地理科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 913-919.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.08.003

• 区域经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

两广地区工业—资源—环境系统协调性分析

杨威1,2,3, 金凤君1,3, 王成金1,3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101|
    2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京100049|
    3. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京100101
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-01 修回日期:2010-05-01 出版日期:2010-08-25 发布日期:2010-08-25
  • 作者简介:杨威(1983-),男,博士生,主要从事区域发展与规划、经济地理研究。E-mail:yangw.09b@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学重点基金项目(40635026);中国博士后科学基金项目(200902133)。

Research on Coordination Degrees of Industry-Resources-Environment in Guangdong and Guangxi

YANG Wei1,2,3, JIN Fengjun1,3, WANG Chengjin1,3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China|
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China|
    3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2010-01-01 Revised:2010-05-01 Online:2010-08-25 Published:2010-08-25

摘要:

以两广地区35地市为例,构建了工业资源环境协调性评价指标体系,运用投影寻踪方法分别计算出了35地市工业、资源、环境子系统的评价指数。在此基础上,利用回归拟合,通过协调度计算模型,对两广地区工业资源环境协调性进行了分析评价。结果表明:①工业发展、资源投入与工业环境污染之间具有显著的相关性,两广地区各地市工业发展、资源投入与工业环境污染具有显著差异,广东各地市工业发展、资源投入与工业环境污染强度总体高于广西各地市。②工业资源环境协调性与经济发展呈一定的负相关,经济发展水平越高的地区,其协调性越差。两广地区各地市工业资源环境协调性具有显著的差异性:广东各地市工业资源环境协调性总体不如广西,其中珠江三角洲地区协调性最差;广西省内部各地市协调性差异不显著,而广东各地市协调性差异显著。③协调是相对的概念,工业资源环境协调性没有绝对标准,分析协调性必须结合区域的实际情况进行判断。虽然广西各地市工业资源环境协调性“较好”,但仅是一种低水平的较好状态。

关键词: 广东, 广西, 投影寻踪, 协调性

Abstract:

This paper designed an indicator system of industry-resource-environment and calculated the evaluation index of industry-resource and environment for the 35 cities in Guangdong and Guangxi based on the projection pursuit method. The coordination of industry-resource-environment of those cities was analyzed and appraized based on the coordination degree calculation model. The obtained results included the following aspexts. (1) There was significant correlation and significant difference of industrial development, resources consumption and industrial pollution among the 35 cities in Guangdong and Guangxi. Also, industries in the cities of Guangdong were much more developed than those of Guangxi, and the intensity of industrial pollution and resources consumption in the cities of Guangdong was higher than those of Guangxi. (2) There was a negative correlation between industry-resource-environment coordination and economy development, that is to say, the higher the economy development level, the worse the industry-resource-environment coordination. The difference was evident in the coordination of the 35 cities. The coordination in Guangxi was better than that in Guangdong, with the Pearl River Delta having the worst coordination. The difference was not obvious in the city coordination in Guangxi, while that in Guangdong was distinct. (3) Coordination was relative, and there was no absolute standard for industry-resource-environment coordination. Coordination should be analyzed combined with the real situation in a certain region. Although the coordination in Guangxi was better, it was still at a relatively low level.

Key words: coordination, Guangdong, Guangxi, projection pursuit