基于体制转换的乡村转型时空格局及演变机理——以甘肃省榆中县为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.12.010

地理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 2311-2326.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.12.010

基于体制转换的乡村转型时空格局及演变机理——以甘肃省榆中县为例

石育中¹(), 赵琳林², 赵雪雁¹, 兰海霞³

1.西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院，兰州 730070
2.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院，兰州 730000
3.西北师范大学经济学院，兰州 730070

收稿日期:2022-04-02 修回日期:2022-08-25 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2022-12-31
作者简介:石育中(1988— )，男，甘肃礼县人，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为社会—生态系统脆弱性与适应。E-mail: syz19880919@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42001268);甘肃省高等学校创新能力提升项目(2019A-010);甘肃省教育厅青年博士基金项目(2021QB-021);西北师范大学青年教师科研能力提升计划项目(NWNU-LKQN2020-17)

Spatiotemporal evolution and mechanism of rural transformation: A case study of Yuzhong County in Gansu Province

SHI Yuzhong¹(), ZHAO Linlin², ZHAO Xueyan¹, LAN Haixia³

1. College of Geography and Environment Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China
3. College of Economics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2022-04-02 Revised:2022-08-25 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2022-12-31
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42001268);Innovation Ability Promotion Program of Colleges and Universitiesin Gansu Province(2019A-010);Young Doctor Fund of Gansu Provincial Department of Education(2021QB-021);Northwest Normal University Young Teachers' Scientific Research Ability Promotion Program(NWNU-LKQN2020-17)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

乡村转型是乡村振兴的关键，也是“三农”转型的重要抓手。论文以黄土高原沟壑区甘肃省榆中县为例，从人口转型、土地转型和产业转型3个维度构建乡村转型指标体系，基于2002—2018年统计数据、农户调研数据、遥感数据等多源数据，运用熵值法、层次分析法、乡村转型度模型和空间分析方法，从县域和农户视角，量化与分析榆中县乡村转型及其时空演变格局，刻画农户生计转型路径；在此基础上，引入体制转换理论阐释乡村转型过程机理，并运用逐步回归分析方法识别驱动乡村转型的关键因素。结果表明：① 2002—2018年榆中县乡村转型度、产业转型度和人口转型度明显上升，而土地转型度稳中有降，乡村转型度和产业转型差异明显且变化较大，在中部川区最为突出。② 乡村转型、人口转型、产业转型均呈现“中部川区较高速和高速转型、北部山区低速转型、南部山区由低速转型向较高速过渡转型的空间格局”，并伴有逐级式和跨级式的变化特点，土地转型空间分布较为分散；乡村转型、人口转型、产业转型和土地转型的热点区主要集聚在中部川区，冷点区主要集聚于北部山区。③ 农户生计表现出多路径转型特征，北部山区为综合型生计转型路径，中部川区和南部山区为兼农型生计转型路径。④ 中部川区实现乡村体制转换，南部山区乡村发展明显升级转型，但未形成新的乡村体制，而北部山区乡村转型不够显著。⑤ 固定资产投资是决定榆中县乡村转型的关键因素。研究结果可为乡村转型提供新的研究视角，也为黄土高原沟壑区乡村振兴与乡村高质量发展提供理论依据。

关键词: 乡村转型, 生计转型, 乡村转型度, 乡村高质量发展, 体制转换, 甘肃省榆中县

Abstract:

Rural transformation is the key to rural revitalization, and it is also an important basis for the transformation of agriculture, rural areas, and farmers. This study constructed a rural transformation indicator system based on population, land use, and industrial transformations, which is applied to a case study of Yuzhong County in Gansu Province in the hilly region of the Loess Plateau. Based on multi-source data such as statistical data from 2002 to 2018, rural household survey data, and remote sensing data, entropy method, analytic hierarchy process, rural transformation degree model, and spatial analysis method were used to quantify and analyze the rural transformation and its spatial-temporal evolution patterns, and to describe the pathways of rural household livelihood transformation from the perspectives of county and rural households. Then, we applied the regime shift theory to describe the mechanism of rural transformation, using the stepwise regression analysis method to identify the key factors driving rural transformation. The results show that: 1) The rural transformation degree, industrial transformation degree, and population transformation degree in Yuzhong County increased significantly from 2002 to 2018, while the land use transformation degree decreased steadily. The difference between rural transformation degree and industrial transformation degree was obvious and changed greatly, especially in the central plain area. 2) Rural transformation, population transformation, and industrial transformation basically showed a spatial pattern of relatively high and high-speed transformation in the central area, low-speed transformation in the north, and transition from low-speed to relatively high-speed transformation in the south, accompanied by step-by-step and cross-level changes, and the spatial distribution of land use transformation was relatively scattered. The hot spots of rural transformation, population transformation, industrial transformation, and land use transformation were concentrated in the central plain area of the county, while cold spots were mainly concentrated in the northern mountainous area. 3) The livelihood transformation pathways of rural households were diverse, which showed comprehensive transformation in the northern mountainous area, and part-time farming in the central plain and southern mountainous areas. 4) Rural transformation regime shift has taken place in the central plain area, while in the southern mountainous area rural development is progressing but a regime shift has not occurred, and rual transformation is not significant in the northern mountainous area. 5) Fixed asset investment is the key factor of rural transformation in Yuzhong County. Finally, the results aim to provide a theoretical basis for rural revitalization and rural high-quality development in the hilly region of the Loess Plateau from the new perspective of rural transformation study.

