山区县国土空间规划协同的弹性空间测度——以湖南省茶陵县为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.002

地理科学进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 1085-1094.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.002

山区县国土空间规划协同的弹性空间测度——以湖南省茶陵县为例

傅丽华¹(), 彭耀辉²^,^*(), 谢美³, 莫振淳³, 鲁婵³, 高兴燕¹

1. 湖南工业大学商学院,湖南株洲 412007
2. 中国城市规划设计研究院厦门分院,福建厦门 361001
3. 湖南工业大学城市与环境学院,湖南株洲 412007

收稿日期:2019-06-19 修回日期:2019-09-28 出版日期:2020-07-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
通讯作者: 彭耀辉
作者简介:傅丽华(1971— ),女,湖南永州人,博士,教授,研究方向为土地利用与国土空间规划。E-mail: lihuaf88@163.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金一般项目(18BGL179)

Resilience spatial measurement of coordinated spatial planning in hilly areas: A case study of Chaling County, Hunan Province

FU Lihua¹(), PENG Yaohui²^,^*(), XIE Mei³, MO Zhenchun³, LU Chan³, GAO Xingyan¹

1. College of Business, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China
2. Xiamen Branch of China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Xiamen 361001, Fujian, China
3. College of Urban and Environment, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China

Received:2019-06-19 Revised:2019-09-28 Online:2020-07-28 Published:2020-09-28
Contact: PENG Yaohui
Supported by:
General Projects of the National Social Science Foundation of China(18BGL179)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

县域空间是中国城乡交融最明显的空间规划基本单元,空间发展与约束导致的用途冲突或重叠现象非常突出。论文以典型山区县湖南省茶陵县为研究对象,建立多规协同的国土空间系统弹性评价体系,运用土地利用区间优化及适宜性评价方法确定各类用地的弹性区间,预测不同土地利用类型的空间转移特征,并提出相应的弹性空间差异化管控建议。结果表明：茶陵县域国土空间系统相关社会与经济指标的弹性贡献度较小,弹性综合评价值在整体上低于湖南省平均水平。不同用地类型的弹性规划区间有明显差异,按不同用地类型弹性区间分析,园地、林地、水域、耕地、其他农用地对茶陵县发展弹性承纳贡献值依次降低,分别占总面积的3.47%、2.97%、1.02%、0.90%、0.06%。不同用地弹性空间转移具有显著的带状分布特征,呈现生态用地与农用地、建设用地与农用地、建设用地与生态用地空间等3种类型交叠,生态用地与农用地空间交叠区最大,占总面积的6.41%;其次是建设用地与农用地交叠区,占比0.97%。对不同用地类型的弹性交叠区域尤其农用地转为建设用地应加强差异化管控。弹性空间测度研究为山区县域国土空间规划用途管制提供了差异化的空间管理技术方法和实证。

关键词: 国土空间, 弹性区间, 空间测度, 规划协同, 茶陵县

Abstract:

County space is the basic unit of spatial planning that shows the greatest urban and rural integration in China. The conflicts or overlaps between spatial development and spatial constraint are particularly prominent in county level territorial spatial planning. Chaling County is a typical hilly area in Hunan Province. Based on land use suitability evaluation and resilience spatial measurement, this study developed a land use resilience evaluation system in typical hilly areas, examined the resilience range of various types of land, spatial transfer of different land use types, and the resilience interval and spatial measurement of different land use types in order to analyze the characteristics of the spatial transfer of resilience space and optimization. The results show that the comprehensive evaluation values of land use structure resilience in Chaling County is lower than the average level of Hunan Province, with low contribution of social and economic resilience. Ecological land has the greatest influence on resilience space. From the perspective of resilience range, the largest contribution to future uncertainty county-wide is from woodland (2.97%), garden land (3.47%), cultivated land (0.90%), and water area (1.02%), and the smallest is from other agricultural land (0.06%) and nature reserve land. The spatial resilience transfer of different land use types shows significant zonal distribution characteristics. The largest overlapping area is ecological land and agricultural land, accounting for 6.41% of the total area, followed by construction land and agricultural land, accounting for 0.97% of the total. It is necessary to strengthen differentiated management and control for the resilience overlapping areas of different land use types, especially the transfer from agricultural land to construction land. This study not only provides some support for county territorial spatial planning and resilience interval from a multi-planning coordination perspective, but also contributes a case reference for similar regional management and control measures.

Key words: territorial space, resilience interval, spatial measurement, coordinated planning, Chaling County

傅丽华, 彭耀辉, 谢美, 莫振淳, 鲁婵, 高兴燕. 山区县国土空间规划协同的弹性空间测度——以湖南省茶陵县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1085-1094.

