净初级生产力的人类占用研究进展

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.02.013

地理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 341-350.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.02.013

净初级生产力的人类占用研究进展

张燕杰¹^,²(), 武俊喜¹^,^*(), 潘影³, 张宪洲¹^,⁴

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2.大理大学农学与生物科学学院,云南大理 671003
3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
4.中国科学院大学,北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-04-19 修回日期:2021-07-24 出版日期:2022-02-28 发布日期:2022-04-28
通讯作者: *武俊喜(1975— ),男,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为可持续生态学。E-mail: wujx@igsnrr.ac.cn
*武俊喜(1975— ),男,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为可持续生态学。E-mail: wujx@igsnrr.ac.cn
*武俊喜(1975— ),男,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为可持续生态学。E-mail: wujx@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:张燕杰(1985— ),女,内蒙古赤峰人,博士,主要从事人类活动对生态系统的影响研究。E-mail: zhangyj.16b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502001);国家自然科学基金项目(42101292);国家自然科学基金项目(31971560);云南省基础研究专项(202001AU070019)

Human appropriation of net primary production: A review

ZHANG Yanjie¹^,²(), WU Junxi¹^,^*(), PAN Ying³, ZHANG Xianzhou¹^,⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. College of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Dali University, Dali 671003, Yunnan, China
3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-04-19 Revised:2021-07-24 Online:2022-02-28 Published:2022-04-28
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFC0502001);National Natural Science Foundation of China(42101292);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31971560);Special Foundation for Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province(202001AU070019)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

人类活动对生态系统的影响和改变已达到前所未有的程度,如何量化人类活动对生态系统的影响成为了生态学和地理学研究中的热点问题。净初级生产力的人类占用(HANPP)是量化人类活动对生态系统能量流的影响程度的指标。目前HANPP研究开始从理论和方法的讨论及案例研究,转向作为指标应用到生态学和地理学研究的诸多领域,其重要性日益凸显。因此,论文详细介绍了HANPP的概念和估算方法;综述了其主要研究进展;讨论了HANPP的优劣及其适用范围,并着重展望了其与生态系统结构、功能、服务、生物多样性、可持续发展和人类福祉等方面有关的未来具体研究方向和科学问题,以及如何运用其探讨人类活动对生态系统的影响机制。期望启发更多与HANPP有关的研究,推动人类活动对生态系统的影响研究向定量化、系统化及多学科交叉的方向发展。

关键词: 人类活动强度, 净初级生产力的人类占用(HANPP), 人地关系, 生态系统服务, 可持续发展

Abstract:

Human activities are unprecedentedly transforming the ecosystems of planet Earth, and quantifying the impacts of human activities on ecosystems therefore becomes increasingly important in ecological and geographical research. Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) is an indicator to quantify the extent of human activities impacting on the energy flows of ecosystems. The research of HANPP is developing, from the discussion on theories and methodology and case studies, toward the application of HANPP as an indicator in many research fields of ecology and geography. This review introduced the definition and estimating methods of HANPP; reviewed the previous works; then discussed the advantages and limitations, especially future issues and applications of HANPP concerning ecosystem structures, functions, services, biodiversity, sustainability, human well-being, and the mechanism of human activities impacting on ecosystems. We hope that this review will inspire more HANPP research and promote the quantification, systematization, and interdisciplinarity development of the human-environment relationship research.

Key words: intensity of human activities, HANPP, man-land relationship, ecosystem services, sustainability

张燕杰, 武俊喜, 潘影, 张宪洲. 净初级生产力的人类占用研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(2): 341-350.

ZHANG Yanjie, WU Junxi, PAN Ying, ZHANG Xianzhou. Human appropriation of net primary production: A review[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(2): 341-350.

