基于环境质量标准的环境承载力评价方法及其应用

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.004

地理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 296-305.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.004

• 研究专题：资源环境承载力 • 上一篇下一篇

基于环境质量标准的环境承载力评价方法及其应用

刘年磊(), 卢亚灵, 蒋洪强^*(), 程曦

环境保护部环境规划院,国家环境保护环境规划与政策模拟重点实验室,北京 100012

收稿日期:2017-01-01 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-03-20
通讯作者: 蒋洪强
作者简介:
作者简介：刘年磊(1984-),女,辽宁葫芦岛人,副研究员,主要从事环境规划与管理研究,E-mail:liunl@caep.org.cn。
基金资助:
国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07601-002);环境保护部财政预算重点项目(2110107);中国科学院科技服务网络计划(STS计划)项目(KFJ-STS-ZDTP-021)

Environmental carrying capacity evaluation methods and application based on environmental quality standards

Nianlei LIU(), Yaling LU, Hongqiang JIANG^*(), Xi CHENG

Chinese Academy of Environment Planning, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2017-01-01 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-03-20
Contact: Hongqiang JIANG
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Major Project, No.2012ZX07601-002;Finance Budget Major Project of Ministry of Environmental Protection, No.2110107;Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KFJ-STS-ZDTP-021

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

建立资源环境承载能力监测预警机制,是全面深化改革的一项创新性工作。本文从环境承载力评价视角出发,提出了一种基于环境质量标准的环境承载力评价模型,即通过计算污染物浓度超标指数衡量大气、水及综合环境承载力状况,并以京津冀地区为试点开展案例研究。评价结果显示：①环境综合承载力方面,99%的区县超载。②大气环境承载力方面,可吸入颗粒物(PM₁₀)和细颗粒物(PM_2.5)是主要污染因子,98%的区县超载;臭氧(O₃)和二氧化氮(NO₂)的超标状况也非常严重,分别有87%、72%的区县超载。③水环境承载力方面,进行评价的108个区县全部超载,总氮(TN)、溶解氧(DO)、氨氮(NH₃-N)和总磷(TP)为主要的超标污染因子。该评价模型以环境质量为基础,客观地反映了环境承载力状态,可广泛应用于中国不同尺度单元环境承载力的评价。

关键词: 环境承载力, 污染物浓度, 环境质量标准, 超标指数, 京津冀地区

Abstract:

Establishing the monitoring and early-warning mechanism of resource and environmental carrying capacity is an innovative work of comprehensive and deepening reforms of China. This research proposed an evaluation model of environmental carrying capacity based on environmental quality standards. This model measures the carrying capacity of atmospheric, water, and the whole environment through calculating the exceeding standard value index of pollutant concentration, and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region was used as the pilot study area. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The evaluation results of the pilot study area show that 99% of the districts were in the status of overloading. (2) With regard to atmospheric environmental carrying capacity, 98% of the districts were in the status of overloading with PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 as the main pollutants. The concentrations of O₃ and NO₂ also seriously exceeded the values specified in the standards—87% and 72% of the districts were in the status of overloading with these two pollutants, respectively. (3) With respect to water environmental carrying capacity, all 108 districts were in the status of overloading with TN, DO, NH₃-N, and TP as the main pollutants. This evaluation model objectively reflects the state of environmental carrying capacity based on the environmental quality. It can potentially be widely applied to the evaluation of environmental carrying capacity in different regions.

Key words: environmental carrying capacity, pollutant concentration, environmental quality standard, exceeding standard value index, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

刘年磊, 卢亚灵, 蒋洪强, 程曦. 基于环境质量标准的环境承载力评价方法及其应用[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 296-305.

Nianlei LIU, Yaling LU, Hongqiang JIANG, Xi CHENG. Environmental carrying capacity evaluation methods and application based on environmental quality standards[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 296-305.

