可持续城市更新的时空演进路径及驱动机理研究进展与展望

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.012

地理科学进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 1942-1955.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.012

可持续城市更新的时空演进路径及驱动机理研究进展与展望

曹可心¹^,²(), 邓羽¹^,^*()

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-05-28 修回日期:2021-07-20 出版日期:2021-11-28 发布日期:2021-11-25
通讯作者: *邓羽(1985— ),男,湖北恩施人,博士,副研究员,研究方向为城市发展与空间管治。E-mail: dengy@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:曹可心(1996— ),女,陕西渭南人,博士生,主要从事城市地理与城市发展研究。E-mail: caokx. 18s@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41601164);中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2019055);中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所优秀人才基金(2017RC202)

Spatio-temporal evolution path and driving mechanisms of sustainable urban renewal: Progress and perspective

CAO Kexin¹^,²(), DENG Yu¹^,^*()

1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-05-28 Revised:2021-07-20 Online:2021-11-28 Published:2021-11-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41601164);Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences(2019055);Excellent Talents Program of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences(2017RC202)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城市更新是构建可持续城市和落实中国高质量发展战略的重要手段。为综合认知可持续城市更新时空演进路径和协同驱动机理,论文梳理了可持续城市更新研究概况,凝练其时空演进路径和区域差异,解析影响因素、驱动机理和典型空间响应模式,并从理论和政策维度进行研究展望。研究发现：① 可持续城市更新形成了从“发展瓶颈倒逼”到“可持续愿景牵引”的时空演进路径,同时在时序化进程、本地化过程与空间演进历程中表征出显著的区域差异性;② 综合地理环境影响可持续城市更新的空间模式,利益相关者决定可持续城市更新的组织模式,政府主导、市场主导和多元驱动等组织模式作用于不同时空尺度的功能空间形成了5类典型空间响应模式;③ 可持续城市更新未来研究需聚焦于全球可持续发展和国内高质量发展目标,定量厘清面向可持续城市更新的驱动因子、主控因素和协同机理,建立保障可持续城市发展的城市更新管控方法库与政策集。中国在实践中需要健全“国家—区域—城市”的多尺度管控制度,建立可持续目标导向的城市更新精细化管理系统,并完善多主体协同的城市更新参与机制。

关键词: 城市空间, 城市更新, 可持续发展, 空间调控, 空间组织

Abstract:

Urban renewal is important to global sustainable development and high-quality development strategy in China. In order to understand the spatial-temporal evolution path and driving mechanisms of sustainable urban renewal, this article reviewed the research on sustainable urban renewal, summarized the spatial-temporal evolution path and regional differentiation of sustainable urban renewal, analyzed the driving factors, mechanisms, and spatial response modes, and put forward the research prospects and policy recommendations. The study shows that sustainable urban renewal has changed from problem oriented to sustainable goal oriented. There are regional differentiations in the process of globalization, localization, and temporal evolution. Geographical environment influences the spatial pattern while stakeholders decide the organizational pattern of sustainable urban renewal, and the interaction of these two systems produces five spatial response modes including government-dominant urban redevelopment, government-dominant urban renaissance, market-dominant real estate development, market-dominant industrial development, and multi-stakeholder participation modes. Future research on sustainable urban renewal needs to focus on global sustainable development and high-quality development strategies, quantitatively analyze the driving factors, main control factors, and collaborative mechanism of sustainable urban renewal, as well as establish governance method library and policy set. In practice, China should improve the multi-scale policy, management system, and participation mechanism of multiple stakeholders.

Key words: urban space, urban renewal, sustainable development, space regulation, spatial organization

曹可心, 邓羽. 可持续城市更新的时空演进路径及驱动机理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1942-1955.

CAO Kexin, DENG Yu. Spatio-temporal evolution path and driving mechanisms of sustainable urban renewal: Progress and perspective[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(11): 1942-1955.

