基于疏散行为的震灾避难场所服务效率评价

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.08.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

科学评估避难场所的服务效率是提高城市应急水平的前提。传统对避难场所服务效率的评估多偏重于避难场所空间布局的合理性,缺少对避难者的空间布局和避难行为等避难需求的考虑,这会使评估结果造成偏差,从而容易引起资源配置的低效率。本文构建了多主体模拟模型,模拟避难者灾后对避难场所的选择、奔跑、安置等关键疏散行为过程,量化评估该地区避难场所服务效率。本文对比了两种量化评估指标在同一案例评估的差异性,一种是传统方法中空间可达性(服务半径覆盖率),一种是利用疏散行为模拟计算出的避难成功率;北京市海淀区的实证研究显示两项指标在同一案例区有巨大差异。这一分析结果显示,传统评估仅利用服务半径覆盖率这一指标来分析避难场所布局现状及规划的合理性存在不足。通过避难疏散行为的模拟发现,以下指标的使用有望辅助提高评估的真实性：①避难场所的利用效率。由于设施的利用效率不均衡,会导致避难场所超容或闲置的情况。在充分考虑避难场所的有效服务面积和服务人口的基础上,设计“人均避难面积”等反应利用效率的指标就显得十分必要。②避难标识系统的连通性。避难模拟的实验显示避难标识系统可能对避难者逃生疏散具有分流和引导作用,据此,避难场所与周边居民区的标识系统的连通性也是评价其服务效率的关键指标。

关键词: 震灾避难场所, 服务效率, 疏散行为, 空间可达性, 多主体模拟

Abstract:

Service quality of seismic emergency shelters is an important reference of seismic planning. Spatial coverage of seismic shelters has been used for evaluating service quality of seismic emergency shelters. However, population distribution and evacuation behaviors were rarely considered, which rendered the evaluation results inaccurate. Based on a multi-agent simulation model, this study examined earthquake evacuation behaviors, such as choice of destination, routing, and sheltering. Evacuation rate—the rate of evacuees who successfully arrived at seismic shelters to take refuge within a specific time period—was then calculated. Coverage rate of emergency shelters and evacuation rate of residents both were used to indicate the evacuation success rate. A case study was conducted in Haidian district. The evaluation result shows significant difference between the spatial coverage rate of seismic shelters and evacuation rate. It indicates that coverage of emergency shelters alone cannot fully evaluate emergency shelters. Coverage rate of seismic shelters together with use efficiency of emergency shelters and signs for evacuation routes that lead to quick and order evacuation are all crucial indicators for evaluating service quality of seismic shelters.

Key words: seismic shelters, service quality, evacuation behaviors, spatial accessibility, multi-agent simulation

季珏, 高晓路, 徐匆匆, 许士翔, 汤飞. 基于疏散行为的震灾避难场所服务效率评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(8): 965-973.

Jue JI, Xiaolu GAO, Congcong XU, Shixiang XU, Fei TANG. Evaluating method on service quality of seismic emergency shelters based on evacuation behaviors[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(8): 965-973.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 21

