国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.002

地理科学进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 276-285.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.002

国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示

宋涛^1,^2,³(), 刘卫东^1,^2,³, 李玏^1,^2,^4,^*()

1. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
3. 中国西南地缘环境与边疆发展协同创新中心,昆明 650500
4. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049

收稿日期:2015-07-01 接受日期:2015-11-01 出版日期:2016-03-25 发布日期:2016-03-25
通讯作者: 李玏
作者简介:
作者简介：宋涛(1983-),男,山西太原人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事区域可持续发展与地缘政治等方面研究,E-mail: songtao@igsnrr.ac.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41530634,41530751);云南省中国西南地缘环境与边疆发展协同创新中心开放课题

International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation

Tao SONG^1,^2,³(), Weidong LIU^1,^2,³, Le LI^1,^2,^4,^*()

1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Geopolitical Setting of Southwest China and Borderland Development, Kunming 650500, China
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2015-07-01 Accepted:2015-11-01 Online:2016-03-25 Published:2016-03-25
Contact: Le LI
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41530634, No.41530751;Foundation of Collaborative Innovation Center for Geopolitical Setting of Southwest China and Borderland Development

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

边境地区是国家重要的国土安全屏障和对外开放门户。在全球化、信息化的背景下,边境地区成为地理学、政治学和政治经济学的研究热点。科学认识和总结国际边境研究是推进学科发展的前提。本文以科学引文索引(Web of Science)中边境研究的学术论文为依据,借助于Citespace科学计量工具,系统回顾了国外1990-2015年边境研究的发展脉络、研究领域重点和研究趋势。从文献计量统计分析来看,1990年以来刊文量最大的期刊包括《政治地理学》(Political Geography)、《地缘政治学》(Geopolitics)等。国外边境研究的领域集中于政治地理、环境生态、商业经济、公共管治、人文艺术等方面。地缘政治视角下的领土、国家权力始终是边境研究的重要内容。新世纪以来,边境研究在汲取了批判性地缘政治学、人本主义地缘政治的精髓后,逐渐增强了对边境环境、社会治理等方面的反思。在文献计量分析的基础上,重点阐述了边境的地理涵义和政治属性、经济商贸交流、边境一体化、边境冲突与安全、文化与社会建构、跨境合作制度等领域的研究趋势。最后提出,未来中国边境研究应增强边境地区的综合性发展战略研究,搭建适应于中国特色发展的跨境合作平台与机制,融入国际政治学、民族学、自然地理学等多学科视角。

关键词: 边境研究, 地缘政治, 科学计量学, “一带一路”

Abstract:

Border region is an important national security barrier and opening gateway. In the context of globalization and rapid development of information technology, research on border region has become a hot topic of geography, political science, and political economy internationally. In this article, by means of bibliometric measurement of the Citespace tool and using data from the Web of Science in 1990-2015, international frontiers and trends of border research have been reviewed systematically. The results of bibliometric statistical analysis show that, since 1990, most of the articles on border research were published in political geography and geopolitics journals. The fields of international border research include political geography, environment, ecology, business, economics, public administration, culture, among others. Geopolitical territory and state power have always been important parts of the border research frontier. Since the 21st century, critical geopolitics and humanism geopolitics have been applied to border research, including rethinking societal governance and other aspects of border areas. This article also reviews the key research trends, including economic and trade exchanges, border integration, border conflicts and security, cultural and social construction, as well as cross-border cooperation systems. Finally, it recommends that Chinese border research in the future should emphasize comprehensive strategic research of border areas; build cross-border cooperation platforms and mechanism; and integrate the international political science, ethnology, physical geography, and other multi-disciplinary approaches.

Key words: border research, geopolitics, scientific metrology, the Belt and Road Initiative

宋涛, 刘卫东, 李玏. 国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(3): 276-285.