图/表 5

参考文献 68

[1]	诸大建. 序言: 探讨全球可持续发展目标的理论基础、指标体系与区域实践[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(1):9.
	[ Zhu Dajian. Preface: Discuss the theoretical basis, indicator system and regional practice of the global sustainable development goals. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(1):9. ]
[2]	United Nations. The sustainable development goals report 2020 [R]. New York, USA: United Nations, 2020.
[3]	严若谷, 周素红, 闫小培. 城市更新之研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(8):947-955.
	[ Yan Ruogu, Zhou Suhong, Yan Xiaopei. Studies of urban regeneration. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(8):947-955. ]
[4]	Carmon N. Three generations of urban renewal policies: Analysis and policy implications[J]. Geoforum, 1999, 30(2):145-158. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00012-3
[5]	丁凡, 伍江. 城市更新相关概念的演进及在当今的现实意义[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(6):87-95.
	[ Ding Fan, Wu Jiang. The evolution of the concept of urban regeneration and the practical connotation in today's society. Urban Planning Forum, 2017(6):87-95. ]
[6]	Zheng H W, Shen G Q, Wang H. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 41:272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
[7]	Deng Y, Fu B J, Sun C Z. Effects of urban planning in guiding urban growth: Evidence from Shenzhen, China[J]. Cities, 2018, 83:118-128. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.014
[8]	Qiu R X, Xu W. Modes of land development in Shanghai[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 61:475-486. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.006
[9]	Nesticò A, Elia C, Naddeo V. Sustainability of urban regeneration projects: Novel selection model based on analytic network process and zero-one goal programming[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 99:104831. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104831. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104831
[10]	Korkmaz C, Balaban O. Sustainability of urban regeneration in Turkey: Assessing the performance of the North Ankara Urban Regeneration Project[J]. Habitat International, 2020, 95:102081. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102081. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102081
[11]	邓羽, 陈田, 刘盛和. 城市物质空间更新研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(5):540-548. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.05.002
	[ Deng Yu, Chen Tian, Liu Shenghe. Progress and prospects of urban regeneration research. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(5):540-548. ]
[12]	Hackworth J, Smith N. The changing state of gentrification[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2001, 92(4):464-477. doi: 10.1111/tesg.2001.92.issue-4
[13]	Couch C, Sykes O, Börstinghaus W. Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency[J]. Progress in Planning, 2011, 75:1-52. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001
[14]	董玛力, 陈田, 王丽艳. 西方城市更新发展历程和政策演变[J]. 人文地理, 2009, 24(5):42-46.
	[ Dong Mali, Chen Tian, Wang Liyan. Development course and policy evolution of urban renewal in western cities. Human Geography, 2009, 24(5):42-46. ]
[15]	Couch C, Dennemann A. Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain: The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership[J]. Cities, 2000, 17(2):137-147. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00008-1
[16]	Weber R. Selling city futures: The financialization of urban redevelopment policy[J]. Economic Geography, 2010, 86(3):251-274. doi: 10.1111/ecge.2010.86.issue-3
[17]	Lehrer U, Laidley J. Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2008, 32(4):786-803. doi: 10.1111/ijur.2008.32.issue-4
[18]	Miles M. Interruptions: Testing the rhetoric of culturally led urban development[J]. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(5/6):889-911. doi: 10.1080/00420980500107375
[19]	MacLeod G. From urban entrepreneurialism to a "revanchist city"? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow's renaissance[J]. Antipode, 2002, 34(3):602-624. doi: 10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
[20]	Zhang Y, Fang K. Is history repeating itself ? From urban renewal in the United States to inner-city redevelopment in China[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2004, 23(3):286-298. doi: 10.1177/0739456X03261287
[21]	Fainstein S S. Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2008, 32(4):768-785. doi: 10.1111/ijur.2008.32.issue-4
[22]	张晓玲. 可持续发展理论: 概念演变、维度与展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(1):10-19.
	[ Zhang Xiaoling. Theory of sustainable development: Concept evolution, dimension and prospect. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(1):10-19. ]
[23]	Ferilli G, Sacco P L, Tavano Blessi G, et al. Power to the people: When culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not)[J]. European Planning Studies, 2017, 25(2):241-258. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1259397
[24]	Degen M, García M. The transformation of the 'Barcelona Model': An analysis of culture, urban regeneration and governance[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2012, 36(5):1022-1038. doi: 10.1111/ijur.2012.36.issue-5
[25]	Evans G. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy[J]. Urban Studies, 2009, 46(5/6):1003-1040. doi: 10.1177/0042098009103853
[26]	修春亮, 魏冶, 王绮. 基于“规模—密度—形态”的大连市城市韧性评估[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12):2315-2328. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812004
	[ Xiu Chunliang, Wei Ye, Wang Qi. Evaluation of urban resilience of Dalian city based on the perspective of "Size-Density-Morphology". Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(12):2315-2328. ]
[27]	González S. Bilbao and Barcelona 'in motion'. How urban regeneration 'models' travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism[J]. Urban Studies, 2011, 48(7):1397-1418. doi: 10.1177/0042098010374510
[28]	Lai Y N, Zhang X L. Redevelopment of industrial sites in the Chinese 'villages in the city': An empirical study of Shenzhen[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 134:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.037
[29]	Gao J L, Chen W, Yuan F. Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 68:604-613. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.021
[30]	Kunc J, Martinát S, Tonev P, et al. Destiny of urban brownfields: Spatial patterns and perceived consequences of post-socialistic deindustrialization[J]. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2014, 10(41):109-128.
[31]	Shin H B. Residential redevelopment and the entrepreneurial local state: The implications of Beijing's shifting emphasis on urban redevelopment policies[J]. Urban Studies, 2009, 46(13):2815-2839. doi: 10.1177/0042098009345540
[32]	Wu F L. Residential relocation under market-oriented redevelopment: The process and outcomes in urban China[J]. Geoforum, 2004, 35(4):453-470. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.10.001
[33]	Liu C, Deng Y, Song W X, et al. Rethinking the geography of gentrification: From a scale perspective[J]. Geoforum, 2021, 118:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.10.004
[34]	Power A. Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?[J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(12):4487-4501. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.022
[35]	He S J, Wu F L. Socio-spatial impacts of property-led redevelopment on China's urban neighbourhoods[J]. Cities, 2007, 24(3):194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.001
