人地系统耦合下生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展与展望

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.06.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

21世纪以来生态系统服务退化与人类需求提升间的矛盾愈发激烈,如何有效推进生态系统服务与人类福祉的协调平衡成为当前可持续发展的核心主题。论文通过梳理生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究的阶段演进发现,现有研究主要从服务对福祉的影响与福祉对服务的反馈切入,逐步聚焦到供需关系与空间流动、权衡/协同的利益博弈、文化服务的价值化、生态补偿与付费、优化调控与可持续管理等二者相互作用关系的实践上。但目前的关系研究仍以“级联框架的‘影响链条’”为主导,缺少测度直接交互作用的技术路径,理论体系匮乏,面向可持续管理的应用支撑较弱,而同时二者逐渐形成非线性交互关系,亟需在人地系统耦合框架下寻求综合集成范式经验以推进理论创新。因此,论文提出从级联到耦合的关系研究新思路,以生态系统服务与人类福祉的耦合研究来系统辨析其交互胁迫效应及内在动力演化机理,同时探索性构建耦合研究的理论框架与技术思路,丰富人地系统耦合的关键命题。以此为基础,未来研究还需着重从交互作用关系的梳理出发,深化耦合效应解耦、传导机制与动态集成、基于服务与福祉协调的可持续优化等领域研究,促进有序协调的生态文明发展。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 人类福祉, 人地系统耦合, 相互作用关系, 耦合, 研究框架

Abstract:

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the conflict between the degradation of ecosystem services (ES) and the increase of human needs has become increasingly intensified. How to improve the interrelationship between ecosystem services and human well-being (HWB) towards a coordinated and balanced state naturally becomes a core theme of sustainable development. Based on the reviews of ES-HWB interrelationship through three phrases, the existing research mainly started from the influences of ES on and responses to HWB, and further focused on the practices of their interrelationship through some key fields including supply-demand relationship and spatial flows, trade-offs/synergies, valuation of cultural ecosystem services, payments for ecosystem services, and optimized regulation and sustainable management. However, the interrelationship research is still led by "influence chain" of the ES cascade while distinct deficiencies exist in terms of theoretical framing, technical methods of direct interrelationship measurement, and support applied for sustainable management. Moreover, the ES-HWB interrelationship tends to become more nonlinear, which urges for certain theoretical innovation from synthetic integration paradigm of the coupled human and natural system framework. This article, therefore, proposed a new path for the ES-HWB interrelationship research—from cascade to coupling, with which the interactive coercing effect and its intrinsic dynamic change mechanism are clear to distinguish in a systematic way. On this basis, an exploratory theoretical research framework of ES-HWB coupling was built with a main thread of "interactive coercing effect measurement-coupling relationship deconstruction-coupled pattern and process evolution-coordinated management and application", so were the technical coupling approaches. In such regards, the ES-HWB coupling research is bound to develop as a pivotal issue enriching the coupled human and natural system studies. First, there is a need to untangle ES-HWB interrelationship as a foundation. Then, further in-depth research should be enriched to achieve the orderly and coordinated development oriented by ecological civilization, including the decoupling of coupled interactions, transmission mechanism and dynamic integration, human needs-oriented differentiated evolution, and sustainable optimization based on the ES-HWB coordination.

Key words: ecosystem services, human well-being, coupled human and natural system, interrelationship, coupling, research framework

邱坚坚, 刘毅华, 袁利, 陈澄静, 黄清瑶. 人地系统耦合下生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(6): 1060-1072.

QIU Jianjian, LIU Yihua, YUAN Li, CHEN Chengjing, HUANG Qingyao. Research progress and prospect of the interrelationship between ecosystem services and human well-being in the context of coupled human and natural system[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(6): 1060-1072.

