珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.03.012

地理科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 428-440.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.03.012

珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式

王甫园^1,²(), 王开泳^1,^2,^*()

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
2. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101

收稿日期:2018-05-14 修回日期:2018-12-26 出版日期:2019-03-28 发布日期:2019-03-28
通讯作者: 王开泳
作者简介:
第一作者简介：王甫园(1988— ),男,湖南新化人,博士后,研究方向为旅游地理与生态空间治理。E-mail: wangfy.15b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2018M641457);国家自然科学基金项目(41871151)

Connectivity and distribution pattern of regional greenways and ecological recreation spaces in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration

Fuyuan WANG^1,²(), Kaiyong WANG^1,^2,^*()

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2018-05-14 Revised:2018-12-26 Online:2019-03-28 Published:2019-03-28
Contact: Kaiyong WANG
Supported by:
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No. 2018M641457;National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41871151.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

绿道对城市群构建连续的生态开放空间网络具有重要作用。基于珠三角城市群现有区域绿道网络,采用拓扑网络和社会网络分析评估生态游憩空间的连接度,揭示生态游憩空间联系的空间分布模式,结果表明：“生态游憩空间-区域绿道”拓扑网络的α、β、γ指数分别为0、0.386、0.129,说明网络中点和边较少,网络为树状形,环通性不高,总体连接度较低;绿道对生态游憩空间的连接度呈集群式分布,且处在边缘的凝聚子群连接度高于中心地区的子群;各集群之间的连接度呈现出东部-北部区域大于西部、东西部之间空间分割性比较明显的格局;连接度分布模式的形成主要受绿道政策与布局、绿道建设机制、生态游憩空间规模集聚格局、地理阻隔与空间邻近性的影响。最后,论文提出了优化“生态游憩空间-绿道”分布模式、构建连接度更高的生态开放空间系统的路径,给中国城市群规划和发展提供参考。

关键词: 生态游憩空间, 绿道, 连接度, 分布模式, 珠三角城市群

Abstract:

Greenways play an important role in building a continuous ecological open space system in an urban agglomeration. Based on the regional greenways in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration, topological network analysis and social network analysis were used to assess the connectivity and distribution pattern of ecological recreation space-regional greenway network. The results show that: 1) The α, β, and γ indices are 0, 0.386, and 0.129 respectively, indicating a low-circuitry and low-connectivity topological structure of the network. 2) The network is clustered, and the degree of connectivity of the cohesive subgroups at the edge is higher than that of the central region. 3) The degree of connectivity between the cohesive subgroups in the eastern and northern regions is greater than that of the cohesive subgroups in the western region, and the connectivity between the western subgroups and eastern subgroups is low, suggesting that the network is fragmented in the east-west direction. 4) The distribution pattern of the connectivity is formed under the influences of the greenway development policy and layout, the greenway construction mechanism, the agglomeration pattern of ecological recreation spaces, geographical barriers, and spatial proximity. Several pathways were proposed to construct an ecological recreation space-greenway network with higher connectivity, for providing some references for the planning and development of China's urban agglomerations.

Key words: ecological recreation spaces, greenway, connectivity, distribution pattern, Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration

王甫园, 王开泳. 珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 428-440.

Fuyuan WANG, Kaiyong WANG. Connectivity and distribution pattern of regional greenways and ecological recreation spaces in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(3): 428-440.