[36]	Zheng W, Shen G Q, Wang H, et al. Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 69:361-371. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.019
[37]	隋洪鑫, 杨秀, 徐姗, 等. 城市功能空间更新研究进展与新时期重点方向[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(6):1150-1160.
	[ Sui Hongxin, Yang Xiu, Xu Shan, et al. Progress and hot research on urban functional space renewal in the new era. Tropical Geography, 2020, 40(6):1150-1160. ]
[38]	Riera Pérez M G, Laprise M, Rey E. Fostering sustainable urban renewal at the neighborhood scale with a spatial decision support system[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 38:440-451. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.038
[39]	Frantal B, Kunc J, Klusacek P, et al. Assessing success factors of brownfields regeneration: International and inter-stakeholder perspective[J]. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2015, 11(44):91-107.
[40]	Dixon T, Otsuka N, Abe H. Critical success factors in urban brownfield regeneration: An analysis of 'hardcore' sites in Manchester and Osaka during the economic recession (2009-10)[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2011, 43(4):961-980. doi: 10.1068/a43468
[41]	Wang H, Shen Q P, Tang B S, et al. A framework of decision-making factors and supporting information for facilitating sustainable site planning in urban renewal projects[J]. Cities, 2014, 40:44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.04.005
[42]	Frantál B, Greer-Wootten B, Klusáček P, et al. Exploring spatial patterns of urban brownfields regeneration: The case of Brno, Czech Republic[J]. Cities, 2015, 44:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.007
[43]	Munneke H J, Womack K S. Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2015, 54:99-115. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.08.001
[44]	Lee G K L, Chan E H W. Factors affecting urban renewal in high-density city: Case study of Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2008, 134(3):140-148. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:3(140)
[45]	Zheng W, Shen G, Wang H, et al. Critical issues in spatial distribution of public housing estates and their implications on urban renewal in Hong Kong[J]. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2015, 4(2):172-187. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-09-2014-0047
[46]	Nogués S, Arroyo N L. Alternative approach to prioritization of brownfield reclamation attending to urban development potentialities: Case study in a depressed industrial district in northern Spain[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2016, 142(1). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000272. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000272
[47]	Unsal B O. State-led urban regeneration in Istanbul: Power struggles between interest groups and poor communities[J]. Housing Studies, 2015, 30(8):1299-1316. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1021765
[48]	Helms A C. Understanding gentrification: An empirical analysis of the determinants of urban housing renovation[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2003, 54(3):474-498. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00081-0
[49]	Osman R, Frantál B, Klusáček P, et al. Factors affecting brownfield regeneration in post-socialist space: The case of the Czech Republic[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 48:309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.003
[50]	Abdullahi S, Pradhan B. Sustainable brownfields land use change modeling using GIS-based weights-of-evidence approach[J]. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2016, 9(1):21-38. doi: 10.1007/s12061-015-9139-1
[51]	Ruelle C, Halleux J M, Teller J. Landscape quality and brownfield regeneration: A community investigation approach inspired by landscape preference studies[J]. Landscape Research, 2013, 38(1):75-99. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2011.647898
[52]	Dubé J, Desaulniers S, Bédard L P, et al. Urban residential reconversion through demolition: A land use model based on administrative spatial micro-data[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 76:686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.052
[53]	Zhou T, Zhao R, Zhou Y L. Factors influencing land development and redevelopment during China's rapid urbanization: Evidence from Haikou City, 2003-2016[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(11). doi: 10.3390/su9112011. doi: 10.3390/su9112011
[54]	Hin L L, Xin L. Redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen, China: An analysis of power relations and urban coalitions[J]. Habitat International, 2011, 35(3):426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.001
[55]	He S J, Wu F L. Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi Redevelopment Project in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2005, 27(1):1-23.
[56]	Adair A, Berry J, McGreal S, et al. Evaluation of investor behaviour in urban regeneration[J]. Urban Studies, 1999, 36(12):2031-2045. doi: 10.1080/0042098992520
[57]	He S J. State-sponsored gentrification under market transition: The case of Shanghai[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2007, 43(2):171-198. doi: 10.1177/1078087407305175
[58]	Weber R. Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment[J]. Antipode, 2002, 34(3):519-540. doi: 10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
[59]	Gao J L, Chen W, Liu Y S. Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: II. A case study of the redevelopment of a local state-owned enterprise in Nanjing[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 72:372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.006
[60]	Zhou T, Zhou Y L, Liu G W. Key variables for decision-making on urban renewal in China: A case study of Chongqing[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(3). doi: 10.3390/su9030370. doi: 10.3390/su9030370
[61]	Schilling J, Logan J. Greening the rust belt a green infrastructure model for right sizing America's shrinking cities[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2008, 74(4):451-466. doi: 10.1080/01944360802354956
[62]	Chiang Hsieh L H Noonan D. The closer the better? Examining support for a large urban redevelopment project in Atlanta[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2018, 40(2):246-260. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2017.1319232
[63]	Harvey D. The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1978, 2:101-131. doi: 10.1111/ijur.1978.2.issue-1-3
[64]	Smith N. Toward a theory of gentrification a back to the city movement by capital, not people[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1979, 45(4):538-548. doi: 10.1080/01944367908977002
[65]	宋伟轩, 刘春卉, 汪毅, 等. 基于“租差”理论的城市居住空间中产阶层化研究: 以南京内城为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12):2115-2130. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201712001
	[ Song Weixuan, Liu Chunhui, Wang Yi, et al. Rent gap and gentrification in the inner city of Nanjing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12):2115-2130. ]
[66]	Hastings A. Unravelling the process of 'partnership' in urban regeneration policy[J]. Urban Studies, 1996, 33(2):253-268. doi: 10.1080/00420989650011997
[67]	Adams D, Hastings E M. Urban renewal in Hong Kong: Transition from development corporation to renewal authority[J]. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18(3):245-258. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00019-9
[68]	Steinberg F. Conservation and rehabilitation of urban heritage in developing countries[J]. Habitat International, 1996, 20(3):463-475. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(96)00012-4