Key words: rural transformation, livelihood transformation, rural transformation degree, rural high-quality development, regime shift, Yuzhong County of Gansu Province

石育中, 赵琳林, 赵雪雁, 兰海霞. 基于体制转换的乡村转型时空格局及演变机理——以甘肃省榆中县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(12): 2311-2326.

SHI Yuzhong, ZHAO Linlin, ZHAO Xueyan, LAN Haixia. Spatiotemporal evolution and mechanism of rural transformation: A case study of Yuzhong County in Gansu Province[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(12): 2311-2326.

图/表 10

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

参考文献 38

[1]	刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
	[ Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570. ]
[2]	龙花楼, 邹健, 李婷婷, 等. 乡村转型发展特征评价及地域类型划分: 以“苏南—陕北”样带为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3): 495-506.
	[ Long Hualou, Zou Jian, Li Tingting, et al. Study on the characteristics and territorial types of rural transformation development: the case of "Southern Jiangsu-Northern Shaanxi" transect. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(3): 495-506. ] doi: 10.11821/yj2012030011
[3]	程德智, 王满仓. 黄河流域金融集聚对区域高质量发展的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(8): 137-147.
	[ Cheng Dezhi, Wang Mancang. Influence of financial agglomeration on regional high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(8): 137-147. ]
[4]	李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 武文豪, 等. 世界乡村转型历程与可持续发展展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 627-635. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.006
	[ Li Yuheng, Yan Jiayu, Wu Wenhao, et al. The process of rural transformation in the world and prospects of sustainable development. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 627-635. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.006
[5]	廖文梅, 虞娟娟, 袁若兰. 脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴的耦合协同性: 基于不同时序脱贫县(市)的比较[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(10): 132-142.
	[ Liao Wenmei, Yu Juanjuan, Yuan Ruolan. Coupling synergy between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization: A comparison between poverty alleviation counties (cities) based on different time series. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(10): 132-142. ]
[6]	吴孔森, 芮旸, 陈佳, 等. 旅游驱动下乡村转型发展的微尺度研究: 以西安市上王村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 1047-1059. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.014
	[ Wu Kongsen, Rui Yang, Chen Jia, et al. Micro-scale study on rural transformation and development driven by tourism: Taking Shangwang Village in Xi'an City as an example. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(6): 1047-1059. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.014
[7]	陈诚. 全球化背景下国家乡村政策演变与乡村地方重组及其不确定性的理论分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4):563-571. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.008
	[ Chen Cheng. Theoretical analysis on the state rural policy evolution, rural locality reconstitution and its uncertainty in China in the context of globalization. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 563-571. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.008
[8]	郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
	[ Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
[9]	Hu X L, Li H B, Zhang X L, et al. Multi-dimensionality and the totality of rural spatial restructuring from the perspective of the rural space system: A case study of traditional villages in the ancient Huizhou region, China[J]. Habitat International, 2019, 94: 102062. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102062. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102062
[10]	张荣天, 张小林, 陆建飞, 等. 我国乡村转型发展时空分异格局与影响机制分析[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(3): 138-147.
	[ Zhang Rongtian, Zhang Xiaolin, Lu Jianfei, et al. Rural transformation development pattern and mechanism China. Human Geography, 2021, 36(3): 138-147. ]
[11]	Tu S S, Long H L. Rural restructuring in China: Theory, approaches and research prospect[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(10): 1169-1184. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1429-x
[12]	Liu Y S, Long H L, Chen Y F, et al. Progress of research on urban-rural transformation and rural development in China in the past decade and future prospects[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(8): 1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1318-8
[13]	龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.001
	[ Long Hualou. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 131-138. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.001
[14]	龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2547-2559.
	[ Long Hualou, Ge Dazhuan, Wang Jieyong. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2547-2559. ]
[15]	Yang R, Zhang J, Xu Q, et al. Urban-rural spatial transformation process and influences from the perspective of land use: A case study of the Pearl River Delta Region[J]. Habitat International, 2020, 104: 102234. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102234. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102234
[16]	房艳刚, 刘建志. 东北地区县域粮劳变化耦合模式与乡村发展类型[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2241-2255. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202010014
	[ Fang Yangang, Liu Jianzhi. Coupled modes of grain yield and agricultural labor changes and rural development types at county level in Northeast China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2241-2255. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202010014
[17]	李婷婷, 龙花楼. 山东省乡村转型发展时空格局[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(3): 490-500. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201403008
	[ Li Tingting, Long Hualou. Study on the spatio-temporal pattern of rural transformation development in Shandong Province. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(3): 490-500. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201403008
[18]	周华, 王炳君. 江苏省乡村性及乡村转型发展耦合关系研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(9): 48-55.
	[ Zhou Hua, Wang Bingjun. Analysis of the coupling rurality index and rural transformation development of Jiangsu Province in China in the early 21st century. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(9): 48-55. ]
