俄罗斯社会经济地理学近30余年的发展

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.06.014

地理科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 941-950.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.06.014

• 研究综述 • 上一篇

俄罗斯社会经济地理学近30余年的发展

特鲁仁宁^1,²(), 董雅文³, 张磊⁴, 高金龙^3,^*()

1. 联邦南方大学, 罗斯托夫344006, 俄罗斯
2. 联邦波罗的海大学, 加里宁格勒236016, 俄罗斯
3. 中国科学院流域地理学重点实验室, 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 南京 210008, 中国
4. 江苏省环境科学研究院, 南京210036, 中国

收稿日期:2018-12-11 修回日期:2019-03-25 出版日期:2019-06-28 发布日期:2019-06-27
通讯作者: 高金龙
作者简介:
第一作者简介：特鲁仁宁(Druzhinin Alexander),男,俄罗斯人,教授,博导,俄罗斯人文地理(社会经济地理)学家联合会主席,主要从事区域社会经济地理与文化地理研究。E-mail: alexdru9@mail.ru
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41701193);自然资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室开放基金项目(2017CZEPK04)

Development of socioeconomic geography in Russia during the past three decades

Alexander DRUZHININ^1,²(), Yawen DONG³, Lei ZHANG⁴, Jinlong GAO^3,^*()

1. Southern Federal University, Rostov 344006, Russia
2. Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
3. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China
4. Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Nanjing 210036, China

Received:2018-12-11 Revised:2019-03-25 Online:2019-06-28 Published:2019-06-27
Contact: Jinlong GAO
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41701193;Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resource, No. 2017CZEPK04.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中俄两国建立战略伙伴关系是共同致力于两国社会经济可持续发展的重要举措,加强了解两国地理学发展的特征、扩大合作领域是推进这一战略任务实施的必然选择。本文以对俄罗斯社会经济地理学相关资料与文献收集与分析、以及近10余年俄罗斯地理学者与社会学者联合会年度学术会议资料等为支撑,用传承、革新、创新的视野,对俄罗斯近30余年社会经济地理学思想体系的发展以及近期的主要趋势进行概略性地阐述。在将俄罗斯经济地理学传承变革划分为6个阶段的基础上,重点围绕国家或区域地缘关系变化、多尺度地域空间组织、地域经济网络结构形成与发展、“大欧亚”建设和“东向发展”构想的社会经济地理学思考和对策、社会经济地理学的包容性和实践性,以及伴随全球化和国家发展战略需要涌现出新的分支学科、新思路、新观念等方面进行分析综述;给出近30余年主要地理研究机构对社会经济地理学研究领域的重点研究问题、主要学者及其代表作;并阐述在理论与方法论、落后地区发展、社会公平、贫困等问题研究方面存在的不足。研究结果对加深中俄两国地理学界的相互了解、推进社会经济地理学的创新发展具有现实意义。

关键词: 社会经济地理学, 传承与革新, 发展态势, 俄罗斯

Abstract:

The establishment of strategic partnership between China and Russia is an important measure for jointly contributing to the sustainability of social and economic development in both countries. Improving the understanding of the development of geography in China and Russia and further expanding the scope of cooperation are necessary for such development. Based on the literature on Russian socioeconomic geography and annual conference material of the Association of Russian Geographers in the past decades, this article briefly expounds contemporary progress of related work in Russia with the vision of inheritance and innovation. The development and major trends of the socioeconomic geography thoughts in Russia are discussed. On the basis of dividing the transformation of Russian economic geography into six stages, this article focuses on terms and phenomena of changes in national or regional geo-relationships, multi-scale regional spatial organization, the development of regional economic network structure, the construction of "big Europe and Asia", as well as the conception of "eastward development". We mainly discussed the inclusivity of socioeconomic geography, as well as the emergence of new sub-disciplines, new ideas, and new concepts along with the progress of globalization and national development. We thereafter listed major concerns of socioeconomic geographers in Russia, as well as the leading scholars and their masterpieces. We also pointed out the shortcomings in the areas of theory and methodology construction, development of less-developed regions, social equity, and poverty, among others. This study may have potential in deepening mutual understanding between Chinese and Russian geographers and promoting the innovative development of socioeconomic geography.

Key words: socioeconomic geography, inheritance and innovation, progress, Russia

特鲁仁宁, 董雅文, 张磊, 高金龙. 俄罗斯社会经济地理学近30余年的发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 941-950.

Alexander DRUZHININ, Yawen DONG, Lei ZHANG, Jinlong GAO. Development of socioeconomic geography in Russia during the past three decades[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 941-950.

