennedy L. Regional industrial policies driving peri-urban dynamics in Hyderabad, India. Cities, 2007, 24(2): 95-109.
[88] 王玲慧. 大城市边缘地区空间整合与社区发展. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版, 2008.
[89] Hudalah D. Peri-urban Planning in Indonesia: Contexts, approaches and institutional capacity[D]. University of Groningen, 2010.
[90] 张敏, 甄峰, 张晓明. 中国沿海欠发达地区半城市化特征与机制: 以福建莆田为例. 地理研究, 2008, 27(4): 927-937.
[91] 刘阳炼. 长株潭城市边缘区演化与发展研究[D]. 湖南师范大学, 2005.
[92] 任荣荣, 张红. 城乡结合部界定方法研究. 城市问题, 2008(4): 44-49.
[93] 于伯华, 吕昌河. 城市边缘区耕地面积变化时空特征及其驱动机制: 以北京市顺义区为例. 地理科学, 2008, 28 (3): 348-353.
[94] 陈浮, 陈刚, 包浩生, 等. 城市边缘区土地利用变化及人文驱动力机制研究. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(3): 204-210.