图/表 5

参考文献 30

[1]	白辉, 高伟, 陈岩, 等. 2016. 基于环境容量的水环境承载力评价与总量控制研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 38(4): 103-106, 110. doi: 10.15985/j.cnki.1001-3865.2016.04.021
	[Bai H, Gao W, Chen Y, et al.2016. Study on water environmental carrying capacity evaluation and gross control based on environmental capacity[J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 38(4): 103-106, 110.] doi: 10.15985/j.cnki.1001-3865.2016.04.021
[2]	段新光, 栾芳芳. 2014. 基于模糊综合评判的新疆水资源承载力评价[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 24(3): 119-122.
	[Duan X G, Luan F F.2014. Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in Xinjiang based on fuzzy comprehensive model[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(3): 119-122.]
[3]	樊杰, 王亚飞, 汤青, 等. 2015. 全国资源环境承载能力监测预警(2014版)学术思路与总体技术流程[J]. 地理科学, 35(1): 1-10.
	[Fan J, Wang Y F, Tang Q, et al.2015. Academic thought and technical progress of monitoring and early-warning of the national resources and environment carrying capacity (V 2014)[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(1): 1-10.]
[4]	高伟, 伊璇, 刘永, 等. 2016. 可持续性约束下开放流域系统氮磷环境承载力研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 36(2): 690-699. doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2015.0451
	[Gao W, Yi X, Liu Y, et al.2016. Environmental carrying capacity of nitrogen and phosphorus in an open watershed system under sustainability requirement[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 36(2): 690-699.] doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2015.0451
[5]	李磊, 贾磊, 赵晓雪, 等. 2014. 层次分析—熵值定权法在城市水环境承载力评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 23(4): 456-460. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201404002
	[Li L, Jia L, Zhao X X, et al.2014. Application of the AHP and entropy weight method in evaluation on city water environmental carrying capacity[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 23(4): 456-460.] doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201404002
[6]	刘东, 封志明, 杨艳昭. 2012. 基于生态足迹的中国生态承载力供需平衡分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 27(4): 614-624. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.008
	[Liu D, Feng Z M, Yang Y Z.2012. Ecological balance between supply and demand in China using ecological footprint method[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(4): 614-624.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.008
[7]	彭建, 吴健生, 潘雅婧, 等. 2012. 基于PSR模型的区域生态持续性评价概念框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(7): 933-940. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.012
	[Peng J, Wu J S, Pan Y J, et al.2012. Evaluation for regional ecological sustainability based on PSR model: Conceptual framework[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(7): 933-940.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.07.012
[8]	王传胜, 朱珊珊, 樊杰, 等. 2012. 主体功能区规划监管与评估的指标及其数据需求[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(12): 1678-1684. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.12.013
	[Wang C S, Zhu S S, Fan J, et al.2012. Key indicators and their data requirements for supervision and evaluation of MFOZ planning[J]. Progress in Geography, 31(12): 1678-1684.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.12.013
[9]	王春娟, 冯利华, 罗伟. 2012. 长三角经济区水资源承载力的综合评价[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 23(4): 38-42.
	[Wang C J, Feng L H, Luo W.2012. Comprehensive evaluation of carrying capacity of water resources in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 23(4): 38-42.]
[10]	王金南, 于雷, 万军, 等. 2013. 长江三角洲地区城市水环境承载力评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 33(6): 1147-1151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2013.06.026
	[Wang J N, Yu L, Wan J, et al.2013. Assessment on water environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. China Environmental Science, 33(6): 1147-1151.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2013.06.026
[11]	王奎峰, 李娜, 于学峰, 等. 2014. 基于P-S-R概念模型的生态环境承载力评价指标体系研究: 以山东半岛为例[J]. 环境科学学报, 34(8): 2133-2139. doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0661
	[Wang K F, Li N, Yu X F, et al.2014. Eco-environmental carrying capacity evaluation index system based on the concept of P-S-R model: A case study in Shandong Peninsula[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 34(8): 2133-2139.] doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0661
[12]	王西琴, 高伟, 曾勇. 2014. 基于SD模型的水生态承载力模拟优化与例证[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 34(5): 1352-1360.
	[Wang X Q, Gao W, Zeng Y.2014. Methods and case study on water ecological carrying capacity using SD model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 34(5): 1352-1360.]
[13]	徐琳瑜, 康鹏, 刘仁志. 2013. 基于突变理论的工业园区环境承载力动态评价方法[J]. 中国环境科学, 33(6): 1127-1136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2013.06.023
	[Xu L Y, Kang P, Liu R Z.2013. Dynamic evaluation on environmental carrying capacity of industrial park with catastrophe progression method[J]. China Environmental Science, 33(6): 1127-1136.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2013.06.023
[14]	薛文博, 付飞, 王金南, 等. 2014. 基于全国城市PM2.5达标约束的大气环境容量模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 34(10): 2490-2496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2014.10.007
	[Xue W B, Fu F, Wang J N, et al.2014. Modeling study on atmospheric environmental capacity of major pollutants constrained by PM2.5 compliance of Chinese cities[J]. China Environmental Science, 34(10): 2490-2496.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2014.10.007
[15]	姚士谋, 张平宇, 余成, 等. 2014. 中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J]. 地理科学, 34(6): 641-647.
	[Yao S M, Zhang P Y, Yu C, et al.2014. The theory and practice of new urbanization in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(6): 641-647.]
[16]	叶龙浩, 周丰, 郭怀成, 等. 2013. 基于水环境承载力的沁河流域系统优化调控[J]. 地理研究, 32(6): 1007-1016. doi: 10.11821/yj2013060004
	[Ye L H, Zhou F, Guo H C, et al.2013. Optimal regulation of Qinghe River watershed system based on water carrying capacity[J]. Geographical Research, 32(6): 1007-1016.] doi: 10.11821/yj2013060004
[17]	曾维华, 等. 2014. 环境承载力理论、方法及应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社.
	[Zeng W H, et al.2014. Huanjing chengzaili lilun, fangfa ji yingyong[M]. Beijing, China: Chemical Industry Press.]
[18]	张会涓, 陈然, 赵言文. 2012. 基于模糊物元模型的区域水环境承载力研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 32(2): 186-189.
	[Zhang H J, Chen R, Zhao Y W.2012. Regional carrying capacity of water environment based on fuzzy matter-element model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 32(2): 186-189.]
[19]	Clarke A L.2002. Assessing the carrying capacity of the Florida keys[J]. Population and Environment, 23(4): 405-418. doi: 10.1023/A:1014576803251
[20]	Gong L, Jin C L.2009. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for carrying capacity of regional water resources[J]. Water Resources Management, 23(12): 2505-2513. doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9393-y
[21]	Li N, Yang H, Wang L C, et al.2016. Optimization of industry structure based on water environmental carrying capacity under uncertainty of the Huai River Basin within Shandong Province, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 4594-4604. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.074
[22]	Peng J, Du Y Y, Liu Y X, et al.2016. How to assess urban development potential in mountain areas? An approach of ecological carrying capacity in the view of coupled human and natural systems[J]. Ecological Indicators, 60: 1017-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.008
[23]	Peng J, Wang Y L, Wu J S, et al.2011. Research progress on evaluation frameworks of regional ecological sustainability[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(4): 496-510. doi: 10.1007/s11769-011-0490-0
[24]	Wackernagel M, Yount J D.1998. The ecological footprint: An indicator of progress toward regional sustainability[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51(1-2): 511-529. doi: 10.1023/A:1006094904277
[25]	Wang W Y, Zeng W H.2013. Optimizing the regional industrial structure based on the environmental carrying capacity: An inexact fuzzy multi-objective programming model[J]. Sustainability, 5(12): 5391-5415. doi: 10.3390/su5125391
[26]	Wei C, Guo Z Y, Wu J P, et al.2014. Constructing an assessment indices system to analyze integrated regional carrying capacity in the coastal zones: A case in Nantong[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 93: 51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.02.009
[27]	Sutton P C, Anderson S J, Tuttle B T, et al.2012. The real wealth of nations: Mapping and monetizing the human ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 16: 11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.008
[28]	Yang J F, Lei K, Khu S, et al.2015. Assessment of water environmental carrying capacity for sustainable development using a coupled system dynamics approach applied to the Tieling of the Liao River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(9): 5173-5183. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4230-0
[29]	Zeng W H, Wu B, Chai Y.2016. Dynamic simulation of urban water metabolism under water environmental carrying capacity restrictions[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(1): 114-128. doi: 10.1007/s11783-014-0669-6
[30]	Zheng D F, Zhang Y, Zang Z, et al.2015. Empirical research on carrying capacity of human settlement system in Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 25(2): 237-249. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0732-z