可持续城市更新的时空演进路径及驱动机理研究进展与展望

Spatio-temporal evolution path and driving mechanisms of sustainable urban renewal: Progress and perspective

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 68

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	吴磊, 李贵才, 晁恒, 黎斌. 新时代发展中国城市政治地理学的思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(5): 858-869.
[2]	李玉恒, 黄惠倩, 宋传垚. 贫困地区乡村经济韧性研究及其启示——以河北省阳原县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1839-1846.
[3]	温士贤, 廖健豪, 蔡浩辉, 陈晓亮. 城镇化进程中历史街区的空间重构与文化实践——广州永庆坊案例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 161-170.
[4]	陈睿山, 赵志强, 徐迪, 陈轶. 城市和城市群可持续发展指数研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[5]	吴健生, 李铠杨, 赵宇豪. 基于改进三维足迹模型的关中地区土地自然资本利用状况分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8): 1345-1355.
[6]	李玉恒, 宋传垚, 阎佳玉, 黄惠倩. 深度贫困地区乡村地域系统演化研究——以河北省阳原县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 951-959.
[7]	杨蓉, 刘晨, 薛德升. 全球化背景下基于宗教地理的西方城市空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 153-165.
[8]	张军泽, 王帅, 赵文武, 刘焱序, 傅伯杰. 地球界限概念框架及其研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 465-476.
[9]	王成, 李颢颖, 何焱洲, 马小苏, 周明茗. 重庆直辖以来乡村人居环境可持续发展力及其时空分异研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 556-566.
[10]	姜玉培, 甄峰, 王文文, 赵梦妮. 城市建成环境对居民身体活动的影响研究进展与启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 357-369.
[11]	段亚明, 刘勇, 刘秀华, 何东. 基于宜出行大数据的多中心空间结构分析——以重庆主城区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1957-1967.
[12]	徐银凤, 汪德根. 中国城市空间结构的高铁效应研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230.
[13]	汤青, 李扬, 陈明星, 徐勇. 半城镇化农民可持续生计与农村可持续发展——理论框架、研究进展及未来展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1022-1030.
[14]	杨喜平, 方志祥. 移动定位大数据视角下的人群移动模式及城市空间结构研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 880-889.
[15]	申悦, 柴彦威. 基于日常活动空间的社会空间分异研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(6): 853-862.