地理科学进展

地理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1742-1750.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.12.003

• 第十四届全国青年地理工作者学术研讨会专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

第十四届全国青年地理工作者学术研讨会青年学术辩论赛决赛实录

中国地理学会青年工作委员   

  1. 中国地理学会青年工作委员
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-01 修回日期:2013-11-01 出版日期:2013-12-25 发布日期:2013-12-25

Live report of the Academic Debate Contest Final at the 14th National Symposium for Young Geographers

Young Geographers' Committee of the Geographical Society of China   

  1. Young Geographers' Committee of the Geographical Society of China
  • Received:2013-10-01 Revised:2013-11-01 Online:2013-12-25 Published:2013-12-25

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要： 青年学术辩论赛是全国青年地理工作者学术研讨会的一个传统内容，今年已是第6 次举办。本届辩论赛分自然地理组和人文地理组，分别就“自然过程与人文过程：谁是改变地球系统的更强驱动力”及“定量研究方法与定性研究方法：谁更适用于人文地理学研究”展开辩论。依照赛制，辩论赛分初赛和决赛。在决赛环节，北京师范大学（领队：董卫华，辩手：贾丹、张琪、周泽威）与太原师范学院（领队：史利江，辩手：闫艺雄、陈怡舟、郭尚龙）代表队分获自然地理组的冠、亚军；北京大学（领队：柴彦威，辩手：谷志莲、刘曦、吴逸思）与西北大学（领队：李钢，辩手：方蕾、颜祥、李楠楠）代表队分获人文地理组冠、亚军。此次辩论赛的议题均为所属学科长期关注的核心和热点问题，因此特对决赛文字记录进行整理发表，期望广大读者能够藉此了解当前青年地理学人对本学科重大问题的关注程度和认识深度，并激发对这些问题进行更进一步的思考和讨论的兴趣。

关键词: 地球系统驱动力, 人文地理学研究方法, 学术辩论

Abstract: As a tradition of the National Symposium for Young Geographers, this is the 6th academic debate held on November 13, 2013. There were seven teams taking part in this debate and the debate topic was divided into physical geography (Natural processes or human processes: Which is the stronger driving force of the changes in the Earth System?) and human geography (Quantitative or qualitative methods: Which is more suitable for human geography research?). Both the two topics are the core and hot issues of modern geography. From the live report of the Academic Debate Contest Final, readers could find how youth geographers in China understand the current major issues of the subject. Hope that their immature opinions could attract more intersts in thinking and discussing these scientific problems.

Key words: academic debate, driving force of the Earth System, methodology of human geography