气候变化风险及其定量评估方法

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.004

地理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 28-35.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.004

气候变化风险及其定量评估方法

吴绍洪^1,^2,^*(), 高江波¹, 邓浩宇^1,², 刘路路^1,², 潘韬³

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2. 中国科学院大学资源环境学院,北京 100049
3. 中国科学院,北京 100864

收稿日期:2018-01-09 修回日期:2018-01-17 出版日期:2018-01-28 发布日期:2018-01-28
通讯作者: 吴绍洪
作者简介:
作者简介：吴绍洪(1961-),男,广东潮州人,研究员,博士生导师,主要研究方向为自然地理综合研究与全球变化,E-mail: wush@igsnrr.ac.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(L1624026);中国科学院学部学科发展战略研究项目(2016-DX-C-02);国家自然科学基金重点项目(41530749);中国清洁发展机制基金赠款项目(2014092,2013034)

Climate change risk and methodology for its quantitative assessment

Shaohong WU^1,^2,^*(), Jiangbo GAO¹, Haoyu DENG^1,², Lulu LIU^1,², Tao PAN¹

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China

Received:2018-01-09 Revised:2018-01-17 Online:2018-01-28 Published:2018-01-28
Contact: Shaohong WU
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.L1624026;Research Project on the Development Strategy of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.2016-DX-C-02;Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41530749;Grants Program of China Clean Development Mechanism Fund, No.2014092, No.2013034

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

风险评估是气候变化研究领域的核心课题之一,减缓和适应战略的理论需求推动下发展出许多定量评估方法,完成了大量的评估工作。然而,已有研究在气候变化的风险构成上从不同的角度去认识,且评估方法论在整体上缺乏对致险因子与承险体的集成分类。基于此,本文明晰气候变化风险构成,包括致险因子的危险性、承险体的暴露度与脆弱度及其相互关系,明晰了风险产生与变化逻辑。融合致险因子与承险体特征,将气候变化风险定量评估方法归纳为突发事件和渐变事件两类,并分别进行了理论阐述和案例剖析。最后,根据气候变化风险的研究现状和评估需求,从温升目标、脆弱性曲线、适应措施等方面提出未来展望。

关键词: 气候变化, 风险构成, 定量评估, 方法论, 进展与展望

Abstract:

Risk assessment is a core area of climate change research. Quantitative assessment methods have been developed particularly due to the needs for theory of mitigation and adaptation strategies, and have been applied to a great number of specific assessments. However, there have been different viewpoints of the risk composition of climate change, and overall, integrated classification by coupling risk causing factors and risk bearing bodies is lacking. This article illuminates the risk composition of climate change, including the danger of risk causing factors, the exposure and vulnerability of risk bearing bodies, and their interrelations. The emergence and change of risk were clarified. Based on the integrated analysis of risk causing factors and risk bearing bodies, this study divided the climate change risk quantitative assessment methods into sudden onset hazard risk and slow onset hazard risk assessment methods, then the theoretical elaboration and case analysis were conducted for the two types of risks respectively. Finally, according to the current status and needs, this article proposes the future development directions of climate change risk research, including risk assessment under different warming amplitude, vulnerability curve construction, and adaptation.

Key words: climate change, risk formation, quantitative assessment, methodology, progress and prospect

吴绍洪, 高江波, 邓浩宇, 刘路路, 潘韬. 气候变化风险及其定量评估方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 28-35.

Shaohong WU, Jiangbo GAO, Haoyu DENG, Lulu LIU, Tao PAN. Climate change risk and methodology for its quantitative assessment[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 28-35.

