资本循环视角下大遗址区乡村社会空间生产机制研究——以秦始皇陵为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.05.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中国大遗址名录中80%以上的大遗址位于城郊或郊野地区,遗址文物保护与旅游开发不可避免地会影响到大遗址区乡村社会空间。分析大遗址区社会经济发展的规律,是实现大遗址区乡村振兴的关键。论文以秦始皇陵大遗址区为案例地,探寻资本逻辑下大遗址区乡村社会空间生产机制。研究发现：① 资本对最优区位的选择产生大遗址区乡村社会空间分异。由于各村庄的自然环境、交通条件、保护区划的限制条件及其与已开发遗存点距离等因素存在差异,资本的选择性投入产生了大遗址区乡村社会空间分异。② 村庄生产方式调整是大遗址区社会空间演变的内在动力。大遗址区乡村社会空间生产是在文物保护的框架下,由于旅游开发的正外部性促进资本流动影响到村庄生产方式调整,进而影响社会关系转变的过程。③ 政府政策措施对大遗址区资本的引导控制是外部影响因素。大遗址的文物脆弱性决定了展示利用过程中必须保证政府的强干预性,村庄生产方式转变可能产生保护与发展的矛盾,因此需要政府权力的介入,进一步导致了村庄生产方式调整。大遗址区乡村社会空间生产是一个动态演进、螺旋式上升的过程。政府有效管理、市场与村庄社区合理介入才能保障大遗址区乡村合理发展与转型。

关键词: 社会空间, 空间生产, 资本循环, 大遗址, 秦始皇陵

Abstract:

As more than 80% of the sites in the list of China's Great Relics Sites are located in suburban or rural areas, relics protection and tourism development will inevitably affect the rural social space around the heritage areas. Analysis of the patterns of social and economic development is the key to achieving the rural revitalization strategy. This study took the heritage area of Qin Shihuang Mausoleum as a case study area and used questionnaire, face-to-face interview, field survey, and other methods to examine the development of rural society around the area in the past 30 years. The study transformed the traditional society-space binary opposition analysis and constructed the society-space dialectical analysis method based on the Space Production Theory and David Harvey's Capital Circulation Theory to explore the mutual feedback mechanism of society and space in the countryside around the heritage area of the Qin Shihuang Mausoleum under the influence of capital. The results show that: 1) The flow of capital to the optimal location results in the differentiation of rural social space in the study area. Due to the differences in the natural environment, traffic conditions, constraints of protection zones, and the distance from the developed heritage sites, the selective investment of capital has resulted in the differentiation of rural social space in the heritage area. 2) The adjustment of rural production mode is the internal driving force of the evolution of social space in the heritage area. Under the framework of cultural relic protection, rural social space production in the relics area is a process in which the positive externality of tourism development promotes the capital flow to adjust the rural production mode, thereby affecting the social relations. 3) The government policy to the restriction of capital access in the heritage area is an external factor. The vulnerability of cultural relics in the heritage area determines that the government's strong intervention must be guaranteed in the process of display and utilization. The transformation of rural production mode that may lead to the conflict between protection and development requires the intervention of the governments, further affecting the adjustment of rural production mode. The spatial production of rural social space in the heritage area is a process of dynamic evolution and spiral rise. Only by the effective management of the government and reasonable participation of the market and rural community can we guarantee the rational development and transformation of rural communities in the heritage area.

Key words: social space, space production, capital circuit, Great Relics, Qin Shihuang Mausoleum

吴冲, 朱海霞, 彭邦文. 资本循环视角下大遗址区乡村社会空间生产机制研究——以秦始皇陵为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(5): 751-765.

