演化经济地理视角下的技术关联研究进展

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.02.006

地理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 229-238.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.02.006

演化经济地理视角下的技术关联研究进展

郭琪¹(), 贺灿飞^2,³

1. 南开大学经济与社会发展研究院,天津 300071
2. 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871
3. 北京大学—林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心,北京 100871

收稿日期:2017-06-13 修回日期:2017-12-02 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2018-02-28
作者简介:
作者简介：郭琪(1987-),女,辽宁兴城人,博士,讲师,研究方向为区域经济和产业地理,E-mail: guoqi0610@yeah.net。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41701124);国家杰出青年科学基金项目(41425001);国家自然科学基金重点项目(41731208)

Progress of research on technological relatedness in the perspective of evolutionary economic geography

Qi GUO¹(), Canfei HE^2,³

1. College of Economic and Social Development, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
2. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3. Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2017-06-13 Revised:2017-12-02 Online:2018-02-28 Published:2018-02-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41701124;National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, No.41425001;Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41731208

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

技术关联是现阶段演化经济地理学的重要概念,对演化经济地理学的发展和现实经济增长路径的探索具有重要意义。本文在演化经济地理学的背景下,探讨技术关联的概念和测度方法,从静态和动态2个视角探究技术关联影响产品演化的微观作用机制,并在国家、区域和企业等不同尺度上梳理了相关研究成果,绝大多数研究证明了产品演化路径显著依赖技术关联,即遵循路径依赖过程。近年来一些研究成果发现,有些区域通过向技术不相关产品进行演化从而实现了路径突破,并对其原因进行剖析,发现金融危机与扶持政策等外生力量和地方环境与制度等内生变量都会导致路径突破。中国发展路径的特殊性为西方演化经济地理学研究提供很好的案例,同时也为中国演化经济地理学的发展创造重要契机。

关键词: 演化经济地理学, 技术关联, 产品演化, 路径依赖, 路径突破

Abstract:

Technological relatedness as a key concept at present in evolutionary economic geography (EEG) is of great significance for the development of EEG and studies on economic growth path. This article explores the definition and measurement of technological relatedness and its micro-mechanism, and reviews the literature on how technological relatedness influences product evolution on different scales, including country, regional, and firm level product evolution. Even though the mechanisms differ slightly by scale, most studies confirm the existence of path dependence. In other words, product evolution path is dependent of technological relatedness. However, several studies find that some countries, regions, and firms do not follow their existing technological relatedness but break the path. They investigate the source of path breaking, finding that path breaking derives from some internal or external forces. China's special development path is not only a supplement for Western evolutionary economic geography theories but also an important opportunity for the development of the emerging Chinese evolutionary economic geography.

Key words: evolutionary economic geography, technological relatedness, product evolution, path dependence, path breaking

郭琪, 贺灿飞. 演化经济地理视角下的技术关联研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(2): 229-238.

Qi GUO, Canfei HE. Progress of research on technological relatedness in the perspective of evolutionary economic geography[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 229-238.

