共生与融合：乡村遗产地“人—地—业”协同发展研究——以听松文化社区为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.004

地理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 582-594.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.04.004

共生与融合：乡村遗产地“人—地—业”协同发展研究——以听松文化社区为例

陶慧¹^,²(), 张梦真¹, 刘家明³^,^*()

1.中央民族大学管理学院,北京 100081
2.北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心,北京 100081
3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101

收稿日期:2021-06-30 修回日期:2021-08-24 出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-06-28
通讯作者: *刘家明(1966— ),男,河南信阳人,研究员,博导,研究方向为旅游地理与旅游规划。E-mail: liujm@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:陶慧(1983— ),女,湖北恩施人,博士,副教授,研究方向为旅游地理与旅游人类学。E-mail: taohui@muc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41901180);中央民族大学硕士研究生自主科研项目(SZKY2021071)

Symbiosis and integration: Coordinated development of human-land-industry in rural heritage sites: A case study of the Tingsong cultural community

TAO Hui¹^,²(), ZHANG Mengzhen¹, LIU Jiaming³^,^*()

1. School of Management, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
2. Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era Research Center in Beijing, Beijing 100081, China
3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2021-06-30 Revised:2021-08-24 Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-06-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901180);Independent Scientific Research Project for Postgraduate of Minzu University of China(SZKY2021071)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

经过5000年文化积淀的中国乡村,除早已生成各自独特稳定的人居环境、社会结构、风俗习惯和运行机制外,更蕴藏了人—地和谐的生态智慧、特殊的地方性知识和丰富的地方遗产资源。作为复杂多元的地域综合系统,乡村遗产的现代化过程不仅包括土地、建筑等空间要素的嬗变,更反映了伴随“人”的生计方式与日常生活的地方实践所产生的乡土社会全系统变迁。实现乡村遗产传统与现代的共生、古典与时尚的互融、传承与创新的契合,需要打破城乡二元体制壁垒、搭建城乡内循环的桥梁,促进以“人、地、业”为核心的资源要素的流动、交互和均衡配置是乡村遗产地实现乡村振兴的核心要义。共生理论是研究乡村各系统内部关系的重要理论,利用该理论可解析乡村遗产地“人—地—业”3个子系统协同发展路径。论文以河北易县听松文化社区为例,基于共生视角阐释了返乡精英带动下人口、土地和产业3个子系统协同动态演化的过程,并提出乡村遗产地共生发展的价值逻辑：① 构建乡村社区共生体;② 促进地域循环共生圈;③ 培育横向产业共生链。以期实现乡村遗产地的人、地、业要素融合与科学重构,为保护和传承乡愁遗产地的文化资源、推动乡村振兴和建设美好乡村提供可能的理论启示与经验借鉴。

关键词: 乡村遗产地, 人—地—业, 共生, 听松文化社区

Abstract:

Many rural heritage sites in China are rich in natural and cultural tourism resources. The co-creation of landscape resources, co-ownership of territorial space, and diverse ethnicities and rural social relationship provide the basis and conditions for the symbiosis development of tourism. In addition, as an open system with comprehensive multidimensional and dynamic evolution, rural heritage sites are formed by the interaction of various elements. Population, land, and industry are the core elements of rural development. Symbiosis theory is an important theory for studying the internal relationships of rural systems, which can be used to analyze the coordinated development paths of human-land-industry subsystems in rural heritage sites. Taking Tingsong cultural community in Yi County, Hebei Province as an example, this study examined the collaborative dynamic evolution process of the three subsystems of population, land, and industry driven by the returning elite from the perspective of symbiosis, and put forward the symbiotic paths of rural development: 1) Building the symbiont of rural community. 2) Promoting the regional circular economic and ecological sphere. 3) Cultivating the horizontal symbiotic chain of industries. The results of this study may provide some reference for the comprehensive revitalization of population, land, and industry in rural heritage sites.

Key words: rural heritage sites, human-land-industry, symbiosis, Tingsong cultural community

陶慧, 张梦真, 刘家明. 共生与融合：乡村遗产地“人—地—业”协同发展研究——以听松文化社区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(4): 582-594.

TAO Hui, ZHANG Mengzhen, LIU Jiaming. Symbiosis and integration: Coordinated development of human-land-industry in rural heritage sites: A case study of the Tingsong cultural community[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 582-594.

