温室气体清单编制方法研究进展

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.03.009

地理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 400-407.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.03.009

温室气体清单编制方法研究进展

马翠梅^1,2, 徐华清³, 苏明山³

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101;
2. 中国科学院大学,北京100049;
3. 国家应对气候变化战略研究和国际合作中心,北京100038

收稿日期:2012-09-01 修回日期:2012-12-01 出版日期:2013-03-25 发布日期:2013-03-25
作者简介:马翠梅(1984-),女,安徽蒙城人,博士研究生,主要从事能源、环境与气候变化研究。E-mail:macm.11b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国清洁发展机制基金赠款项目(1213006);国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAC20B00)。

The research progress on greenhouse gas inventory methods

MA Cuimei^1,2, XU Huaqing³, SU Mingshan³

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2012-09-01 Revised:2012-12-01 Online:2013-03-25 Published:2013-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 温室气体清单反映了温室气体排放和吸收的状况,是制定与衡量应对气候变化政策和措施的基础。虽然联合国规定了国家清单采用生产者责任方法编制,但很多研究认为该方法存在“碳泄漏”,容易造成发达国家转移减排责任等问题,并提出了其他清单编制方法。本文对已有的温室气体清单编制方法研究进行了总结,将其归纳为3大类:生产者责任方法、消费者责任方法和生产—消费者共同责任方法,并进一步总结了3大类方法下的多种估算方法;通过图表、数据等方式分析了各类方法的原理、优点及局限性。通过已有的研究分析推断,未来一段时间内生产者责任方法仍将是推荐的国家温室气体清单编制方法。最后展望了我国国家和省级温室气体清单编制研究方向。

关键词: 生产—消费者共同责任方法, 生产者责任方法, 碳核算, 温室气体清单, 消费者责任方法

Abstract: Greenhouse gas inventory provides emission and absorption data and plays a fundamental role in the establishment and evaluation of the policies and measures in response to climate change. Although United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has implemented a national Greenhouse Gas inventory method based on producer responsibility, many studies suggest that the method has the problem of“carbon leakage”, namely, letting the developed countries evade the responsibility of reducing carbon emissions, in addition to other issues, and put forward other inventory methods. This paper classifies the current greenhouse gas inventory estimate methods into three categories, including producer responsibility method, consumer responsibility method and shared responsibility method, and furthermore summarizes multiple methods in the three categories. The principle, advantages and limits of the methods are analyzed by graphs, charts and data. Based on the current analysis, producer responsibility method will still be the recommended national greenhouse gas inventory method in the near future. Lastly, we propose to strengthen the studies of consumer responsibility method and shared responsibility method in China, establish and improve statistical data, and try to develop provincial level greenhouse gas inventory by consumer responsibility method as a supplement.

Key words: carbon accounting, consumer responsibility method, greenhouse gas inventory, producer responsibility method, shared responsibility method

马翠梅, 徐华清, 苏明山. 温室气体清单编制方法研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(3): 400-407.

MA Cuimei, XU Huaqing, SU Mingshan. The research progress on greenhouse gas inventory methods[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(3): 400-407.