参考文献 73

[1]	贺灿飞, 董瑶, 周沂. 2016. 中国对外贸易产品空间路径演化[J]. 地理学报, 71(6): 970-983. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201606006
	[He C F, Dong Y, Zhou Y.2016. Evolution of export product space in China: Path-dependent or path-breaking[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(6): 970-983.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201606006
[2]	刘志高, 尹贻梅. 2005. 演化经济地理学评介[J]. 经济学动态, (12): 91-95.
	[Liu Z G, Yin Y M.2005. Yanhua jingji dilixue pingjie[J]. Economic Perspectives, (12): 91-95.]
[3]	刘志高, 尹贻梅, 孙静. 2011. 产业集群形成的演化经济地理学研究评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(6): 652-657. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.002
	[Liu Z G, Yin Y M, Sun J.2011. A review of the research progress on industrial cluster formation from the perspective of evolutionary economic geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 30(6): 652-657.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.002
[4]	刘志高, 张薇. 2016. 演化经济地理学视角下的产业结构演替与分叉研究评述[J]. 经济地理, 36(12): 218-223, 232.
	[Liu Z G, Zhang W.2016. Review on study of industrial structure evolution and branching from the perspective of evolutionary economic geography[J]. Economic Geography, 36(12): 218-223, 232.]
[5]	王周杨, 胡晓辉, 马木兰. 2013. 演化经济地理的理论基础及其在集群研究中的应用[J]. 人文地理, 28(4): 13-19.
	[Wang Z Y, Hu X H, Ma M L.2013. The theoretical fundamentals of evolutionary economic geography and its application into cluster research[J]. Human Geography, 28(4): 13-19.]
[6]	Asheim B T, Boschma R, Cooke P.2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases[J]. Regional Studies, 45(7): 893-904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
[7]	Bathelt H, Boggs J S.2003. Toward a reconceptualization of regional development paths: Is Leipzig's media cluster a continuation of or a rupture with the past[J]. Economic Geography, 79(3): 265-293. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00212.x
[8]	Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A.2009. Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate[J]. Research Policy, 38(2): 318-337. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
[9]	Boschma R.2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
[10]	Boschma R, Capone G.2016. Relatedness and diversification in the European Union (EU-27) and European Neighbourhood Policy countries[J]. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(4): 617-637. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614729
[11]	Boschma R, Iammarino S.2009. Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy[J]. Economic Geography, 85(3): 289-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
[12]	Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M.2012. Related variety and regional growth in Spain[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2): 241-256.
[13]	Boschma R, Minondo A, Navarro M.2013. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness[J]. Economic Geography, 89(1): 29-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x
[14]	Boschma R, Wenting R.2007. The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2): 213-238. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm004
[15]	Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F.2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy, 32(1): 69-87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
[16]	Cantner U, Graf H.2010. Growth, development and structural change of innovator networks: The case of Jena[M]//Boschma R, Martin R. Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 370-387.
[17]	Castaldi C, Frenken K, Los B.2015. Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting[J]. Regional Studies, 49(5): 767-781. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
[18]	Caves R E.1981. Diversification and seller concentration: Evidence from changes, 1963-72[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(2): 289-293. doi: 10.2307/1924100
[19]	Chang S J.1996. An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: Entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981-89[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 17(8): 587-611. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199610)17:8<587::AID-SMJ834>3.0.CO;2-1
[20]	Colombelli A, Krafft J, Quatraro F.2014. The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology[J]. Research Policy, 43(10): 1681-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008
[21]	Cooke P.2007. To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms[J]. European Planning Studies, 15(2): 179-194. doi: 10.1080/09654310601078671
[22]	Danneels E.2002. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12): 1095-1121. doi: 10.1002/smj.275
[23]	Dawley S.2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development[J]. Economic Geography, 90(1): 91-112. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12028
[24]	Dosi G.1997. Opportunities, incentives and the collective patterns of technological change[J]. The Economic Journal, 107(444): 1530-1547. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00064.x
[25]	Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A.2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1105-1121. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
[26]	Essletzbichler J.2015. Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas[J]. Regional Studies, 49(5): 752-766. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.806793
[27]	Fan J P H, Lang L H P.2000. The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification[J]. Journal of Business, 73(4): 629-660. doi: 10.1086/209657
[28]	Farjoun M.1998. The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7): 611-630. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199807)19:7<611::AID-SMJ962>3.0.CO;2-E
[29]	Frenken K, Boschma R A.2007. A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5): 635-649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
[30]	Frenken K, Van Oort F, Verburg T.2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth[J]. Regional Studies, 41(5): 685-697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
[31]	Gertler M S.2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there)[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 75-99. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
[32]	Gertler M S.2010. Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change[J]. Regional Studies, 44(1): 1-15. doi: 10.1080/00343400903389979
[33]	Guo Q, He C F.2017. Production space and regional industrial evolution in China[J]. GeoJournal, 82(2): 379-396. doi: 10.1007/s10708-015-9689-4
[34]	Guo Q, He C F, Li D Y.2016. Entrepreneurship in China: The role of localisation and urbanisation economies[J]. Urban Studies, 53(12): 2584-2606. doi: 10.1177/0042098015595598
[35]	Hagedoorn J.2002. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960[J]. Research Policy, 31(4): 477-492. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
[36]	Hausmann R, Hidalgo C A.2010. Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence[R]. Social Science Research Network, Working Paper, No.RWP10-045.
[37]	Hausmann R, Klinger B.2007. The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage[R]. CID Working Paper, No.146.
[38]	He C F, Yan Y, Rigby D.2016. Regional industrial evolution in China[J]. Papers in Regional Science, doi: 10.1111/pirs.12246. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12246
[39]	Helfat C E, Peteraf M A.2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 997-1010. doi: 10.1002/smj.332
[40]	Henderson J V, Kuncoro A, Turner, M.1995. Industrial development in cities[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5): 1067-1085. doi: 10.1086/262013
[41]	Hidalgo C A.2009. The dynamics of economic complexity and the product space over a 42 year period[R]. Center for International Development Working Paper, No.189.
[42]	Hidalgo C A, Klinger B, Barabási A L, et al.2007. The product space conditions the development of nations[J]. Science, 317: 482-487. doi: 10.1126/science.1144581 pmid: 17656717
[43]	Hodgson G M.2009. Institutional economics into the twenty-first century[J]. Studi e Note di Economia, 14(1): 3-26.
[44]	Isaksen A, Trippl M.2016. Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis[M]//Davide P M, Fitjar R D, Rodríguez-Pose A. Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies. New York: Routledge: 66-84.
[45]	Jaffe A B.1989. Characterizing the "technological position" of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers[J]. Research Policy, 18(2): 87-97. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3
[46]	Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R.1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
[47]	Lawson C.1999. Towards a competence theory of the region[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2): 151-166. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.2.151
[48]	Lemelin A.1982. Relatedness in the patterns of interindustry diversification[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4): 646-657. doi: 10.2307/1923949
[49]	MacDonald J M.1985. R&D and the directions of diversification[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4): 583-590. doi: 10.2307/1924802
[50]	MacKinnon D, Cumbers A, Pyke A, et al.2009. Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation[J]. Economic Geography, 85(2): 129-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x
[51]	Maskell P.2001. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 921-943. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.921
[52]	Maskell P, Malmberg A.1999. The competitiveness of firms and regions 'Ubiquitification' and the importance of localized learning[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1): 9-25. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600102
[53]	Meyer-Stamer J.1998. Path dependence in regional development: Persistence and change in three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil[J]. World Development, 26(8): 1495-1511. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00072-2
[54]	Neffke F, Hartog M, Boschma R, et al.2014. Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification[R]. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht, Netherlands: Urban & Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University.
[55]	Neffke F, Henning M.2013. Skill relatedness and firm diversification[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3): 297-316. doi: 10.1002/smj.2013.34.issue-3
[56]	Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R.2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions[J]. Economic Geography, 87(3): 237-265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
[57]	Nelson R R.1994. The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1): 47-63. doi: 10.1093/icc/3.1.47
[58]	Nelson R R, Winter S G.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[59]	Nooteboom B.2000. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance[J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1-2): 69-92. doi: 10.1023/A:1009941416749
[60]	Nooteboom B, Van Haverbeke W, Duysters G, et al.2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Research Policy, 36(7): 1016-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
[61]	Penrose E T.1959. The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. New York: John Wiley.
[62]	Pike A, Birch K, Cumbers A, et al.2009. A geographical political economy of evolution in economic geography[J]. Economic Geography, 85(2): 175-182. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01021.x
[63]	Poncet S, De Waldemar F S.2015. Product relatedness and firm exports in China[J]. World Bank Economic Review, 29(3): 579-605. doi: 10.1093/wber/lht037
[64]	Rodríguez-Pose A.2013. Do institutions matter for regional development[J]. Regional Studies, 47(7): 1034-1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
[65]	Schamp E W.2010. On the notion of co-evolution in economic geography[M]//Boschma R, Martin R. Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 432-449.
[66]	Simon H A.1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 2(1): 125-134. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.125
[67]	Storper M.1995. The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3): 191-221. doi: 10.1177/096977649500200301
[68]	Teece D J.1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(3): 223-247. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90002-5
[69]	Teece D J.1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(1): 39-63.
[70]	Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A.1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
[71]	Teece D J, Rumelt R, Dosi G, et al.1994. Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1): 1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9
[72]	Tushman M L, Anderson P.1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3): 439-465. doi: 10.2307/2392832
[73]	Zhu S J, He C F, Zhou Y.2017. How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(3): 521-545. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbw047

