粤港澳大湾区背景下的珠三角城市群产业—人口—空间交互影响机理

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.007

地理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 1653-1662.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.12.007

所属专题：人口与城市研究；粤港澳大湾区

粤港澳大湾区背景下的珠三角城市群产业—人口—空间交互影响机理

刘锦^1,³(), 田银生^1,^2,^*()

1. 华南理工大学建筑学院,广州510640
2. 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室,广州510640
3. 广东培正学院管理学院,广州 510830

收稿日期:2017-10-16 修回日期:2018-02-25 出版日期:2018-12-28 发布日期:2018-12-28
通讯作者: 田银生
作者简介:
作者简介：刘锦(1984-),男,湖南岳阳人,博士研究生,讲师,主要研究方向为城乡发展理论,E-mail: liujin1984yy@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51678241);亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主创新基金项目(2017KB08)

Mutual influencing mechanism of industry-population-space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in the context of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development

Jin LIU^1,³(), Yinsheng TIAN^1,^2,^*()

1. College of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Guangzhou 510640, China
3. Management School of Guangdong Peizheng College, Guangzhou 510830, China

Received:2017-10-16 Revised:2018-02-25 Online:2018-12-28 Published:2018-12-28
Contact: Yinsheng TIAN
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.51678241;Independent Innovation Fund for State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, No.2017KB08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在粤港澳大湾区成为国家战略的背景下,具有经济地理优势的“湾区”地带,因作为推动全球经济发展的重要增长极而举世瞩目。本文以其主要组成部分的“珠三角9市”为研究对象,通过建立向量自回归VAR模型,利用脉冲响应函数和方差分解方法,对该城市群发展进程中的“产业—人口—空间”交互影响机理进行分析。研究结果表明：珠三角城市群的产业发展对人口的吸纳作用在后期近乎消退,人口集聚对产业发展的促进作用在中后期也明显减弱,而空间扩展对人口集聚的影响效果比较有限且后期呈现负影响。基于上述结论可以判断,珠三角城市群产业、人口和空间要素之间具有短期间的互促发展效果,但是尚未形成城市群应具有的长期稳定的互促机制。为推进粤港澳大湾区建设,珠三角城市群应积极推动产业类型不断提升以集聚高素质人口,积极引导空间扩张与人口增长匹配发展,并构筑多层次且协同互补的产业空间,以此深化产业、人口和空间要素的协同发展格局。

关键词: 城市群, 产业—人口—空间;, VAR模型, 交互影响, 珠三角, 粤港澳大湾区

Abstract:

The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area with economic geographical advantages is deemed to be the growth point that captivated the world for its impetus to the global economy. This article focuses on the nine main cities of the Pearl River Delta, analyzing the mutual influences among industry-population-space during the rapid development process of this urban agglomeration by constructing a vector auto regressive model and impulse response function and variance decomposition analysis. The results show that: The absorption effect for population in the development of industry in the urban agglomeration of the Pearl River Delta faded in the late stage. The acceleration that industry benefitted from population aggregation weakened in the middle and late periods. The spatial expansion effects on population aggregation were limited and have become negative in the late period. It concludes that in general a short-term mutual promoting development mechanism between industry-population-space was formed, but a long-term mechanism is yet to be developed. In order to promote the development of the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao, the urban agglomeration of the Pearl River Delta should attract highly-qualified workforce on the basis of industrial upgrading, plan spatial growth according to the population aggregation, and construct a multilevel synergistic industrial space with complementary products and services. With these measures, the overall aims are to strengthen the synergistic development among industry, population, and space and promote the development of the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao.

Key words: urban agglomeration, industry-population-space, vector auto regressive (VAR) model, mutual influence, Pearl River Delta, Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Greater Bay Area

刘锦, 田银生. 粤港澳大湾区背景下的珠三角城市群产业—人口—空间交互影响机理[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1653-1662.

Jin LIU, Yinsheng TIAN. Mutual influencing mechanism of industry-population-space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in the context of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1653-1662.