图/表 1

参考文献 94

[1]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis [M]. Washington D C, USA: Island Press, 2005: 1-17.
[2]	Grimm N B, Faeth S H, Golubiewski N E, et al. Global change and the ecology of cities[J]. Science, 2008,319:756-760. doi: 10.1126/science.1150195
[3]	陆大道. 关于“十四五”规划: 领域与认识[J]. 地理科学, 2020,40(1):1-5.
	[ Lu Dadao. About the 14th Five Year Plan: Field and understanding. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(1):1-5. ]
[4]	李双成, 刘金龙, 张才玉, 等. 生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式[J]. 地理学报, 2011,66(12):1618-1630.
	[ Li Shuangcheng, Liu Jinlong, Zhang Caiyu, et al. The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(12):1618-1630. ]
[5]	Hansen M H, Li H T, Svarverud R. Ecological civilization: Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2018,53:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014
[6]	Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[7]	Daily G C. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems [M]. Washington D C, USA: Island Press, 1997.
[8]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment [M]. Washington D C, USA: Island Press, 2003.
[9]	Breslow S J, Sojka B, Barnea R, et al. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016,66:250-259.
[10]	赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 等. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(1):139-151. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015
	[ Zhao Wenwu, Liu Yue, Feng Qiang, et al. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(1):139-151. ]
[11]	Potschin-Young M, Haines-Young R, Görg C, et al. Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,29:428-440. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.015 pmid: 31008045
[12]	Dawson N, Martin A. Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: A disaggregated study in western Rwanda[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015,117:62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.018
[13]	Summers J K, Smith L M, Case J L, et al. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services[J]. AMBIO, 2012,41(4):327-340. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0256-7 pmid: 22581385
[14]	Smith L M, Case J L, Smith H M, et al. Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013,28:79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.032
[15]	Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, et al. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being[J]. Environmental Conservation, 2011,38(4):370-379. doi: 10.1017/S0376892911000506
[16]	Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,28:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
[17]	Xu Z H, Wei H J, Fan W G, et al. Relationships between ecosystem services and human well-being changes based on carbon flow: A case study of the Manas River Basin, Xinjiang, China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019,37:100934. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100934. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100934
[18]	Milcu A I, Hanspach J, Abson D, et al. Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research[J]. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(3):44. doi: 10.5751/ES-05790-180344.
[19]	Chan K M A, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012,74:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
[20]	Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Tengö M, et al. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: Why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?[J]. BioScience, 2010,60:576-589. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4
[21]	Duraiappah A K. Ecosystem services and human well-being: Do global findings make any sense?[J]. BioScience, 2011,61:7-8. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.2
[22]	King M F, Renó V F, Novo E M L M. The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: A literature review[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2014,116(3):681-698. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0
[23]	李琰, 李双成, 高阳, 等. 连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架[J]. 地理学报, 2013,68(8):1038-1047.
	[ Li Yan, Li Shuangcheng, Gao Yang, et al. Ecosystem services and hierarchic human well-being: Concepts and service classification framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(8):1038-1047. ]
[24]	Tibesigwa B, Ntuli H, Lokina R. Valuing recreational ecosystem services in developing cities: The case of urban parks in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania[J]. Cities, 2020,106:102853. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102853. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102853
[25]	Aguado M, González J A, Bellott K, et al. Exploring subjective well-being and ecosystem services perception along a rural-urban gradient in the high Andes of Ecuador[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,34:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.002
[26]	Robinson B E, Zheng H, Peng W J. Disaggregating livelihood dependence on ecosystem services to inform land management[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019,36:100902. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100902. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100902
[27]	Fulford R S, Smith L M, Harwell M, et al. Human well-being differs by community type: Toward reference points in a human well-being indicator useful for decision support[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015,56:194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.003
[28]	Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming G S, et al. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social-ecological approach[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2013,11(5):268-273. doi: 10.1890/120144
[29]	Fisher B, Turner R K. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008,141(5):1167-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019
[30]	Daw T M, Hicks C C, Brown K, et al. Elasticity in ecosystem services: Exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being[J]. Ecology and Society, 2016,21(2):11. doi: 10.5751/ES-08173-210211.
[31]	Fedele G, Locatelli B, Djoudi H. Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,28:43-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011
[32]	Nassl M, Löffler J. Ecosystem services in coupled social-ecological systems: Closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback[J]. AMBIO, 2015,44(8):737-749. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0651-y
[33]	王圣云. 多维转向与福祉地理学研究框架重构[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011,30(6):739-745.
	[ Wang Shengyun. Multidimensional turns and research frame re-construction of well-being geography. Progress in Geography, 2011,30(6):739-745. ]