演化经济地理视角下的技术关联研究进展

Progress of research on technological relatedness in the perspective of evolutionary economic geography

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 73

相关文章 9

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	钱肖颖, 孙斌栋. 跨区域产业技术关联与产业创新——基于中国制造业的分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(11): 1822-1831.
[2]	高菠阳,郭凌煜,黄志基,冯锐. 企业异质性、技术关联度与中国对外直接投资决策[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(10): 1535-1544.
[3]	赵政原, 刘志高. 演化经济地理学视角下旅游目的地研究述评及启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 101-110.
[4]	李振发, 贺灿飞, 黎斌. 中国出口产品地区专业化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 963-975.
[5]	金璐璐, 贺灿飞, 周沂, 胡绪千. 中国区域产业结构演化的路径突破[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(8): 974-985.
[6]	吕晨, 孙威. 人口集聚区吸纳人口迁入的影响因素——以东莞市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(5): 593-604.
[7]	吴加伟, 袁丰, 吕卫国, 王桂玲. 金融危机下泛长三角FDI时空格局演化及其机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(12): 1601-1613.
[8]	刘志高, 尹贻梅, 孙静. 产业集群形成的演化经济地理学研究评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6): 652-657.
[9]	马仁锋, 吴杨, 沈玉芳. 产业区演化研究的主要领域与进展——兼论对创意产业区演化研究的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(10): 1276-1288.