[19]	贺艳华, 范曙光, 周国华, 等. 基于主体功能区划的湖南省乡村转型发展评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 667-676. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.010
	[ He Yanhua, Fan Shuguang, Zhou Guohua, et al. Evaluation of rural transformation development in Hunan Province based on major function oriented zoning. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 667-676. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.010
[20]	马晓冬, 李鑫, 顾晓波, 等. 城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8):1853-1866.
	[ Ma Xiaodong, Li Xin, Gu Xiaobo, et al. The characteristics and path of urban-rural transition in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of urban-rural integration. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200808
[21]	Zhang X L, Pan M M. Emerging rural spatial restructuring regimes in China: A tale of three transitional villages in the urban fringe[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 93: 287-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.005
[22]	鲁大铭, 杨新军, 石育中, 等. 黄土高原乡村体制转换与转型发展[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(2): 348-364. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002010
	[ Lu Daming, Yang Xinjun, Shi Yuzhong, et al. Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 348-364. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202002010
[23]	黄晓军, 王博, 刘萌萌, 等. 社会—生态系统恢复力研究进展: 基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(8): 3007-3017.
	[ Huang Xiaojun, Wang Bo, Liu Mengmeng, et al. Process in social and ecological system resilience based on CiteSpace method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 3007-3017. ]
[24]	Meng J N, Fang H W, Scavia D. Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 125(1): 107529. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529
[25]	Nayak P K, Armitage D. Social-ecological regime shifts (SERS) in coastal systems[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2018, 161: 84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.020
[26]	Biggs R, Peterson G D, Rocha J C. The regime shifts database: A framework for analyzing regime shifts in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2018, 23(3): 018473. doi: 10.1101/018473. doi: 10.1101/018473
[27]	蒋维, 王俊, 杨新军, 等. 黄土高原农村社会—生态系统体制转换初探: 以陕西省长武县洪家镇为例[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1): 56-60.
	[ Jiang Wei, Wang Jun, Yang Xinjun, et al. A study of regime shift of rural social-ecological system in loess plateau: A case study of HongJia town of ChangWu county, Shaanxi Province. Human Geography, 2011, 26(1): 56-60. ]
[28]	陈佳, 杨新军, 温馨, 等. 旅游发展背景下乡村适应性演化理论框架与实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1586-1601.
	[ Chen Jia, Yang Xinjun, Wen Xin, et al. The theoretical framework and demonstration of rural adaptive evolution in the context of tourism development. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(7): 1586-1601. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200706
[29]	李博. 乡村转型背景下农户家庭体制转换与生活满意度研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2018.
	[ Li Bo. Research on household regime shifts and life satisfaction of farmers under the background of rural transformation. Xi'an, China: Northwest University, 2018. ]
[30]	石翠萍. 乡村社会—生态系统体制转换影响因素及稳健性[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2015.
	[ Shi Cuiping. Regime shift influential factors and robustness of rural social-ecological systems. Xi'an, China: Northwest University, 2015.]
[31]	Kosten S, Veraart A J, Dakos V. Regime shifts and tipping points[M]// RudstamL, BouffardD, PergaM-E. Encyclopedia of inland waters, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2022: 352-361.
[32]	石育中, 李文龙, 鲁大铭, 等. 基于乡镇尺度的黄土高原干旱脆弱性时空演变分析: 以榆中县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(11): 2130-2140. doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.11.11
	[ Shi Yuzhong, Li Wenlong, Lu Daming, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of drought vulnerability on the Loess Plateau of China at town level. Resources Science, 2017, 39(11): 2130-2140. ] doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.11.11
[33]	曹苗苗, 彭鹏, 王贤, 等. 湖南武陵山片区乡村转型时空演化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(9): 1930-1940.
	[ Cao Miaomiao, Wang Xian, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of rural transformation and and its influencing factors analysis in Wuling Mountain area of Hunan Province. Resources and Environment in The Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(9): 1930-1940. ]
[34]	李婷婷, 龙花楼. 基于转型与协调视角的乡村发展分析: 以山东省为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 531-541.
	[ Li Tingting, Long Hualou. Rural development from viewpoints of transformation and coordination: A case in Shandong Province. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 531-541. ]
[35]	王富喜, 毛爱华, 李赫龙, 等. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.011.1323
	[ Wang Fuxi, Mao Aihua, Li Helong, et al. Quality measurement and regional difference of urbanization in Shandong Province based on the entropy method. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.011.1323
[36]	石育中. 黄土高原社会—生态系统的干旱脆弱性及农户适应研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2018.
	[ Shi Yuzhong. Drought vulnerability in social-ecological system and drought adaptation of farmer household on the Loess Plateau: A case study of Yuzhong County of Gansu Province, China. Xi'an, China: Northwest University, 2018. ]
[37]	石育中, 杨新军, 王婷. 陕南秦巴山区可持续生计安全评价及其鲁棒性分析[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(12): 2309-2321. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201612010
	[ Shi Yuzhong, Yang Xinjun, Wang Ting. An evaluation of sustainable livelihood security based on robustness analysis of the Qinba Mountain region of Shaanxi Province, China. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(12): 2309-2321. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201612010
[38]	Dakos V, Kéfi S. Ecological resilience: What to measure and how[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2022, 17(4): 043003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5767. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5767