FU Lihua, PENG Yaohui, XIE Mei, MO Zhenchun, LU Chan, GAO Xingyan. Resilience spatial measurement of coordinated spatial planning in hilly areas: A case study of Chaling County, Hunan Province[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1085-1094.

图/表 10

图1

表1

表2

表3

用地约束条件设置"

约束类型	用地类型	约束函数
农业发展	大农业用地( $x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4$ )	$x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ≥ [N a, N b]$
	耕地( $x 1$ )	$x 1 ≥ [G a, G b]$
	园地( $x 2$ )	$x 2 ≥ 1,1.3 × Y$
	其他农用地( $x 4$ )	$Q ≤ x 4 ≤ 1.6 Q$
生态保护	林地( $x 3$ )	$x 3 ≥ ∑ i = 1 10 x i × (u / [λ a, λ b])$
生态保护	水域( $x 9$ )	$x 9 ≥$ [0.85, 1.1]× $W n$
宜居建设	城镇建设用地( $x 5$ )	$x 5 ≥ [P 1 a, P 1 b] × m 1$
宜居建设	乡村建设用地( $x 6$ )	$x 6 ≥ [P 2 a, P 2 b] × m 2$
集约利用	城镇建设用地( $x 5$ )	$x 5 ≤ [P 1 a, P 1 b] × m 3$
集约利用	乡村建设用地( $x 6$ )	$x 6 ≤ [P 2 a, P 2 b] × m 4$
城乡发展	交通用地( $x 7$ )	$x 7 / (x 5 + x 6) = [0.2,0.4]$
	其他建设用地( $x 8$ )	$x 8 = 1,10 × Z n$
	未利用地( $x 10$ )	$x 10 = [3200,4713.85]$
开发强度		$x 5 + x 6 + x 7 + x 8 ∑ i = 1 10 x i ≤ [5 %, 7 %]$
土地总量		$∑ i = 1 10 x i = 249634.63 h m 2$

