多重城市网络空间结构及影响因素——基于有向多值关系视角

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.09.008

地理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1257-1267.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.09.008

多重城市网络空间结构及影响因素——基于有向多值关系视角

宋琼¹(), 赵新正¹, 李同昇^1,^*(), 刘静玉²

1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127
2. 河南大学环境与规划学院,河南开封 475004

收稿日期:2017-12-14 修回日期:2018-05-03 出版日期:2018-09-28 发布日期:2018-09-28
通讯作者: 李同昇
作者简介:
作者简介：宋琼(1990-),女,河南林州人,博士研究生,主要从事经济地理与区域发展研究,E-mail: songqiongnwu@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41401184);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(14YJCZH222);陕西省教育厅科学研究计划项目(14JK1753);西北大学研究生自主创新项目(YZZ17148) [Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41401184

Spatial structures and influencing factors of multiple urban networks based on the perspective of directed-multivalued relation

Qiong SONG¹(), Xinzheng ZHAO¹, Tongsheng LI^1,^*(), Jingyu LIU²

1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
2. College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China

Received:2017-12-14 Revised:2018-05-03 Online:2018-09-28 Published:2018-09-28
Contact: Tongsheng LI
Supported by:
Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, China, No.14YJCZH222;Natural Science Foundation of MOE in Shaanxi Province, No.14JK1753;Graduate Student Innovation Project of Northwest University, No.YZZ17148

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从有向多值关系视角,以中原城市群为案例区,对比分析静态网络、百度信息网络、综合交通网络的空间结构,选择经济、文化、行政、时间距离方面的7个因素构建关系回归模型,剖析3个网络的影响因素。结果表明：①3个网络之间的相关系数表现为：百度信息网络与综合交通网络>百度信息网络与静态网络>综合交通网络与静态网络且其值均高于0.582,表明整体的相似性大于差异性;②在空间结构上,3个网络均表现出以郑州为中心,以京广线和陇海线为发展轴,郑州、开封、新乡、洛阳、许昌构成了骨干网络,并形成辐射与集聚优势共存的中心片区;在中心片区之外,3个网络表现出明显的差异性特征。网络节点的辐射与集聚能力在百度信息与综合交通网络中均是正相关,而在静态网络中则是负相关;③关系回归模型的7个因素均对3个网络产生了不同程度的影响,其中企业合作、行业结构相似、经济制度邻近是影响3个网络相似性较强的因素,而收入差距、文化相似、行政隶属、平均时间距离是影响它们之间差异性的因素。本研究为关系转向下的城市体系研究提供了新的思路。

关键词: 多重城市网络, 空间结构, 关系回归模型, 影响因素, 有向多值关系, 中原城市群

Abstract:

Urban system is one of the core subjects of human-economic geography. From the perspective of directed-multivalued relation, taking the Zhongyuan urban agglomeration as the case study area, a comparative study on spatial structures and influencing factors of multiple urban networks—static network, Baidu information network, and comprehensive transportation network—will provide a new train of thought for urban system research under relational transition. This study analyzed the hierarchical structure and the node structure of the networks of the Zhongyuan urban agglomeration, to extract generality and particularity of the three networks mentioned above. Furthermore, we built a relational regression model with the help of the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) method to dissect the influencing factors of these three networks, from the aspects of economy, culture, administration, and time distance. The empirical results are as follows: (1) The correlation coefficients of the three networks are over 0.582, presented as Baidu information versus comprehensive transportation > Baidu information versus static > Comprehensive transportation versus static, and the overall similarity is stronger than the difference. (2) Integrating the three networks, the Zhongyuan urban agglomeration, a mononuclear spatial structure cored by Zhengzhou, consisted of two regional development belts along with the Beijing-Guangzhou railway and the Lianyungang-Lanzhou railway, and formed a central area with obvious advantages of radiation and concentration with a backbone network constituted by Zhengzhou, Kaifeng, Xinxiang, Luoyang, and Xuchang. Outside of the central area, the three networks showed obvious particularity. The radiation and agglomeration ability of cities have negative correlation in static network, while showed positive correlation in Baidu information network and comprehensive transportation network. (3) The seven influencing factors have different effects on the three networks. Enterprise cooperation, industrial structure similarity, and economic system proximity lead to the similarity of the three networks. Meanwhile, income gap, cultural similarity, administrative affiliation, and average time distance lead to their differences.