1	窦凯丽, 陈畅. 2016. 基于NetLogo建模的城市防灾应急疏散模拟研究: 以某大城市校园人群疏散为例[C]//规划60年: 成就与挑战: 2016中国城市规划年会论文集(01城市安全与防灾规划). 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社. [Dou K L, Chen C. 2016. Study of urban emergency evacuation based on multi-agent simulation with Netlogo: A case study of evacuation in one campus[C]//Planning 60 years: Achievement and challeage: Proceedings of the annual conference on urban planning in China in 2016. Beijing, China: China Architecture Industy Press.]
2	洪婷婷. 2009. 城市绿地防灾避难机能的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学. [Hong T T. 2009. Research on disaster prevention and evacuation function of urban green space[D]. Fuzhou, China: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.]
3	季珏, 高晓路. 2014. 紧急避难场所震灾服务效率的评价方法及实证: 以北京市海淀区为例[J]. 地理研究, 33(11): 2105-2114. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201411010
	[Ji J, Gao X L.2014. Evaluation method and empirical study on service quality of seismic emergency shelters: A case study of Haidian District, Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 33(11): 2105-2114.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201411010
4	Neo.2011. 地震心理学: 12秒自救机会[J]. 中国减灾, (16): 48-49.
	[Neo.2011. Dizhen xinlixue : 12 miao zijiu jihui[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, (16): 48-49.]
5	戚伟, 李颖, 刘盛和, 等. 2013. 城市昼夜人口空间分布的估算及其特征: 以北京市海淀区为例[J]. 地理学报, 68(10): 1344-1356. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201310004
	[Qi W, Li Y, Liu S H, et al.2013. Estimation of urban population at daytime and nighttime and analyses of their spatial pattern: A case study of Haidian District, Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(10): 1344-1356.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201310004
6	施小斌. 2006. 城市防灾空间效能分析及优化选址研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学. [Shi X B. 2006. Evaluate the efficacy and optimize addressing option on urban disaster-prevention space[D]. Xi'an, China: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology.]
7	王坤鹏. 2011. 北京市防灾空间安全性评价: 避难场所的空间布局及安全性分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学. [Wang K P. 2011. Safety evaluation of disaster prevention space in Beijing: Layout and safety analysis of emergency shelter[D]. Beijing, China: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.]
8	魏冶, 修春亮, 高瑞, 等. 2014. 基于高斯两步移动搜索法的沈阳市绿地可达性评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(4): 479-487. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.005
	[Wei Y, Xiu C L, Gao R, et al.2014. Evaluation of green space accessibility of Shenyang using Gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area method[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 479-487.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.005
9	谢军飞, 李延明, 李树华. 2007. 北京城市公园绿地应急避险功能布局研究[J]. 中国园林, 23(7): 23-29.
	[Xie J F, Li Y M, Li S H.2007. The layout study on the emergency and disaster-prevention functions of the green space of Beijing city park[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 23(7): 23-29.]
10	杨杰莹, 冯瑶, 邵明琦. 2016. 基于虚拟仿真的城市公园的防灾避难服务范围模拟研究[C]//中国园林学会. 中国风景园林学会2016年会论文集. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社. [Yang J Y, Feng Y, Shao M Q. 2016. Analysis of simulation on evacuation service range of city park based on virtual simulation[C]//Annual conference on Chinese Society of Landscape Architecture in 2016. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
11	张丽梅, 许倩英, 胡志良. 2005. 天津市避难场所人均用地指标取值研究[J]. 城市, (3): 30-32.
	[Zhang L M, Xu Q Y, Hu Z L.2005. Study on average land quota per capita in Tianjin refuge place[J]. City, (3): 30-32.]
12	张培, 张靖岩, 王佳, 等. 2015. 城市社区应急避难场所区位配置模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 25(6): 172-176.
	[Zhang P, Zhang J Y, Wang J, et al.2015. Research on urban community emergency shelter location-allocation model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 25(6): 172-176.]
13	郑晓红. 2013. 基于GIS的应急避难场所选址与布局研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学. [Zheng X H. 2013. Location and layout research of urban emergency shelters based on GIS[D]. Qingdao, China: Ocean University of China.]
14	中华人民共和国建设部. 2007. GB 50413-2007 城市抗震防灾规划标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社. [Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2007. GB 50413-2007 Standard for urban planning on earthquake resistance and hazardous prevention[S]. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.]
15	周爱华, 张景秋, 杜姗姗, 等. 2017.一种北京城区避难场所可达性评价方法[J]. 测绘科学, 42(1): 88-92, 106. doi: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2017.01.017
	[Zhou A H, Zhang J Q, Du S S, et al.2017. Spatial accessibility of emergency shelters in Beijing based on improved two-step floating catchment area method[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 42(1): 88-92, 106.] doi: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2017.01.017
16	周天颖, 简甫任. 2001. 紧急避难场所区位决策支持系统建立之研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 8(1): 17-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2001.01.005
	[Zhou T Y, Jian F R.2001. Study on establishing the supporting system for location of the urgent refuge[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 8(1): 17-24.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2001.01.005
17	周兆军, 李攀. 2016. 基于GIS的城市应急避难场所布局研究[J]. 科技通报, 32(5): 202-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7119.2016.05.042
	[Zhou Z J, Li P.2016. Study on the layout optimization of the city emergency shelter based on GIS[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 32(5): 202-206.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7119.2016.05.042
18	Chen X, Kwan M P, Li Q, et al.2012. A model for evacuation risk assessment with consideration of pre- and post-disaster factors[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3): 207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.11.002
19	Chu J Y, Su Y P.2012. The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities[J]. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3: 391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.061
20	Manley M, Kim Y S.2012. Modeling emergency evacuation of individuals with disabilities (exitus): An agent-based public decision support system[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9): 8300-8311. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.169
21	Melinek S J, Booth S.1975. An analysis of evacuation times and the movement of crowds in buildings[R]. Building Research Establishment Fire Research Station, CP 96/75.

[1]	杨慧敏, 张香玲, 李立, 李小建, 王兵. 山区贫困县中小学空间格局变化与可达性分析——以河南省嵩县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(4): 556-566.
[2]	程敏, 连月娇. 基于改进潜能模型的城市医疗设施空间可达性——以上海市杨浦区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(2): 266-275.
[3]	汤鹏飞, 向京京, 罗静, 陈国磊. 基于改进潜能模型的县域小学空间可达性研究——以湖北省仙桃市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(6): 697-708.
[4]	邓丽, 邵景安, 郭跃, 徐新良. 基于改进的两步移动搜索法的山区医疗服务空间可达性——以重庆市石柱县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(6): 716-725.
[5]	颜秉秋, 高晓路, 季珏. 城市养老设施配置的微观模拟与规划政策分析——以北京市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(12): 1586-1597.
[6]	胡瑞山, 董锁成, 胡浩. 就医空间可达性分析的两步移动搜索法——以江苏省东海县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(12): 1600-1607.
[7]	宋正娜,陈雯,张桂香,张蕾. 公共服务设施空间可达性及其度量方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(10): 1217-1224.
[8]	宋正娜1,2\|陈雯1. 基于潜能模型的医疗设施空间可达性评价方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(6): 848-854.
[9]	王松涛, 郑思齐, 冯杰. 公共服务设施可达性及其对新建住房价格的影响———以北京中心城为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(6): 87-94.