过去300 a大清河上游南部流域耕地变化重建

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.06.009

地理科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 883-895.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.06.009

过去300 a大清河上游南部流域耕地变化重建

李俊¹(), 叶瑜^1,^2,^*(), 魏学琼³

1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京 100875
2. 北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875
3. 南京信息工程大学地理科学学院,南京 210044

收稿日期:2018-12-11 修回日期:2019-03-18 出版日期:2019-06-28 发布日期:2019-06-27
通讯作者: 叶瑜
作者简介:
第一作者简介：李俊(1992— ),女,云南蒙自人,硕士生,主要从事历史土地覆盖变化研究。E-mail: lixiaojun@mail.bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFA0603304);国家自然科学基金项目(41471156)

Reconstruction of cropland change in the southern area of the Daqing River Basin over the past 300 years

Jun LI¹(), Yu YE^1,^2,^*(), Xueqiong WEI³

1. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
3. School of Geographical Science, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2018-12-11 Revised:2019-03-18 Online:2019-06-28 Published:2019-06-27
Contact: Yu YE
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2017YFA0603304;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41471156.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

过去300 a耕地变化重建是环境变化研究的基础。华北地区河湖演变对历史土地开垦的影响需要在历史耕地重建时予以考虑。论文基于清代地方志、民国统计资料和现代土地利用数据,通过量化坡度和历史时期潜在耕地垦殖率因子,建立宜垦性模型,重建过去300 a白洋淀与大清河上游南部流域5个时间断面上空间分辨率为1 km×1 km的耕地变化,并结合大清河南支的河道变迁和白洋淀演变过程分析了县域尺度下河道变迁、湖群演变对土地开垦过程的影响。结果表明：① 近300 a来研究区开垦范围向山区扩展,开垦强度不断加深,平均垦殖率由1646年的0.162增至1980年代的0.579;② 白洋淀收缩为安新、容城、任丘、高阳和蠡县土地开垦提供良好的物质基础,清中后期5县垦殖率较同期周围县高约3%~40%不等,且增长速度明显快于周围县;③ 古河道为肃宁、河间、任丘和安国的土地开垦提供了物质基础,河流改道后肃宁、河间和任丘的垦殖率分别增长为原来的2.12、2.6和2.86倍;安国垦殖率增长了37%,为同期增长最为显著的县;④ 新河道虽会冲毁部分土地,但泛滥区却能为土地开垦提供物质基础,故途经地垦殖率有增有减,蠡县和高阳的垦殖率分别增加为原来的1.80倍和1.88倍,望都、清苑垦殖率分别增加3%、4%,定州垦殖率减少4%。

关键词: 土地开垦, 耕地网格化分配, 过去300 a, 河道变迁, 白洋淀, 大清河上游南部流域

Abstract:

Reconstruction of cropland change over the past 300 years forms the basis for environmental change studies. The influence of changes in river and lake areas in North China can provide a reference and validation for the reconstruction of historical arable land. Based on the local historical documents of the Qing Dynasty, the statistical data of the Republic of China, and the data of modern land use, this study reconstructed the cropland change of five time periods in the Baiyangdian Lake and the southern area of the Daqing River Basin in the past 300 years. It established the reclamation model by quantifying the slope and the potential cultivated land reclamation rate in historical periods. The spatial resolution of the analysis is 1 km × 1 km. This study also analysed the influence of river and lake evolution on the cultivation ratio via the changes of the Baiyangdian Lake and the southern branches of the Daqing River. The results show that: 1) Land reclaimation in the research area has expanded to the mountainous areas, and reclamation has constantly intensified over the past 300 years. Average cultivation ratio increased from 0.162 in 1646 to 0.579 in the 1980s. 2) The contraction of the Baiyangdian Lake provided a good material basis for land reclamation in Anxing, Rongcheng, Renqiu, Gaoyang, and Lixian Counties. The reclamation rate of the five counties in the middle and late Qing period was about 3%-40% higher than that of the surrounding counties, and the growth rate was faster too than that of the surrounding counties. 3) The old river channel provided material basis for land reclaimation of Suning, Hejian, Renqiu, and Anguo Counties. After the river diversion, the reclamation rates of the former three counties increased by 2.12, 2.6, and 2.86 times respectively. The reclamation rate in Anguo County increased by 37%, the most significant increase in the same period. 4) Although the new river could destroy some of the land, the floodplain, however, can provide a material basis for land reclamation. Therefore the cultivation ratio of the counties along the new river can increase or decrease. The reclamation rates of Lixian and Gaoyang have increased to 1.80 times and 1.88 times respectively. The reclamation rate of Wangdu and Qingyuan increased by 3% and 4%, and that of Dingzhou decreased by 4%.