图/表 11

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

图3

图4

图5

表4

图6

图7

参考文献 63

[1]	查尔斯·E·利特尔. 2013. 美国绿道 [M]. 余青, 莫雯静, 陈海沐, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社.
	[Little C E.2013. American greenways. Translated by Yu Q, Mo W J, Chen H M. Beijing, China: China Building Industry Press. ]
[2]	柴舟跃, 谢晓萍, 尤利安·韦克尔. 2016. 德国城市群内区域公园规划管理手段研究: 以莱茵美茵区域公园为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 31(2): 110-115.
	[Chai Z Y, Xie X P, Wekel J.2016. Research on planning and management of regional parks in german metropolitan regions: A case study on Regional Park Rhein Main in Frankfurt/Rhein-Main metropolitan region. Urban Planning International, 31(2): 110-115. ]
[3]	陈浩, 陆林, 郑嬗婷. 2011. 基于旅游流的城市群旅游地旅游空间网络结构分析: 以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 地理学报, 66(2): 257-266. doi: 10.11821/xb201102011
	[Chen H, Lu L, Zheng S T.2011. The spatial network structure of the tourism destinations in urban agglomerations based on tourist flow: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(2): 257-266. ] doi: 10.11821/xb201102011
[4]	陈爽, 王丹, 王进. 2010. 城市绿地服务功能的居民认知度研究[J]. 人文地理, 25(4): 55-59.
	[Chen S, Wang D, Wang J.2010. A study on greenspace service cognition of urban residents in Nanjing China. Human Geography, 25(4): 55-59. ]
[5]	陈伟劲, 马学广, 蔡莉丽, 等. 2013. 珠三角城市联系的空间格局特征研究: 基于城际客运交通流的分析[J]. 经济地理, 33(4): 48-55.
	[Chen W J, Ma X G, Cai L L, et al.2013. Characteristics of regional city connection's spatial pattern based on intercity passenger traffic flow in Pearl River Delta. Economic Geography, 33(4): 48-55. ]
[6]	丁俊, 王开泳. 2016. 珠江三角洲城市群工业生产空间格局、形态特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(5): 610-621. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.05.008
	[Ding J, Wang K Y.2016. Spatial pattern and morphological characteristics of industrial production space and influential factors in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration. Progress in Geography, 35(5): 610-621. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.05.008
[7]	冯利芳. 2012. 功在当下造福千秋: 珠三角绿道网建设的调查报告[J]. 城市发展研究, 19(2): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2012.02.001
	[Feng L F.2012. Investigating on the Pearl River Delta greenway network. Urban Studies, 19(2): 1-6. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2012.02.001
[8]	佛山市人民政府. 2017. 佛山市城市生态控制线划定规划 [EB/OL]. (2017-06-20)[2018-04-04]. .
	[The People's Government of Foshan City. 2017. Planning of urban ecological control line in Foshan City. (2017-06-20)[2018-04-04]. . ]
[9]	富伟, 刘世梁, 崔保山, 等. 2009. 景观生态学中生态连接度研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 29(11): 6174-6182. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.11.052
	[Fu W, Liu S L, Cui B S, et al.2009. A review on ecological connectivity in landscape ecology. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(11): 6174-6182. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.11.052
[10]	高长征, 王成晖, 宋亚亭. 2011. 珠三角区域绿道建设与管理问题研究[J]. 规划师, 27(S1): 153-158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2011.z1.032
	[Gao C Z, Wang C H, Song Y T.2011. Greenbell construct and management of Pearl River Delta. Planner, 27(S1): 153-158. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2011.z1.032
[11]	高洁. 2010. 交通运输网络连通性评价指标分析[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 8(1): 35-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2010.01.007
	[Gao J.2010. Analysis of transportation network connectivity evaluation index. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 8(1): 35-38. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2010.01.007
[12]	广东省旅游局. 2017. 广东省A级旅游景区名录(截至2017年9月8日) [EB/OL]. (2017-10-30)[2018-01-01]. .
	[Tourism Bureau of Guangdong Province. A list of grade-A scenic spots in Guangdong Province (up to September 8, 2017). (2017-10-30)[2018-01-01]. . ]
[13]	广东省住房和建设厅. 2010. 珠江三角洲绿道网总体规划纲要[J]. 建筑监督检测与造价, (3): 10-70.
	[Department of Housing and Urban-rural Of Guangdong Province.2010. Green Pearl River Delta road network master plan outline. Supervision Test and Cost of Construction, (3): 10-70. ]
[14]	广州市林业和园林局. 2010. 广州市绿道网建设第四次现场会议 [R]. 广州: 广州市林业和园林局.
	[Guangzhou Forestry and Landscape Bureau.2010. The fourth on-site meeting of Guangzhou greenway network construction. Guangzhou, China: Guangzhou Forestry and Landscape Bureau. ]
[15]	胡卫华. 2013. 绿道旅游存在的问题及开发对策: 以珠三角绿道网为例[J]. 热带地理, 33(4): 504-510.
	[Hu W H.2013. Problems of greenway tourism and countermeasures: A case study of PRD. Tropical Geography, 33(4): 504-510. ]
[16]	李华. 2015. 城市生态游憩空间服务功能评价与优化对策[J]. 城市规划, (8): 63-69. doi: 10.11819/cpr20150809a
	[Li H.2015. Evaluation and optimization countermeasures for service functions of urban ecological recreation space. City Planning Review, (8): 63-69. ] doi: 10.11819/cpr20150809a
[17]	李玏, 刘家明, 宋涛, 等. 2015. 北京市绿带游憩空间分布特征及其成因[J]. 地理研究, 34(8): 1507-1521. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508009
	[Li L, Liu J M, Song T, et al.2015. Spatial characteristics and causes of recreational space in the urban green belt of Beijing, China. Geographical Research, 34(8): 1507-1521. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201508009
[18]	刘军. 2009. 整体网分析讲义: UCINET软件实用指南 [M]. 上海: 格致出版社.
	[Liu J.2009. Lectures on whole network approach: A practical guide to UCINET. Shanghai, China: Gezhi Press. ]
[19]	刘岳, 李忠武, 唐政洪, 等. 2012. 基于适宜性分析与GIS的长沙市大河西先导区城市绿道网络设计[J]. 生态学杂志, 31(2): 426-432.
	[Liu Y, Li Z W, Tang Z H, et al.2012. Greenway network design of Great West River Pilot Area in Changsha City, Hunan Province of South-central China based on suitability analysis and GIS. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31(2): 426-432. ]