图/表 5

参考文献 48

[1]	《第三次气候变化国家评估报告》编写委员会. 2015. 第三次气候变化国家评估报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Committee for the Compilation of Third National Climate Assessment. 2015. Disanci qihou bianhua guojia pinggu baogao[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press.]
[2]	高江波, 焦珂伟, 吴绍洪, 等. 2017. 气候变化影响与风险研究的理论范式和方法体系[J]. 生态学报, 37(7): 2169-2178.
	[Gao J B, Jiao K W, Wu S H, et al.2017. Theory paradigm and a methods system for research on climate change impacts and risks[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(7): 2169-2178.]
[3]	黄玫, 季劲钧, 曹明奎, 等. 2006. 中国区域植被地上与地下生物量模拟[J]. 生态学报, 26(12): 4156-4163.
	[Huang M, Ji J J, Cao M K, et al.2006. Modeling study of vegetation shoot and root biomass in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(12): 4156-4163.]
[4]	石晓丽, 陈红娟, 史文娇, 等. 2017. 基于阈值识别的生态系统生产功能风险评价: 以北方农牧交错带为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 26(1): 6-12. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2017.01.002
	[Shi X L, Chen H J, Shi W J, et al.2017. Risk assessment of ecosystems production based on the thresholds identification: The case study of farming-pastoral ecotone in northern China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26(1): 6-12.] doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2017.01.002
[5]	史培军. 2005. 四论灾害系统研究的理论与实践[J]. 自然灾害学报, 14(6): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2005.06.001
	[Shi P J.2005. Theory and practice on disaster system research in a fourth time[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 14(6): 1-7.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2005.06.001
[6]	吴绍洪, 潘韬, 贺山峰. 2011. 气候变化风险研究的初步探讨[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 7(5): 363-368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2011.05.009
	[Wu S H, Pan T, He S F.2011. Primary study on the theories and methods of research on climate change risk[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 7(5): 363-368.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2011.05.009
[7]	吴绍洪, 潘韬, 刘燕华, 等. 2017. 中国综合气候变化风险区划[J]. 地理学报, 72(1): 3-17. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701001
	[Wu S H, Pan T, Liu Y H, et al.2017. Comprehensive climate change risk regionalization of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 3-17.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701001
[8]	徐影, 张冰, 周波涛, 等. 2014. 基于CMIP5模式的中国地区未来洪涝灾害风险变化预估[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 10(4): 268-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2014.04.007
	[Xu Y, Zhang B, Zhou B T, et al.2014. Projected risk of flooding disaster in China based on CMIP5 models[J]. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis, 10(4): 268-275.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2014.04.007
[9]	赵东升, 吴绍洪, 尹云鹤. 2011. 气候变化情景下中国自然植被净初级生产力分布[J]. 应用生态学报, 22(4): 897-904.
	[Zhao D S, Wu S H, Yin Y H, et al.2011. Variation trends of natural vegetation net primary productivity in China under climate change scenario[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(4): 897-904.]
[10]	AghaKouchak A, Cheng L Y, Mazdiyasni O, et al.2014. Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California drought[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(24): 8847-8852. doi: 10.1002/2014GL062308
[11]	Alfieri L, Feyen L, Di Baldassarre G.2016. Increasing flood risk under climate change: A pan-European assessment of the benefits of four adaptation strategies[J]. Climatic Change, 136(3-4): 507-521. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1641-1
[12]	Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, et al.1994. At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters[M]. London: Routledge.
[13]	Carpenter K E, Abrar M, Aeby G, et al.2008. One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts[J]. Science, 321(5888): 560-563. doi: 10.1126/science.1159196 pmid: 18653892
[14]	Castellari S.2007. Climate change assessment report[EB/OL].
[15]	Cotton W R, Pielke R A.2007. Human impacts on weather and climate[M]. Cambrige, Britain: Cambridge University Press.
[16]	D'Ippoliti D, Michelozzi P, Marino C, et al.2010. The impact of heat waves on mortality in 9 European cities: Results from the EuroHEAT project[J]. Environmental Health, 9: 37. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-37 pmid: 2914717
[17]	Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl G A, et al.2016. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5): 1937-1958. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
[18]	FAO.2016. Climate change and food security: Risks and responses[M]. Rome, Italy: FAO.
[19]	Fischer E M, Knutti R.2015. Anthropogenic contribution to global occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes[J]. Nature Climate Change, 5(6): 560-564. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2617
[20]	Gordon K. 2014. The economic risks of climate change in the United States-a climate risk assessment for the United States[EB/OL]. [2018-01-15]. .
[21]	Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S, et al.2013. Global flood risk under climate change[J]. Nature Climate Change, 3(9): 816-821. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1911
[22]	HM Government.2012. UK climate change risk assessment: Government report[R]. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
[23]	Höhne N, Luna L, Fekete H, et al. 2017. Action by China and India slows emissions growth, president Trump’s policies likely to cause US emissions to flatten[EB/OL]. (2017-05-15)[2018-01-15]. .
[24]	Hulme M, Dessai S.2008. Predicting, deciding, learning: Can one evaluate the ‘success’ of national climate scenarios[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 3(4): 045013. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045013
[25]	IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptations and vulnerability: Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC[M]. Cambrige, Britain: Cambridge University Press.
[26]	IPCC. 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: a Special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R]. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.
[27]	IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects: Working group II contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report[M]. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.
[28]	Jones R.2004. When do POETS become dangerous[C]//Proceedings of IPCC workshop on describing scientific uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and of options. Maynooth, Ireland: National University of Ireland.
[29]	Jones R N.2001. An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments[J]. Natural Hazards, 23(2-3): 197-230. doi: 10.1023/A:1011148019213
[30]	Jones R N, Hennessy K J.1999. Climate change impacts in the Hunter Valley[J]. CSIRO Atmospheric Research, 47(1-2): 91-115. doi: 10.9774/GLEAF.978-1-907643-29-3_4
[31]	Jones R N, Preston B L.2011. Adaptation and risk management[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2): 296-308. doi: 10.1002/wcc.97
[32]	Kromp-Kolb H, Nakicenovic N, Steininger K, et al.2014. Austrian climate change assessment report 2014: Summary for policymakers[M]. Wien, Österreich: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
[33]	Lamb W F, Rao N D.2015. Human development in a climate-constrained world: What the past says about the future[J]. Global Environmental Change, 33: 14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.010
[34]	Li Y P, Ye W, Wang M, et al.2009. Climate change and drought: A risk assessment of crop-yield impacts[J]. Climate Research, 39(1): 31-46. doi: 10.3354/cr00797
[35]	Melillo J M, Yohe G W.2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment[J]. Evaluation & Assessment, 61(12): 46-48. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X14000996
[36]	Ploberger C, Filho W L.2016. Towards long-term resilience: The challenge of integrating climate change related risks into a risk analysis framework[M]//Filho W L, Musa H, Cavan G, et al. Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience and Hazards. Cham, Germany: Springer.
[37]	Prudhomme C, Wilby R L, Crooks S, et al.2010. Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: application to flood risk[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 390(3-4): 198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.043
[38]	Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, et al.2014. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9): 3268-3273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110 pmid: 24344314
[39]	Roudier P, Andersson J C M, Donnelly C, et al.2016. Projections of future floods and hydrological droughts in Europe under a +2°C global warming[J]. Climatic Change, 135(2): 341-355. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1570-4
[40]	Schaller N, Kay A L, Lamb R, et al.2016. Human influence on climate in the 2014 southern England winter floods and their impacts[J]. Nature Climate Change, 6(6): 627-634. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2927
[41]	Scholze M, Knorr W, Arnell N W, et al.2006. A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(35): 13116-13120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601816103 pmid: 16924112
[42]	Schuur E A, Abbott B.2011. Climate change: High risk of permafrost thaw[J]. Nature, 480(7375): 32-33. doi: 10.1038/480032a pmid: 22129707
[43]	UNEP.2017. The emissions gap report 2017: A UN environment synthesis report[R]. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programm e (UNEP).
[44]	UNFCCC .1992. United Nations conference on environment and development: Framework convention on climate change[J]. International Legal Materials, 31(4): 849-873.
[45]	United Nations. 2015. Paris agreement[EB/OL]. (2015-12-12)[2018-01-15]. .
[46]	Urban M C.2015. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change[J]. Science, 348(6234): 571-573. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4984
[47]	Van Minnen J G, Onigkeit J, Alcamo J.2002. Critical climate change as an approach to assess climate change impacts in Europe: Development and application[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 5(4): 335-347. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00044-8
[48]	Wilby R L, Keenan R.2012. Adapting to flood risk under climate change[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3): 348-378. doi: 10.1177/0309133312438908