参考文献 39

[1]	阿加福诺夫H T, 等. 1983. 苏联社会经济地理学的发展途径: 根据《苏联地理学会第七次代表大会总结》[J]. 王荣来, 译. 地理科学进展, 2(4): 21-24. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1983.04.006
	[Acafunov H T.1983. The way to develop the social economic geography of the Soviet Union: According to the summary of the seventh congress of the Soviet Geographical Society. Translated by Wang R L. Progress in Geography, 2(4): 21-24. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1983.04.006
[2]	阿纳琴A A, 拉夫罗夫S B, 拉齐宁斯基V A.1984. 苏联社会经济地理学的任务[J]. 云浦, 译. 地理科学进展, 3(1): 36-38. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1984.01.008
	[Anuchinn A A, Lavrov S B, Lakininskiy V A.1984. The task of Soviet socioeconomic geography. Translated by Yun P. Progress in Geography, 3(1): 36-38. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1984.01.008
[3]	白光润. 1995. 地理学的哲学贫困[J]. 地理学报, 50(3): 279-287.
	[Bai G R.1995. The philosophical predicament in the development of geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 50(3): 279-287. ]
[4]	董锁成, 杨洋, 李富佳, 等. 2019. 中俄蒙高铁建设的影响机理及对策[J]. 地理学报, 74(2): 297-311.
	[Dong S C, Yang Y, Li F J, et al.2019. Influencing mechanism and policy suggestions of China-Mongolia-Russia high-speed railway construction. Acta Geografica Sinica, 74(2): 297-311. ]
[5]	樊杰, 孙威. 2011. 中国人文经济地理学科进展及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(12): 1459-1469. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.12.001
	[Fan J, Sun W.2011. Recent progress and outlook of human-economic geography in China. Progress in Geography, 30(12): 1459-1469. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.12.001
[6]	金凤君, 靳海涛. 2018. 人文-经济地理学的学科融合和创新[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(3): 309-316.
	[Jin F J, Jin H T.2018. Intergration and innovation paths of human geography. Progress in Geography, 37(3): 309-316. ]
[7]	拉任采夫B H.1983. 地域生产综合体在区域经济体系中的地位(关于方法论的探讨)[J]. 赵抱力, 译. 地理科学进展, 2(3): 8-11. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1983.03.003
	[Laghincaiv B H.1983. The position of regional production complex in regional economic system (discussion on methodology). Translated by Zhao B L. Progress in Geography, 2(3): 8-11. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1983.03.003
[8]	刘卫东. 2015. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 538-544. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
	[Liu W D.2015. Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road Initiative of China and related research themes. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 538-544. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
[9]	宋长青, 葛岳静, 刘云刚, 等. 2018. 从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径[J]. 地理研究, 37(1): 3-19.
	[Song C Q, Ge Y J,Liu Y G, et al.2018. Undertaking research on Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective. Geographical Research, 37(1): 3-19. ]
[10]	吴淼, 杨兆萍, 戴颂英. 2009. 1990年代以来俄罗斯社会经济地理学的发展[J]. 世界地理研究, 18(1): 157-164.
	[Wu M, Yang Z P, Dai S Y.2009. Analysis on Russian socio-economic geography development since 1990s. Word Regional Studies, 18(1): 157-164. ]
[11]	于国政. 1995. 论俄罗斯社会经济地理学[J]. 人文地理, 10(3): 47-52.
	[Yu G Z.1995. On Russian socio-economic geography. Human Geography, 10(3): 47-52. ]
[12]	郑度. 1994. 中国 21 世纪议程与地理学[J]. 地理学报, 49(6): 481-489.
	[Zheng D.1994. China's agenda 21 and geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 49(6): 481-489. ]
[13]	中村泰三, 郭玉珍. 1983. 七十年代的苏联经济地理学: 从生产配置课堂到社会-经济地理学[J]. 地理科学进展, 2(1): 14-19. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1983.01.004
	[Nakamura Y, Guo Y Z.1983. Soviet economic geography in the 1970s: From production configuration classroom to social-economic geography. Progress in Geography, 2(1): 14-19. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.1983.01.004
[14]	中国科学院地理研究所, 东北师范大学. 1983. 苏联经济地理(上册, 总论) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Northeast Normal University. 1983. Soviet Geography (Volume 1, General). Beijing, China: Science Press. ]
[15]	中国科学院地理研究所, 东北师范大学. 1987. 苏联经济地理(下册, 区域) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Northeast Normal University. 1987. Soviet Geography (Volume 2, Region). Beijing, China: Science Press. ]
[16]	Alekseev A I, Mironenko N S.2000. Territorial organization and integration into the world economy of Russia at the turn of the century[J]. News Worlds: Geographical Series, 6: 56-67.