参考文献

[1] Andrew R, Forgie V. 2008. A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand. Ecological Economics, 68: 194-204.
[2] Bastianoni S, Pulselli F M, Tiezzi E. 2004. The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 49: 253-257.
[3] California Air Resources Board. Greenhouse gas inventory data: 2000 to 2009 [EB/OL]. California: Air Resources Board. April 6, 2012[December 3, 2012]. http://arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm D'Avignon A, Carloni F A, Rovere E L L, et al. 2010. Emission inventory: An urban public policy instrument and benchmark. Energy Policy, 38: 4838-4847.
[4] Davis S J, Caldeira K. 2010. Consumption-based accounting of CO₂ emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(12): 5687-5692.
[5] Eder P, Narodoslawsky M. 1999. What environmental pressures are a region's industries responsible for: A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input-output models. Ecological Economics, 29: 359-374.
[6] Editorial board of China Electric Power Yearbook. 2011. China electric power yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Electric Power Press. [《中国电力年鉴》编辑委员会. 2011. 中国电力年鉴2011. 北京: 中国电力出版社.]
[7] Erickson P, Allaway D, Lazarus M, et al. 2012. A consumption- based GHG inventory for the U.S. State of Oregon. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(7): 3679-3686.
[8] Ferng J J. 2003. Allocating the responsibility of CO₂ over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecological Economics, 46: 121-141.
[9] IPCC. 1996. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Kanagawa, Japan: The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
[10] IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Kanagawa, Japan: The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
[11] IPCC. 2007. IPCC Fourth assessment report: Climate change 2007. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Jiusto S. 2006. The differences that methods make: Cross-border power flows and accounting for carbon emissions from electricity use. Energy Policy, 34: 2915-2928.
[13] Kennedy C, Steinberger J, Gasson B, et al. 2010. Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Energy Policy, 38: 4828-4837.
[14] Kondo Y, Moriguchi Y, Shimizu H. 1998. CO₂ emissions in Japan: Influences of imports and exports. Applied Energy, 59: 163-174.
[15] Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, et al. 2007. Shared producer and consumer responsibility: Theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 61: 27-42.
[16] Lin B Q, Sun C W. 2010. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy, 38: 613-621.
[17] Liu H G, Liu W D, Fan X M. 2011. The impact of foreign trade on CO₂ emissions induced by industriala cttivities in China. Geographical Research, 30(4): 590-600. [刘红光, 刘卫东, 范晓梅. 贸易对中国产业能源活动碳排放的影响. 地理研究, 30(4): 590-600.]
[18] Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. 2001. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input- output approach. Ecological Economics, 39: 409-424.
[19] Minx J C, Wiedmann T, Wood R, et al. 2009. Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting: An overview of applications. Economic Systems Research, 21(3): 187-216.
[20] Munksgaard J, Pedersen K A. 2001. CO₂ accounts for open economies: Producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Policy, 29: 327-334.
[21] Pan J H, Phillips J, Chen Y. 2008. China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: Approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(2): 354-376.
[22] Peters G P. 2008. From production-based to consumption- based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 65: 13-23.
[23] Peters G P, Hertwich E G. 2008a. CO₂ embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(5): 1401-1407.
[24] Peters G P, Hertwich E G. 2008b. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption. Climatic Change, 86(1-2): 51-66.
[25] Peters G P, Minx J C, Weber C L, et al. 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(21): 8903-8908.
[26] Qi Y, Li H M, Xu M. 2008. Accounting embodied carbon in import and export in China. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 18(3): 8-13. [齐晔, 李惠民, 徐明. 中国进出口贸易中的隐含碳估算. 中国人口·资源与环境, 18(3): 8-13.]
[27] Rodrigues J, Domingos T, Giljum S, et al. 2006. Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility. Ecological Economics, 59: 256-266.
[28] Shu Y Q. 2012. Spatiotemporal characteristics of carbon emissions from energy consumption in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(16): 4950-4960. [舒娱琴. 中国能源消费碳排放的时空特征. 生态学报, 32(16): 4950-4960.]
[29] Stechemesser K, Guenther E. 2012. Carbon accounting: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36(SI): 17-38.
[30] Wang T,Watson J. 2008. China's carbon emissions and international trade: Implications for post-2012 policy. Climate Policy, 8(6): 577-587.
[31] Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D, et al. 2008. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy, 36: 3572-3577.
[32] Wiedmann T. 2009. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69: 211-222.
[33] Wiedmann T, Lenzen M, Turner K, et al. 2007. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities (Part 2): Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 61: 15-26.
[34] Wiedmann T, Wood R, Minx J C, et al. 2010. A Carbon footprint time series of the UK: Results from a multi-region input-output model. Economic Systems Research, 22(1): 19-42.
[35] Wyckoff AW, Roop J M. 1994. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: Implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 22: 187-194.
[36] Xiang R M. 2007. Input-output systerm. Chengdu, China: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics Press. [向蓉美. 2007. 投入产出法. 成都: 西南财经大学出版社.]
[37] Yao Y F, Qi S C, Liu Q. 2008. Studies on the impact of the evolution of the mix of China's imports and exports on its economy, employment and energy, and some policy suggests. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, (10): 56-65, 86. [姚愉芳, 齐舒畅, 刘琪. 中国进出口贸易与经济、就业、能源关系及对策研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, (10): 56-65, 86.]
[38] Zhang Y G. 2010. Carbon contents of the Chinese trade and their determinants: An analysis based on non-competitive (import) input-output tables. China Economic Quarterly, 9 (4): 1287-1310. [张友国. 中国贸易含碳量及其影响因素: 基于(进口)非竞争型投入产出表的分析. 经济学(季刊), 9(4): 1287-1310.]
[39] Zhou X. 2010. Emissions embodied in international trade and trade adjustment to national GHG inventory. Management Review, 22(6): 17-24. [周新. 国际贸易中的隐含碳排放核算及贸易调整后的国家温室气体排放. 管理评论, 22(6): 17-24.]

温室气体清单编制方法研究进展

The research progress on greenhouse gas inventory methods

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0