Key words: multiple urban networks, spatial structure, relational regression model, influencing factors, directed-multivalued relation, Zhongyuan urban agglomeration

宋琼, 赵新正, 李同昇, 刘静玉. 多重城市网络空间结构及影响因素——基于有向多值关系视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1257-1267.

Qiong SONG, Xinzheng ZHAO, Tongsheng LI, Jingyu LIU. Spatial structures and influencing factors of multiple urban networks based on the perspective of directed-multivalued relation[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1257-1267.

图/表 6

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

表4

参考文献 40

[1]	鲍超, 陈小杰. 2014. 中国城市体系的空间格局研究评述与展望[J].地理科学进展, 33(10): 1300-1311. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.10.002
	[Bao C, Chen X J.2014. Review and prospect of research on the spatial pattern of China's urban system[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(10): 1300-1311.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.10.002
[2]	陈伟, 刘卫东, 柯文前, 等. 2017. 基于公路客运流的中国城市网络结构及空间组织模式[J]. 地理学报, 72(2): 224-241.
	[Chen W, Liu W D, Ke W Q, et al.2017. The spatial structures and organization patterns of China's city networks based on the highway passenger flows[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(2): 224-241.]
[3]	池子华. 2013. 人口流动中的文化基因[J]. 人民论坛, (18): 136-137.
	[Chi Z H.2013. Cultural genes in population flow[J]. People's Tribune, (18): 136-137.]
[4]	方创琳. 2014. 中国城市群研究取得的重要进展与未来发展方向[J]. 地理学报, 69(8): 1130-1144.
	[Fang C L.2014. Progress and the future direction of research into urban agglomeration in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8): 1130-1144.]
[5]	顾朝林, 徐海贤. 1999. 改革开放二十年来中国城市地理学研究进展[J]. 地理科学, 19(4): 320-331.
	[Gu C L, Xu H X.1999. Development of urban geography since 1978[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 19(4): 320-331.]
[6]	顾朝林, 庞海峰. 2008. 基于重力模型的中国城市体系空间联系与层域划分[J]. 地理研究, 27(1): 1-12.
	[Gu C L, Pang H F.2008. Study on spatial relations of Chinese urban system: Gravity model approach[J]. Geographical Research, 27(1): 1-12.]
[7]	冷炳荣, 杨永春, 李英杰, 等. 2011. 中国城市经济网络结构空间特征及其复杂性分析[J]. 地理学报, 66(2): 199-211.
	[Leng B R, Yang Y C, Li Y J, et al.2011. Spatial characteristics and complex analysis: A perspective from basic activities of urban networks in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(2): 199-211.]
[8]	李亚婷, 潘少奇, 苗长虹. 2014. 中原经济区县际经济联系网络结构及其演化特征[J]. 地理研究, 33(7): 1239-1250.
	[Li Y T, Pan S Q, Miao C H.2014. Structure and evolution of economic linkage network at county level in Central Plains Economic Zone[J]. Geographical Research, 33(7): 1239-1250.]
[9]	刘军. 2009.整体网分析讲义: UCINET软件实用指南[M].上海: 格致出版社.
	[Liu J.2009.Overall network analysis notes: UCINET software practical guide[M]. Shanghai, China: Truth & Wisdom Press.]
[10]	刘君德. 2006. 中国转型期“行政区经济”现象透视: 兼论中国特色人文—经济地理学的发展[J]. 经济地理, 26(6): 897-901.
	[Liu J D.2006. Perspective of the "administrative region economy'' phenomenon in China's transitional period: An introduction of human-economic geography with Chinese characteristics[J]. Economic Geography, 26(6): 897-901.]
[11]	刘沛林, 刘春腊, 邓运员, 等. 2010. 中国传统聚落景观区划及景观基因识别要素研究[J]. 地理学报, 65(12): 1496-1506.
	[Liu P L, Liu C L, Deng Y Y, et al.2010. Landscape division of traditional settlement and effect elements of landscape gene in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(12): 1496-1506.]