Key words: land reclamation, rasterization, past 300 years, channel change, Baiyangdian Lake, southern area of the Daqing River Basin

李俊, 叶瑜, 魏学琼. 过去300 a大清河上游南部流域耕地变化重建[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 883-895.

Jun LI, Yu YE, Xueqiong WEI. Reconstruction of cropland change in the southern area of the Daqing River Basin over the past 300 years[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 883-895.

图/表 7

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 40

[1]	摆万奇, 柏书琴. 1999. 土地利用和覆盖变化在全球变化研究中的地位和作用[J]. 地域研究与开发, 18(4): 13-16.
	[Bai W Q, Bai S Q.1999. The status and roles of land use and cover change in global change study. Areal Research and Development, 18(4): 13-16. ]
[2]	陈锋. 1987. 清代亩额初探: 对省区“折亩”的考察[J]. 武汉大学学报(人文科学版), (5): 78-85.
	[Chen F.1987. A preliminary study of the Mu in the Qing Dynasty: An investigation of the discount of mu at the provincial level. Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences), (5): 78-85. ]
[3]	陈桥驿, 吕以春, 乐祖谋. 1984. 论历史时期宁绍平原的湖泊演变[J]. 地理研究, 3(3): 29-43.
	[Chen Q Y, Lv Y C, Le Z M.1984. An analysis of lake change in the Ningshao Plain during the historical period. Geographical Research, 3(3): 29-43. ]
[4]	邓辉, 李羿. 2018. 人地关系视角下明清时期京津冀平原东淀湖泊群的时空变化[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4): 95-105.
	[Deng H, Li Y.2018. Temporal and spatial changes of the Dongdian Lake group in the Jing-Jin-Ji Plain during the Ming and Qing Dynasties from the perspective of human-environment interaction. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (4): 95-105. ]
[5]	傅辉. 2008. 明以来河南土地利用变化与人文机制研究 [D]. 上海: 复旦大学.
	[Fu H.2008. Study on land use change and anthropogenic mechanism in Henan Province, 1368-1953. Shanghai, China: Fudan University. ]
[6]	何炳棣. 1985. 南宋至今土地数字的考释和评价(下)[J]. 中国社会科学, (3): 125-160.
	[He B D.1985. An interpretation and evaluation of land numbers since the Southern Song Dynasty. Social Sciences in China, (3): 125-160. ]
[7]	何凡能, 李士成, 张学珍. 2011. 北宋中期耕地面积及其空间分布格局重建[J]. 地理学报, 66(11): 1531-1539.
	[He F N, Li S C, Zhang X Z.2011. The reconstruction of cropland area and its spatial distribution pattern in the mid-Northern Song Dynasty. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(11): 1531-1539. ]
[8]	何凡能, 李士成, 张学珍, 等. 2012. 中国传统农区过去300年耕地重建结果的对比分析[J]. 地理学报, 67(9): 1190-1200.
	[He F N, Li S C, Zhang X Z, et al.2012. Comparisons of reconstructed cropland area from multiple datasets for the traditional cultivated region of China in the last 300 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(9): 1190-1200. ]
[9]	敬正书. 2013. 中国河湖大典·海河卷 [M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社.
	[Jing Z S.2013. Encyclopedia of rivers and lakes in China: Section of Haihe River Basin. Beijing, China: Water & Power Press. ]
[10]	李蓓蓓, 方修琦, 叶瑜, 等. 2010. 全球土地利用数据集精度的区域评估: 以中国东北地区为例[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 40(8): 1048-1059. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.01081
	[Li B B, Fang X Q, Ye Y, et al.2010. Accuracy assessment of global historical cropland datasets based on regional reconstructed historical data: A case study in Northeast China. Science China Earth Sciences, 40(8): 1048-1059. ] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.01081
[11]	李辅斌. 1994. 清代中后期直隶山西传统农业区垦殖述论[J]. 中国历史地理论丛, 9(2): 147-162.
	[Li F B.1994. An explanation of reclamation of the traditional agricultural area of Zhili and Shanxi Province in the middle and late Qing Dynasty. Journal of Chinese Historical Geography, 9(2): 147-162. ]
[12]	李辅斌. 1995. 清代前期直隶山西的土地复垦[J]. 中国历史地理论丛, 10(3): 71-84.
	[Li F B.1995. Land reclamation in Zhili and Shanxi Province in the Early Qing Dynasty. Journal of Chinese Historical Geography, 10(3): 71-84. ]
[13]	李美娇, 何凡能, 杨帆, 等. 2018. 元代前期省域耕地面积重建[J]. 地理学报, 73(5): 832-842.
	[Li M J, He F N, Yang F, et al.2018. Reconstruction of cropland area at the provincial level in the early Yuan Dynasty. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(5): 832-842. ]
[14]	李巧萍, 丁一汇, 董文杰. 2006. 中国近代土地利用变化对区域气候影响的数值模拟[J]. 气象学报, 64(3): 257-270. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6619.2006.03.001
	[Li Q P, Ding Y H, Dong W J.2006. A numerical simulation on impact of historical land-use changes on regional climate in China since 1700. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 64(3): 257-270. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0577-6619.2006.03.001
[15]	李士成, 何凡能, 陈屹松. 2012. 清代西南地区耕地空间格局网格化重建[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(9): 1196-1203. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.09.011
	[Li S C, He F N, Chen Y S.2012. Gridding reconstruction of cropland spatial patterns in Southwest China in the Qing Dynasty. Progress in Geography, 31(9): 1196-1203. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.09.011
[16]	刘洪升. 2002. 唐宋以来海河流域水灾频繁原因分析[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 27(1): 23-27.
	[Liu H S.2002. An analysis of the causes of frequent floods in Haihe Valley since the Tang and Song Dynasties. Journal of Hebei University (Philosophy and Social Science), 27(1): 23-27. ]
[17]	罗静, 张镱锂, 刘峰贵. 2014. 青藏高原东北部河湟谷地1726年耕地格局重建[J]. 地理研究, 33(7): 1285-1296.
	[Luo J, Zhang Y L, Liu F G.2014. Reconstruction of cropland spatial patterns for 1726 on Yellow River-Huangshui River Valley in northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geographical Research, 33(7): 1285-1296. ]