图/表 7

图1

表1

图2

表2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 45

[1]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[2]	陶慧, 麻国庆, 冉非小, 等. 基于H-I-S视角下传统村落分类与发展模式研究: 以邯郸市为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(11): 82-95.
	[ Tao Hui, Ma Guoqing, Ran Feixiao, et al. The classification and development model of traditional villages from H-I-S perspective: A case study of Handan City. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(11): 82-95. ]
[3]	周慧玲. 旅游共生的研究述评[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2014, 30(9): 1134-1137.
	[ Zhou Huiling. Research review about tourism symbiosis. Resource Development and Market, 2014, 30(9): 1134-1137. ]
[4]	Viken A. Tourism, research, and governance on Svalbard: A symbiotic relationship[J]. Polar Record, 2011, 47(4): 335-347. doi: 10.1017/S0032247410000604
[5]	刘玮, 王婷, 谭晓军. 区域协同发展视角下的景区依托型乡村旅游规划研究: 以重庆市巫溪县为例[J]. 小城镇建设, 2021, 39(5): 32-40.
	[ Liu Wei, Wang Ting, Tan Xiaojun. Research on the scenic area-based rural tourism planning from the perspective of regional coordinated development: Taking Wuxi County of Chongqing as an example. Development of Small Cities & Towns, 2021, 39(5): 32-40. ]
[6]	程明洋, 刘彦随, 蒋宁. 黄淮海地区乡村人-地-业协调发展格局与机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908007
	[ Cheng Mingyang, Liu Yansui, Jiang Ning. Study on the spatial pattern and mechanism of rural population-land-industry coordinating development in Huang-Huai-Hai area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908007
[7]	杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼. 中国环渤海地区人口-土地-产业非农化转型协同演化特征[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(3): 475-486. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503007
	[ Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou. The study on non-agricultural transformation co-evolution characteristics of "population-land-industry": Case study of the Bohai Rim in China. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(3): 475-486. ]
[8]	Stringer P F, Pearce P L. Toward a symbiosis of social psychology and tourism studies[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1984, 11(1): 5-17. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(84)90093-8
[9]	王金伟, 王士君. 黑色旅游发展动力机制及“共生”模式研究: 以汶川8.0级地震后的四川为例[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(2): 339-344.
	[ Wang Jinwei, Wang Shijun. A study on dynamic mechanism and symbiotic model of dark tourism: A case of Sichuan after Wenchuan MS 8.0 earthquake. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(2): 339-344. ]
[10]	陆相林, 孙中伟, 马世猛. 京津冀区域城市旅游共生关系分析与协同发展对策[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(4): 181-187.
	[ Lu Xianglin, Sun Zhongwei, Ma Shimeng. The symbiotic relationship and the polycentric cooperative development countermeasures of urban tourism in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(4): 181-187. ]
[11]	弓志刚, 李亚楠. 乡村旅游产业链共生系统的特征及模式的演化和构建: 以山西省为例[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2011, 32(1): 73-77.
	[ Gong Zhigang, Li Yanan. Characteristics of rural tourism industry chain symbiosis system and its evolution and construction patterns: A case study of Shanxi Province. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2011, 32(1): 73-77. ]
[12]	Butcher J. Can ecotourism contribute to tackling poverty? The importance of 'Symbiosis'[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2011, 14(3): 295-307. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2011.555526
[13]	高俊, 王灵恩, 黄巧. 边境旅游地乡村转型及可持续发展路径: 云南打洛口岸地区的民族志研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2233-2248. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191139
	[ Gao Jun, Wang Lingen, Huang Qiao. Transformation of rural border tourism destination and its sustainable development path: An ethnographic study of Daluo port area in Yunnan. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(10): 2233-2248. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191139
[14]	郭旸. 共生型跨区域旅游空间融合的CAS动态演化机制研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2011, 26(2): 33-36.
	[ Guo Yang. Study on CAS dynamic evolution mechanism of space integration of symbiosis cross-regional tourism. Modern Urban Research, 2011, 26(2): 33-36. ]
[15]	杨昀, 保继刚. 本地旅游精英培育与目的地层面内在影响研究: 基于阳朔的历时性解释[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(5): 87-97.
	[ Yang Yun, Bao Jigang. The cultivation of local tourism elites and the influences of destination development: A diachronic interpretive case study of Yangshuo. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(5): 87-97. ]
[16]	李灿. 基于共生理论的企业利益相关者关系研究: 基本逻辑与演进机理[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2013, 36(6): 88-92.
	[ Li Can. Research on symbiosis relationship between enterprise stakeholders: Basic logical and evolution mechanism. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2013, 36(6): 88-92. ]
[17]	成竹, 吕宛青, 陈伟. 滇越国际旅游合作共生机制研究[J]. 思想战线, 2016, 42(4):153-157.
	[ Cheng Zhu, Lv Wanqing, Chen Wei. A study of the symbiosis mechanisms in international tourism cooperation between Yunnan and Vietnam. Thinking, 2016, 42(4): 153-157. ]
[18]	朱德亮, 张瑾. 基于共生理论的桂黔湘边区民族旅游竞合模式研究[J]. 广西民族研究, 2012(4): 185-192.
	[ Zhu Deliang, Zhang Jin. The cooperation-competition model of Ethnic Tourism in Guangxi-Guizhou-Hunan border based on the symbiosis theory. Guangxi Ethnic Studies, 2012(4): 185-192. ]
[19]	李春发, 李萌萌, 王强, 等. 生态工业共生网络中利益相关者关系研究[J]. 软科学, 2012, 26(12): 5-9.
	[ Li Chunfa, Li Mengmeng, Wang Qiang, et al. Study on the relationship of stakeholders of eco-industrial symbiosis network. Soft Science, 2012, 26(12): 5-9. ]
[20]	孙九霞, 阿荣娜. 民族旅游场域中新乡贤的成长路径与社区角色研究[J]. 北方民族大学学报, 2020(1): 54-62.
	[ Sun Jiuxia, Arongna. Growth path and community role of new county sages in the field of ethnic tourism. Journal of North Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2020(1): 54-62. ]
[21]	Zhu F K, Zhang F R, Ke X L. Rural industrial restructuring in China's metropolitan suburbs: Evidence from the land use transition of rural enterprises in suburban Beijing[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74: 121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.004
[22]	李婷婷, 龙花楼. 基于转型与协调视角的乡村发展分析: 以山东省为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 531-541.
	[ Li Tingting, Long Hualou. Rural development from viewpoints of transformation and coordination: A case in Shandong Province. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 531-541. ]
[23]	姚旻, 赵爱梅, 宁志中. 散居型村寨旅游“共生”发展机制与培育路径[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2019, 40(12): 132-138.
	[ Yao Min, Zhao Aimei, Ning Zhizhong. Study on the development mechanism and path of "symbiosis" of ethnic village tourism in scattered village. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 2019, 40(12): 132-138. ]