[12]	刘铮, 王世福, 赵渺希, 等. 2013. 有向加权型城市网络的探索性分析[J]. 地理研究, 32(7): 1253-1268.
	[Liu Z, Wang S F, Zhao M X, et al.2013. Exploratory analysis of directed weighted network of city[J]. Geographical Research, 32(7): 1253-1268.]
[13]	钱春蕾, 叶菁, 陆潮. 2015. 基于改进城市引力模型的武汉城市圈引力格局划分研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(2): 237-245. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.02.012
	[Qian C L, Ye J, Lu C.2015. Gravity zoning in Wuhan Metropolitan area based on an improved urban gravity model[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(2): 237-245.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.02.012
[14]	王波, 甄峰, 席广亮, 等. 2013. 基于微博用户关系的网络信息地理研究: 以新浪微博为例[J]. 地理研究, 23(2): 380-391.
	[Wang B, Zhen F, Xi G L, et al.2013. A study of cybergeography based on micro-blog users' relationship: With a case of Sina micro-blog[J]. Geographical Research, 23(2): 380-391.]
[15]	王聪, 曹有挥, 陈国伟. 2014. 基于生产性服务业的长江三角洲城市网络[J]. 地理研究, 33(2): 323-335.
	[Wang C, Cao Y H, Chen G W.2014. Study on urban network of Yangtze River Delta region based on producer services[J]. Geographical Research, 33(2): 323-335.]
[16]	王姣娥, 景悦. 2017. 中国城市网络等级结构特征及组织模式: 基于铁路和航空流的比较[J]. 地理学报, 72(8): 1508-1519.
	[Wang J E, Jing Y.2017. Comparison of spatial structure and organization mode of inter-city networks from the perspective of railway and air passenger flow[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(8): 1508-1519.]
[17]	王永明, 马耀峰, 王美霞. 2012. 中国入境游客多城市旅游空间网络结构[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(4): 518-526. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.04.016
	[Wang Y M, Ma Y F, Wang M X.2012. Network structure of multicity inbound tourists to China[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(4): 518-526.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.04.016
[18]	吴必虎. 1996. 中国文化区的形成与划分[J]. 学术月刊, (3): 10-15.
	[Wu B H.1996. Partition and the formation of the Chinese culture areas[J]. Academic Monthly, (3): 10-15.]
[19]	吴康, 方创琳, 赵渺希. 2015. 中国城市网络的空间组织及其复杂性结构特征[J]. 地理研究, 34(4): 711-728.
	[Wu K, Fang C L, Zhao M X.2015. The spatial organization and structure complexit of Chinese intercity networks[J]. Geographical Research, 34(4): 711-728.]
[20]	张旺, 申玉铭. 2012. 京津冀都市圈生产性服务业空间集聚特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(6): 742-749. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.010
	[Zhang W, Shen Y M.2012. The spatial characteristics of producer service agglomeration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan region[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(6): 742-749.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.010
[21]	赵渺希, 吴康, 刘行健, 等. 2014. 城市网络的一种算法及其实证比较[J]. 地理学报, 69(2): 169-183.
	[Zhao M X, Wu K, Liu X J, et al.2014. A novel method to approximate intercity networks and its empirical validation[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(2): 169-183.]
[22]	中共中央国务院. 2016.“关于中原城市群发展规划的批复(国函〔2016〕210号)”[EB/OL]. 中华人民共和国中央人民政府网, 2016-12-28 [2017-6-06].
	[Central Committee of Communist Party of China and the State Council.2016. Guanyu zhongyuan chengshiqun fazhan guihua de pifu (state letter [2016] No. 210)[EB/OL]. The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China website, 2016-12-28 [2017-6-06].]