[18]	石超艺. 2012. 历史时期大清河南系的变迁研究: 兼谈与白洋淀湖群的演变关系[J]. 中国历史地理论丛, 27(2): 50-59.
	[Shi C Y.2012. A study on migration of the southern branches of the Daqinghe River in historical periods: And on its relationship with the evolution of the Baiyangdian Lake. Journal of Chinese Historical Geography, 27(2): 50-59. ]
[19]	石志新. 2000. 清代后期甘宁青地区人口与耕地变量分析[J]. 中国农史, 19(1): 72-79.
	[Shi Z X.2000. Analysis on variable of the population and land in the area of Gan, Ning and Qing of the late Qing Dynasty. Agricultural History of China, 19(1): 72-79. ]
[20]	谭徐明. 2002. 海河流域水环境的历史演变及其主要影响因素研究[J]. 水利发展研究, 2(12): 15-20.
	[Tan X M.2002. A research of water environment change in Haihe River Basin and its main influence factors. Water Resources Development Research, 2(12): 15-20. ]
[21]	王长松, 尹钧科. 2014. 三角淀的形成与淤废过程研究[J]. 中国农史, 33(3): 104-111.
	[Wang C S, Yin J K.2014. Research on the process of formation and disappearance of the Sanjiaodian. Agricultural History of China, 33(3): 104-111. ]
[22]	王会昌. 1983. 一万年来白洋淀的扩张与收缩[J]. 地理研究, 2(3): 8-18.
	[Wang H C.1983. Expansion and contraction of the Baiyangdian Lake since 10000 years ago. Geographical Research, 2(3): 8-18. ]
[23]	王建革. 2001. 清浊分流: 环境变迁与清代大清河下游治水特点[J]. 清史研究, (2): 33-42.
	[Wang J G.2001. Clear and muddy flows: Environmental change and special features of the water: Control of the Da Qing River lower reaches. Studies in Qing History, (2): 33-42. ]
[24]	王培华. 2017. 清代永定河下游的沧桑之变[J]. 河北学刊, (5): 62-69.
	[Wang P H.2017. The great changes at the lower reaches of the Yongding River. Hebei Academic Journal, (5): 62-69. ]
[25]	魏学琼. 2016. 过去300年华北地区耕地变化重建研究 [D]. 北京: 北京师范大学.
	[Wei X Q.2016. Reconstruction of cropland change in North China over the past 300 years. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University. ]
[26]	阎同生, 董继国, 刘勇, 等. 2007. 河北省耕地变化研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 35(8): 2392-2393, 2402.
	[Yan T S, Dong J G, Liu Y, et al.2007. Changes of cultivated land in Hebei Province. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 35(8): 2392-2393, 2402. ]
[27]	叶瑜, 方修琦, 任玉玉, 等. 2009. 东北地区过去300年耕地覆盖变化[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 39(3): 340-350.
	[Ye Y, Fang X Q, Ren Y Y, et al.2009. Cropland change in the Northeast Plain in the past 300 years. Science in China: Earth Sciences), 39(3): 340-350. ]
[28]	尹玲玲, 王卫. 2016. 明清时期夏盖湖的垦废变迁及其原因分析[J]. 中国农史, 35(1): 122-129.
	[Yin L L, Wang W.2016. Analysis on the cause of the use and re-use of the Xiagai Lake during the Ming and Qing Dynasty periods. Agricultural History of China, 35(1): 122-129. ]
[29]	袁存, 叶瑜, 方修琦. 2015. 清代中期苏皖地区耕地数据网格化处理及精度对比[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(1): 83-91. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.01.010
	[Yuan C, Ye Y, Fang X Q.2015. Rasterizing cropland data and accuracy comparison in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces in the Mid-Qing Dynasty. Progress in Geography, 34(1): 83-91. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.01.010
[30]	张贵军. 2005. 河北省土地利用变化及其驱动机制研究 [D]. 保定: 河北农业大学.
	[Zhang G J.2005. A research of land use change and driving forces mechanism of Hebei Province. Baoding, China: Hebei Agricultural University. ]
[31]	张建民. 1990. 明清农业垦殖论略[J]. 中国农史, 9(4): 9-27.
	[Zhang J M.1990. Explanation of agricultural reclamation in Ming and Qing Dynasty. Agricultural History of China, 9(4): 9-27. ]
[32]	章有义. 1991. 近代中国人口和耕地的再估计[J]. 中国经济史研究, (1): 20-30.
	[Zhang Y Y.1991. Re-estimation of population and cropland data in modern China. Researches in Chinese Economic History, (1): 20-30. ]
[33]	邹逸麟. 1993. 黄淮海平原历史地理 [M]. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社.
	[Zou Y L.1993. Historical geography of Huanghuaihai Plain. Hefei, China: Anhui Education Press. ]
[34]	Goldewijk K K, Beusen A, Doelman J, et al.2017. New anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene: HYDE 3.2[J]. Earth System Science Data, 9(2): 927-953. doi: 10.5194/essd-9-927-2017
[35]	Hurtt G C, Chini L P, Frolking S, et al.2011. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500-2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands[J]. Climatic Change, 109: 117-161. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2
[36]	Ramankutty N, Foley J A.1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13(4): 997-1027. doi: 10.1029/1999GB900046
[37]	Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, et al.1997. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems[J]. Science, 277: 494-499. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494
[38]	Wei X Q, Ye Y, Zhang Q, et al.2015. Methods for cropland reconstruction based on gazetteers in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911): A case study in Zhili Province, China[J]. Applied Geography, 65: 82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.002
[39]	Wei X Q, Ye Y, Zhang Q, et al.2016. Reconstruction of cropland change over the past 300 years in the Jing-Jin-Ji area, China[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 16(7): 1-13.
[40]	Ye Y, Wei X Q, Li F, et al.2015. Reconstruction of cropland cover changes in the Shandong Province over the past 300 years[J]. Scientific Reports, 5(1), doi: 10.1038/srep13642.