图/表 10

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 19

[1]	蔡赤萌, 2017. 粤港澳大湾区城市群建设的战略意义和现实挑战[J]. 广东社会科学, (4): 5-14.
	[Cai C M, 2017. The strategic significance and realistic challenges of the construction of urban agglomeration in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao[J]. Guangdong Social Sciences, (4): 5-14.]
[2]	陈林心, 何宜庆, 徐夕湘. 2017. 长江中游城市群人口–空间–产业城镇化的时空耦合特征分析[J]. 统计与决策, (12): 129-133.
	[Chen L X, He Y Q, Xu X X.2017. Spatial-temporal coupling characteristics of population-space-industry urbanization of the UAMRYR[J]. Statics & Decision, (12): 129-133.]
[3]	邓春玉. 2010. 珠三角经济圈对外经济联系与地缘经济关系匹配分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 29(2): 208-216.
	[Deng C Y.2018. A matching analysis on the foreign economic contact and geo-economic relationship of the economic circle PRD[J]. Progress in Geography, 29(2): 208-216.]
[4]	方创琳. 2014. 中国城市群研究取得的重要进展与未来发展方向[J]. 地理学报, 69(8): 1130-1144.
	[Fang C L.2014. Progress and the future direction of research into urban agglomeration in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8):1130-1144.]
[5]	方创琳, 姚士谋, 刘盛和. 2011. 2010中国城市群发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Fang C L, Yao S M, Liu S H.2011. 2010 Zhongguo chengshiqun fazhan baogao[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press.]
[6]	高铁梅. 2005. 计量经济分析方法与建模[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
	[Gao T M.2005. Analytical methods of econometrics and modeling[M]. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.]
[7]	李子奈, 叶阿忠. 2000. 高等计量经济学[M].北京: 清华大学出版社.
	[Li Z N, Ye A Z.2000. Advanced econometrics[M]. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.]
[8]	刘盛和, 陈田, 蔡建明. 2003. 中国非农化与城市化关系的省际差异[J]. 地理学报, 58(6): 937-946.
	[Liu S H, Chen T, Cai J M.2003. Provincial disparities of the relationship between industrialization and urbanization[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(6): 937-946.]
[9]	汪行东, 鲁志国. 2017. 粤港澳大湾区城市群空间结构研究: 从单中心到多中心[J]. 岭南学刊, (5): 1-8.
	[Wang X D, Lu Z G.2017. Space structure of the agglomeration of Guangdong, HK & Mac Bay Area: From the mono-centric to the polycentric[J]. Academic Journal of South China, (5): 1-8.]
[10]	王浩, 沈正平, 李新春. 2017. 淮海城市群战略定位与协同发展途径及措施[J]. 经济地理, 37(5): 58-65.
	[Wang H, Shen Z P, Li X C.2017. Strategic position of huaihai urban agglomeration and its synergetic development paths and measures[J]. Economic Geography, 37(5): 58-65.]
[11]	王小章. 2013. 从产业、空间、人口三维关系看当前城镇化问题: 以浙江省德清县为例[J]. 浙江社会科学, (11): 80-85.
	[Wang X Z.2013. Research on urbanization from the three-dimensional relation of industry, space, population: A case study of Deqing County in Zhejiang Province[J]. Zhejiagn Social Science, (11): 80-85.]
[12]	王周伟, 崔百胜, 朱敏, 等. 2015. 经济计量研究指导: 实证分析与软件实现[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	[Wang Z W, Cui B S, Zhu M.2015. Research guide to econometrics: Empirical study and software actualization[M]. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.]
[13]	吴群, 李永乐. 2010. 财政分权、地方政府竞争与土地财政[J]. 财贸经济, (7): 51-59.
	[Wu Q, Li Y L.2010. Fiscal decentralization, competition and local land revenue[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, (7): 51-59.]
[14]	肖大威. 2013. 论中国经济发展转型期的城镇化与城乡统筹[J]. 南方建筑, (1): 4-5.
	[Xiao D W.2013. Research on the urbanization and rural-urban integration during transformation of Chinese economic development[J]. South Architecture, (1): 4-5.]
[15]	谢文惠, 邓卫. 1997. 城市经济学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
	[Xie W H, Deng W.1997. Chengshi jingjixue [M]. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.]
[16]	曾鹏, 张凡. 2017. 十大城市群“产业—人口—空间”耦合协调度的比较[J].统计与决策, (10): 94-98.
	[Zeng P, Zhang F.2017. Coupling coordination comparison of industry-population-space development in China's top ten urban agglomerations[J]. Statics & Decision, (10): 94-98.]
[17]	周春山, 罗利佳, 史晨怡, 等. 2017. 粤港澳大湾区经济发展时空演变特征及其影响因素[J]. 热带地理, 37(6): 802-813.
	[Zhou C S, Luo L J, Shi C Y, et al.2017. Spatio-temporal evolutionary characteristics of the economic development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and its influencing factors[J]. Tropical Geography, 37(6): 802-813.]
[18]	朱传耿, 孙姗姗, 李志江. 2008. 中国人口城市化的影响要素与空间格局[J]. 地理研究, 27(1): 13-22.
	[Zhu C G, Sun S S, Li Z J.2008. The influencing factors and spatial distribution of population urbanization in China[J]. Geographical Research, 27(1): 13-22.]
[19]	朱江丽, 李子联. 2015. 长三角城市群产业—人口—空间耦合协调发展研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 25(2): 75-82.
	[Zhu J L, Li Z L.2015. Coupling coordination development of industry-population-space in city cluster of Yangtze River-Delta region[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(2): 75-82.]