[23]	钟业喜, 冯兴华, 文玉钊. 2016. 长江经济带经济网络结构演变及其驱动机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 36(1): 10-19. doi: 10.1329/j.cnki.sgs.2016.01.002
	[Zhong Y X, Feng X H, Wen Y Z.2016. The evolvement and driving mechanism of economic network structure in the Changjiang River Economic Zone[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36(1): 10-19.] doi: 10.1329/j.cnki.sgs.2016.01.002
[24]	Alderson A S, Beckfield J, Jessica S J.2010. Intercity relations and globalization: The evolution of the global urban hierarchy, 1981-2007[J]. Urban Studies, 47(9): 1899-1923. doi: 10.1177/0042098010372679
[25]	Castells M.1996. The rise of the network society[M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
[26]	Daniels P W, Ho K C, Hutton T A.2005. Service industries and Asia-Pacific cities: New development trajectories[M]. London, UK: Routledge.
[27]	Derudder B, Taylor P J, Ni P, et al.2010. Pathways of change: Shifting connectivities in the world city network, 2000-2008[J]. Urban Studies, 47(9): 1861-1877. doi: 10.1177/0042098010372682
[28]	He J H, Li C, Yu Y, et al.2017. Measuring urban spatial interaction in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China: A spatially explicit approach[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32: 569-583. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.014
[29]	Huggins R, Prokop D.2017. Network structure and regional innovation: A study of university-industry ties[J]. Urban Studies, 54(4): 931-952. doi: 10.1177/0042098016630521
[30]	Jacobs W, Koster H, Hall P.2011. The location and global network structure of maritime advanced producer services[J]. Urban Studies, 48(13): 2749-2769. doi: 10.1177/0042098010391294
[31]	Lao X, Zhang X, Shen T, et al.2016. Comparing China's city transportation and economic networks[J]. Cities, 53: 43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.006
[32]	Liu X, Derudder B.2012. Two-mode networks and the interlocking world city network model: A reply to Neal[J]. Geographical Analysis, 44(2): 171-173. doi: 10.1111/gean.2012.44.issue-2
[33]	Malecki E J.2002a. Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness[J]. Urban Studies, 39(5): 929-945. doi: 10.1080/00420980220128381
[34]	Malecki E J.2002b. The economic geography of the Internet's infrastructure[J]. Economic Geography, 78(4): 399-424. doi: 10.2307/4140796
[35]	Pflieger G, Rozenblat C.2010. Introduction. Urban networks and network theory: The city as the connector of multiple networks[J]. Urban Studies, 47(13): 2723-2735. doi: 10.1177/0042098010377368
[36]	Scott K, Liew T.2012. Social networking as a development tool: A critical reflection[J]. Urban Studies, 49(12): 2751-2767. doi: 10.1177/0042098011435279
[37]	Taylor P J.2001. Specification of the world city network[J]. Geographical Analysis, 33(2): 181-194.
[38]	Taylor P J, Catalano G, Walker D R F.2002. Measurement of the world city network[J]. Urban Studies, 39(13): 2367-2376. doi: 10.1080/00420980220080011
[39]	Taylor P J.2004. World city network: A global urban analysis[M]. New York: Routledge.
[40]	Zhao M, Liu X, Derudder B, et al.2015. Mapping producer services networks in mainland Chinese cities[J]. Urban Studies, 52(16): 3018-3034. doi: 10.1177/0042098014558541