气候变化风险及其定量评估方法

Climate change risk and methodology for its quantitative assessment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 48

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邓国富, 李明启. 树轮密度对气候的响应及重建研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2): 343-356.
[2]	敖雪, 翟晴飞, 崔妍, 周晓宇, 沈历都, 赵春雨, 宁喜龙. 基于EOF分解的辽宁省城市化气候效应检测[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1532-1543.
[3]	熊琛然, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 向宁, 王博. 地缘政治风险研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[4]	周美君, 李飞, 邵佳琪, 杨海娟. 气候变化背景下中国玉米生产潜力变化特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 443-453.
[5]	宋臻, 史兴民. 雨养农业区农户的气候变化适应行为及影响因素路径分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 461-473.
[6]	黄安, 许月卿, 卢龙辉, 刘超, 张益宾, 郝晋珉, 王惠. “生产-生活-生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.
[7]	张学珍, 郑景云, 郝志新. 中国主要经济区的近期气候变化特征评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1609-1618.
[8]	谢正辉, 刘斌, 延晓冬, 孟春雷, 徐宪立, 刘宇, 秦佩华, 贾炳浩, 谢瑾博, 李锐超, 王龙欢, 王妍, 陈思. 应对气候变化的城市规划实施效应评估研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 120-131.
[9]	方佳毅, 史培军. 全球气候变化背景下海岸洪水灾害风险评估研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
[10]	周玉科. 青藏高原植被NDVI对气候因子响应的格兰杰效应分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 718-730.
[11]	张会, 李铖, 程炯, 吴志峰, 吴艳艳. 基于“H-E-V”框架的城市洪涝风险评估研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[12]	赵彦茜, 肖登攀, 柏会子, 陶福禄. 中国作物物候对气候变化的响应与适应研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 224-235.
[13]	廖柳文, 高晓路. 人口老龄化对乡村发展影响研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 617-626.
[14]	萧凌波. 1736-1911年中国水灾多发区分布及空间迁移特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(4): 495-503.
[15]	张国庆. 青藏高原湖泊变化遥感监测及其对气候变化的响应研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(2): 214-223.