Tao SONG, Weidong LIU, Le LI. International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(3): 276-285.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

表2

参考文献 69

1	陈才. 2001. 地缘关系与世界经济地理学科建设[J]. 世界地理研究, 10(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2001.03.001
	[Chen C.2001. Geo-relation and course construction of world economic geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 10(3): 1-7.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2001.03.001
2	杜德斌, 段德忠, 刘承良, 等. 2015. 1990 年以来中国地理学之地缘政治学研究进展[J]. 地理研究, 34(2): 199-212. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502001
	[Du D B, Duan D Z, Liu C L, et al.2015. Progress of geopolitics of Chinese geography since 1990[J]. Geographical Research, 34(2): 199-212.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201502001
3	何跃, 高虹. 2011. 论云南跨境教育和跨境民族教育[J]. 云南民族大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 28(2): 5-9.
	[He Y, Gao H.2011. On the cross-border education and the cross-border ethnic education in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University: Social Sciences, 28(2): 5-9.]
4	胡志丁, 骆华松, 李灿松, 等. 2012. 地缘安全视角下国家边界的“三重功能”及其优化组合[J]. 人文地理, 27(3): 73-77.
	[Hu Z D, Luo H S, Li C S, et al.2012. Triple functions of country border and its concerning optimized combination under the perspective of geopolitical security[J]. Human Geography, 27(3): 73-77.]
5	李灿松, 胡志丁, 葛岳静, 等. 2014. 当前国外政治地理学边境安全研究进展[J]. 热带地理, 34(4): 454-462.
	[Li C S, Hu Z D, Ge Y J, et al.2014. Progress of foreign political geography in border security studies[J]. Tropical Geography, 34(4): 454-462.]
6	梁双陆, 程小军. 2007. 国际区域经济一体化理论综述[J]. 经济问题探索, (1): 40-46.
	[Liang S L, Cheng X J.2007. Guoji quyu jingji yitihua lilun zongshu[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, (1): 40-46.]
7	刘卫东. 2015. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 538-544. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
	[Liu W D.2015. Scientific understandingof the Belt and Road initiative of China and related research themes[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 538-544.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
8	刘志高, 王琛, 李二玲, 等. 2014. 中国经济地理研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 69(10): 1449-1458. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410005
	[Liu Z G, Wang C, Li E L, et al.2014. Research progress of economic geography in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(10): 1449-1458.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201410005
9	陆大道, 杜德斌. 2013. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考[J]. 地理学报, 68(6): 723-727.
	[Lu D D, Du D B.2013. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(6): 723-727.]
10	毛汉英. 2013. 中国周边地缘政治与地缘经济格局和对策[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(3): 289-302. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.03.001
	[Mao H Y.2013. Geopolitical and geo-economic situation around and China's strategies[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(3): 289-302.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.03.001
11	汤建中, 张兵, 陈瑛. 2002. 边界效应与跨国界经济合作的地域模式: 以东亚地区为例[J]. 人文地理, 17(1): 8-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2002.01.003
	[Tang J Z, Zhang B, Chen Y.2002. The boundary effect and cross-border subregional economic cooperation: A case study of East Asia[J]. Human Geography, 17(1): 8-12.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2002.01.003
12	张金鹏, 保跃平. 2013. 云南边疆民族地区跨境婚姻与社会稳定研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 30(1): 47-54.
	[Zhang J P, Bao Y P.2013. Research on cross-border marriage and social stability in the minority borderland of Yunnan[J]. Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University: Social Sciences, 30(1): 47-54.]
13	Agamben G.1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life[M]. Heller-Roazen D, trans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14	Aker J C, Klein M W, O'Connell S A, et al.2014. Borders, ethnicity and trade[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 107: 1-16.
15	Aldenderfer M S, Blashfield R K.1984. Cluster analysis: Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences 07-044[M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16	Amoore L.2006. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror[J]. Political Geography, 25(3): 336-351. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
17	Anderson B.1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism[M]. London, UK: Verso.
18	Anderson M.1997. The political science of frontiers[M]//Ganster P, Scott J, Dieter-Eberwein W. Borders and border regions in Europe and North America. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