图/表 3

图1

表1

图2

参考文献 62

[1]	Ellis E C, Gauthier N, Klein Goldewijk K, et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years[J]. PNAS, 2021, 118(17):e2023483118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023483118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023483118
[2]	Scholes R J, Montanarella L, Brainich E, et al. IPBES(2018): Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services[R]. Bonn, Germany: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2018.
[3]	Crutzen P J. Geology of mankind[J]. Nature, 2002, 415:23. doi: 10.1038/415023a. doi: 10.1038/415023a
[4]	Ellis E C, Goldewijk K K, Siebert S, et al. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19(5):589-606.
[5]	Krausmann F, Erb K H, Gingrich S, et al. Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century[J]. PNAS, 2013, 110(25):10324-10329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211349110 pmid: 23733940
[6]	Whittaker R H, Likens G E. Primary production: The biosphere and man[J]. Human Ecology, 1973, 1(4):357-369. doi: 10.1007/BF01536732
[7]	Vitousek P M, Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H, et al. Human appropriation of the products of photosynjournal[J]. BioScience, 1986, 36(6):368-373. doi: 10.2307/1310258
[8]	Wright D H. Human impacts on energy-flow through natural ecosystems, and implications for species endangerment[J]. AMBIO, 1990, 19(4):189-194.
[9]	Imhoff M L, Bounoua L, Ricketts T, et al. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production[J]. Nature, 2004, 429:870-873. doi: 10.1038/nature02619
[10]	Rojstaczer S, Sterling S M, Moore N J. Human appropriation of photosynjournal products[J]. Science, 2001, 294:2549-2552. pmid: 11752576
[11]	Haberl H, Erb K H, Krausmann F, et al. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems[J]. PNAS, 2007, 104(31):12942-12947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704243104
[12]	Haberl H, Plutzar C, Erb K-H, et al. Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2005, 110:119-131. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.03.009
[13]	Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F. Human appropriation of net primary production: Patterns, trends, and planetary boundaries[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2014, 39(1):363-391. doi: 10.1146/energy.2014.39.issue-1
[14]	Zaks D P M, Ramankutty N, Barford C C, et al. From Miami to Madison: Investigating the relationship between climate and terrestrial net primary production[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2007, 21(3): GB3004. doi: 10.1029/2006GB002705. doi: 10.1029/2006GB002705
[15]	Zhang Y J, Pan Y, Zhang X Z, et al. Patterns and dynamics of the human appropriation of net primary production and its components in Tibet[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 210:280-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.039
[16]	Huang X T, Luo G P, Han Q F. Temporospatial patterns of human appropriation of net primary production in Central Asia grasslands[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 91:555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.045
[17]	Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice I C, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model[J]. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(2):161-185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x
[18]	Pritchard R, Ryan C M, Grundy I, et al. Human appropriation of net primary productivity and rural livelihoods: Findings from six villages in Zimbabwe[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 146:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.003
[19]	Krausmann F, Erb K H, Gingrich S, et al. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(3):471-487. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.012
[20]	Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Giljum S, et al. Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2011, 15(6):855-876. doi: 10.1111/jiec.2011.15.issue-6
[21]	Niedertscheider M, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, et al. Exploring the effects of drastic institutional and socio-economic changes on land system dynamics in Germany between 1883 and 2007[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 28:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.006
[22]	Niedertscheider M, Erb K. Land system change in Italy from 1884 to 2007: Analysing the North-South divergence on the basis of an integrated indicator framework[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 39:366-375. pmid: 25844007
[23]	Zhou C B, Elshkaki A, Graedel T E. Global human appropriation of net primary production and associated resource decoupling: 2010-2050[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(3):1208-1215. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04665
[24]	Krausmann F. Land use and industrial modernization: An empirical analysis of human influence on the functioning of ecosystems in Austria 1830-1995[J]. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00042-9
[25]	Musel A. Human appropriation of net primary production in the United Kingdom, 1800-2000: Changes in society's impact on ecological energy flows during the agrarian-industrial transition[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(2):270-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.012
[26]	Kohlheb N, Krausmann F. Land use change, biomass production and HANPP: The case of Hungary 1961-2005[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(2):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.010
[27]	Schwarzlmüller E. Human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in Spain, 1955-2003: An empirical analysis of the industrialization of land use[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(2):282-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.016
[28]	Vačkář D, Orlitová E. Human appropriation of aboveground photosynthetic production in the Czech Republic[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2011, 11(3):519-529. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0167-8
[29]	Fetzel T, Gradwohl M, Erb K H. Conversion, intensification, and abandonment: A human appropriation of net primary production approach to analyze historic land-use dynamics in New Zealand 1860-2005[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 97:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.002
[30]	Gingrich S, Niedertscheider M, Kastner T, et al. Exploring long-term trends in land use change and aboveground human appropriation of net primary production in nine European countries[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 47:426-438. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.027
[31]	Kastner T. Trajectories in human domination of ecosystems: Human appropriation of net primary production in the Philippines during the 20th century[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.019
[32]	Niedertscheider M, Gingrich S, Erb K H. Changes in land use in South Africa between 1961 and 2006: An integrated socio-ecological analysis based on the human appropriation of net primary production framework[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2012, 12(4):715-727. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0285-6
[33]	Fetzel T, Niedertscheider M, Haberl H, et al. Patterns and changes of land use and land-use efficiency in Africa 1980-2005: An analysis based on the human appropriation of net primary production framework[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16(5):1507-1520. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0891-1
[34]	Chen A F, Li R Y, Wang H L, et al. Quantitative assessment of human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015, 312:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.017