[20]	刘铮. 2017. 都市主义转型: 珠三角绿道的规划与实施 [D]. 广州: 华南理工大学.
	[Liu Z.2017. Urbanism in transformation: The planning and implementation of the Pearl River Delta greenways. Guangzhou, China: South China University of Technology. ]
[21]	卢飞红, 尹海伟, 孔繁花. 2015. 城市绿道的使用特征与满意度研究: 以南京环紫金山绿道为例[J]. 中国园林, 31(9): 50-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2015.09.012
	[Lu F H, Yin H W, Kong F H.2015. The using characteristics and satisfaction of urban greenway: A case study of the purple mountain greenway in Nanjing. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 31(9): 50-54. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2015.09.012
[22]	马向明, 程红宁. 2013. 广东绿道体系的构建: 构思与创新[J]. 城市规划, 37(2): 38-44.
	[Ma X M, Cheng H N.2013. Building of greenway system in Guangdong Province: Conception and innovation. City Planning Review, 37(2): 38-44. ]
[23]	马向明, 杨庆东. 2017. 广东绿道的两个走向: 南粤古驿道的活化利用对广东绿道发展的意义[J]. 南方建筑, (6): 44-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2017.06.044
	[Ma X M, Yang Q D.2017. Two trends of Guangdong greenway system evolution: The significance of the revitalization of South China historical trail to Guangdong greenway system. South Architecture, (6): 44-48. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2017.06.044
[24]	孙琨, 唐承财, 钟林生. 2016. 基于人口特征的城市生态游憩空间配置: 以常熟市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(6): 714-723. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.06.005
	[Sun K, Tang C C, Zhong L S.Siting of urban recreational eco-space based on population characteristics: A case study of Changshu City, China. Progress in Geography, 35(6): 714-723. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.06.005
[25]	孙琨, 钟林生, 张爱平, 等. 2016. 城市生态游憩空间休闲价值对比分析: 以常熟市为例[J]. 地理研究, 35(2): 256-270. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1323283
	[Sun K, Zhong L S, Zhang A P, et al.2016. Comparative analysis on the leisure values of urban ecological recreation spaces: A case study of Changshu City. Geographical Research, 35(2): 256-270. ] doi: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1323283
[26]	文克·E·德拉姆施塔德, 温迪·J·杰里施塔德, 徐凌云, 等. 2016. 景观生态学作为可持续景观规划的框架[J]. 中国园林, 32(4): 16-27.
	[Wenche E. DRAMSTAD, Wendy J. FJELLSTAD, Xu L Y.2016. Landscape ecology as a framework for sustainable landscape planning. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 32(4): 16-27. ]
[27]	吴隽宇, 游亚昀. 2017. 珠三角区域绿道(省立)一号线生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J]. 中国园林, 33(3): 98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2017.03.019
	[Wu J Y, You Y Y.2017. Preliminary assessment of ecosystem services value of Pearl River Delta greenway line one. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 33(3): 98-103. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2017.03.019
[28]	熊春妮, 魏虹, 兰明娟. 2008. 重庆市都市区绿地景观的连通性[J]. 生态学报, 28(5): 2237-2244. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.05.040
	[Xiong C N, Wei H, Lan M J.2008. Analysis of connectivity on greenland landscape in metropolitan region of Chongqing City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(5): 2237-2244. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.05.040
[29]	徐东辉, 郭建华, 高磊. 2014. 美国绿道的规划建设策略与管理维护机制[J]. 国际城市规划, 29(3): 83-90.
	[Xu D H, Guo J H, Gao L.The planning & construction strategy and management & maintenance mechanism of American greenway. Urban Planning International, 29(3): 83-90. ]
[30]	徐军, 罗嵩龄. 2000. 公路网连通性研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 13(1): 95-97. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2000.01.022
	[Xu J, Luo S L.A study of connectness for the highway network. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 13(1): 95-97. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2000.01.022
[31]	杨丽婷, 刘大均, 赵越, 等. 2016. 长江中游城市群森林公园空间分布格局及可达性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 25(8): 1228-1237. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201608009
	[Yang L T, Liu D J, Zhao Y, et al.2016. Spatial pattern and accessibility of the forest parks in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 25(8): 1228-1237. ] doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201608009
[32]	叶盛东. 1992. 美国绿道简介[J]. 国外城市规划, (3): 46-49.
	[Ye S D.1992. The introduction of American greenways. Urban Planning International, (3): 46-49. ]
[33]	叶玉瑶. 2006. 城市群空间演化动力机制初探: 以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 城市规划, 30(1): 61-66. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2006.01.010
	[Ye Y Y.2006. Spatial evolution mechanism of urban conglomeration: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. City Planning Review, 30(1): 61-66. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2006.01.010
[34]	殷柏慧, 吴必虎. 2004. 长三角与环渤海区域旅游合作条件对比研究: 兼论环渤海次区域旅游合作道路选择[J]. 旅游学刊, 19(6): 33-37.
	[Yin B H, Wu B H.2004. A comparative study on regional tourism cooperation between Yangtze River Delta and Bohai Rim. Tourism Tribune, 19(6): 33-37. ]
[35]	俞孔坚, 李伟, 李迪华, 等. 2005. 快速城市化地区遗产廊道适宜性分析方法探讨: 以台州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 24(1): 69-76. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2005.01.008
	[Yu K J, Li W, Li D H.2005. Suitability analysis of heritage corridor in rapidly urbanizing region: A case study of Taizhou City. Geographical Research, 24(1): 69-76. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2005.01.008
[36]	赵珂, 李享, 袁南华. 2017. 从美国“绿道”到欧洲绿道: 城乡空间生态网络构建: 以广州市增城区为例[J]. 中国园林, 33(8): 82-87.
	[Zhao K, Li X, Yuan N H.2017. From American "Greenway" to European Greenway: The construction of ecological network in urban and rural space: A case study of Zengcheng District of Guangzhou. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 33(8): 82-87. ]