[24]	黄艺农, 李竹, 许春晓. 国内旅游共生研究的阶段性及其成就[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2016(1): 144-148.
	[ Huang Yinong, Li Zhu, Xu Chunxiao. Stages and achievements of tourism symbiosis research in China. Social Sciences in Hunan, 2016(1): 144-148. ]
[25]	胡婷. 区域旅游地共生系统测量与结构研究: 以湖南湘西地区为例[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2019: 21-30.
	[ Hu Ting. Study on measurement and structure of regional symbiosis system of tourist destinations: Taking western Hunan for example. Changsha, China: Hunan Normal University, 2019: 21-30. ]
[26]	龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
	[ Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, Tu Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
[27]	杨永侠, 孙婷, 张丽红, 等. 京津冀地区耕地质量空间分布分形机制研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(2): 165-171.
	[ Yang Yongxia, Sun Ting, Zhang Lihong, et al. Fractal mechanism of spatial distribution of arable land quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Transactions of the CSAM, 2017, 48(2): 165-171. ]
[28]	Arouri M, Nguyen C, Youssef A B. Natural disasters, household welfare, and resilience: Evidence from rural Vietnam[J]. World Development, 2015, 70: 59-77. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.017
[29]	白凯, 郭生伟. 旅游景区共生形象对游客重游意愿及口碑效应影响的实证研究: 以西安曲江唐文化主题景区为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2010, 25(1): 53-58.
	[ Bai Kai, Guo Shengwei. An empirical study on the impact of symbiotic image in scenic areas on tourists' willingness of revisit and their words of mouth effect: A case study on Qujiang scenic areas with the theme of Tang culture in Xi'an. Tourism Tribune, 2010, 25(1): 53-58. ]
[30]	吴泓, 顾朝林. 基于共生理论的区域旅游竞合研究: 以淮海经济区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2004, 24(1): 104-109.
	[ Wu Hong, Gu Chaolin. The cooperation-competition of regional tourism based on the symbiosis theory: A case study on Huaihai economic region. Economic Geography, 2004, 24(1): 104-109. ]
[31]	费孝通. 论中国小城镇的发展[J]. 中国农村经济, 1996(3): 3-6.
	[ Fei Xiaotong. Development of small towns in China. Chinese Rural Economy, 1996(3): 3-6. ]
[32]	曲亮, 郝云宏. 基于共生理论的城乡统筹机理研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2004, 25(5): 371-374.
	[ Qu Liang, Hao Yunhong. Research on planing urban and rural areas as a whole based on symbiosis theory. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2004, 25(5): 371-374. ]
[33]	武小龙. 城乡对称互惠共生发展: 一种新型城乡关系的解释框架[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018, 39(4): 14-22.
	[ Wu Xiaolong. Symmetry mutualism of urban and rural areas: A new theoretical framework of urban-rural relationship. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, 39(4): 14-22. ]
[34]	孙九霞, 王学基. 城乡循环修复: 乡村旅游建构新型城乡关系的框架与议题[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 42(1): 25-32.
	[ Sun Jiuxia, Wang Xueji. Urban-rural cycle restoration: The framework and issues for rural tourism to construct a new urban-rural relationship. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 2021, 42(1): 25-32. ]
[35]	亚当·斯密. 国民财富的性质和原因的研究(上卷)[M]. 郭大力, 王亚南, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2008.
	[ Smith A. Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Vol 1. Translated by Guo Dali, Wang Yanan. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press, 2008. ]
[36]	臧玉珠, 杨园园, 曹智. 大城市郊区乡村转型与重构的典型模式分析: 以天津东丽区华明镇为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 713-724. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180976
	[ Zang Yuzhu, Yang Yuanyuan, Cao Zhi. Typical model of rural transformation and restructure in suburban areas: A case study of Huaming Township in Dongli District, Tianjin City. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 713-724. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180976
[37]	张鹏岩, 杨丹, 李二玲, 等. 人口城镇化与土地城镇化的耦合协调关系: 以中原经济区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(8): 145-154.
	[ Zhang Pengyan, Yang Dan, Li Erling, et al. The coupled coordination relationship between land urbanization and population urbanization: A case study of the central plains economic region. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(8): 145-154. ]
[38]	叶强, 钟炽兴. 乡建, 我们准备好了吗: 乡村建设系统理论框架研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 1843-1858. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710003
	[ Ye Qiang, Zhong Chixing. Have we been ready for rural construction: Research on the theoretical framework of rural construction system. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10): 1843-1858. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710003
[39]	弓志刚, 原梅生. 休闲农业产业化发展的组织创新研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2009(1): 114-117.
	[ Gong Zhigang, Yuan Meisheng. Research on organizational innovation of leisure agriculture industrialization development. Finance & Trade Economics, 2009(1): 114-117. ]
[40]	Xu W, Tan K C. Impact of reform and economic restructuring on rural systems in China: A case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2002, 18(1): 65-81. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00030-4
[41]	李涛, 朱鹤, 王钊, 等. 苏南乡村旅游空间集聚特征与结构研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2281-2294. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190630
	[ Li Tao, Zhu He, Wang Zhao, et al. The cluster characteristics and structural model about rural tourism in South Jiangsu. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(10): 2281-2294. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190630
[42]	孙九霞, 黄凯洁. 乡村文化精英对旅游发展话语的响应: 基于安顺屯堡周官村的研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2019, 40(3): 27-33.
	[ Sun Jiuxia, Huang Kaijie. The response of rural cultural elites to the discourse of tourism development: Research based on Zhouguan village of Anshun Tunpu. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 2019, 40(3): 27-33. ]
[43]	贾榕榕, 吴冰. 乡村旅游精英的权力维度及其阶段性呈现特征: 以袁家村为例[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(2): 142-151.
	[ Jia Rongrong, Wu Bing. The power dimensions and stage presentation characteristics of rural tourism elite: A case study of Yuanjia Village. Human Geography, 2020, 35(2): 142-151. ]
[44]	Jenkins C L. The use of investment incentives for tourism projects in developing countries[J]. Tourism Management, 1982, 3(2): 91-97. doi: 10.1016/0261-5177(82)90004-8
[45]	赫尔曼·哈肯. 协同学: 大自然构成的奥秘[M]. 凌复华, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2013: 17-21.
	[ Haken H. Erfolgsgeheimnisse der natur synergetik: Die lehre vom zusammenwirken. Translated by Ling Fuhua. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2013: 17-21. ]