19	Appadurai A.1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions in globalization[M]. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
20	Arreola D D, Curtis J R.1993. The Mexican border cities: Landscape anatomy and place personality[M]. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
21	Bakker K.1999. The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong[J]. Political Geography, 18(2): 209-232. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(98)00085-7
22	Barter P A.2006. Multiple dimensions in negotiating the cross-border transportlinks that connect and divide Singapore and Johor, Malaysia[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47(2): 287-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2006.00306.x
23	Barth F.1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference[M]. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin.
24	Blatter J K.2001. Debordering the world of states: Towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from border regions[J]. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2): 175-209.
25	Brunet-Jailly E.2005. Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Geopolitics, 10(4): 633-649. doi: 10.1080/14650040500318449
26	Bunnell T, Muzaini H, Sidaway J D.2006. Global city frontiers: Singapore' shinterland and the contested socio-political geographies of Bintan, Indonesia[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1): 3-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00647.x
27	Butler E W, Pick J B, Hettrick W J.2001. Mexico and Mexico City in the world economy[M]. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28	Clark T.1994. National boundaries, border zones, and marketing strategy: A conceptual framework and theoretical model of secondary boundary effects[J]. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 67-80. doi: 10.2307/1252311
29	Docquier F, Lowell B L, Marfouk A.2009. A gendered assessment of highly skilled emigration[J]. Population and Development Review, 35(2): 297-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00277.x
30	EhlersN, BuursinkJ.2000. Binationalcities: Peoples, institutions, and structures[M]//van der Velde M, van Houtum H. Borders, regions, and people. London, UK: Pion.
31	Feitelson E.2002. Implications of shifts in the Israeli water discourse for Israeli-Palestinian water negotiations[J]. Political Geography, 21(3): 293-318. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00038-5
32	Fernandez L, Carson R T.2002. Both sides of the border: Transboundary environmental managementissues facing Mexico and the United States[M]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33	Fox C.1999. The fence and the river: Culture and politics at the U.S.-Mexico border[M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
34	Gao X, Long C X.2014. Cultural border, administrative border, and regional economicdevelopment: Evidence from Chinese cities[J]. China Economic Review, 31: 247-264. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2014.10.002
35	Garcıa J Z.2003. Directions in border research: An overview[J]. The Social Science Journal, 40(4): 523-533. doi: 10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00066-1
36	Globerman S, Paul S.2008. Theimpacts of 9/11 on Canada-U.S. trade[M]. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press: 45.
37	Grundy-Warr C, Peachey K, Perry M.1999. Fragmented integration in the Singapore-Indonesian border zone: Southeast Asia's 'growth triangle' againstthe global economy[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2): 304-328. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00197
38	Hanson G H.1998. Regional adjustment to trade liberalization[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28(4): 419-444. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00006-4
39	Hoover E M.1963. The location of economic activity[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40	Jiang H.2004. Cooperation, land use, and the environment in Uxin Ju: The changing landscape of a Mongolian-Chinese borderland in China[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1): 117-139. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401007.x
41	Lau H F, Sin L Y M, Chan K K C.2005. Chinese cross-border shopping: An empirical study[J]. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 29(1): 110-133. doi: 10.1177/1096348004272178
42	Lee C K.2009. How does a cluster relocate across the border? The case of information technology cluster in the Taiwan-Suzhou region[J]. Technological Forecasting and SocialChange, 76(3): 371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.07.005
43	Löfgren O.2008. Regionauts: The transformation of cross-border regions in Scandinavia[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(3): 195-209. doi: 10.1177/0969776408090418