[37]	周年兴, 俞孔坚, 黄震方. 2006. 绿道及其研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 26(9): 3108-3116.
	[Zhou N X, Yu K J, Huang Z F.2006. Perspectives on greenway development. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(9): 3108-3116. ]
[38]	Ahern J.1995. Greenways as a planning strategy[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1-3): 131-155. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V
[39]	Akpinar A.2016. Factors influencing the use of urban greenways: A case study of Aydın, Turkey[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16: 123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.004
[40]	Arnberger A, Eder R.2012. The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(1): 41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.11.003
[41]	Cook E A.2002. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2-4): 269-280. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00226-2
[42]	Czembrowski P, Kronenberg J.2016. Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 146: 11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005
[43]	Dai D.2011. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene?[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4): 234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002
[44]	Deenihan G, Caulfield B, O'Dwyer D.2013. Measuring the success of the Great Western Greenway in Ireland[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 7: 73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2013.03.004
[45]	Dzhambov A M, Dimitrova D D.2015. Green spaces and environmental noise perception[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4): 1000-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.006
[46]	Fábos J G.2004. Greenway planning in the United States: Its origins and recent case studies[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 68(2): 321-342. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.003
[47]	Flink C A, Olka K, Searns R M.2001. Trails for the Twenty-first Century: Planning, Design, and management manual for multi-use trails[M]. Second Edition. Washington: Island Press
[48]	Jang M, Kang C-D.2015. Urban greenway and compact land use development: A multilevel assessment in Seoul, South Korea[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143: 160-172. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.010
[49]	Keith S J, Larson L R, Shafer C S, et al.2018. Greenway use and preferences in diverse urban communities: Implications for trail design and management[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 172: 47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.007
[50]	Linehan J, Gross M, Finn J.1995. Greenway planning: Developing a landscape ecological network approach[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 33(1-3): 179-193. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)02017-A
[51]	Madureira H, Nunes F, Oliveira J V, et al.2015. Urban residents’ beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1): 56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008
[52]	Preston-Whyte R.2001. Constructed leisure space: The seaside at Durban[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(3): 581-596. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00067-0
[53]	Rao P S, Gavane A G, Ansari M F, et al.2004. Performance evaluation of a green belt in a petroleum refinery: A case study[J]. Ecological Engineering, 23(2): 77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.06.013
[54]	Senes G, Rovelli R, Bertoni D, et al.2017. Factors influencing greenways use: Definition of a method for estimation in the Italian context[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 65: 175-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.014
[55]	Sinclair K E, Hess G R, Moorman C E, et al.2005. Mammalian nest predators respond to greenway width, landscape context and habitat structure[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2-4): 277-293. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.001
[56]	Smyth R, Mishra V, Qian X.2008. The environment and well-being in urban China[J]. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2): 547-555. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.017
[57]	Toccolini A, Fumagalli N, Senes G.2006. Greenways planning in Italy: The Lambro River Valley Greenways System[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1-4): 98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.038
[58]	Turner T.2006. Greenway planning in Britain: Recent work and future plans[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1-4): 240-251. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.035
[59]	Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, Schipperijn J.2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(1): 5-19. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003
[60]	Wan C, Shen G Q.2015. Encouraging the use of urban green space: The mediating role of attitude, perceived usefulness and perceived behavioural control[J]. Habitat International, 50: 130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.010
[61]	Wang F Y, Wang K Y.2018. Measuring spatial accessibility to ecological recreation spaces in the Pearl River Delta region: An improved twostep floating catchment area method[J]. Journal of Spatial Science, 63(2): 279-295. doi: 10.1080/14498596.2018.1488633
[62]	Wasserman S, Faust K.1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[63]	Yu K, Li D, Li N.2006. The evolution of greenways in China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1-4): 223-239. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.034