序列	检验形式(C, T, L)	ADF值	10%	5%	1%	P值	检验结果
FNCY	(C, T, 0)	-0.8153	-2.7133	-3.0655	-3.9203	0.7871	非平稳
CZRK	(C, T, 0)	-0.1444	-2.7133	-3.0655	-3.9203	0.9281	非平稳
JCMJ	(C, T, 0)	-1.3951	-2.7133	-3.0655	-3.9203	0.5581	非平稳
lnFNCY	(C, 0, 0)	-3.0448	-2.7316	-3.0810	-3.9591	0.0533	平稳
lnCZRK	(C, 0, 0)	-2.7496	-2.7316	-3.0810	-3.9591	0.0891	平稳
lnJCMJ	(C, 0, 0)	-3.8883	-2.7316	-3.0810	-3.9591	0.0114	平稳

Lag(滞后阶数)	logL	LR	FPE	AIC	SC	HQ
0	68.06314	NA	3.43e-08	-8.675085	-8.533475	-8.676593
1	123.8430	81.81054^*	6.97e-11	-14.91241	-14.34597	-14.91844
2	137.9358	15.03224	4.30e-11^*	-15.59144^*	-14.60017^*	-15.60200^*

原假设	特征根	Trace(特征根迹检验)			Max(最大特征值检验)
原假设	特征根	统计量	5%临界值	P值	统计量	5%临界值	P值
无特征根^*	0.7152	45.9541	29.7970	0.0003	18.8427	21.1316	0.1015
最多1个特征根^*	0.6243	27.1113	15.4947	0.0006	14.6865	14.2646	0.0429
最多2个特征根	0.5632	12.4247	3.8414	0.0004	12.4247	3.8414	0.0004

原假设	F统计量	显著水平
lnFNCY不是lnCZRK的Granger原因	8.5244	0.0069
lnCZRK不是lnFNCY的Granger原因	1.4405	0.2820
lnJCMJ不是lnCZRK的Granger原因	3.6568	0.0443
lnCZRK不是lnJCMJ的Granger原因	1.1543	0.3539
lnJCMJ不是lnFNCY的Granger原因	1.9735	0.1895
lnFNCY不是lnJCMJ的Granger原因	4.1989	0.0474

变量序列	lnCZRK	lnFNCY	lnJCMJ
lnCZRK(-1)	0.952082	0.530069	0.210302
lnCZRK(-1)	(0.23502)	(0.53042)	(0.15275)
lnCZRK(-2)	-0.608563	-1.307026	-0.190160
lnCZRK(-2)	(0.23300)	(0.52587)	(0.15144)
lnFNCY(-1)	-0.127860	0.587268	0.122371
lnFNCY(-1)	(0.11624)	(0.26235)	(0.07555)
lnFNCY(-2)	0.242163	-0.122154	0.044644
lnFNCY(-2)	(0.10134)	(0.22871)	(0.06587)
lnJCMJ(-1)	0.328441	1.150933	0.460311
lnJCMJ(-1)	(0.36196)	(0.81691)	(0.23526)
lnJCMJ(-2)	-0.306956	0.922405	-0.042890
lnJCMJ(-2)	(0.38349)	(0.86551)	(0.24925)
常数项C	4.279901	-4.912637	2.973355
常数项C	(1.74620)	(3.94102)	(1.13495)
R-squared	0.990718	0.998204	0.998442

粤港澳大湾区背景下的珠三角城市群产业—人口—空间交互影响机理

Mutual influencing mechanism of industry-population-space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in the context of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈睿山, 赵志强, 徐迪, 陈轶. 城市和城市群可持续发展指数研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[2]	龚建周, 蒋超, 胡月明, 杨颢. 珠三角基塘系统研究回顾及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1236-1246.
[3]	郭庆宾, 骆康, 刘承良. 长江经济带城市群要素集聚能力差异的比较研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 542-552.
[4]	唐承丽, 郭夏爽, 周国华, 吴佳敏, 陈伟杨. 长江中游城市群创新平台空间分布及其影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 531-541.
[5]	卢明华, 周悦颜, 刘汉初, 许欣. 北京企业对河北直接投资的时空动态特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 389-401.
[6]	刘汉初, 樊杰, 张海朋, 王甫园. 珠三角城市群制造业集疏与产业空间格局变动[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 195-206.
[7]	郑艳婷. 中国城市群的空间模式——分散性区域集聚的理论背景、形成机理及最新进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 339-352.
[8]	罗奎, 李广东, 劳昕. 京津冀城市群产业空间重构与优化调控[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 179-194.
[9]	牛强, 沈英杰, 周燚, 黄经南, 王盼. 基于滞后变量模型的城市群建设用地增长对经济增长的滞后期和效应分析——以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[10]	李极恒, 龚岳, 李贵才. 珠三角村镇建成区的空间型态：特征、类型和产业影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 829-839.
[11]	周亮, 赵琪, 杨帆. 基于POI与NPP/VIIRS灯光数据的城市群边界定量识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 840-850.
[12]	王甫园, 王开泳. 珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(3): 428-440.
[13]	吴炫, 杨家文. 流动量与关注度视角下的城市网络结构——以广州、深圳为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1843-1853.
[14]	马冰滢, 黄姣, 李双成. 基于生态-经济权衡的京津冀城市群土地利用优化配置[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 26-37.
[15]	王晓梦, 王锦, 吴殿廷. “交通—产业”耦合背景下的京津冀城市群空间发育特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1231-1244.