44	Martánez O J.1994. Border people: Life and society in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands[M]. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
45	Miller T.1985. Cited[M]//Hansen G M. Borders and frontiers I, the challenges of teaching about international borders, an overview. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University.
46	Nevins J.2002. Operation gatekeeper: The rise of the "illegal alien" and the remaking of the U.S.-Mexico boundary[M]. New York: Roultedge.
47	Newman D.2006. The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our 'borderless' world[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2): 143-161. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
48	Newman D, Paasi A.1998. Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2): 186-207.
49	Paasi A.1996. Territories, boundaries andconsciousness: The changing geographies of the Finnish-Russian border[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
50	Perkmann M.2003. Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2): 153-171. doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002004
51	Perkmann M.2007. Policy entrepreneurshipand multilevel governance: A comparativestudy of European cross-border regions[J]. Environment and Planning C: Governmentand Policy, 25(6): 861-79. doi: 10.1068/c60m
52	Pick J B, Butler E W.1990. Socioeconomic inequality in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands: Modernization and buffering[J]. Frontera Norte, 2(3): 31-62.
53	Prokkola E K.2007. Cross-border regionalization and tourism development at the Swedish-Finnish border: "Destination arctic circle"[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(2): 120-138. doi: 10.1080/15022250701226022
54	Ratti R, Reichman S.1993. Theory and practice of transborder cooperation[M]. Basel & Frankfurt: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
55	Saxena G, Ilbery B.2010. Developing integrated rural tourism: Actor practices in the English/Welsh border[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(3): 260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.001
56	Shen J F.2014. Not quite a twin city: Cross-boundary integration in Hong Kong and Shenzhen[J]. Habitat International, 42: 138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.003
57	Sit V F S.1998. Hong Kong's "transferred" industrialization and industrial geography[J]. Asian Survey, 38(9): 880-904. doi: 10.1525/as.1998.38.9.01p0387e
58	Sklair L.1993. Assembling for development: The maquila industry in Mexico and the United States[M]. San Diago, CA: Routledge.
59	Sparke M B.2005. In the space of theory: Post-foundational geographies of the nation-state[M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
60	Sparke M B.2006. A neoliberal nexus: Economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border[J]. Political Geography, 25(2): 151-180. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.10.002
61	Spierings M, van der Velde M.2013. Cross-border differences and unfamiliarity: Shopping mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion[J]. European Planning Studies, 21(1): 5-23. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.716236
62	Su X B.2013. From frontier to bridgehead: Cross-border regions and the experience of Yunnan, China[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4): 1213-1232. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01191.x
63	Tosun C, Temizkan S P, Timothy D J, et al.2007. Tourist shopping experiences and satisfaction[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 9(2): 87-102. doi: 10.1002/jtr.595
64	Truett S, Young E.2004. Continental crossroads: Remapping U.S.-Mexico borderlands history[M]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
65	van Houtum H.2005. The geopolitics of borders and boundaries[J]. Geopolitics, 10(4): 672-679. doi: 10.1080/14650040500318522
66	Venables A J.1996. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries[J]. International Economic Review, 37(2): 341-359.
67	Viswanathana N K, PickbJ B, Hettrickc W J, et al.2005. An analysis of commonality in the twin metropolitan areas of San Diego, California, and Tijuana, Mexico[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 39(1): 57-79. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2003.10.006
68	Vlassenroot K, Büscher K.2013. Borderlands, identity and urban development: The case of Goma (Democratic Republic of the Congo)[J]. Urban Studies, 50(15): 3168-3184. doi: 10.1163/187541100X00120
69	Wang D G.2004. Hong Kongers' cross-border consumption and shopping in Shenzhen: Patterns and motivations[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(3): 149-159. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6989(03)00014-6

