北京公交就业可达性及其地区和人群差异

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.08.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用经济普查、人口普查数据和基于百度地图的公交出行时间数据,分析北京都市区基于公共交通的就业可达性及其在城市不同人群和地区间的差异。结果表明：北京都市区的居民可在60分钟内通过公共交通到达18.3%的都市区工作岗位,这比美国100个最大的都市区的平均就业可达性水平要高,接近于美国纽约都市区的就业可达性水平。同时,由于就业郊区化程度有限和以中心—放射式布局的公交网络,北京都市区内的公交就业可达性存在着巨大的区域差异,中心城区的就业可达性远远高于郊区。此外,人口居住的郊区化程度远远高于就业的郊区化程度,导致北京都市区宏观层面的职住不平衡。随着人口居住郊区化程度的提高,公共交通如何服务居住日益分散的人口,提高就业可达性,是一项巨大的挑战。研究还发现,由于城市中心区的大部分就业为高技术的就业岗位,因此高受教育程度人口能更多地享受目前公共交通系统的便利,而受教育程度低的人口和外来人口公交就业可达性较低。为解决弱势群体所面临的就业可达性的不平等问题,需要更多的规划与政策干预。

关键词: 公交就业可达性, 人口群体, 职住不平衡, 地区差异, 北京

Abstract:

Using the latest economic census and population census data as well as the transit-based travel time data obtained through the Baidu Map API, this study examines the job accessibility via transit in the Beijing metropolitan area and helps understand how well workers can access jobs by transit in Beijing and how it is different for various population groups and in different regions. Our results show that residents in the Beijing metropolitan area can reach 18.3% of metropolitan jobs within 60 minutes by transit, which is better than the average job accessibility via transit for 100 largest metropolitan areas in the United States, and similar to the New York metropolitan area. Due to the limited extent of job suburbanization as well as the hub-and-spoke pattern of the road and transit network in Beijing, there exist great regional disparities in the job accessibility by transit within the Beijing metropolitan area, with the job accessibility level significantly higher in the inner city than in the suburbs. Compared to jobs, population has suburbanized more extensively in Beijing, which has led to the great jobs-housing imbalance in the metropolitan area. With the increasingly more extensively decentralized spatial distribution of population, great challenges lie in further expanding the transit network to better serve the suburbs. Meanwhile, since most jobs in the inner city are oriented toward workers with higher levels of education, highly educated population is better served by the current transit system. Meanwhile, less educated population (without college degrees) and migrants reach less metropolitan jobs by transit because they are more extensively suburbanized due to their relatively low income and limited housing options. This raises a concern about the ability of suburbanizing disadvantaged populations to connect to job opportunities via transit. Therefore, multiple policies including affordable housing programs, transit investments, economic development initiatives, and appropriate land use planning should be coordinated to address the apparent spatial mismatch that disadvantaged population groups are facing.

Key words: job accessibility by transit, population groups, jobs-housing imbalance, regional variation, Beijing

孙铁山, 范颖玲, 齐云蕾. 北京公交就业可达性及其地区和人群差异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(8): 1066-1074.

Tieshan SUN, Yingling FAN, Yunlei QI. Job accessibility by transit and variation among different population groups and in different regions in Beijing[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1066-1074.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 24