[34]	Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment[J]. PNAS, 2009,106:1305-1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
[35]	Yang W, Dietz T, Kramer D B, et al. Going beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: An index system of human well-being[J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(5):e64582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064582
[36]	Bennett E M, Cramer W, Begossi A, et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2015,14:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007
[37]	Gissi E, Burkhard B, Verburg P H. Ecosystem services: Building informed policies to orient landscape dynamics[J]. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, 2015,11:185-189.
[38]	彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 等. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(6):960-973. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201706002
	[ Peng Jian, Hu Xiaoxu, Zhao Mingyue, et al. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(6):960-973. ]
[39]	Cruz-Garcia G S, Sachet E, Blundo-Canto G, et al. To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,25:201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.005
[40]	Villamagna A M, Angermeier P L, Bennett E M. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2013,15(5):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
[41]	Geijzendorffer I R, Martín-López B, Roche P K. Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015,52:320-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016
[42]	Mouchet M A, Lamarque P, Martín-López B, et al. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,28:298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
[43]	Boerema A, Rebelo A J, Bodi M B, et al. Are ecosystem services adequately quantified?[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,54(2):358-370. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12696
[44]	Wang L J, Zheng H, Wen Z, et al. Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019,37:100939. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100939. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100939
[45]	Bagstad K J, Villa F, Batker D, et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments[J]. Ecology and Society, 2014,19(2):64. doi: 10.5751/ES-06523-190264.
[46]	Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(3):643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
[47]	Lan X, Tang H P, Liang H G. A theoretical framework for researching cultural ecosystem service flows in urban agglomerations[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,28:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.014
[48]	Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, et al. National parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4:104-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
[49]	Syrbe R U, Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012,21:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
[50]	李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J]. 地理研究, 2013,32(8):1379-1390.
	[ Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013,32(8):1379-1390. ]
[51]	Dearing J A, Yang X, Dong X, et al. Extending the timescale and range of ecosystem services through paleoenvironmental analyses, exemplified in the lower Yangtze Basin[J]. PNAS, 2012,109(18):E1111-E1120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118263109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118263109
[52]	Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, et al. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,28:263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005
[53]	Cord A F, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M, et al. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,28:264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012
[54]	de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010,7:260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
[55]	Fish R, Church A, Winter M. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016,21:208-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002
[56]	La Rosa D, Spyra M, Inostroza L. Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning: A review[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016,61:74-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028
[57]	Christie M, Fazey I, Cooper R, et al. An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012,83:67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012
[58]	Havinga I, Bogaart P W, Hein L, et al. Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,43:101091. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101091. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101091
[59]	Yoshimura N, Hiura T. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,24:68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009
[60]	Brown G, Hausner V H. An empirical analysis of cultural ecosystem values in coastal landscapes[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017,142:49-60.
[61]	Bryce R, Irvine K N, Church A, et al. Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016,21:258-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015
[62]	Wunder S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015,117:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016
[63]	Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):663-674. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
[64]	欧阳志云, 郑华, 岳平. 建立我国生态补偿机制的思路与措施[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(3):686-692.
	[ Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua, Yue Ping. Establishment of ecological compensation mechanisms in China: Perspectives and strategies. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(3):686-692. ]
[65]	Muñoz-Piña C, Guevara A, Torres J M, et al. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):725-736. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
[66]	Pascual U, Muradian R, Rodríguez L C, et al. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(6):1237-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
[67]	Schulz C, Ioris A A R, Martin-Ortega J, et al. Prospects for payments for ecosystem services in the Brazilian Pantanal: A scenario analysis[J]. The Journal of Environment & Development, 2015,24(1):26-53.
[68]	Merlet P, van Hecken G, Rodriguez-Fabilena R. Playing before paying? A PES simulation game for assessing power inequalities and motivations in the governance of ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,34:218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.024
[69]	Bateman I J, Harwood A R, Mace G M, et al. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom[J]. Science, 2013,341:45-50. doi: 10.1126/science.1234379
[70]	Zeng L, Li J, Zhou Z X, et al. Optimizing land use patterns for the Grain for Green Project based on the efficiency of ecosystem services under different objectives[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,114:106347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106347
