城际合作空间的生产与重构——基于领域、网络与尺度的视角

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

空间合作是城市合作的重要形式,同时又是一个涉及领域、网络和尺度等多维度的社会空间过程。本文以深汕特别合作区为例,从领域、网络和尺度3个社会空间维度分析城市间合作空间的生产与重构。研究表明,在这种合作形式中,再领域化涉及资本和管制权力2个方面,联系网络具有政治动员、信息共享等功能,而尺度重组的关键则是对高尺度行动者的动员。此外,共同利益是城市空间合作中最核心的要素,高尺度行动者在合作过程中也可能将自身利益嵌入合作空间。最后,这些维度之间存在复杂的相互作用,并具体表现为同一、并行、替代和实现4种组合关系。这4种组合关系对更细致地分析多维度的空间生产具有一定借鉴意义。

关键词: 城市合作, 尺度, 领域, 网络, 空间生产, 深汕特别合作区

Abstract:

Space-based cooperation is an important form of interurban cooperation and a multidimensional sociospatial process concerning reterritorialization, network building, and rescaling. Based on the case study of the Shenzhen-Shanwei Special Cooperation Zone and considering three sociospatial dimensions including territory, network, and scale, the production and restructuring of interurban cooperative space is analyzed. This research suggests that the reterritorialization involved both capital and regulatory power; the network that link actors together serves as tools for political mobilization and information sharing; the key factor for rescaling is the mobilization of actors at higher scales. Common interests of relevant actors are fundamental factors of space-based interurban cooperation. Specifically, the actors at higher scales tend to embed their own interests into the political strategies crossing scales. Moreover, a complex interaction is found among the three sociospatial dimensions, with four major types of combination including identical, parallel, substitution, and realization, which could be of significance in future studies aiming to further examining the production of multidimensional space.

Key words: interurban cooperation, scale, territory, network, production of space, Shenzhen-Shanwei Special Cooperation Zone

马学广, 李鲁奇. 城际合作空间的生产与重构——基于领域、网络与尺度的视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1510-1520.

Xueguang MA, Luqi LI. The production and restructuring of interurban cooperative space:From the perspective of territory, network and scale[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1510-1520.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