数据	级别	来源
森林公园名录	国家级、省级、市级、县(市、区)级	1) 广东省森林公园一览表(https://www.gdf.gov.cn/index.php?action=view&id=7481) 2) 省级森林公园名录(https://park.gdf.gov.cn/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=79:2010-01-11-03-07-17&catid=16:gongyuanminglu) 3) 广东省免费森林公园名单(https://www.gdf.gov.cn/index.php?controller=front&action=view&id=10033759) 4) 广东省森林公园体系和湿地公园体系建设与发展规划基础数据(https://www.gdf.gov.cn/index.php?controller=front&action=view&id=10019383)
湿地公园名录(截至2017年7月)	国家级、省级、市级、县(市、区)级	名称、面积和等级信息均通过申请广东省林业厅政府信息公开获得
风景名胜区名录	国家级、省级	1) 广东省风景名胜区名录(http://www.360doc.com/document/13/0122/16/9090133_261783885.shtml) 2) 广东省风景名胜区体系规划(2015—2030)
水利风景区名录	国家级	从水利部官方网站(http://slfjq.mwr.gov.cn/jqml/)获得国家级水利风景区名录,其面积经由网络搜索获得
地质公园名录	国家级、省级	向广东省国土资源厅申请信息公开获得名称、面积和等级信息
A级景区名录(截至2017年9月8日)	5A、4A、3A、2A	名录和等级信息来自广东省旅游局官方网站(广东省旅游局, 2017),面积同样通过网络搜索整理
城市公园（综合公园和专类公园）	市级,社区公园服务范围较小,未予纳入	名称、位置和面积从各市园林绿化主管部门官方网站、旅游服务网站(如侠侣网)、百度百科等网站整理,所在位置通过查询谷歌地图获得^*