主要访谈对象	编号	时间	地点	访谈内容
企业高管及员工	M01~M03 S01~S06	2019年5月1—9日 2020年12月20—27日 2021年3月1—7日	听松书院	了解听松文化社区创建及与周边农户“共生”过程并访谈部分重点员工
当地居民	V01~V13	2019年5月1—9日 2020年12月20—27日 2021年3月1—7日	五道河村	听松对当地就业环境以及居民文化生活的改善与带动作用
政府工作人员	O01~O03	2021年3月1—7日	西陵镇政府	听松产业对改善基础设施、带动当地产业发展以及提升乡村整体形象所产生的示范效应
游客	T01~T14	2020年12月20—27日 2021年3月1—7日	听松书院	对听松文创产品、民宿风格以及美育课程的评价

共生与融合：乡村遗产地“人—地—业”协同发展研究——以听松文化社区为例

Symbiosis and integration: Coordinated development of human-land-industry in rural heritage sites: A case study of the Tingsong cultural community

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 45

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杨坤, 芮旸, 李宜峰, 杨钰华. 基于共生理论的中国特色保护类村庄振兴类型细分研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1861-1875.
[2]	郭荣朝1,2\|苗长虹1\|夏保林3\|李军甫4. 城市群生态空间结构优化组合模式及对策——以中原城市群为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(3): 363-369.