表3

表4

表5

表6

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 24

[1]	Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1973,4(4):1-23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
[2]	Meerow S, Newell J P, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: A review[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016,147:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
[3]	严金明, 陈昊, 夏方舟. “多规合一”与空间规划: 认知、导向与路径[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017,31(1):21-27.
	[ Yan Jinming, Chen Hao, Xia Fangzhou. Direction and path of future spatial planning based on the background of multiple planning integration. China Land Science, 2017,31(1):21-27. ]
[4]	陈雯, 孙伟, 陈江龙. 我国市县规划体系矛盾解析与“多规合一”路径探究[J]. 地理研究, 2017,36(9):1603-1612. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201709001
	[ Chen Wen, Sun Wei, Chen Jianglong. Decoding the conflicts within the planning system and approaches to multi-plan integration at the county and municipal level in China. Geographical Research, 2017,36(9):1603-1612. ]
[5]	张骏杰, 高延利, 蔡玉梅, 等. 基于“多规合一”的市级国土空间优化方法: 以烟台市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(8):1045-1054. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.08.004
	[ Zhang Junjie, Gao Yanli, Cai Yumei, et al. Spatial optimization on the municipal level based on "multiple planning integration": A case study of Yantai City. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(8):1045-1054. ]
[6]	胡飞, 何灵聪, 杨昔. 规土合一、三线统筹、划管结合-武汉城市开发边界划定实践[J]. 规划师, 2016,32(6):31-37.
	[ Hu Fei, He Lingcong, Yang Xi. Urban planning and land use plan integration, three lines coordination, planning and management combination: Wuhan urban development boundary practice. Planners, 2016,32(6):31-37. ]
[7]	王子强, 祁鹿年. 弹性用地思想导向下的用地功能更新研究: 以苏州工业园区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2017,31(2):114-119.
	[ Wang Ziqiang, Qi Lunian. Study on the land use function to update ideas under the guidance of flexible land uses: A case study of Suzhou Industrial Park. Modern Urban Research, 2017,31(2):114-119. ]
[8]	高国力. 我国市县开展“多规合一”试点的成效、制约及对策[J]. 经济纵横, 2017,33(10):41-46.
	[ Gao Guoli. The effects, constraints and countermeasures of multi-plans integration pilot project in China's cities and counties. Economic Review Journal, 2017,33(10):41-46. ]
[9]	李鑫, 欧名豪, 严思齐. 基于区间优化模型的土地利用结构弹性区间测算[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013,29(17):240-247.
	[ Li Xin, Ou Minghao, Yan Siqi. Calculation of elastic interval of land use structure based on interval optimization model. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013,29(17):240-247. ]
[10]	刘江艳, 曾忠平. 弹性城市评价指标体系构建及其实证研究[J]. 电子政务, 2014,11(3):82-88.
	[ Liu Jiangyan, Zeng Zhongping. Establishment and empirical study of flexible city evaluation index system. E-Government, 2014,11(3):82-88. ]
[11]	廖柳文, 秦建新, 刘永强, 等. 基于土地利用转型的湖南省生态弹性研究[J]. 经济地理, 2015,35(9):16-23.
	[ Liao Liuwen, Qin Jianxin, Liu Yongqiang, et al. Study on ecological elasticity of Hunan Province based on land use transition. Economic Geography, 2015,35(9):16-23. ]
[12]	袁源, 王亚华, 周鑫鑫, 等. 大数据视角下国土空间规划编制的弹性和效率理念探索及其实践应用[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(1):9-16.
	[ Yuan Yuan, Wang Yahua, Zhou Xinxin, et al. Conceptual exploration and practical application on flexibility and efficiency of territory spatial planning making from the perspective of big data. China Land Science, 2019,33(1):9-16. ]
[13]	余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 国土空间规划管制与区域经济协调发展研究: 一个分析框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(8):1445-1456.
	[ Yu Liangliang, Cai Yinying. Research on spatial regulation of land use planning and coordinated development of regional economy: An analytical framework. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(8):1445-1456. ]
[14]	陈铭. 新时代县级国土空间规划编制的几点思考[J]. 浙江国土资源, 2019,35(1):32-34.
	[ Chen Ming. Thoughts on the compilation of county-level territorial spatial planning in the new era. Zhejiang Land & Resources, 2019,35(1):32-34. ]
[15]	龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(10):1837-1849. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
	[ Long Hualou, Zhang Yingnan, Tu Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(10):1837-1849. ]
[16]	张富刚, 郝晋珉, 李旭霖, 等. 县域土地利用协调发展度评价: 以河北省曲周县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005,25(2):63-68.
	[ Zhang Fugang, Hao Jinmin, Li Xulin, et al. Evaluation of coordinated development degree of land use at county scale: A case study at Quzhou County of Hebei Province. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005,25(2):63-68. ]
[17]	秦伟山, 廖和平, 张春柱, 等. 县域土地利用协调度研究: 以重庆市璧山县为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(19):344-348.
	[ Qin Weishan, Liao Heping, Zhang Chunzhu, et al. Evaluation of coordinated degree of land use at county scale: A case study at Bishan County of Chongqing City. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010,26(19):344-348. ]
[18]	郭均鹏, 李汶华. 区间线性规划的标准型及其最优值区间[J]. 管理科学学报, 2004,17(3):59-63.
	[ Guo Junpeng, Li Wenhua. Standard form of interval linear programming and its optimal objective interval value. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2004,17(3):59-63. ]
[19]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
	[ Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919. ]
[20]	杨琳. 土地利用弹性规划研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.
	[ Yang Lin. Research of flexible land-use planning. Shanghai, China: Tongji University, 2008. ]
[21]	李茂森, 王继军, 陈超, 等. 基于GIS的安塞县县南沟流域农用地生态适宜性评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018,25(1):237-242.
	[ Li Maosen, Wang Jijun, Chen Chao, et al. Ecological suitability evaluation of agricultural land in Xiannangou Watershed of Ansai using GIS system. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(1):237-242. ]
[22]	谭少军, 邵景安. 基于生态适宜性评价的西南丘陵区土地整治工程布局研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(4):659-677. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201804002
	[ Tan Shaojun, Shao Jing'an. Land consolidation project layout based on ecological suitability evaluation in hilly areas of Southwest China. Geographical Research, 2018,37(4):659-677. ]
[23]	张荣群, 王大海, 艾东, 等. 基于生态位和“反规划”思想的城市土地开发适宜性评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(3):258-264.
	[ Zhang Rongqun, Wang Dahai, Ai Dong, et al. Suitability evaluation of urban land development based on niche and anti-planning. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018,34(3):258-264. ]
[24]	丁雨賝, 冯长春, 王利伟. 山地区域土地生态红线划定方法与实证研究: 以重庆市涪陵区义和镇为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(7):851-859. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.07.006
	[ Ding Yuchen, Feng Changchun, Wang Liwei. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe Town in Chongqing Municipality. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(7):851-859. ]