目标层	准则层	指标层	指标权重	指标属性
乡村转型度	人口转型 0.334	城镇化率	0.132	+
	人口转型 0.334	农村非农劳动力占比	0.202	+
	土地转型 0.332	耕地面积占比	0.105	+
		农村居民点面积占比	0.124	-
		复种指数	0.103	-
	产业转型 0.334	非农产业产值占比	0.084	+
		有效灌溉面积占比	0.069	+
		农业劳动生产率	0.092	+
		非粮作物面积占比	0.088	+

因变量	自变量	B	β	t	Sig.	修正R²	修正Sig.
乡村转型	常数项	0.686	—	7.995	<0.001	0.656	<0.001
乡村转型	固定资产投资	0.438	0.823	5.614	<0.001	0.656	<0.001
人口转型	常数项	0. 208	—	6.547	<0.001	0.615	<0.001
人口转型	人均GDP	0.440	0.500	5.517	<0.001	0.615	<0.001
产业转型	常数项	-0.157	—	-3.416	0.004
	人均耕地面积	0.381	0.509	6.260	<0.001	0.832	<0.001
	固定资产投资	0.647	0.756	9.307	<0.001	0.904	<0.001
土地转型	常数项	0.176	—	8.814	<0.001
	农村劳动力规模	-0.366	-0.593	-4.218	0.001	0.509	0.001
	年降水量	-0.366	-0.477	-3.394	0.004	0.711	<0.001

基于体制转换的乡村转型时空格局及演变机理——以甘肃省榆中县为例

Spatiotemporal evolution and mechanism of rural transformation: A case study of Yuzhong County in Gansu Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 38

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张静, 余灏哲, 谯伟, 徐增让, 成升魁. 国内村域尺度乡村转型发展与重构的现状述评及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(5): 896-904.
[2]	吴孔森, 芮旸, 陈佳, 张丽琼, 杨新军, 张佰刚. 旅游驱动下乡村转型发展的微尺度研究——以西安市上王村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 1047-1059.
[3]	孙伟, 刘崇刚, 闫东升. 乡村精明增长——起源与实践[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 320-331.
[4]	李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 武文豪, 刘彦随. 世界乡村转型历程与可持续发展展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 627-635.
[5]	贺艳华, 范曙光, 周国华, 唐承丽, 彭鹏. 基于主体功能区划的湖南省乡村转型发展评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 667-676.
[6]	李二玲, 胥亚男, 雍雅君, 魏莉霞. 农业结构调整与中国乡村转型发展——以河南省巩义市和鄢陵县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 698-709.
[7]	龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 乡村重构的理论认知[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 581-590.
[8]	杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼, 张怡筠. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(8): 1019-1030.
[9]	李婷婷, 龙花楼. 基于转型与协调视角的乡村发展分析——以山东省为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 531-541.
[10]	龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.