地理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1332-1343.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.09.003
古杰1, 周素红1,2, 闫小培1, 柴彦威3, 郑重1
收稿日期:
2013-01-01
修回日期:
2013-08-01
出版日期:
2013-09-25
发布日期:
2013-09-25
通讯作者:
周素红(1976- ), 女, 广东饶平人, 教授, 主要从事城市地理学、城市公共政策研究。E-mail:eeszsh@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:
古杰(1984- ), 男, 河省郸城人, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为城市地理学。E-mail:gujie198410@sina.com
基金资助:
GU Jie1, ZHOU Suhong1,2, YAN Xiaopei1, CHAI Yanwei3, ZHENG Zhong1
Received:
2013-01-01
Revised:
2013-08-01
Online:
2013-09-25
Published:
2013-09-25
摘要: 本文采用“Web of Science”数据库收录的1999-2013年期间发表的探讨时空关系相关文献,包括2263篇直接文献和这些文献引用的78139篇参考文献为基础数据,采用Histcite软件构建时空关系研究文献数据库,结合Citespace软件对该数据库进行文献引用关系和知识图谱的可视化处理,并对热点文献进行解读与分析,从而分析时空关系研究的研究热点和发展趋势。研究发现:2000年前后,时空关系研究与GIS结合逐步突破了传统时间地理学研究的技术瓶颈和研究框架,迅速进入了一个文献爆炸的阶段,研究的内容逐步从时空行为的描述转向对时空关系的解释。随着时空GIS技术的不断成熟,本领域的研究更多地把时空行为作为一种变量,对各种时空现象和社会问题进行解释,而不仅仅是一个被描述和解释的对象,其学科应用价值将逐步突显。
古杰, 周素红, 闫小培, 柴彦威, 郑重. 基于文献引用关系和知识图谱的时空关系研究热点分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(9): 1332-1343.
GU Jie, ZHOU Suhong,YAN Xiaopei, CHAI Yanwei, ZHENG Zhong. The trend and hot issues in the field of space-time research: Based on the literature citation relationships and knowledge map[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(9): 1332-1343.
Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S. 1985. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Chai Y W, Shen Y, Xiao Z P, et al. 2012. Review for space-time behavior research: Theory frontiers and application in the future. Progress in Geography, 31(6):667-675. [柴彦威, 申悦, 肖作鹏, 等. 2012. 时空间行为研究动态及其实践应用前景. 地理科学进展, 31(6):667-675.]Chai Y W, Zhao Y. 2009. Recent development in time geography.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 29(4): 593-600. [柴彦威, 赵莹. 2009. 时间地理学研究最新进展. 地理科学,29(4): 593-600.]Chapin F S. 1974. Human activity patterns in the city: Things people do in time and in space. New York:Wiley.Doherty S T, Miller EJ. 2000. A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation, 27(1): 75-97.Golob T F. 2000. A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34(5): 355-376.Golob T F, Regan A C. 2001. Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: Research challenges and opportunities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 9(2): 87-121.Graham S, Marvin S. 1996. Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places. London and New York: Routledge.Hägerstrand T. 1970. What about people in regional science. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 24(1): 7-21.Handy S L, Niemeier D A. 1997. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29: 1175-1194.Hansen W G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2): 73-76.Harvey D. 1989. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell Oxford.Janelle D G. 1969. Spatial reorganization: A model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59(2): 348-364.Jones P M, Dix M C, Clarke M I, et al. 1983. Understanding travel behaviour. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Kain J F. 1968. Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(2): 175-197.Kitamura R. 1988. An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation, 15(1-2): 9-34.Kritzler M, Raubal M, Krüger A. 2007. A GIS framework for spatio-temporal analysis and visualization of laboratory mice tracking data. Transactions in GIS, 11(5): 765-782.Kwan M-P. 1998. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3): 191-216.Kwan M-P. 1999a. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer, 51(2): 211-227.Kwan M-P. 1999b. Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of nonemployment activities. Economic Geography, 75(4): 370-394.Kwan M-P. 2000a. Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: A methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 8(1): 185-203.Kwan M-P. 2000b. Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area, 32(2): 145-156.Kwan M-P. 2000c. Analysis of human spatial behavior in a GIS environment: Recent developments and future prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2(1): 85-90.Kwan M-P. 2001. Cyberspatial cognition and individual access to information: The behavioral foundation of cybergeography. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1): 21-37.Kwan M-P. 2002a. Time, information technologies, and the geographies of everyday life. Urban geography, 23(5):471-482.Kwan M-P. 2002b. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4):645-661.Kwan M-P. 2003. Gender troubles in the internet era. Feminist Media Studies, 3(3): 371-374.Kwan M-P. 2004. GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography, 86(4): 267-280.Kwan M-P. 2005. Gis methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography,86(4): 267-280.Kwan M-P. 2006. Transport geography in the age of mobilecommunications. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(5):384-385.Kwan M-P. 2007a. Mobile communications, social networks,and urban travel: Hypertext as a new metaphor for conceptualizing spatial interaction. Professional Geographer,59(4): 434-446.Kwan M-P. 2007b. Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. Professional Geographer, 59(1): 22-34.Kwan M-P, Weber J. 2003. Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century. Geographical Analysis, 35(4): 341-353.Lenntorp B. 1976. Paths in space-time environments. Lund, Sweden: Department of Geography, Royal University of Lund.Massey D. 1999. Space-time, "science" and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(3): 261-276.Miller H J. 1991. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 5(3): 287-301.Miller H J. 1999. Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis, 31(1): 1-26.Miller H J, Wu Y H. 2000. GIS software for measuring space-time accessibility in transportation planning and analysis. GeoInformatica, 4(2): 141-159.Miller H J. 2005a. A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37(1): 17-45.Miller H J. 2005b. A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37(1): 17-45.Miller H J, Bridwell S. 2009. A field-based theory for time geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,99(1): 49-75.Miller H J. 2010. The data avalanche is here: Shouldn't we be digging? Journal of Regional Science, 50(1): 181-201.Miller H J, Witlox F, Tribby C P. 2013. Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: A measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 26: 51-64.Pred A. 1977. The choreography of existence: Comments on Hägerstrand's time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53(2): 207-221.Pred A. 1984. Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2): 279-297.Preston J, Rajé F. 2007. Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography,15(3): 151-160.Shaw S-L, Yu H. 2009. A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical-virtual space. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(2): 141-149.Schwanen T, Kwan M-P. 2008. The internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum, 39(3): 1362-1377.Shoval N, Isaacson M. 2007. Sequence alignment as a method for human activity analysis in space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2):282-297.Timmermans H, Arentze T, Joh C-H. 2001. Modeling effects of anticipated time pressure on execution of activity programs. Transportation Research Record, (1752): 8-15.Timmermans H, Arentze T, Joh C-H. 2002a. Analysing space-time behaviour: New approaches to old problems. Progress in Human Geography, 26(2): 175-190.Timmermans H, van der Waerden P, Alves M, et al. 2002b.Time allocation in urban and transport settings: An international,inter-urban perspective. Transport Policy, 9(2):79-93.Timmermans H, van der Waerden P, Alves M, et al. 2003. Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: An international comparison. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(1): 37-46.Timmermans H, van derWaerden P. 2008. Synchronicity of activity engagement and travel in time and space descriptors and correlates of field observations. Transportation Research Record, (2054): 1-9.Timmermans H, Zhang J Y. 2009. Modeling household activity travel behavior: Examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(2): 187-190.Timmermans H, Arentze T A. 2011. Transport models and urban planning practice: Experiences with albatross. Transport Reviews, 31(2): 199-207.Weber J, Kwan M-P. 2002. Bringing time back in: A study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. The Professional Geographer, 54(2): 226-240.Weber J. Kwan M-P. 2003. Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geography, 24(8): 647-671Yu H, Shaw S-L. 2008. Exploring potential human activities in physical and virtual spaces: A spatio-temporal GIS approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(4): 409-430. |
[1] | 胡国建, 陆玉麒. 基于企业视角的城市网络研究进展、思考和展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596. |
[2] | 任嘉敏, 马延吉. 地理学视角下绿色发展研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1196-1209. |
[3] | 程晗蓓, 邹游, 林赛南, 李志刚. 居住迁移对居民健康的影响研究进展述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(7): 1210-1223. |
[4] | 熊琛然, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 向宁, 王博. 地缘政治风险研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(4): 695-706. |
[5] | 黄安, 许月卿, 卢龙辉, 刘超, 张益宾, 郝晋珉, 王惠. “生产-生活-生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 503-518. |
[6] | 邹利林, 刘彦随, 王永生. 中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 298-309. |
[7] | 柴彦威, 李春江, 张艳. 社区生活圈的新时间地理学研究框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12): 1961-1971. |
[8] | 杨俊, 由浩琳, 张育庆, 金翠. 从传统数据到大数据+的人居环境研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 166-176. |
[9] | 郭华, 王灵恩, 马恩朴. 食物系统认知进展及其地理学研究范式探讨[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 1034-1044. |
[10] | 湛东升, 张文忠, 谌丽, 虞晓芬, 党云晓. 城市公共服务设施配置研究进展及趋向[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 506-519. |
[11] | 曹小曙, 胡培婷, 刘丹. 电动汽车充电站选址研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(1): 139-152. |
[12] | 陈晓红, 周宏浩. 城市化与生态环境关系研究热点与前沿的图谱分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1171-1185. |
[13] | 徐银凤, 汪德根. 中国城市空间结构的高铁效应研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230. |
[14] | 杨喜平, 方志祥. 移动定位大数据视角下的人群移动模式及城市空间结构研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 880-889. |
[15] | 符文颖. 地方创业与产业集群互动关系的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(6): 739-749. |
|