期刊名称	边境研究文章数量	2014年期刊影响因子	期刊所在国
《政治地理学》Political Geography	90	2.676	英国
《地缘政治学》Geopolitics	87	0.923	英国
《环境与规划D辑》Environment and Planning D	66	1.515	英国
《经济地理学与社会地理学期刊》Tijdschrift voor Economische enSociale Geografie	57	1.096	荷兰
《区域研究》Regional Studies	54	2.068	英国
《环境与规划A辑》Environment and Planning A	48	1.604	英国
《美国地理学会会刊》Annals of the Association of American Geographers	47	2.291	美国
《特兰西瓦尼亚评论》Transylvanian Review	47	0.012	罗马尼亚
《对极》Antipode	46	2.104	美国
《欧洲规划研究》European Planning Studies	46	1.228	比利时

排名	名称	类型	主题词	文献
1	领土,边界和意识：芬兰与俄罗斯边境的地理变化	专著	边境、领土、芬兰—俄罗斯、意识	Paasi, 1996
2	后现代主义世界中的阻隔和睦邻：政治地理学中的边界叙述	论文	边境叙述、多尺度、后现代、领土、去边境化	Newman et al, 1998
3	无边界世界中的边界：将我们分离的边境线	论文	边境地区、边境叙述、国际关系、跨学科	Newman, 2006
4	反恐中的移动性治理：生物识别边界	论文	恐怖袭击、边界、生物识别、国土安全、风险	Amoore, 2006
5	新自由主义关系：边境公民的经济、安全和生命政治	论文	边境、公民、安全、新自由主义、地缘经济、另类空间	Sparke, 2006
6	想象的社区：国家主义起源和传播的思考	专著	国家主义、政治学、东南亚、政权	Anderson, 1991
7	边境守护及其背后的故事：与非法移民的战争,美国墨西哥边境的重塑	专著	非法移民、边境守护、美国边境巡警、边境管制	Nevins, 2002
8	禁绝之人：主权权力和赤裸生命	专著	主权权力、传统政治理论、生命政治、政治民族学	Agamben, 1998
9	欧洲跨境区域的重要性及区域跨境合作机制	论文	跨境合作、跨境区域、欧盟、区域间合作	Perkmann, 2003
10	消失的现代性：全球化的文化维度	专著	全球化、后现代、文化问题、多元文化、当代消费格局	Appadurai, 1996

[1]	郭建科, 侯雅洁, 何瑶. “一带一路”背景下中欧港口航运网络的演化特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(5): 716-726.
[2]	熊琛然, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 向宁, 王博. 地缘政治风险研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 695-706.
[3]	宋周莺, 祝巧玲. “一带一路”背景下的中国与巴基斯坦的贸易关系演进及其影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(11): 1785-1797.
[4]	郑智, 刘卫东, 宋周莺, 叶尔肯·吾扎提, 梁宜. “一带一路”生产网络及中国参与程度[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 951-962.
[5]	熊理然, 刘保强, 武友德, 蒋梅英. 2010—2015年中东北非政局变动中的“政治性民意势力”及其影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(6): 930-940.
[6]	侯璐璐, 刘云刚. 政治地理学中生存空间概念的演变[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 637-647.
[7]	胡伟, 胡志丁, 葛岳静. 中国地缘环境研究进展与思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 477-488.
[8]	叶滨鸿, 程杨, 王利, 杨林生. 北极地区地缘关系研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 489-505.
[9]	刘晓凤, 葛岳静, 胡伟, 黄宇, 马腾. 非国家行为体的地缘政治空间影响及实现路径[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1735-1746.
[10]	秦奇, 成升魁, 李飞, 吴良, 张丹, 陈晓鹏. 1992年以来国内外地缘政治比较研究——基于地理学视角的分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1475-1488.
[11]	黄宇, 葛岳静, 马腾, 刘晓凤. 中国高铁外交的地缘空间格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1489-1499.
[12]	苏晓波, 蔡晓梅. 领域陷阱与中国在缅甸北部的跨国禁毒实践[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1552-1561.
[13]	李飞, 成升魁, 于会录, 秦奇, 刘晓洁, 徐增让, 吴良, 张丹, 李欣, 初冬梅. 国家地缘脆弱性探索——缅甸案例及对中国地缘战略启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(6): 737-746.
[14]	曹原, 葛岳静, 王淑芳, 胡志丁. 经济途径对地缘政治格局的影响机制及其空间表现研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(3): 265-275.
[15]	刘卫东. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(5): 538-544.

国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示

International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 69

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0