[71]	马冰滢, 黄姣, 李双成. 基于生态—经济权衡的京津冀城市群土地利用优化配置[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(1):26-37. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.01.003
	[ Ma Bingying, Huang Jiao, Li Shuangcheng. Optimal allocation of land use types in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration based on ecological and economic benefits trade-offs. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(1):26-37. ]
[72]	Jin G, Deng X Z, Chu X, et al. Optimization of land-use management for ecosystem service improvement: A review[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2017,101:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2017.03.003
[73]	Landuyt D, Broekx S, Goethals P L M. Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016,71:327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.015
[74]	Harmáčková Z V, Vačkář D. Future uncertainty in scenarios of ecosystem services provision: Linking differences among narratives and outcomes[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,33:134-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.06.005
[75]	樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):597-607. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804001
	[ Fan Jie. "Territorial System of Human-environment Interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):597-607. ]
[76]	宋长青, 程昌秀, 杨晓帆, 等. 理解地理“耦合”实现地理“集成”[J]. 地理学报, 2020,75(1):3-13. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202001001
	[ Song Chang-qing, Cheng Changxiu, Yang Xiaofan, et al. Understanding geographic coupling and achieving geographic integration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(1):3-13. ]
[77]	Blythe J, Armitage D, Alonso G, et al. Frontiers in coastal well-being and ecosystem services research: A systematic review[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2020,185:105028. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105028.
[78]	王大尚, 李屹峰, 郑华, 等. 密云水库上游流域生态系统服务功能空间特征及其与居民福祉的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(1):70-81.
	[ Wang Dashang, Li Yifeng, Zheng Hua, et al. Ecosystem services' spatial characteristics and their relationships with residents' well-being in Miyun Reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(1):70-81. ]
[79]	刘海猛, 方创琳, 李咏红. 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(8):1489-1507. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908001
	[ Liu Haimeng, Fang Chuanglin, Li Yonghong. The coupled human and natural cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1489-1507. ]
[80]	Li Y F, Li Y, Zhou Y, et al. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012,98:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
[81]	方创琳, 崔学刚, 梁龙武. 城镇化与生态环境耦合圈理论及耦合器调控[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(12):2529-2546. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912008
	[ Fang Chuanglin, Cui Xuegang, Liang Longwu. Theoretical analysis of urbanization and eco-environment coupling coil and coupler control. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(12):2529-2546. ]
[82]	Fang C L, Liu H M, Li G D. International progress and evaluation on interactive coupling effects between urbanization and the eco-environment[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(8):1081-1116. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1317-9
[83]	Caviglia-Harris J L, Chambers D, Kahn J R. Taking the "U" out of Kuznets: A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(4):1149-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
[84]	方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林, 等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径[J]. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):531-550. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201604001
	[ Fang Chuanglin, Zhou Chenghu, Gu Chaolin, et al. Theoretical analysis of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(4):531-550. ]
[85]	Liu J G. Integration across a metacoupled world[J]. Ecology and Society, 2017,22(4):29. doi: 10.5751/ES-09830-220429.
[86]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 韩燕, 等. 人地系统远程耦合的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020,39(2):310-326. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.02.012
	[ Ma Enpu, Cai Jianming, Han Yan, et al. Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of human-earth system. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(2):310-326. ]
[87]	刘春腊, 刘卫东, 陆大道. 生态补偿的地理学特征及内涵研究[J]. 地理研究, 2014,33(5):803-816. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405001
	[ Liu Chunla, Liu Weidong, Lu Dadao. A study of the geographical features and implications of eco-compensation. Geographical Research, 2014,33(5):803-816. ]
[88]	Wei H J, Fan W G, Wang X C, et al. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,25:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017
[89]	Sun Y X, Liu S L, Dong Y H, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution scenarios and the coupling analysis of ecosystem services with land use change in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,681:211-225. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.136
[90]	乔标, 方创琳. 城市化与生态环境协调发展的动态耦合模型及其在干旱区的应用[J]. 生态学报, 2005,25(11):3003-3009.
	[ Qiao Biao, Fang Chuanglin. The dynamic coupling model of the harmonious development between urbanization and eco-environment and its application in arid area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005,25(11):3003-3009. ]
[91]	Liu Y B, Li R D, Li C H. Scenarios simulation of coupling system between urbanization and eco-environment in Jiangsu Province based on system dynamics model[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2005,15(3):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s11769-005-0033-7
[92]	Santos-Martín F, Martín-López B, García-Llorente M, et al. Unraveling the relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing in Spain[J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(9):e73249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073249
[93]	Xiao R, Lin M, Fei X F, et al. Exploring the interactive coercing relationship between urbanization and ecosystem service value in the Shanghai-Hangzhou Bay metropolitan region[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,253:119803. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119803. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119803
[94]	熊鹰, 侯珂伦, 郑偲睿, 等. 基于结构方程模型的南方丘陵山地农户福祉与生态系统服务关系: 以广东省乐昌市为例[J]. 热带地理, 2020,40(5):843-855.
	[ Xiong Ying, Hou Kelun, Zheng Sirui, et al. Relationship between farmer's well-being and ecosystem services in hilly and mountainous areas of South China based on structural equation model: A case study of Lechang in Guangdong Province. Tropical Geography, 2020,40(5):843-855. ]