县域	1646年	1762年	1884年	1916年	1980年代
清苑县	0.210	0.457	0.472	0.269	0.864
满城县	0.116	0.208	0.285	0.183	0.572
徐水县	0.276	0.531	0.534	0.247	0.782
容城县	0.271	0.487	0.594	0.482	0.83
望都县	0.133	0.451	0.468	0.355	0.875
顺平县	0.207	0.374	0.393	0.439	0.486
唐县	0.087	0.171	0.174	0.225	0.317
安国市	0.265	0.465	0.637	0.528	0.839
博野县	0.340	0.693	0.774	0.621	0.838
蠡县	0.358	0.644	0.766	0.457	0.888
高阳县	0.369	0.699	0.876	0.814	0.905
定州市	0.111	0.408	0.390	0.123	0.848
曲阳县	0.187	0.267	0.267	0.101	0.549
阜平县	0.004	0.008	0.008	0.008	0.081
行唐县	0.063	0.128	0.129	0.094	0.638
无极县	0.310	0.573	0.534	0.796	0.859
新乐市	0.091	0.255	0.238	0.805	0.814
安新县	0.219	0.462	0.573	0.436	0.635
肃宁县	0.377	0.799	0.831	0.689	0.872
河间市	0.314	0.815	0.815	0.866	0.882
任丘市	0.230	0.659	0.666	0.578	0.846
灵丘县	0.044	0.122	0.110	0.188	0.218
保定市市辖区	—	—	—	—	0.583

指标	1646年	1762年	1884年	1916年	1980年代
总耕地数/km²	3322.42	7303.96	7732.2	6801.69	11867.63
总土地面积/km²	20481.49	20481.49	20481.49	20481.49	20481.49
平均垦殖率	0.162	0.357	0.378	0.332	0.579

过去300 a大清河上游南部流域耕地变化重建

Reconstruction of cropland change in the southern area of the Daqing River Basin over the past 300 years

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 40

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	袁瑞强, 龙西亭, 王鹏, 王仕琴, 宋献方. 白洋淀流域地下水更新速率[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(3): 381-388.
[2]	张秀梅, 唐以剑, 章申. 白洋淀地区土壤——植物系统中污染物含量与变化规律研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 1997, 16(2): 62-69.