基于环境质量标准的环境承载力评价方法及其应用

Environmental carrying capacity evaluation methods and application based on environmental quality standards

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘汉初, 樊杰, 张海朋, 王甫园. 珠三角城市群制造业集疏与产业空间格局变动[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 195-206.
[2]	付慧, 刘艳军, 孙宏日, 周国磊. 京津冀地区耕地利用转型时空分异及驱动机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.
[3]	黄琳珊, 陈彦光, 李双成. 京津冀城镇用地空间结构的多分维谱分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 50-64.
[4]	李宵, 申玉铭, 邱灵. 京津冀生产性服务业关联特征分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(2): 299-307.
[5]	吕一河, 傅微, 李婷, 刘源鑫. 区域资源环境综合承载力研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 130-136.
[6]	徐勇, 张雪飞, 周侃, 王传胜, 徐小任. 资源环境承载能力预警的超载成因分析方法及应用[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 277-285.
[7]	徐卫华, 杨琰瑛, 张路, 肖燚, 王效科, 欧阳志云. 区域生态承载力预警评估方法及案例研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.
[8]	孟晖, 李春燕, 张若琳, 李亚民. 京津冀地区县域单元地质灾害风险评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 327-334.
[9]	贾克敬, 张辉, 徐小黎, 祁帆. 面向空间开发利用的土地资源承载力评价技术[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 335-341.
[10]	余建辉, 张文忠, 李佳洺. 资源环境耗损过程评价方法及其应用[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 350-358.
[11]	周道静, 王传胜. 资源环境承载能力预警城市化地区专项评价——以京津冀地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 359-366.
[12]	李国平, 罗心然. 京津冀地区人口与经济协调发展关系研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(1): 25-33.
[13]	刘小茜, 马廷, 裴韬, 王向东, 杜云艳, 谢传节. 京津冀地区人口规模调控政策参数化路径与系统模拟[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(1): 34-45.
[14]	左玉珊, 王卫, 郝彦莉, 刘红. 基于MODIS影像的土地覆被分类研究——以京津冀地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11): 1556-1565.
[15]	左玉珊, 王卫, 郝彦莉, 刘红. 基于MODIS影像的土地覆被分类研究——以京津冀地区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11): 1556-1565.