序号	景区等级	其他生态游憩空间等级	权重值	游憩服务供给水平
1	AA	县级	0.333	低
2	AAA	市级	0.667	中
3	AAAA	省级	1	高
4	AAAAA	国家级	1.333	最高

	珠海尖峰山森林公园	肇庆星湖风景名胜区	深圳梧桐山国家森林公园	深圳大鹏半岛国家地质公园	广州海珠湖国家湿地公园	江门圭峰山国家森林公园	东莞松山湖景区
珠海尖峰山森林公园	0
肇庆星湖风景名胜区	7.830	0
深圳梧桐山国家森林公园	0.946	23.042	0
深圳大鹏半岛国家地质公园	14.886	337.646	3205.033	0
广州海珠湖国家湿地公园	10.115	305.019	17.638	240.441	0
江门圭峰山国家森林公园	24.799	571.241	32.56	494.311	517.999	0
东莞松山湖景区	10.142	266.339	1411.108	7039.627	221.418	362.243	0
……

名称	子群①	子群②	子群③	子群④	子群⑤	子群⑥	子群⑦	子群⑧
① 珠海市东部集群	25701.94
② 深圳市东部-惠州市南部集群	46.94	6721995.50
③ 东莞市-深圳市北部-惠州市西部集群	3266.27	79.88	984.72
④ 深圳市西部和广州市中部集群	37997.99	108.19	82.71	3310.63
⑤ 珠海市西部-中山市南部集群	1.49	2.02	3.97	2.14	681.82
⑥ 肇庆市辖区-佛山市-江门市东北部集群	6.62	4.73	10.19	5.97	5.90	118111.57
⑦ 广州市南部集群	1.85	0.95	2.33	1.57	9.25	5.44	56.26
⑧ 广州市北部集群	213.55	21.29	118.49	956.53	6.72	20.33	6.18	9250.32

珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式

Connectivity and distribution pattern of regional greenways and ecological recreation spaces in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 63

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘汉初, 樊杰, 张海朋, 王甫园. 珠三角城市群制造业集疏与产业空间格局变动[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 195-206.
[2]	孙琨, 唐承财, 钟林生. 基于人口特征的城市生态游憩空间配置——以常熟市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(6): 714-723.
[3]	张旺, 申玉铭. 京津冀都市圈生产性服务业空间集聚特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6): 742-749.