[17]	Baklanov P Y.2007. Territorial structures of economy in regional management[M]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
[18]	Baburin L V.2002. Evolution of Russian spaces: From the Big Bang to the present day (innovative and synergetic approach) [M]. Moscow, Russia: URSS Publishing Group.
[19]	Druzhinin A G.2015. Development of Russian Human geography trends, problem, situations, priorities[J]. Baltic Region, 2: 127-140. doi: 10.5922/2074-9848
[20]	Druzhinin A G.2016a. Russia in modern Eurasia: The vision of a Russian geographer. Quaestiones Geographicae[J]. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 35(3): 31-39.
[21]	Druzhinin A G.2016b. "The marine component" of Russian social geography: Traditions and innovations[J]. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Geographical Series, 6: 7-16.
[22]	Druzhinin A G.2018. Geo-Economic interdependence and geopolitical alliances in the modern Eurasian space[J]. Socio-economic Geography Bulletin of the ARGO, 6(C): 24-38.
[23]	Druzhinin A G, Streletsky V N.2015. The cultural component of social geography in modern Russia: The genesis, characteristics and priority directions of development[J]. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Geographical Series, 1: 3-18.
[24]	Gerasimov I P.1976. Soviet constructive geography: Problems, approaches, results[M]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.(in Russian)
[25]	Harvey M E, Holly B P.1981. Paradigm, philosophy and geographic thought[M]. New York, NY: Routledge.
[26]	Kaledin N V, Kaledin V N.2017. Spatial and temporal dynamics of integration and disintegration processes in Eurasia[C]. Materials of the International Scientific Conference, Perm, Russia: 39-44.
[27]	Kolosov V A.2008. Geography of state borders: Ideas, achievements, practice[J]. Izvestiya RAS: Geographical Series, 5(C): 8-20.
[28]	Kolosov V A.2018. Russian borderlands: Challenges of neighborhood[M]. Moscow: New Chronograph.
[29]	Kuznetsova O. V.2019. The problem of choosing the priorities for spatial development[J]. Questions of Economy, 1: 146-15.
[30]	Nefedova T G.2017. Strengthening of polarization of rural space and integration-disintegration processes in the non-Chernozem zone of Russia (on the example of the Kostroma region)[C]. Materials of the International Scientific Conference. 52-55.
[31]	Polyan P.2014. Territorial structures, urbanization, settlement: Theoretical approaches and research methods[M]. Moscow, Russia: New Chronograph.
[32]	Saushkin Y G.1973. Economic Geography: History, theory, methods and practice[M]. Moscow, Russia: Thought.
[33]	Saushkin Y G.1980. Geographical science in the past, present, future[M]. Moscow, Russia.
[34]	Shuper V A.2017. Self-Organization at the trajectory fracture[C]. Materials of the international scientific conference. Perm, Russia: 71-75.
[35]	Smirnyagin L V.2005. Human geography, federalism, regionalism[M]. Moscow, Russia: KomKniga.
[36]	Sushhiy S Y, Druzhinin A G.1994. Essays on geography Russian culture[M]. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: Southern University.
[37]	Treivish A I.2009. Town, district, country and the world. Development of Russia through the eyes of a country expert[M]. Moscow, Russia: New Chronograph.
[38]	Zubarevich N I.2005. Big business in Russian regions: Territorial development strategies and social interests. Analytical report[M]. Moscow, Russia: Independent Institute of Social Policy.
[39]	Zubarevich N I.2019. The strategy of spatial development: Priorities and instruments[J]. Questions of Economy, 1: 135-145.

俄罗斯社会经济地理学近30余年的发展

Development of socioeconomic geography in Russia during the past three decades

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 39

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	马明清, 袁武, 葛全胜, 袁文, 杨林生, 李汉青, 李萌. “一带一路”若干区域社会发展态势大数据分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 1009-1020.
[2]	初楠臣, 张平宇, 李鹤. 高速铁路情景下的俄罗斯远东铁路可达性及其空间效应研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 988-997.
[3]	毛汉英. 中国与俄罗斯及中亚五国能源合作前景展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(10): 1433-1443.
[4]	钱丽芸, 朱竑. 从国家基金立项看文化地理学研究的状况和趋势——基于知识生产的视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(10): 1289-1297.
[5]	王庆生, 许韶立. 俄罗斯阿尔泰边区的旅游业发展研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 1997, 16(3): 80-86.