[35]	Renard D, Rhemtulla J M, Bennett E M. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles[J]. PNAS, 2015, 112(43):13411-13416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502565112
[36]	Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Haberl H, et al. Long-term trajectories of the human appropriation of net primary production: Lessons from six national case studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 77:129-138. pmid: 23565034
[37]	Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, et al. Assessing nature's contributions to people[J]. Science, 2018, 359:270-272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826
[38]	Lorel C, Plutzar C, Erb K-H, et al. Linking the human appropriation of net primary productivity-based indicators, input cost and high nature value to the dimensions of land-use intensity across French agricultural landscapes[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 283:106565. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.06.004. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.06.004
[39]	deSouza P, Malhi Y. Land use change in India (1700-2000) as examined through the lens of human appropriation of net primary productivity[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2018, 22(5):1202-1212. doi: 10.1111/jiec.2018.22.issue-5
[40]	陈红宁. 基于人类占用的净初级生产力的土地集约利用研究: 以陕西省为例[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2015.
	[ Chen Hongning. The study of intensive land use based on the human appropriation of net primary production: A case of Shaanxi Province. Xi'an, China: Northwest University, 2015. ]
[41]	Andersen C, Donovan R, Quinn J. Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in an agriculturally-dominated watershed, southeastern USA[J]. Land, 2015, 4(2):513-540. doi: 10.3390/land4020513
[42]	Plutzar C, Kroisleitner C, Haberl H, et al. Changes in the spatial patterns of human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in Europe 1990-2006[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16(5):1225-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0820-3
[43]	Haberl H, Plutzar C, Erb K-H, et al. Human appropriation of net primary production as determinant of avifauna diversity in Austria[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2005, 110(3/4):119-131. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.03.009
[44]	Tello E, Marull J, Padró R, et al. The loss of landscape ecological functionality in the Barcelona Province (1956-2009): Could land-use history involve a legacy for current biodiversity?[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(6):2238. doi: 10.3390/su12062238. doi: 10.3390/su12062238
[45]	Cardoch L, Day Jr J W, Ibàñez C. Net primary productivity as an indicator of sustainability in the Ebro and Mississippi deltas[J]. Ecological Applications, 2002, 12(4):1044-1055. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1044:NPPAAI]2.0.CO;2
[46]	彭建, 王仰麟, 吴健生. 净初级生产力的人类占用: 一种衡量区域可持续发展的新方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(1):153-158.
	[ Peng Jian, Wang Yanglin, Wu Jiansheng. Human appropriation of net primary production: An approach for ecological assessment of regional sustainable development. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(1):153-158. ]
[47]	龙爱华, 王浩, 程国栋, 等. 黑河流域中游地区净初级生产力的人类占用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(4):853-858.
	[ Long Aihua, Wang Hao, Cheng Guodong, et al. Human appropriation of net primary production in the middle reach of Heihe River basin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(4):853-858. ]
[48]	Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Anderson S, et al. The future value of ecosystem services: Global scenarios and national implications[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26:289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.004
[49]	Pan Y, Wu J X, Xu Z R. Analysis of the tradeoffs between provisioning and regulating services from the perspective of varied share of net primary production in an alpine grassland ecosystem[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2014, 17:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.11.001
[50]	Zhang Y J, Pan Y, Li M, et al. Impacts of human appropriation of net primary production on ecosystem regulating services in Tibet[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 47:101231. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101231. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101231
[51]	武俊喜, 潘影, 李振男, 等. 基于NPP分配的生产和生态功能协同提升模式: 以西藏拉萨河谷半农半牧村为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11):4596-4605.
	[ Wu Junxi, Pan Ying, Li Zhennan, et al. An ecological restoration mode to synergized improve production and ecological capacity based on the NPP components analysis: A case study of the semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral village in the valley area of Tibet. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(11):4596-4605. ]
[52]	Jenkins D G, Haberl H, Erb K H, et al. Global human "predation" on plant growth and biomass[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2020, 29(6):1052-1064. doi: 10.1111/geb.v29.6
[53]	Chen B X, Zhang X Z, Tao J, et al. The impact of climate change and anthropogenic activities on alpine grassland over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 189/190:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.002
[54]	Zhou W, Gang C C, Zhou F C, et al. Quantitative assessment of the individual contribution of climate and human factors to desertification in northwest China using net primary productivity as an indicator[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 48:560-569. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.043
[55]	Li S C, Zhang Y L, Wang Z F, et al. Mapping human influence intensity in the Tibetan Plateau for conservation of ecological service functions[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 30:276-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.003
[56]	Li S C, Wu J S, Gong J, et al. Human footprint in Tibet: Assessing the spatial layout and effectiveness of nature reserves[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.216
[57]	方恺. 足迹家族研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(24):7974-7986.
	[ Fang Kai. Footprint family: Current practices, challenges and future prospects. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(24):7974-7986. ]
[58]	Haberl H, Wackernagel M, Krausmann F, et al. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: A comparison[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3):279-288. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.008
[59]	Helmut Haberl. 生态足迹与人类初级生产力占用的比较[J]. 李蕾, 译. 国土资源情报, 2005(1):18-23.
	[ Haberl H. A comparison of ecological footprints and human primary production. Translated by Li Lei. Land and Resources Information, 2005(1):18-23. ]
[60]	Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, et al. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The national footprint accounts' underlying methodology and framework[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 24:518-533. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005
[61]	Morel A C, Adu Sasu M, Adu-Bredu S, et al. Carbon dynamics, net primary productivity and human-appropriated net primary productivity across a forest-cocoa farm landscape in West Africa[J]. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25(8):2661-2677. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2019.25.issue-8
[62]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 韩燕, 等. 人地系统远程耦合的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2):310-326. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.02.012
	[ Ma Enpu, Cai Jianming, Han Yan, et al. Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of Human-Earth system. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(2):310-326. ]