表2

参考文献 44

[1]	晁恒, 马学广, 李贵才. 2015. 尺度重构视角下国家战略区域的空间生产策略: 基于国家级新区的探讨[J]. 经济地理, 35(5): 1-8. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.05.001
	[Chao H, Ma X G, Li G C.2015. Production strategy of space under the national strategy region in the perspective of scale rescaling: Based on the analysis of the state-level new areas[J]. Economic Geography, 35(5): 1-8.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.05.001
[2]	陈丹阳. 2016. 尺度政治视角下的曾灶财涂鸦[J]. 热带地理, 36(2): 158-165, 173. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002820
	[Chen D Y.2016. Politics of scale in Tsang Tsou Choi's graffiti[J]. Tropical Geography, 36(2): 158-165, 173.] doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002820
[3]	贺小婧, 刘云刚, 葛岳静. 2015. 钓鱼岛事件的尺度政治与言论分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 24(3): 24-33.
	[He X J, Liu Y G, Ge Y J.2015. Analysis of the Diaoyu Islands dispute by the method of politics of scale and text analysis[J]. World Regional Studies, 24(3): 24-33.]
[4]	胡志丁, 葛岳静, 徐建伟. 2014. 尺度政治视角下的地缘能源安全评价方法及应用[J]. 地理研究, 33(5): 853-862. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405005
	[Hu Z D, Ge Y J, Xu J W.2014. Geopolitical energy security evaluation method and its application based on politics of scale[J]. Geographical Research, 33(5): 853-862.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405005
[5]	李小建, 罗庆. 2007. 经济地理学的关系转向评述[J]. 世界地理研究, 16(4): 19-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2007.04.003
	[Li X J, Luo Q.2007. A review on relational turn in economic geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 16(4): 19-27.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2007.04.003
[6]	刘云刚, 王丰龙. 2011a. 尺度的人文地理内涵与尺度政治: 基于1980年代以来英语圈人文地理学的尺度研究[J]. 人文地理, 26(3): 1-6.
	[Liu Y G, Wang F L.2011a. Concept of scale in human geography and political of scale: Based on Anglophone human geography since 1980s[J]. Human Geography, 26(3): 1-6.]
[7]	刘云刚, 王丰龙. 2011b. 三鹿奶粉事件的尺度政治分析[J]. 地理学报, 66(10): 1368-1378. doi: 10.11821/xb201110007
	[Liu Y G, Wang F L.2011b. Politics of scale in "Sanlu-Milkpowder Scandal"[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(10): 1368-1378.] doi: 10.11821/xb201110007
[8]	刘云刚, 叶清露. 2013. 区域发展中的路径创造和尺度政治: 对广东惠州发展历程的解读[J]. 地理科学, 33(9): 1029-1036.
	[Liu Y G, Ye Q L.2013. Path creation with politics of scale in the regional development: A case study of Huizhou City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(9): 1029-1036.]
[9]	刘云刚, 叶清露, 许晓霞. 2015. 空间、权力与领域: 领域的政治地理研究综述与展望[J]. 人文地理, 30(3): 1-6.
	[Liu Y G, Ye Q L, Xu X X.2015. Space, power and territory: A review on territory in political geography[J]. Human Geography, 30(3): 1-6.]
[10]	罗小龙, 殷洁, 田冬. 2010. 不完全的再领域化与大都市区行政区划重组: 以南京市江宁撤县设区为例[J]. 地理研究, 29(10): 1746-1756. doi: 10.11821/yj2010100003
	[Luo X L, Yin J, Tian D.2010. Administrative boundary re-organization in Nanjing metropolitan region[J]. Geographical Research, 29(10): 1746-1756.] doi: 10.11821/yj2010100003
[11]	马学广. 2016. 全球城市区域的空间生产与跨界治理研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Ma X G.2016. Quanqiu chengshi quyu de kongjian shengchan yu kuajie zhili yanjiu[M]. Beijing, China: Science Publishing.]
[12]	马学广, 李鲁奇. 2016. 国外人文地理学尺度政治理论研究进展[J]. 人文地理, 31(2): 6-12.
	[Ma X G, Li L Q.2016. A review of overseas research on politics of scale in human geography[J]. Human Geography, 31(2): 6-12.]
[13]	苗长虹, 胡志强. 2015. 城市群空间性质的透视与中原城市群的构建[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(3): 271-279. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.03.002
	[Miao C H, Hu Z Q.2015. The nature of urban agglomeration space and the construction of Zhongyuan Urban Agglomeration[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(3): 271-279.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.03.002
[14]	王丰龙, 刘云刚. 2015. 尺度概念的演化与尺度的本质: 基于二次抽象的尺度认识论[J]. 人文地理, 30(1): 9-15.
	[Wang F L, Liu Y G.2015. An analytical framework of scale based on second abstraction[J]. Human Geography, 30(1): 9-15.]
[15]	殷洁, 罗小龙. 2013. 尺度重组与地域重构: 城市与区域重构的政治经济学分析[J]. 人文地理, 28(2): 67-73.
	[Yin J, Luo X L.2013. Rescaling, deterritorialization and reterritorialization: The political economic analysis for city and regional restructuring[J]. Human Geography, 28(2): 67-73.]
[16]	Agnew J, Mitchell K, Toal G.2003. A companion to political geography[M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
[17]	Bank A, Van Heur B.2007. Transnational conflicts and the politics of scalar networks: Evidence from Northern Africa[J]. Third World Quarterly, 28(3): 593-612. doi: 10.1080/01436590701193031
[18]	Brenner N.2001. The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4): 591-614. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688959