WU Chong, ZHU Haixia, PENG Bangwen. Rural social space production mechanism in a Great Relics Area from the perspective of capital circulation theory of Harvey:A case of Qin Shihuang Mausoleum[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 751-765.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 38

[1]	中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 关于实施中华优秀传统文化传承发展工程的意见 [N/OL]. 人民日报, 2017- 01- 26(11) [2019-01-15]. http://culture.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0126/c87423-29049971.html.
	[ General Office of the CPC Central Committee, General Office of the State Council. Opinions on carrying out the project of inheritance and development of Chinese excellent traditional culture. People's Daily, 2017- 01- 26(11) [2019-01-15]. http://culture.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0126/c87423-29049971. html. ]
[2]	中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 关于加强文物保护利用改革的若干意见 [N/OL]. 人民日报, 2018- 10- 09(1) [2019-01-15]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2018-10/09/nw.D110000renmrb_20181009_2-01.htm.
	[ General Office of the CPC Central Committee, General Office of the State Council. Opinions on strengthening the reform of the protection and utilization of Cultural Relics. People's Daily, 2018- 10- 09(1) [2019-01-15]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2018-10/09/nw.D110000renmrb_20181009_2-01.htm. ]
[3]	陈稳亮, 孙圣举, 高忠 , 等. 共生还是绝离: 居民融入汉长安城遗址保护与发展问题探究 [J]. 城市发展研究, 2014,21(11):53-59.
	[ Chen Wengliang, Sun Shengju, Gao Zhong , et al. Symbiosis or separation: Research of residents integrating into the Han Chang-an City Site's protection and development. Urban Development Studies, 2014,21(11):53-59. ]
[4]	张立新, 杨新军, 陈佳 , 等. 大遗址区人地系统脆弱性评价及影响机制: 以汉长安城大遗址区为例 [J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(9):1848-1859.
	[ Zhang Lixin, Yang Xinjun, Chen Jia , et al. Vulnerability assessment and mechanism of human-land systems in the Han Dynasty Chang'an Large Relic area. Resources Science, 2015,37(9):1848-1859. ]
[5]	Amin H M T M. The impact of heritage decline on urban social life [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2018,55:34-47.
[6]	Monteiro V, Painho M, Vaz E . Is the heritage really important? A theoretical framework for heritage reputation using citizen sensing [J]. Habitat International, 2015,45:156-162.
[7]	赵振斌, 褚玉杰, 郝亭 , 等. 汉长安城遗址乡村社区意义空间构成 [J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(10):1606-1621.
	[ Zhao Zhenbin, Chu Yujie, Hao Ting , et al. Meaning space structure of rural community in Han Chang'an City historical site. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(10):1606-1621. ]
[8]	Elidiana B . Cultural heritage of Albania: A fabulous economic source for the sustainable economic development of tourism [J]. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015,188:89-94.
[9]	Kovacs J F, Galvin K J, Shipley R . Assessing the success of heritage conservation districts: Insights from Ontario, Canada [J]. Cities, 2015,45:123-132.
[10]	吕琳, 吕仁义, 周庆华 . 中国大遗址问题研究评析与展望 [J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,44(4):517-522, 540.
	[ Lv Lin, Lv Renyi, Zhou Qinghua . Research critique and prospect of major heritage site issue in China. Journal of Xi' an University of Architectural Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012,44(4):517-522, 540. ]
[11]	Jones N, Clark J R, Panteli M , et al. Local social capital and the acceptance of Protected Area policies: An empirical study of two Ramsar river delta ecosystems in northern Greece [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012,96(1):55-63.