指标/方法	优点	缺点
潜在和遥感NPP趋势分析法	可用于区分气候变化和人类活动对生态系统的影响	适用于草地,但不适用于农田、森林等土地利用/覆被类型
人类影响强度	打分法计算简便、结果直观	较主观,半定量结果
人类足迹	打分法计算简便、结果直观	较主观,半定量结果
生态足迹	综合、定量、应用广泛	衡量需求而非强度
HANPP	适用所有土地利用/覆被类型;得到以碳为单位的结果,定量、直观;可深入解析人类活动的结构、格局和变化趋势;与生态系统结构、功能、服务、土地利用、生物多样性、可持续发展等均有关	计算方法比较复杂,更适用于社会经济依赖自然系统的地区

净初级生产力的人类占用研究进展

Human appropriation of net primary production: A review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 62

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	薛冰, 赵冰玉, 李京忠. 地理学视角下城市复杂性研究综述——基于近20年文献回顾[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 157-172.
[2]	张文佳, 鲁大铭. 行为地理学的方法论与微观人地关系研究范式[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 27-39.
[3]	塔娜, 柴彦威. 行为地理学的学科定位与前沿方向[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 1-15.
[4]	邱坚坚, 刘毅华, 袁利, 陈澄静, 黄清瑶. 人地系统耦合下生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(6): 1060-1072.
[5]	黄逸恒, 朱竑, 尹铎. 西方政治生态学的地理学研究进展与启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(12): 2153-2162.
[6]	李玉恒, 黄惠倩, 宋传垚. 贫困地区乡村经济韧性研究及其启示——以河北省阳原县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1839-1846.
[7]	曹可心, 邓羽. 可持续城市更新的时空演进路径及驱动机理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1942-1955.
[8]	李小建, 胡雪瑶, 史焱文, 杨慧敏. 乡村振兴下的聚落研究——来自经济地理学视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 3-14.
[9]	曾国军, 徐雨晨, 王龙杰, 钟淑如. 从在地化、去地化到再地化：中国城镇化进程中的人地关系转型[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 28-39.
[10]	陈睿山, 赵志强, 徐迪, 陈轶. 城市和城市群可持续发展指数研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[11]	吴健生, 李铠杨, 赵宇豪. 基于改进三维足迹模型的关中地区土地自然资本利用状况分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8): 1345-1355.
[12]	李玉恒, 宋传垚, 阎佳玉, 黄惠倩. 深度贫困地区乡村地域系统演化研究——以河北省阳原县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 951-959.
[13]	刘采, 张海燕, 李迁. 1980—2018年海南岛人类活动强度时空变化特征及其驱动机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 567-576.
[14]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 韩燕, 廖柳文, 林静. 人地系统远程耦合的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 310-326.
[15]	成超男, 胡杨, 赵鸣. 城市绿色空间格局时空演变及其生态系统服务评价的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.