[19]	Brenner N.2004. New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood[M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[20]	Bulkeley H.2005. Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks[J]. Political Geography, 24(8): 875-902. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
[21]	Castells M.1999. Grassrooting the space of flows[J]. Urban Geography, 20(4): 294-302. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.294
[22]	Clarno A.2013. Rescaling white space in post-apartheid Johannesburg[J]. Antipode, 45(5): 1190-1212. doi: 10.1111/anti.12015
[23]	Cox K R.1998. Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics[J]. Political Geography, 17(1): 1-23. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6
[24]	Delaney D.2005. Territory: A short introduction[M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
[25]	Harrison J L.2006. 'Accidents' and invisibilities: Scaled discourse and the naturalization of regulatory neglect in California's pesticide drift conflict[J]. Political Geography, 25(5): 506-529. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.003
[26]	Houdret A, Dombrowsky I, Horlemann L.2014. The institutionalization of river basin management as politics of scale: Insights from Mongolia[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 519: 2392-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.037
[27]	Howitt R.2002. Scale and the other: Levinas and geography[J]. Geoforum, 33(3): 299-313. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00006-4
[28]	Jessop B, Brenner N, Jones M.2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations[J]. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3): 389-401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
[29]	Jones K T.1998. Scale as epistemology[J]. Political Geography, 17(1): 25-28. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00049-8
[30]	Jones M, Jessop B.2010. Thinking state/space incompossibly[J]. Antipode, 42(5): 1119-1149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00796.x
[31]	Leitner H.2004. The politics of scale and networks of spatial connectivity: Transnational interurban networks and the rescaling of political governance in Europe[M]//Sheppard E, McMaster R B. Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 236-255.
[32]	Leitner H, Sheppard E, Sziarto K M.2008. The spatialities of contentious politics[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2): 157-172. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x
[33]	Li Y, Wu F L.2012. The transformation of regional governance in China: The rescaling of statehood[J]. Progress in Planning, 78(2): 55-99. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.03.001
[34]	Marston S A.2000. The social construction of scale[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2): 219-242. doi: 10.1177/030913330002400204
[35]	Marston S A.2004. A long way from home: Domesticating the social production of scale[M]//Sheppard E, McMaster R B. Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 170-191.
[36]	Marston S A, Jones III J P, Woodward K.2005. Human geography without scale[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4): 416-432. doi: 10.1111/tran.2005.30.issue-4
[37]	McMaster R B, Sheppard E. 2004. Introduction: Scale and geographic inquiry[M]//Sheppard E, McMaster R B. Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 1-22.
[38]	Painter J.2010. Rethinking territory[J]. Antipode, 42(5): 1090-1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00795.x
[39]	Perkmann M.2007. Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region[J]. Regional Studies, 41(2): 253-266. doi: 10.1080/00343400600990517
[40]	Sheppard E.2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality[J]. Economic Geography, 78(3): 307-330. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2002.tb00189.x
[41]	Smith N.1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space[M]. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
[42]	Staeheli L A.2003. Place[M]//Agnew J A, Mitchell K, Toal G. A companion to political geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 158-170.
[43]	Taylor P J.2003. The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system[M]//Brenner N, Jessop B, Jones M, et al. State/space: A reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 101-113.
[44]	Wei Y D.2015. Spatiality of regional inequality[J]. Applied Geography, 61: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.013

结构化原则	结构化场所
结构化原则	领域	网络	尺度
领域	权力或制度的领域(深圳、汕尾)根植性	领域边界(深圳—汕尾)对网络形态的塑造	通过领域(四镇)的重构推动尺度跳跃
网络	领域间(深圳—汕尾)的跨边界信息流动	权力、信息、资本等要素的流动	通过网络连接不同尺度并推动向上或向下的尺度跳跃
尺度	通过行政权限的下放推动领域(四镇)的重塑	网络的纵向延伸(省政府—两市)	行政结构的层级分化;权力在尺度间分配的不均衡性

组合关系	是否同属一个社会空间过程	是否在单一维度能被完整解释	实例
同一关系	是	能	合作区的尺度上移—合作区的领域重构
并行关系	否	能	广东省对合作区的权限赋予—广东省与合作区之间的网络建构
替代关系	否	不能	深圳市对合作区领域的直接突破(不能实现)—深圳市与汕尾市之间的网络建构
实现关系	是	不能	深圳市向广东省的尺度跳跃(不能独立实现) —深圳市与广东省之间的网络建构