[12]	余洁, 潘秋玲, 梁学成 . 我国大遗址保护区控制农地流转的法律及制度研究 [J]. 经济地理, 2007,27(4):629-633.
	[ Yu Jie, Pan Qiuling, Liang Xuecheng . A study of legislation and institutions on the restrictions to the rural land transference in large archaeological sites. Economic Geography, 2007,27(4):629-633. ]
[13]	Yung E H K, Zhang Q, Chan E H W . Underlying social factors for evaluating heritage conservation in urban renewal districts [J]. Habitat International, 2017,66:135-148.
[14]	王新文, 张沛, 张中华 . 城市更新视域下大明宫遗址区空间生产实践检讨及优化策略研究 [J]. 城市发展研究, 2017,24(2):125-128.
	[ Wang Xinwen, Zhang Pei, Zhang Zhonghua . Production practice and optimization strategy research of Daming Palace Ruins area space in the urban renewal horizon. Urban Development Studies, 2017,24(2):125-128. ]
[15]	郑育林, 唐远志, 张立 . 基于博弈论的大遗址保护区政府与居民搬迁行为分析 [J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009,39(6):1052-1055.
	[ Zheng Yulin, Tang Yuanzhi, Zhang Li . Game analysis on the residents' relocation of Great Site. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2009,39(6):1052-1055. ]
[16]	Tucker H, Carnegie E . World heritage and the contradictions of universal value [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2014,47:63-76.
[17]	唐龙, 余洁 . 大遗址保护中的土地问题 [J]. 中国文化遗产, 2008(4):65-71.
	[ Tang Long, Yu Jie . Land problems in the protection of Great Sites. China Cultural Heritage, 2008(4):65-71. ]
[18]	Wang X, Aoki N . Paradox between neoliberal urban redevelopment, heritage conservation, and community needs: Case study of a historic neighbourhood in Tianjin, China [J]. Cities, 2019,85:156-169.
[19]	吴铮争 . 基于博弈论的汉长安城遗址保护策略研究 [J]. 城市问题, 2012(11):37-41.
	[ Wu Zhengzheng . Research on the protection strategy of Han Chang-an City Site based on Game Theory. Urban Problems, 2012(11):37-41. ]
[20]	钟晓华 . 遗产社区的社会抗逆力: 风险管理视角下的城市遗产保护 [J]. 城市发展研究, 2016,23(2):23-29.
	[ Zhong Xiaohua . Social resilience of heritage communities: The conservation of urban heritage in the perspective of risk management. Urban Development Studies, 2016,23(2):23-29. ]
[21]	郭文, 王丽 . 文化遗产旅游地的空间生产与认同研究: 以无锡惠山古镇为例 [J]. 地理科学, 2015,35(6):708-716.
	[ Guo Wen, Wang Li . The production of space and identity in cultural heritage tourism destination: A case study of Huishan Ancient Town in Wuxi, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(6):708-716. ]
[22]	方远平, 易颖, 毕斗斗 . 传承与嬗变: 广州市小洲村的空间转换 [J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(11):2318-2330.
	[ Fang Yuanping, Yi Ying, Bi Doudou . Inheritance and transmutation: Space transformation of Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 2018,37(11):2318-2330. ]
[23]	孟莹, 张冠增 . 乡村空间营造的逻辑: 基于文化与社会空间理论视角的分析 [J]. 城市规划, 2018,42(6):23-29.
	[ Meng Ying, Zhang Guanzheng . The logic of rural space making: From the perspective of cultural and social space theory. City Planning Review, 2018,42(6):23-29. ]
[24]	王维艳 . 乡村旅游地的空间再生产权能及其空间正义实现路径: 地役权视角下的多案例透析 [J]. 人文地理, 2018,33(5):152-160.
	[ Wang Weiyan . The approach to realize space reproduction power and space justice for rural tourist areas: Deep analysis on multiple cases from the perspective of easement. Human Geography, 2018,33(5):152-160. ]
[25]	杨忍 . 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制 [J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(8):1622-1636.
	[ Yang Ren . Spatial differentiation and mechanisms of typical rural areas in the suburbs of a metropolis: A case study of Beicun Village, Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1622-1636. ]