[1]	北京交通发展研究院. 2016. 2016年北京交通发展年报[R/OL]. 2016-08-01[2018-08-20]. .
	[Beijing Transport Institute. 2016. Beijing jiaotong fazhan nianbao 2016. 2016-08-01[2018-08-20]. 2016. Beijing jiaotong fazhan nianbao 2016. 2016-08-01[2018-08-20]. .]
[2]	北京市统计局. 2016. 北京统计年鉴2016[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	[Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. 2016.Beijing statistical yearbook 2016[M]. Beijing: China: China Statistics Press.]
[3]	刘志林, 王茂军. 2011. 北京市职住空间错位对居民通勤行为的影响分析: 基于就业可达性与通勤时间的讨论[J]. 地理学报, 66(4): 457-467. doi: 10.11821/xb201104003
	[Liu Z L, Wang M J.2011. Job accessibility and its impacts on commuting time of urban residents in Beijing: From a spatial mismatch perspective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(4): 457-467.] doi: 10.11821/xb201104003
[4]	吕斌, 张纯, 陈天鸣. 2013. 城市低收入群体的就业可达性变化研究: 以北京为例[J]. 城市规划, (1): 56-63.
	[Lu B, Zhang C, Chen T M.2013. Study on changes in job accessibility for the urban low-income: A case study of Beijing[J]. City Planning Review, (1): 56-63.]
[5]	齐云蕾, 孙铁山. 2015. 职住分离的行业差异及其影响因素: 以北京都市区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, (1): 58-65.
	[Qi Y L, Sun T S.2015. Sector differences in jobs-housing mismatch and their causes: A case study of Beijing metropolitan area[J]. Urban Research, (1): 58-65.]
[6]	沈青. 2007. 内城区的区位特征与低收入者的就业可达性[J]. 国际城市规划, 22(2): 26-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2007.02.004
	[Shen Q.2007. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers[J]. Urban Planning International, 22(2): 26-35.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2007.02.004
[7]	孙铁山. 2015. 北京市居住与就业空间错位的行业差异和影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 34(2): 351-363. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502014
	[Sun T S.2015. Spatial mismatch between residences and jobs by sectors in Beijing and its explanations[J]. Geographical Research, 34(2): 351-363.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502014
[8]	孙铁山, 王兰兰, 李国平. 2012. 北京都市区人口—就业分布与空间结构演化[J]. 地理学报, 67(6): 829-840.
	[Sun T S, Wang L L, Li G P.2012. Distributions of population and employment and evolution of spatial structures in the Beijing metropolitan area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(6): 829-840.]
[9]	王绮, 修春亮, 魏冶, 等. 2015. 基于高斯两步移动搜索法的沈阳市就业可达性评价[J]. 人文地理, 30(2): 78-82.
	[Wang Q, Xiu C L, Wei Y, et al.2015. Evaluation of job accessibility of Shenyang using Gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area method[J]. Human Geography, 30(2): 78-82.]
[10]	吴江洁, 孙斌栋. 2015. 居民就业可达性的空间分布及对收入的影响: 基于上海都市区的实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 34(9): 1744-1754.
	[Wu J J, Sun B D.2015. Job accessibility and its impact on income: Outcomes from Shanghai metropolitan area[J]. Geographical Research, 34(9): 1744-1754.]
[11]	Alam B M.2009. Transit accessibility to jobs and employment prospects of welfare recipients without cars: A study of Broward County, Florida, using geographic information systems and an econometric model[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2110): 78-86. DOI: 10.3141/2110-10. doi: 10.3141/2110-10
[12]	Bunel M, Tovar E.2014. Key issues in local job accessibility measurement: Different models mean different results[J]. Urban Studies, 51(6): 1322-1338. doi: 10.1177/0042098013495573
[13]	Cheng J, Bertolini L.2013. Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 30: 100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.03.005
[14]	Fan Y, Allen R, Sun T.2014. Spatial mismatch in Beijing, China: Implications of job accessibility for Chinese low-wage workers[J]. Habitat International, 44: 202-210.
[15]	Hansen W G.1959. How accessibility shapes land use[J]. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 25(2): 73-76. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307
[16]	Hu L.2016. Job accessibility and employment outcomes: Which income groups benefit the most?[J]. Transportation, 1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9708-4
[17]	Kain J F.1968. Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(2): 175-197.
[18]	Kawabata M.2003. Job access and employment among low-skilled autoless workers in US metropolitan areas[J]. Environment and Planning A, 35(9): 1651-1668. doi: 10.1068/a35209
[19]	Kneebone E.2009. Job sprawl revisited: The changing geography of metropolitan employment[R]. Washington: Brookings Institution.
[20]	Lin J J, Chen C H, Hsieh T Y2016. Job accessibility and ethnic minority employment in urban and rural areas in Taiwan[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 95(2): 363-382. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12125
[21]	Sanchez T W.1999. The connection between public transit and employment: The cases of Portland and Atlanta[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3): 284-296. doi: 10.1080/01944369908976058
[22]	Sun T, Han Z, Wang L, et al.2012. Suburbanization and subcentering of population in Beijing metropolitan area: A nonparametric analysis[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, (4): 1-11.
[23]	Tilahun N, Fan Y.2014. Transit and job accessibility: An empirical study of access to competitive clusters and regional growth strategies for enhancing transit accessibility[J]. Transport Policy, 33: 17-25.
[24]	Tomer A, Kneebone E, Puentes R, et al.2011. Missed opportunity: Transit and jobs in metropolitan America[R]. Washington: Brookings Institution.

就业类型	低受教育程度常住人口	高受教育程度常住人口	高受教育程度户籍人口	高受教育程度外来人口	低受教育程度户籍人口	低受教育程度外来人口
低技能就业	13.0	19.2	20.6	15.5	13.6	12.2
高技能就业	18.1	28.3	30.4	22.5	18.9	17.1

区域	就业类型	高受教育程度户籍人口	高受教育程度外来人口	低受教育程度户籍人口	低受教育程度外来人口
中心城区	低技能就业高技能就业	36.5 53.2	36.2 52.2	35.9 52.2	36.9 54.1
近郊区	低技能就业高技能就业	22.8 34.4	19.3 29.0	18.6 26.5	15.2 22.1
远郊区	低技能就业高技能就业	2.6 1.8	2.6 2.1	1.5 0.9	2.7 1.8