主目标	子目标及权重	指标及权重	指标值	湖南省参照值
国土空间系统弹性度(U)	生态弹性(A) 0.30	植被覆盖度(A₁) 0.14	62.00%	40.53%
		空气优良率(A₂) 0.08	78.40%	81.20%
		Ⅱ类水质达标率(A₃) 0.08	100%	64.92%
	经济弹性(B) 0.40	非建设用地经济效率(B₁) 0.12	1.51万元/hm²	1.61万元/hm²
		建设用地经济效率(B₂) 0.20	80.41万元/hm²	149.72万元/hm²
		人均GDP(B₃) 0.08	2.95万元/人	4.31万元/人
	社会弹性(C) 0.30	人均建设用地集约度(C₁) 0.10	-0.38	-0.27
		居民人均住房面积(C₂) 0.07	72.30 m²/人	52.00 m²/人
		居民人均可支配收入(C₃) 0.08	17872.00元/人	20364.00元/人
		人均社会消费零售总额(C₄) 0.05	9891.83元/人	18213.49元/人

主目标层		子目标层		指标层
指标	弹性值	指标	弹性贡献度	指标	无量纲值	弹性贡献度
U	0.75	A	0.41	A₁	1.53	0.21
				A₂	0.97	0.08
				A₃	1.54	0.12
		B	0.28	B₁	0.94	0.11
				B₂	0.54	0.11
				B₃	0.79	0.06
		C	0.06	C₁	-1.38	-0.14
				C₂	1.39	0.10
				C₃	0.75	0.07
				C₄	0.54	0.03

用地类型	主导因子	权重	极适宜(9)	非常适宜(7)	适宜(5)	一般适宜(3)	不适宜(1)
生态用地	植被覆盖度与河流距离生态适宜区	0.25	0.84~1.00	0.65~0.84	0.47~0.65	0.25~0.47	0~0.25
		0.36	<30 m	30~80 m	80~150 m	150~300 m	>300 m
		0.39	极度重要区	—	重要区	—	一般区
适宜性评价值			5.11~9.00	4.04~5.11	2.98~4.04	1.97~2.98	1.00~1.97
农用地	坡度	0.27	<2°	2°~6°	6°~15°	15°~25°	>25°
	高程	0.15	47~130 m	130~169 m	169~267 m	267~452 m	452~1373 m
	与河流距离	0.16	100 m	200 m	300 m	400 m	500 m
	是否为农田	0.42	是	—	—	—	否
适宜性评价值			5.36~9.00	3.64~5.36	2.41~3.64	1.28~2.41	1.00~1.28
建设用地	坡度	0.15	<2°	2°~8°	8°~15°	15°~25°	>25°
	高程	0.08	47~130 m	130~169 m	169~267 m	267~452 m	452~373 m
	缓冲区与中心村距离	0.15	建设用地	<300 m	300~500 m	500~1000 m	>1000 m
	缓冲区与县城距离	0.23	<500 m	500~1000 m	1000~1500m	1500~2000 m	>2000 m
	距主干道距离	0.09	<500 m	<1 km	1~2 km	2~3 km	>3 km
适宜性评价值			6.43~9.00	5.05~6.43	3.79~5.05	2.57~3.79	1.00~2.57

适宜性分级	生态用地	农用地	建设用地
1级区	10.89	15.01	25.90
2级区	26.41	30.62	27.20
3级区	21.10	18.42	22.37
4级区	19.72	17.98	19.58
5级区	21.88	17.97	4.94
合计	100	100	100

用地类型决策变量	现状用地	目标下限	目标上限
耕地	44461.05	40000.00	42250.00
园地	4025.44	15448.78	24101.37
林地	168018.82	155454.30	162856.90
其他农用地	902.71	1444.34	1444.34
城镇建设用地	2697.32	2732.70	3375.69
乡村建设用地	11861.16	6517.18	7958.28
交通用地	2702.82	3243.38	4533.59
其他建设用地	115.12	991.41	1151.19
水域	10136.33	8615.88	11149.96
未利用地	4713.85	3000.00	3000.00

山区县国土空间规划协同的弹性空间测度——以湖南省茶陵县为例

Resilience spatial measurement of coordinated spatial planning in hilly areas: A case study of Chaling County, Hunan Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 24

相关文章 7

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	徐小任, 王梁, 徐勇, 段健. 基于“三类”空间的后备可利用土地资源评价研究——以山西省介休市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 272-282.
[2]	成超男, 胡杨, 赵鸣. 城市绿色空间格局时空演变及其生态系统服务评价的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[3]	张骏杰, 高延利, 蔡玉梅, 周伟, 袁涛. 基于“多规合一”的市级国土空间优化方法——以烟台市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1045-1054.
[4]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378-391.
[5]	刘彦随, 王介勇. 转型发展期“多规合一”理论认知与技术方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(5): 529-536.
[6]	喻忠磊, 张文新, 梁进社, 庄立. 国土空间开发建设适宜性评价研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(9): 1107-1122.
[7]	樊杰, 周侃, 孙威, 陈东. 人文—经济地理学在生态文明建设中的学科价值与学术创新[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(2): 147-160.