[26]	周尚意, 许伟麟 . 时空压缩下的中国乡村空间生产: 以广州市域乡村投资为例 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(5):647-654.
	[ Zhou Shangyi, Xu Weilin . A geographical analysis on the positive investment projects in rural vitalization under time-space compression: A case study of Guangzhou City. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):647-654. ]
[27]	陈稳亮 . 大遗址保护研究中民生问题研究综述 [J]. 城市问题, 2014(11):27-32.
	[ Chen Wenliang . A summary of the research on people's livelihood in the protection of Great Sites. Urban Problems, 2014(11):27-32. ]
[28]	Harvey D . The limits to capital [M]. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1982: 70-78.
[29]	张京祥, 姜克芳 . 解析中国当前乡建热潮背后的资本逻辑 [J]. 现代城市研究, 2016(10):1-8.
	[ Zhang Jingxiang, Jiang Kefang . Analyzing capital logic behind rural construction boom in contemporary China. Modern Urban Research, 2016(10):1-8. ]
[30]	陈建华 . 城市化发展阶段的资本循环动因研究: 马克思主义政治经济学的视角 [J]. 经济学家, 2017,4(4):20-26.
	[ Chen Jianhua . A study on the motivation of capital cycle in the stage of urbanization development: From the perspective of Marxist political economics. Economist, 2017,4(4):20-26. ]
[31]	张天泽, 张京祥 . 乡村增长主义: 基于“乡村工业化”与“淘宝村”的比较与反思 [J]. 城市发展研究, 2018,25(6):112-119.
	[ Zhang Tianze, Zhang Jingxiang . New growth supremacism in rural areas: Interpretation and reflection on the phenomenon of "Taobao Village". Urban Development Studies, 2018,25(6):112-119. ]
[32]	周玉璇, 李郇, 申龙 . 资本循环视角下的城市空间结构演变机制研究: 以海珠区为例 [J]. 人文地理, 2018,33(4):68-75.
	[ Zhou Yuxuan, Li Xun, Shen Long . Research on the evolution mechanism of urban spatial structure in the view of capital circuit theory of Harvey: A case of Haizhu District. Human Geography, 2018,33(4):68-75. ]
[33]	吴冲, 朱海霞, 向远林 , 等. 保护性利用影响下的大遗址周边地区社会空间演变: 基于空间生产视角 [J]. 人文地理, 2019,34(1):106-114.
	[ Wu Chong, Zhu Haixia, Xiang Yuanlin , et al. The evolution of social space in the surrounding areas of Great Relics under protective utilization: Based on the perspective of space production. Human Geography, 2019,34(1):106-114. ]
[34]	孙九霞, 苏静 . 旅游影响下传统社区空间变迁的理论探讨: 基于空间生产理论的反思 [J]. 旅游学刊, 2014,29(5):78-86.
	[ Sun Jiuxia, Su jing. Traditional community space change under the influence of tourism: A reflective study based on space production theory. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(5):78-86. ]
[35]	欧阳文婷, 吴必虎 . 旅游发展对乡村社会空间生产的影响: 基于开发商主导模式与村集体主导模式的对比研究 [J]. 社会科学家, 2017(4):96-102.
	[ Ouyang Wenting, Wu Bihu . The impact of tourism development on rural social space production: A comparative study based on the model of the developer leading and the village collective leadership. Social Scientist, 2017(4):96-102. ]
[36]	殷洁, 罗小龙 . 资本、权力与空间: “空间的生产”解析 [J]. 人文地理, 2012,27(2):12-16, 11.
	[ Yin Jie, Luo Xiaolong . Capital, power and space: Decoding "production of space". Human Geography, 2012,27(2):12-16, 11. ]
[37]	Smith N. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space [M]. Athens, USA: University of Georgia Press, 2008: 103-202.
[38]	谢富胜, 巩潇然 . 资本积累驱动下不同尺度地理空间的不平衡发展: 史密斯马克思主义空间理论探讨 [J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(8):1407-1420.
	[ Xie Fusheng, Gong Xiaoran . Uneven development process of geographical space in distinct scales driven by accumulation of capital: A discussion on Smith's spatial Marxist theory. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(8):1407-1420. ]

聚落物质环境变化特征	聚落空间职能的转变	邻近的要素	村庄名称
村庄旅游服务设施用地增加,体现景观符号化特征	手工艺品制作与旅游接待	兵马俑博物馆	王俭村、下和村
村庄仓储、物流用地比例增加	农产品包装、加工、物流	旅游公路	秦陵村、杨家村、毛家村
物质景观无明显变化	无明显变化	无	鱼池村、孙马村、上陈村

门类	20世纪 80年代	20世纪90年代	2000年	2010年	2018年
农林业	1	0	0	0	0
工业、建筑业	2	5	5	3	3
文物复制	20	46	46	32	32
旅游业	0	0	4	10	16
租赁与物业服务	0	0	1	2	2