目标层	系统层	指标层
城市综合实力	城市规模	市区总人口、建成区面积
	城市经济	人均GDP、固定资产投资额、第三产业总产值、工业增加值、实际使用外资金额
	城市发展	人均城市道路面积、万人拥有公共汽(电)车辆数
	城市生活	在岗职工平均工资、万人拥有高校在校学生数、万人拥有医生数、社会消费品零售总额
	城市生态	人均绿地面积、建成区绿化覆盖率

城市	静态网络		百度信息网络		综合交通网络
城市	辐射	集聚	辐射	集聚	辐射	集聚
郑州	1.000	0.711	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000
开封	0.415	0.690	0.329	0.643	0.333	0.420
洛阳	0.434	0.651	0.392	0.777	0.301	0.372
平顶山	0.156	0.805	0.247	0.524	0.173	0.185
安阳	0.191	0.888	0.266	0.551	0.269	0.373
鹤壁	0.157	0.977	0.186	0.446	0.206	0.206
新乡	0.352	0.795	0.356	0.539	0.260	0.427
焦作	0.294	0.825	0.271	0.465	0.110	0.125
濮阳	0.116	0.853	0.243	0.482	0.179	0.176
许昌	0.363	0.669	0.253	0.563	0.282	0.399
漯河	0.208	0.723	0.209	0.461	0.292	0.379
三门峡	0.160	0.748	0.193	0.479	0.167	0.158
南阳	0.148	0.621	0.315	0.643	0.131	0.151
商丘	0.075	0.756	0.442	0.616	0.330	0.369
信阳	0.068	0.743	0.333	0.572	0.222	0.279
周口	0.162	0.732	0.362	0.463	0.108	0.164
驻马店	0.111	0.784	0.236	0.497	0.184	0.227
济源	0.132	1.000	0.139	0.419	0.049	0.073
邢台	0.161	0.856	0.218	0.312	0.217	0.252
邯郸	0.365	0.647	0.262	0.402	0.250	0.273
聊城	0.172	0.590	0.203	0.342	0.094	0.122
菏泽	0.147	0.696	0.248	0.336	0.109	0.146
淮北	0.204	0.636	0.088	0.242	0.037	0.032
亳州	0.081	0.741	0.103	0.324	0.100	0.118
宿州	0.091	0.873	0.115	0.282	0.075	0.092
蚌埠	0.204	0.518	0.126	0.428	0.129	0.166
阜阳	0.072	0.716	0.154	0.402	0.128	0.202
长治	0.161	0.775	0.167	0.291	0.032	0.061
晋城	0.243	0.836	0.154	0.267	0.026	0.063
运城	0.075	0.888	0.161	0.273	0.022	0.038

影响因素	回归系数
影响因素	Y₁静态网络	Y₂百度信息网路	Y₃综合交通网络
X₁企业关系	0.268^***	0.175^**	0.333^**
X₂经济行业关系	-0.083^**	-0.165^**	-0.143^**
X_3-1收入差距关系	0.090	-0.160^**	-0.020
X_3-2收入差距关系	-0.001	0.370^**	0.184
X₄经济制度邻近关系	0.160^**	0.189^**	0.159^**
X₅文化关系	0.186^***	0.042	0.127^**
X₆行政关系	0.035	0.426^***	0.223^**
X₇平均时间距离关系	-0.174^***	-0.050	-0.128^**
R²	0.265	0.423	0.401

多重城市网络空间结构及影响因素——基于有向多值关系视角

Spatial structures and influencing factors of multiple urban networks based on the perspective of directed-multivalued relation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	付占辉, 梅林, 郑茹敏, 王彤彤. 东北地区城市女性就业水平空间分异机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318.
[2]	程晗蓓, 邹游, 林赛南, 李志刚. 居住迁移对居民健康的影响研究进展述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1210-1223.
[3]	丁建军, 王璋, 柳艳红, 余方薇. 中国连片特困区经济韧性测度及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(6): 924-937.
[4]	谢永顺, 王成金, 韩增林, 刘书舟. 哈大城市带网络结构韧性演化研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1619-1631.
[5]	胡小芳, 李小雅, 王天宇, 赵红敏, 杨铄, 邓磊, 李景旺. 民宿空间分布的集聚模式与影响因素研究——基于杭州、湖州、恩施的比较[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1698-1707.
[6]	杨奎,张宇,赵小风,文琦,钟太洋. 乡村土地利用结构效率时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1393-1402.
[7]	陈秧分, 刘玉, 王国刚. 大都市乡村发展比较及其对乡村振兴战略的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1403-1411.
[8]	段学军,邹辉,陈维肖,王雅竹,叶磊. 长江经济带形成演变的地理基础[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(8): 1217-1226.
[9]	戴旭俊, 刘爱利. 地方认同的内涵维度及影响因素研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 662-674.
[10]	段亚明, 刘勇, 刘秀华, 何东. 基于宜出行大数据的多中心空间结构分析——以重庆主城区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1957-1967.
[11]	毛帅永, 焦利民, 许刚, 李泽慧. 基于多源数据的武汉市多中心空间结构识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1675-1683.
[12]	李雪铭, 刘贺, 田深圳, 宫一路. 东北三省城市人居活动网络结构及影响因素分析——基于百度贴吧分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1726-1734.
[13]	何萍, 崔梅艳, 李矜霄, 刘树华. 昆明市太阳辐射变化特征及影响因子分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1793-1801.
[14]	杨文越, 曹小曙. 多尺度交通出行碳排放影响因素研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1814-1828.
[15]	徐银凤, 汪德根. 中国城市空间结构的高铁效应研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230.